506 posts • joined 24 Nov 2007
What Watson does is a fundamentally different type of "thinking" compared to what a human does; as a result, we can reasonably expect to miss a lot of things that a human would catch, but also to catch at least some things that a human would miss. That's where the value is.
The machine will sometimes make mistakes that are obvious to a human (like ignoring real-world knowledge that humans deem too self-evident to put in the paper), but humans sometimes make mistakes that are obvious to a machine (like overestimating the correctness of a paper that shows a result you desire). A human using a machine has a good chance of spotting both types.
It may not be top speed, but at that price/size ratio it's in a good position to get sold to some people who are still using HDDs, and for most common uses any SSD is going to feel vastly faster than nearly any HDD, simply because of no seek time.
Re: Renewable is OK but...
Right, while burning fossils instead, which is what Chile will have to do now, is SO much better for nature.
Re: Language skills?
I'm pretty sure the conversation was in English. Choosing a character for which English is not the primary language is probably a trick to plausibly invalidate language-based jokes.
Girl who sleeps around = open-minded
Girl who sleeps around, but not with you = slut
Re: 25mph (about 40kmph),
In lots of urban areas, if you could drive 40 kph reliably, but not more than that, you'd still be going about as fast as now or faster.
The bright eyed messianic ones eventually evolve into the gnarly old been-there-done-that-got-the-t-shirt ones.
That's actually Tim's point. Lots of elements are not economic at the moment to extract and process at the concentration that they currently exist at, but there is no shortage of them.
If the low-hanging fruit runs out, you don't run out of fruit - you just buy a ladder, and sell the fruit for a little bit more. It's not the apocalypse if Li prices increase by a bunch; and it's not like they can increase indefinitely (at some point, you're better off recycling).
Re: Too smart for their own good?
There's little text in Indus Script, and none of it has a translation. Are you suggesting that a good encryption algorithm should only be used for a handful of messages in the whole world, and said messages should never get translated into cleartext?
Re: Seems like there's a better cash crop...
There's probably less random arsenic in that air than in your house's. There's a reason they call them clean rooms.
Quote from the article, in turn quoting the paper:
Even worse, it's really difficult to come up with any way to measure the economic value of product quality: “the higher quality of some of the output produced with these additional inputs may not be fully reflected in the measures of real value added growth for the subsector”.
In other words, "I can't find a solid number for this, so I'll just ignore it".
Be wary, be very wary, of any paper, in any subject, where any variant of that concept is expressed.
Premise is correct, conclusion is completely wrong
Yes, providing exactly one model of anything maximises productivity.
The correct conclusion is: there is something seriously wrong with this definition of "productivity".
Re: Could read it both ways.....
That's the whole point of the article.
The time it takes to change one gene gets longer if the gene is more important, because mutations to important genes are very likely to kill or cripple the individual, preventing the mutation from spreading.
25m years is a pretty long time, even for evolution; the fact that it took that long to change one gene in Y is a fairly strong indicator that all the genes left on Y are the really rather important ones. Most of those 600 genes in X have probably been evolved away much faster because they weren't needed (or, more likely, because the single copy in a male's single X was sufficient).
Studies like this one are actually strongly backing the theory of evolution.
Re: yeah, well
Don't worry. Plenty of money will go into understanding, and then finding ways to mitigate, this very real external threat. It'll happen very quickly _after_ the first city gets levelled.
A password that you cannot change, and leave written everywhere you go. I can't fathom why people think it's a good idea.
The last two "certified" WHQL drivers crash when playing The Secret World on Windows 8 about every hour. And not your regular crash-to-desktop either; you get a black screen, fans spinning to max on the card, and a message from the OS saying that the driver stopped responding and was restarted.
The previous ones fortunately only crash once in a while, but when they do they bring down the whole system. As in, hard reset required. Both these issues have been confirmed by multiple users.
Just when I finally get tired of AMD's crap drivers and decide to switch to Nvidia, this is what I get. Makes sense.
Frustration makes people angry
In other news, water is wet.
Causes cancer, prevents cancer...
We really hate the idea of a risk that we can't control at all, do we?
