Stupid
This is just PR.
There are better solutions. LTE is designed to suit patent holders, the issues of terrestrial channel size, handovers between bases etc.
9252 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Nov 2007
This is nonsense. Very many things can use 2G/GSM, 3G and now more often 4G/LTE. Small low power embedded modems have existed for years. Despite what Apple claims, the SIM size isn't a problem either.
The issue has always been about COVERAGE, due to lack of proper universal coverage regulation. The 5G makes no difference to ability to include a modem and it will make almost no difference to coverage. That's only increased by regulation. It's about capex vs revenue. Adding more coverage or increasing base density (smallest cells give up to x10 speed) adds very few extra subscribers. Existing ones won't pay the 4x more needed to give same profits.
Why was UPC/Virgin allowed to buy TV3 channels?
Why is a subscription platform (Sky) allowed to OWN any channels at all?
Why are Skyboxes only able to take Sky Pay TV cards?
Why can you only download Amazon eBooks in UK & Ireland from Amazon UK (Sterling).
Why though you can install Kindle App on phone/tablet/laptop, NO competitor's eBook reader can read Amazon eBooks that have DRM?
Why does the Kindle (which is bought outright) not accept ePubs, not even DRM free?
Buy a scalextrix? Maybe though that's USA racing. Rally driving seems more interesting to me. But I appreciate the pain of people wanting Premiership football (might soon need 3 or 4 subs in some places) or F1.
Perhaps if no-one subscribed, it would end up FTA on BBC/ITV/C4?
As I don't watch the Pay "sports" and little sport at all, I don't any longer subscribe to anything except Internet provider.
PAYG phone credit.
Amazon Prime/Subs cheat book authors.
Streaming music cheats musicians.
All subscriptions make excess profit and cheat consumer due to renewal is usually automatic and novelty wears off. Consumer pays more than simply BUYING the content they really want (which also doesn't depend on a dish, cable TV or broadband connection. Or fragile cloud servers.
I'll buy the CDs/DVDs/BDs/Books I actually want. If I buy an eBook, I'll make sure it doesn't need a server to authorise it and I'll back it up.
Idiotic. They missed the bit where Murdoch has been CONTROLLING Sky for years. The Murdoch bid is because he thinks he'll get more profits, not more control.
The various UK competition regulators have often looked at the wrong aspect of take overs for maybe 60 years. They made Ever Ready ripe for asset stripping by Hanson by blocking their take over of Mallory (rebranded Duracell). The husk of the brand bought after stripping by US Eveready (now Energiser and owned by a pet food company).
Yet strategic UK assets often thrown to the wolves abroad.
How did so many UK / Ireland newspapers & some radio stations end up being controlled by an Australian that bought US citizenship so as to be able to buy USA media?
Look at what happened to two Italian Pay TV companies. Search card piracy, who funded it and who bought/controlled the wreckage.
Dishonest Sky take over of BSB and also 28.2E satellite spot (intended for Central Europe).
It's irrelevant now what Competition Regulator thinks of Murdoch's takeover, damage long done to UK media.
Comcast isn't much liked by USA customers. Replacing a rapacious controller with a USA company?
Also while Irish takeover of Chorus and NTL cable was by UPC, (Sort of Dutch flavoured, Tulip logo, big in Europe) who then took over Virgin Media, is the renting of the name Virgin for UK and Ireland to hide the fact from ordinary consumer that it's actually Liberty Global / Liberty Media, another rapacious USA company?
~
The USA rarely cares about consumers or Corporate Control.
Disney: Fox, Muppets, Starwars, Pixar and more.
I've lost track of what MS, Google and Apple have taken over.
Facebook assurances about customer privacy on their takeovers proved worthless.
Amazon: IMDB, Abe Books, Book Depositary, CreateSpace, Mobi and many more.
Need slapped down hard with % of turnover fines unless they stop their illegal data harvesting.
The Mobile & ISPs absolutely must not be allowed to "join the party". It's got to stop.
Everything you watch on HDMI connected players, Broadcast, apps, streaming, conversation potentially being sent to Google and often TV maker. Android TV needs banned and firmware updates to stop the spying.
