Nominet & ICANN
Making Lawyers for Patent Trolls look good.
Making Halliburton look less like a weasel. Though I think someone has been sanitising Halliburton search results?
3179 posts • joined 23 Nov 2007
Making Lawyers for Patent Trolls look good.
Making Halliburton look less like a weasel. Though I think someone has been sanitising Halliburton search results?
Absolutely they should have 1/2 as much or less staff and just be part of ITU.
Much as ITU has flaws it works better than ICANN and is ultimately answerable to its members.
Formed 17 May 1865
Survived a gazzillion wars and technological changes. WWI, WWII, League of Nations and UN. Agrees usage of every aspect of Communications (including most international physical layers) except the actual stuff ICANN mis-controls. IP4 was handed out very unfairly. Loads of US Universities, US Corps and US state agencies still with more IPs than many countries, that they don't even need.
What ever crazyness ITU might do, it won't be as bad as ICANN record on charges, TLD, DNS and IP.
These domains are more expensive than decent hosting.
Money for a database entry.
Paid every year for ever.
Having a decent domain name is turning into something only big corporations own. Eventually 50 or so big companies will completely control the internet and host all it's content. Facebook, Twitter, Google, Amazon, Wikipedia, eBay etc.
The bike shop will have to rent space in someone else's cyber mall. It will be no place for the small guy.
Maybe the IBM guy wasn't totally wrong... Just call Google's system a single distributed parallel processing Computer.
What if the device ISN'T a fake, but the FTDI programmers make a mistake? (Cue FTDI getting sued)
Are they ONLY looking at USB ID? What if it starts disabling real FTDI IDs due to a bug?
This is arrogant unacceptable behaviour. At the most their driver should simply not operate non-FTDI hardware. It's immoral of them to change the ID.
If they have a problem with vendors allegedly doing fakes they need to
a) Prove the copies are illegal. Not all kinds of functional copies are illegal
b) Use due process of law.
Some people still believe in God. Did anyone ever believe in MS
a) After ME
b) After Vista
c) After Win8
g) Active X in Browser
The biggest issue is users lack of security sense,
They'll still install fake codecs, click on silly links in emails, enable all remote content in email by default, add stupid toolbars, download and install malware riddled pirateware and have too much faith in AV.
Total security is impossible. Someone will find another way to load code hidden in content.
We need something better than sysvinit
But systemd obviously isn't it as it seems to create problems.
The attempt by Babbage to build various machines made UK a leader in Machine tools and advanced Science and Mathematics. The Chess Turk was an outright fraud with a dwarf inside.
Bell was 1st because they had bought in more recently produced purer Germanium.
The French about the same time as Bell Labs. But admittedly not very good transistors (they were recycling the Germanium out of diodes in WWII proximity fuses)
Westinghouse and RCA hampered by "bean counters" wanting them to use existing stocks.
Gradual Materials Science developments more than any one person enabled transistors and ICs.
With ICs the 6502 and 8080 based PCs that pre-dated the IBM PC were inevitable. The idea of transistors and ICs was in 1930s, but materials where not good enough and valves cheap (almost fully automated production, films transferred to video on YouTube). The Wartime 1940s era computing made transistor research very attractive. No-one really wanted 20,000 valve computers.
MS Basic was a port of Dartmouth Basic, a cut down beginers version of Fortran for Dartmouth (USA) students on their University Computer (Anyone know if it was IBM mainframe or DEC minicomputer? I think only the UK much used George on ICL, Students there having actual Fortran.in early to mid 1970s
If the sites are doing illegal stuff, take them down.
You don't block the road to a dodgy shop. You get a warrant, court order, prosecution and close them.
This is plain lazy and wrong.
5.8Ghz and 10.6GHz bands are used terrestrially. (WiFi and LOS Fixed Wireless).
5.8GHz outdoors is really just Line of Sight. 10.2GHz to 10.6GHz band gives smaller aerial panel arrays and blocked easily by one tree.
