2645 posts • joined 23 Nov 2007
Fat chance of them being investigated by the Irish Authorities!
They should offer Stream to Watch + buy DVD/BD physical Disk.
GDI is horrid, but at least unlike DirectX it's designed for Window Icon Mouse Pointer interface, DirectX is a huge monster of an Adhoc interface invented to make porting DOS Games easy.
COM was stupid and it's offspring DCOM evil.
Is there no-one left in MS that can do real OS design or is it dominated by Xbox, Zune and Win95 games folks?
Still no sighting of the Soup Dragon?
Win8 goes back to DOS 2.11!
In DOS 2.11 you could redefine "switchchar" from / to - and thus options on command line are -h -x etc rather than /h /x etc. A side effect was that the Path character became / instead of \
I'm not sure when they added subdirectories, Early DOS didn't have them. DOS2.x something was likely the first.
I just use a password Address book. Which I don't keep in the Laptop bag.
And passwords that look like N5hX1qfap
I only memorise my main login.
Won't be hard for MS to come third I'm thinking. All they need to do is stay on the Market.
Didn't anyone pay attention to Music? Edison's Phonograph (drum) was awkward and "blown away" by the disc.
Emile Berliner Gramophone discs from 1886!
So why did ANYONE ever build a magnetic drum and not go straight to disc storage? The machines to cut masters even had linear tracking servo arms.
I've never understood why drum storage was built.
We are lucky I suppose that the first optical drive was disc (Sony/Philips CD) and not a drum.
What is baffling is that Apple has the biggest profit margin, is one of the most successful gadget companies and yet Foxconn that make it are making a loss?
I have no interest in having one of these, but unlike many shiny gadgets it's really innovative.
If the other end of the WiFi link though was a box monitoring the cooker, doors, freezer etc to put up alerts I might be interested though.
It was long ago though.
The power mat needs a PSU, it's less portable, it uses up more table surface and it needs a cable to the mains.
"Wireless charging" is pointless gimmick for people too lazy to find the end of the cable and plug it into their gadget.
It's less efficient and limited in power compared to a direct cable.
I'd also be surprised if it doesn't generate more interference too.
Or are Duracell going to sell rechargeable power mats, or worse, ones with disposable cells?
How much liquid nitrogen does it use?
Anyway, ironically DOS applications will be fine.
DOS programs will run better than on NT4, Win2K, XP, Vista or Win7 ...
As long as you install the 3rd party Dosbox for ARM. the x86 Dosbox VM runs DOS programs better than NTVDM on x86 XP. Also runs them on Linux.
16 bit windows will run *IN* DOS box on ARM quite well too.
Java, Flash, Air, .NET applications will all run.
It's 32bit and 64bit Native Windows applications that either won't run at all, or like a pig in a VM.
Any contrast issues are LCD related. Nothing to do with type of back light.
If you don't mind the depth, only expensive RGB led true back light (not "white" LED edge lit) is maybe better than CCFL or CFL.
It's too expensive.
Of course it looks the same. What other way is there?
The Pen & Pad I designed in 1988 looked the same too.
The issue inst the similarity, the issue is does Apply have exclusivity to a simple rectangular shape with a rectangular screen.
Yes it could look like a Cardassian terminal. But that would be as stupid as cars with Octagonal wheels.
Doing a Gizmodo?
Art student renderings are news now?
Rendered 3rd party imaginings are rarely ever practical or influence anything.
Not a new idea, but badly done
IBM had that idea in mind for OS/2
I described it in 1988 for a Pen & Pad Operating system.
But Apple has made a mess of implementing it.. Because they are not good at actual real development, only taking industry standard stuff and adding their own candy.
I can think of nothing Apple has done that's original. Except maybe the unique and poor 5.25" floppy format of the original Apple II drives. Lowest capacity at the time?
About 4 years ago Samsung doing ARM SoC, RAM and Flash, one 3mm high package, three layered chips. Doesn't work with x86. The RAM and FLASH would fry.
as much as 40 per cent of website user accounts being fraudulent.