Except for some well-known factors, ultimately whether you get cancer or not is almost completely down to blind luck. Avoid the really idiotic stuff like smoking or hanging around uranium. Hope you don't have broken genes. But after that, if you work really hard at it, all you can do is very, very marginal improvements. Ultimately, you're mortal, deal with it.
The last videogame I played on my PC saw that I had Visual Studio installed, decided I must be a cracker, and refused to run. After wrestling with it for the best part of a day, I gave up and cracked it.
It's not the money. I regularly go to the cinema, despite ticket prices being, frankly, insane. The problem is accessibiliy, availability and ease of use. That's where content owners need to start competing with piracy.
At the moment, legal copies of stuff are *less* valuable than pirated copies (DRM means you're not sure it'll work on every device where you might want to see it), and a lot harder to get (good luck finding a legal copy of the latest American TV show subtitled in your language of choice). I wouldn't want them even for free.
But give me a legal way to get a standard video format download of anything I want, with subtitles in any major language, available 24 hours after the first TV or DVD release, and here, you can have my money.
Re: What do we do for those for whom it works?
I had an "incurable" skin condition when I was a kid too. Modern medicine offered some cortisone for the days when it was real bad, but nothing to really cure it. Not believing in unproven "medicine", I didn't turn to anything else - I simply lived with it. Now guess what - I'm 33 and it's nearly disappeared, only occasionally flaring up a little but even then perfectly manageable without treatment. At this rate I'm pretty sure it'll be gone by the time I'm 40.
Of course, if I had taken to homeopathy, I'd have had the exact same result, which are exactly the same results you've had (down to the white patch of hair, which I've had since I was 20!), with the only difference that I'd be mistakenly attributing them to homeopathy.
Google used not to be in the hardware business.
What does it say if you're running, say, Win98?
The obvious serviable slave isn't reason enough?
Unwanted roaming data
During a trip to Portugal, my GF was surprised to find a few €s in data roaming charges, when she had disabled data roaming on her phone before leaving.
Turns out that due to some kind of bug in Android, there can be a small window of time, right after connecting to the network, during which the phone is connected to the network, but it doesn't know it's roaming. If the phone decides to download an update at this point, sure enough it will download until it figures out it's roaming.
Yeah, I know - I wouldn't believe it either, but I saw this happen with my own eyes. I googled the issue, and I'm not the only one either. I don't know what versions of Android are affected; the phone in question was 2.3.
Re: Let me get this straight
Agree, and I work specifically in this field. It's not that hard - the heavy machinery is well-known to be inherently insecure, so you keep it behind a layer of indirectness or three. I know enough of heavy machinery to know they can't really be secured, they know enough about IT to know there's hostile traffic, we set the whole thing up so that the heavy machinery is well shielded. Problems arise when someone thinks it would be really cool to be able to run their factory from their smartphone, or when they don't want to spend a single extra buck on making the design secure, or when they feel that having to enter passwords is an unacceptable drag on productivity.
I wonder how much power it takes to refresh an e-ink display.
Re: Idiot film-makers
WinCE is still pretty widespread in industrial environments. And not just in legacy devices too.
My thought exactly. If it's a desktop application, there's nothing especially strange about it being able to access all of your files, given that desktop OSes simply don't have the same permission model that mobiles have. Chances are that Chrome just shows that warning on any .exe you download - I don't even see how it could possibly know what permissions the program requires. On Windows, pretty much the only choice is whether to require administrator or not, but even that is not something that can be easily learned without trying to run the app.
Technically, as food ultimately grows from sunlight, it's solar-powered. Then again, knowing how sunlight is made, it's actually nuclear-powered. On the other hand, knowing how stars are made, it turns out it *really is* gravity-powered. So the article was right after all!
Re: Prove him wrong once and for all.
It's pointless. You won't get the thing. If you're lucky, they'll tell you it's backlogged; if you're unlucky, they'll take the money and then apply delaying strategies until you have to sue.
Re: I read this and I think
Yup. Freedom is a process, not a product.
Either we're alone, or we're not
Both possibilities are equally terrifying.
Re: Is this really an IT issue?
It's quite impressive to a foreigner that you consider 1200$/mo PLUS up to 5K$ in case something happens to be a good deal. The mind boggles at considering what would be considered a bad deal - death, I guess?