Both only good for roof top or wall fixed aerials.
Above 10GHz to 400GHz you are looking at HAP, Satellite and Point to point Line of Site.
5G doesn't exist. If it does it will be about more flexible infrastructure, not faster or higher frequency mobile.
3.5GHz band has been tried for Mobile and Nomadic, it's rubbish compared to 1.8GHz. Propagation too poor except for fixed wireless.
Mobile has various bands from 700MHz to 2.6GHz, Operators and Countries use spectrum poorly. There are good arguments that Mobile should be only 880MHz to 2.2GHz (with gaps for DECT and GPS) and a single wholesale infrastructure for best utilisation/spectrum efficiency.
Regulators want to sell as much spectrum to as many Mobile operators as possible to maximise Licence Revenue. A truly stupid way to assign & manage spectrum
I'm glad the animated gif is gone. That was wrecking my head!
What a pity no suitable spacecraft partner,
It's like Poison letters, or malicious adverts in paper. Just cheaper to to do. It doesn't need new legislation.
"Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" is a well-known phrase in the United States Declaration of Independence.
It was stupidity to put "Happiness" in it.
maybe the box and "ferric fluid rare earth magnet" is really clever on the Bose?
Soundwise any I heard seemed rubbish compared to an LS3a, or more damningly a big MDF box full of rockwool and cheap OEM 6" driver unit.
What does a cone made iridium plated panda hymens look and sound like?
Either Sennheiser or cheap no name Chinese at under £3 if going outside my castle.
My 1926 metal diaphragm 2K + 2K Bakelite and Alloy cans sound better than some branded stuff today. (transformer needed unless between 120V and the anode of a triode).
1980s Military gear is dreadful, seems like 1960 telephone earpieces inside.
Now all they need is to remove Apple and Beats earphones from Apple store too, to further increase quality.
The Operator & Network still sees a SIM. But it's simulated in software.
a) If you are sensible you are never ever charged for Kindle 3G
b) you can change the SIM. But why would you when Amazon, Wikipedia, books you buy are no 3G charge and currently 60Mbyte other browsing is free?
c) You can setup kindle so you are never charged, transfer your own content or free eBooks via USB.
If it is still there it won't be on a later model if this works for Apple. They said ages ago they wanted to abolish physical SIM to save space. But it's really about more Apple control
Surely the point is there is NO physical SIM at all?
1) Security of a "soft SIM"
2) Device Seller control
Only about 1/3rd of people in the West have good enough speed/cap.
Also it will work out more expensive for many people.
Still available at discount.
not needed for eBooks
Great for PDFs, esp scans of Manuals, datasheets and old books.
no AMOLED or LCD screen comes close to eInk in daylight or for reading 4 hours at a go, 120K novels etc.
Digital replacements existed in the Corporate world from late 1980s. (Hard drive based Voicemail systems for PABX)
I think they were asking the wrong people.
Gradually the price reduced and storage increased over last 20 years.
Check BARB figures for viewing time vs Freesat, Freeview and FTA generally.
Of course it's not Free to redistribute or Free to Carry (mostly). But less than 10% of viewing of Pay TV viewers is of pay TV channels. Some of the programs on Pay TV are repeats originally Free To Air (Freeview, Freesat etc).
Percentage viewing time on BARB figures. The numbers of channels are irrelevant! The percentage viewing time of the most successful Pay only channels are under 2%
A sky box without a sub is crippled (no sub, no record and no playback). A replacement Freesat HD box under £100, or even under £200 for HD Recording. Some Freesat boxes support Diseqc and then with a 80cm dish and multiple LNBs you can add 100s of decent European mainland radio and some 10 or decent TV for English speakers out of the 1000s of TV & Radio and not be limited to Sky's UK Ghetto. No Sky box supports Diseqc.