Chrome, ChromeOS, Android, YouTube, all Google APIs & services, Analytics, scripted buttons on websites to Social Media. Kids Toys. IoT gadgets.
It's all beyond the nightmares of most dystopian SF writers ALREADY!
More coverage and better speed will only exist with MORE regulation. It's got too light. They cherry pick and build minimal number of base stations.
They are already underutilising the spectrum they have due to cells too big. Lack of regulation.
This is crazy.
Also having multiple PHYSICAL operators underutilises spectrum. There needs to be ONE infrastructure operator with licence setting minimum performance & 100% coverage. Raise "licence" revenue by sales tax on the retail operators selling access.
It's not like baked beans or beer where multiple "operators" makes sense, and need less regulation. Spectrum is very limited.
FCC, Ofcom & Comreg encourage the greed of these operators by not regulating enough and wanting to raise revenue by auctions of spectrum.
Because it doesn't come with Mac OSX, but with increasingly annoying windows.
Unless Apple is selling Mac OS for it or Linux Mint + Mate is perfect on it, it's nearly pointless.
Also Lenovo's online agent for Ireland (Invoice is from Shannon) refuses to honour 2 year SOGA and will only refer replacement queries to wrong Lenovo technical support or even IBM UK.
I'm not buying Lenovo again till they start implementing Irish / EU law on sales. What is Huawei SOGA retail sale compliance in EU like?
I'll stick with my Z1. Fits small jacket pocket, fantastic FM radio, Headphone jack and also micro HDMI socket. Replaceable battery, Micro SD card slot, regular SIM.
I'd buy a slightly fatter one with longer battery life. I don't want a smaller bezel. Makes screen too fragile and leaves nowhere to hold the phone.
Top form today!
Thanks.
BBC Transmitter engineers are gone. Such a shame. Most of the jobs or entire companies I've worked for are gone. In one case they closed entire R&D dept.
I bought my first copy of Byte and of PCW before there was an IBM PC.
PCW - 1978. No idea when I first got a copy.
IBM PC in N.I. UK = 1981
Byte launched in 1975. I first bought a copy of a UK edition of Byte, that had the Apple II on the cover. Was it 1978, 1978 or 1980?
I do still have a computer magazine with launch of Archimedes and a later one of UNIX launch for it. Perhaps Acorn User?
I'm about to dump my 1993 to 2004 collection of MS CDs and DVDs of Select/MSDN/TechNet. I dumped Microsoft December 2016, though I still have 2 x Win 10, 1 x Win 7, 2 x XP (games & Satellite TV) and 1 x Win2K (test gear controller) with multiboot to DOS /Win3.11/Win98 (for radio programming).
Some TVs & Radios had remotes in 1950s. One 1930s USA Radio had a WIRELESS connected dial to select a preset radio station.
I'm pretty common and I had email (300 baud or 1200/75 depending on if Prestel, BBS or X25 PAD) from 1981 on CP/M. By 1987 using an account to get access to Telex, Fax and Bitnet email from a PCW8256 with 300 baud modem. Fax replies were posted to me by physical mail.
You can even buy the parts and breadboard a rotatary to DTMF. A pi or old laptop with serial port (sense a handshake line) can do it. Even easier if old laptop has a built in modem (AT D command).
Some exchanges and ATAs do still support pulse dialing.
Two analogue phones (any kind) and a 6V battery all in series makes an intercom. We used top & bottom wire of a fence when we were kids.
Nobility mostly went bust when Industrialisation and imported food & cloth killed ability of their Estates to make money from agriculture (mostly wool, which is why eradicating wolves was seen as so important and the "woolsack" in Parliament).
Managers, Politicians, senior civil service...
Unlike magnetic bubble memory which actually made it into some military products. I wonder what archive life is and how small/capacity and fast it can be? Flash isn't archival, but certainly seriously beats bubble memory on speed and capacity.
I expect commercial fusion power stations before we see consumer holographic storage or proper performance VR with focus & movement tracking of eyes as well as head.
It's handier to have a "bar of soap" Mobile to WiFi hotspot. Can sit on windowsill for FAR better mobile signal, allow more than one device / user. Often has far better & easier to configure firewall than tablet / laptop.