Depends on what they mean by "on" Google+. At some point I turned my gmail account into a Google+ account, for reasons I can't remember, but I've never even visited the actual service. I suspect I'm not the only one.
Re: One question...
Like most viruses, phages are extremely specific. As a treatment, they would be way more accurate than antibiotics, which notoriously tend to kill off good bacteria as well.
Streaming is a bad substitute for downloading. With my connection, I'm unlikely to get a reliable SD stream, and a HD stream is mathematically impossible. This is unlikely to change any time soon. And how many streaming services work with the PS3 I mostly use to watch stuff? It's pointless for studios to offer me cheap streaming, as I can't trust it to work in the first place. I wouldn't even want it for free.
And DRM poses similar problems - I can't trust it to work on my favored devices, I can't trust it to work ten years from now, I can't trust it to be able to be backupped or carried to a friend's home to watch together. Hell, even if they somehow came up with a DRM scheme that actually works perfectly, at this point the concept is so poisoned that it'd take years before I gave it a chance.
A straight AVI is free, but the important thing is that it JUST WORKS. Drag'n'drop it on a USB key, and nearly everything on the planet will reliably play it with one or two button clicks. They need to understand that their problem is not "competing against free". It's competing against *easy and reliable*.
Actually, what I'm more concerned about is that when it comes to cancer, I'd really rather get treated with the most effective drug - not the most cost-effective one.
Re: 24hrs later
The Register don't just copy/paste news from agencies. They do actual analysis. I'll take that over getting it a few hours earlier any day of the week, and twice on Sunday.
There are three sides at fault here, and, frankly, Apple is the least of them. Navigators are not perfect, they can't be, and they should be expected to make the occasional mistake.
On the other hand, drivers should not follow a satnav's direction blindly, and signs - not to mention common sense - always take precedence over whatever the satnav is saying.
And finally, what the hell? The airport has a direct access from the public road to the runway that doesn't even have a fence? I'm not calling for three meters tall concrete walls, but seriously, every airport I've ever seen in the first world has at least a fence. Anyone could be an idiot even without a satnav.
If my bank required Java for online access, I would seriously consider changing bank.
Re: but what about us?
On the other hand, so far humanity has a 100% success rate at not getting extinct.
Genetic engineering of humans will fix this very soon. Not soon on a personal scale, possibly not soon on a historical scale, but definitely soon on an evolutionary scale. Unless we all die first, of course.
When there's no way to make a profit selling something everyone absolutely needs, you know regulation is screwed up.
Re: Let there be.....Ignorance?
Evolution != abiogenesis
I don't think they mean it's the system drive. That doesn't make sense. I think they mean it's the drive where your collections (images, music, documents) are stored. Personally, I think it's a good idea - for those who are blessed with a decent broadband.
Re: Energy levels
Thanks! I was wondering about the wisdom of embarking in another ultra-expensive physics project when the LHC isn't even running at full power yet. Your explanation sounds reasonable.
So the camera is a ~50$ add-on to a ~400$ box, while MS's offer is a ~500$ box that includes the camera. It doesn't sound much like a catch to me.
Permanent conflict? How so?
It's only permanent if the two sides are exactly balanced. A war like that is basically a challenge of industrial production capacity. Eventually, one of the two will manage to bomb more drone factories than the other, and then it's over.
Re: Solution to global warming is easy
The argument that there is a hard limit on resources, and therefore we should stop expansion in a controlled fashion before it stops abruptly on its own, is very popular these days.
The problem with this argument is that it's a non sequitur: while it is technically true that resources are limited, this isn't sufficient to state that we need to stop expansion now.
You would also need to prove that we're close to the limit. That's a lot harder, but without that the argument doesn't prove anything.
Re: Is this before or after
Okay, but Google isn't in the business of food and roads and water. It's in the business of Internet. If Internet gets there before food, roads and water, it's the food, roads and water guys that are to blame, not the Internet guys.
- JLaw, Kate Upton exposed in celeb nude pics hack
- Google flushes out users of old browsers by serving up CLUNKY, AGED version of search
- GCHQ protesters stick it to British spooks ... by drinking urine
- Page File Love XKCD? Love science? You'll love a book about science from Randall Munroe
- Facebook to let stalkers unearth buried posts with mobe search