Or get a Linux based Media centre Sat receiver which will get all the UK free channels
Free non Freesat UK channels can be manually added to the cheapest Freesat boxes.
Freeview is more transportable, working with an easily pointed aerial in most places and simple whip on an £8 USB stick in more than 1/.4 places (Or roof aerial over 95% of UK)
A box and Quattro LNB lets you feed 16 to 2000 rooms from one dish.
Over 90% of what the Customers are paying for is free content. Sky is a rip off that is also distorting and destroying football and other sports.
Pay Platform operators shouldn't be allowed to own channels.
But I'd rather be based in Portarlington than Dublin AKA "Western Britain"
But €1.7M is nothing compared to some Irish Agencies and organisations and their total lack of Transparency and Incompetence.
DCENR (pack of pointless time wasters)
In his address to the Dáil, Ireland’s Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources Alex White laid out the department’s finances for 2015, including a budget of €172m .
Probably Oireachtas (Parliament) Refusing to pay to be on the Irish equivalent of Freeview &Freesat. Only on pay channels recently and Internet for over 7 years.
Even Greek parliament you can get FTA. Or the UK one in Netherlands, France, Spain, Portugal and Ireland.
Still overpriced nonsense worse than some £2 and £10 no-name gear.
If there is going to be Chemotherapy etc ... Maybe. Otherwise isn't this a ploy to delude women into thinking they can put off having a family and purely benefiting the company that wants to own people?
Motherhood is much more than the age of the eggs. Also are artificially implanted pregnancies as safe as the ordinary natural kind?
XP is irrelevant if you have a sensible browser, i.e. not IE!
Less frequency response on AM. But easily much less distortion than 128K DAB or even 128K DAB+ stereo.
Fantastic coverage. A good complement to VHF-FM for national stations, especially R4, Five Live or any other talk/New stations. Good for international at night.
Of course AM and FM could be even better if not over-processed. DAB ironically copes even worse with heavily processed material. Car Radios would be better with unprocessed transmissions and local processing based on background noise level and type.
Digital Radio is crap. It has NONE of the advantages of that Digital TV has over Analogue TV.
Using Mobile Infrastructure in a Broadcast mode just gives the same thing with worse coverage.
DAB has one inherent flaw that digital terrestrial TV didn't, the cost to consumers to upgrade.
Bad UI compared to Analogue Radio. (DTT has identical or better UI than Analogue TV)
Bad Coverage for portable
Much much poorer compression vs Analogue Audio compared to Video
DTT does WS and HD (not on Analogue Video)
No significant power difference on Analogue Vs Digital TV as screen backlight (or CRT or projector) is most of the power.
Little TV usage is portable. Much Radio usage is portable.
Radio is used with HiFi, (DAB isn't), transportable table sets, for Foreign Radio (DAB is local/National only), Mobile and Portable. DAB useless for Portable.
DAB isn't suitable for Local or Comunity, the MUX areas are far too large, yet are full of holes.
No gradual degradation when moving into poor reception, But DAB cuts out and can't restart till buffer active.
Massive x20 power consumption for Headphones, Only acceptable in car or mains.
DAB isn't an AM/FM replacement. Perhaps no Digital Radio can replace the unique properties of Analogue Radio easily.
Multicast isn't Broadcast!
128kbps is crap. 256K min for Stereo.
Also Mobile coverage is total garbage compared to FM, never mind AM.
There is a true "broadcast mode" both for 3G and 4G. But 10 channels at 256Kbps each leaves very little for Mobile Data, apart from the crap power consumption (digital vs FM) and coverage apart from inherent disadvantage of 800/900/1800/2100/2500 bands vs 100MHz band.
It's possible to triple the FM spectrum and many radios can handle the extra bands. Several countries are adding FM spectrum below 88MHz.
DAB is pointless. Broadcast modes on Mobile Networks is even greater lunacy!