Built in mobile is near dead except on phones, maybe also a thing on Amazon Kindle eReaders for people with no wifi / laptop etc.
Really? Where?
Also notoriously bad and over priced extra compared with a USB stick.
Also the entire idea of a so called "5G" modem / radio for consumer space is laughable.
~
Perhaps the master plan is to have revenue for mobile operators by an in Office femto cell for so called 5G (i.e. on a band higher than 2.1GHz and thus useless outside) instead of WiFi.
Unless these properly work with GSM, 3G and LTE worldwide, properly, it's stupid. I've a Lenovo with Intel's ill fated Wimax as well as WiFi and 3G in it. Only the WiFi is any use.
Ha Ha.
It's just chargeable WiFi.
You'd be lucky to have 20 users with actual decent frame rate & quality physics.
The 5G isn't really about new bands or higher speed or more capacity. We reached the Shannon limit more than 12 years ago. The 4G is more efficient than 3G with multiple users. With one user on the same signal level and channel size there is almost ZERO difference between 3G, 4G and so called 5G.
The 5G is supposed to be about integration. The 4G can only do VOIP for voice, 3G and 2G have native codecs, so ironically per MHz of channel they are more efficient than 4G for voice. The 2G is more robust than 3G because 3G cell varies in size with number of users (largely cured in 4G). The 4G is mainly faster because the channels can be 20MHz instead of 5MHz (thus 4x faster for one user with perfect signal).
All these 5G Press Releases are just um, PR :)
Is there any independent audit of what Google stores about users of Android, Chrome, Chrome OS, Android TV, any web site with any Google hosted content (apis, fonts, analytics, adverts), Google services (maps, translate, plus, groups, YouTube)?
Targeted advert usage is only part of the story.
Google has too much power & dominance.
Amazon, Apple, MS, Adobe, Facebook etc all need investigated too over data acquisition and retention. Also what is spent on lobbying and front groups, takeovers etc.
Big company buys in innovative thingy.
Development stutters. Sometimes later versions worse or unchanged (Paint Shop Pro, Visio, Skype, Pebble, Mobi-reader, Glen-Dimplex buying Roberts etc, Harvard then Argos with Bush/Murphy, Flarion bought by Qualcomm)
Big company loses interest and kills it.
Bosses of Tech companies reading SF as tech blueprints. Why? Their lack of empathy, social responsibility and ethics/morality makes them miss the point of the stories, which isn't to sell shiny or glorify tech for sake of it, but to make social and political comments. It's only in Hollywood (and toy franchises) that it's about the gadgets.
HHGTG was a parody, not a blueprint either!
I'd argue that for people used to windows XP, Vista and 7, that Windows 10 isn't consumer ready unless it's only for web browsing and store apps, in which case Android is better / cheaper.
Win 10 for traditional applications:
"It's complicated, confusing, and difficult."
I'm finding supporting users on Linux Mint + Mate desktop, properly setup, is less bothersome than Win7. Mostly I don't see them now.
It's a shame to see what was a diverse innovator (was part of Philips) and far beyond stuff Qualcomm interested being taken by someone only interested in Mobile & IoT IP. Qualcomm are almost a patent troll. They are more interested in royalties than making chips.
Shame to see the last big European chipmaker go.
Something can't be a currency AND an investment.
At best cryptocurrencies are investments. At worst they are ponzi schemes. The Blockchain isn't scaleable. The cost of creating extra coins is too high and dependant on electricity & computer costs, not economic indicators. The time and cost per transaction is too high.
So not a currency. It's a possession, even though it's not physical.
Seems like a reasonable decision.
Yes, sounds like a stupid bean counter decision. I think people that buy into Franchises are being conned. They supply capital, premises, staff and basically are an employee in all but name. Responsible for everything yet only able to use the Franchise supplies. KFC isn't a fast food chain, it's a marketing company, so inevitable they will end up using a cheaper inappropriate supplier for the outsourced distribution.
Franchises are nasty and exploitive.
Why isn't there more progress on automating railways? Perhaps Google and others are more interested in personal information, trip data than actual autonomous cars. Look at the crapware called Android TV, you can't tune the set without accepting Google's T&C. Or the fact that Uber is more interested in user data than making profit from actual trips.