Close DAB and put far better FM into Phones. DAB tuner chip consumes about x20 more power than an FM tuner chip. Good luck trying to listen for more than 2 hours!
Oh ... The Phones HAVE FM!
Well then, extend the FM Spectrum, like other countries are doing.
DAB or DAB+ at real FM coverage and real HiFi simply doesn't have the savings of DTT. Audio simply doesn't compress as well as video.
DAB coverage for Portable / Mobile needs more spectrum and x6 as many masts (mostly low power) as current DAB.
DAB has too big a coverage per station (but with too many holes) due to SFNs. DAB is only an advantage to pan National Broadcasters wanting to squeeze out locals.
The BBC should not be promoting the failed DAB system. It's also a ploy to claim every mobile phone sale that has DAB built in as a DAB listener.
Built in DTT in phones (even if just for the Radio channels) makes more sense than DAB.
Not an Irish Company I think?
Yes, the MS ones for DOS pinched from CP/M Digital Research!
We knew Ofcom was for this stunning stupid spectrum grab as part of their plan to abolish Terrestrial TV.
It's bloody dammed stupid and doesn't work, nor can ever work unless EVERY TV RECEIVER reports live to the Database.
Nor can it be properly policed or regulated.
Nor will people with "freezing" or pixelated pictures know who to complain to.
The very name "White space" is an US invented Euphemism!
Big business selling gadgets is behind this. Ofcom only cares about Corporates. Not the Consumer or protecting Spectrum users.
There is thing called Spectrum Planning. There IS not "white space" it's a myth. Unused channels can't be filled with Local DTT , IOT or Internet links. The channels HAVE to be unused. MORONS!
Filing cabinet: A regular drill on lock
Ordinary door: Sledge hammer or ram
Safe or ATM: Fork lift it away or blow it up
I guess they did this to see if they could.
Other approaches are to see which buttons are worn or have finger prints. Most commonly the digits ascend or descend. But if you know the digits and not the order you have dramatically reduced the number codes to what can be done by hand.
Any SW keyboard locks I have designed quadruple retry delay on each wrong attempt with a one day reset period.
You couldn't make this stuff up..
1) Nadella's mad answer. Even if it was given to men, even worse to give it to women who are almost universally paid less for the same job and quality of work. Or for much better work.
2) Who asked it.
Machiavelli would have been proud of her though!
Definitely a better ploy than trying to get the subject added to a Board meeting agenda quietly!
Only if you are a Famous person connected with a successful phone brand. So that rules out anyone at MS or RIM/Blackberry ...
Various pre MS applications used Ctrl-C, Ctrl-X, Ctrl-V for editing
In windows Console the Copy & Paste is associated with Mark command in the title bar menu under edit. A handy way of copying out a column is to display the text in Console (which may or may not be actual 32 bit console or a DOS command shell in a VM) and Edit Mark, then paste in the Windows app.
Actual MS DOS command line on real DOS without windows had little value in copy/paste as only one process and loading an application would trash any shell buffer usually.
LED wavelength is too long compared with Mercury Discharge UV. Cheap high efficiency CFLs have poor colour rendition. Lower efficiency 'better' phosphor mix CFLs are not as good as Halogen, but FAR better than any existing 'White' LED at any price.
There is also an issue with phosphor life and light diffusion. If even overall lighting and good colour rendition is needed then CFL is far better. If daylight quality colour is needed, then you need Halogen. As halogen is continuous perfectly smooth spectrum the colour temperature can be adjusted on electronic Photography easily. Better colour temperature Halogen are more efficient but sadly much shorter life.
But obviously not because of eating per-se.
It sounds complex.
Certainly kids that used to walk to school, or walk to & from bus stops don't anymore.
There is more TV watching, in 1950s and 1960s the TV wasn't on 24 x7. Programs only from late afternoon to before midnight.
No computer games till late 1970s.
No Interwebs till 1990s.
Obviously mostly useful tips for anyone dealing with anyone.