About 300 members and 11,500 rejected spammers.
I make that about 97% fraudulent.
Real Names is a fraction of the 300 valid non-fraudulent members.
You could say we audit so well that none of the 300 are spammers. 100% of the user accounts are not fraudulent.
Nothing here all day
Even If I typed in the IP of El Reg
I think the ISP must have "pulled the plug".
4" is the limit
5" is too big unless it's a 3:1 or maybe 2.5:1 form factor. Too wide.
The iPhone looks like older "tablet" devices. How distinctive can a rectangle that is as much display as possible on front going to be? You don't want a Lemon or Toblerone shaped handset?
Before Nokia SW sank in a morass of Bureaucracy.
I had one. Fax worked well. Email perfect.
I had a company account so they paid for double timeslot GSM so Web browsing was 28k. I only had 19K on the home phone line.
The office used ISDN, DSL was in office end of 2001.
I liked my Nokia Brick. You could do real work on it too.
I have no idea of the virtue of these claims though.
Does not compute. Macs are not for Enterprise. Even Apple agrees. It's a consumer product. Didn't they scrap their server HW product?
Apple hasn't changed the world.
You can watch TV, make phone calls, create and consume information easily on a Computer based device, listen to music etc etc without a single Apple product.
They are successful and have slick GUIs. They are very very good at Marketing.
World changing, Innovative, Creative? No.
Lost its way?
Acorns grow into great Arms.
Surely the revenue and profits are irrelevant if they never pay profit related dividends.
Apple shares are entirely thus a speculation vehicle as having them gives you no income.
So HP actually make Laptops?
I thought "desktops" sales now much smaller than Laptop + netbook, and those all outsourced by HP anyway?
The inherent concept is good
No need to sync bookmarks, documents, email contacts.
It's just not useful till the phone has all functionality of a Netbook and just as good/fast and the phone + dock are similar price. Then why buy both.
The phone should "dock" at the "touch pad" location and then be a touch pad / programmable keys
They bought a shell and some IP
The People that made Autonomy what it is will leave. How long do the founders and visionaries of any of these small companies stay when bought out?
HP may have really been facing challenges. But ditching Itanium rather than WebOS would have made more sense.
This Apple crowd need a bloody nose.
They have done some pretty UI stuff. That's it . Zilch other real innovation.
I designed a small tablet with touch screen back in 1987. Basically any such device has certain obvious features that NO-ONE should be able to copyright or patent as they are too obvious.
1) Rectangular as skinny as possible.
2) Rounded corners.
3) Screen takes as much of front as is possible.
4) Icons on the main screen for all the commonly used functions (Since Xerox in 1970s)
5) Maybe a button or two separate from screen.
My was called the Pen and Pad.
The "pen" had a 2.5mm optically read ball and option for ink (as you can make IR transparent black or coloured ink). Microphone near tip, Earphone at top. Three buttons. WiFi, Bluetooth etc didn't exist then so the Cordless link for voice and data from Pen to Pad was 60kHz Ultrasound. OK the FM receiver had doppler shift issues if you waved it about too much.
If any good lawyer wants to work on a no-win-no-fee maybe the lapsed patent can be revived and we sue EVERY blue tooth headset maker .... :-) I don't think so.
It's time Judges, Juries and patent offices did some real research and stop all this nonsense.
Of course there was the same thing in 1920s over valves and 1930s, 1940s on Radio and TV patents.
Not to mention the despicable behaviour of "Enforcers" of Cine Camera patents at the dawn of Cinema (Nickelodeon isn't a Documentary, but it gives the flavour well).
I think HP make ZERO on printers. Maybe a loss. The profit is all on the Ink.
Are only a Speculation vehicle as they don't pay a dividend.
1990 was the time to buy them, not now when they could be near peak. Apple are actually vulnerable to change in "Fashion" and have very narrow range of product.
But I agree it's terrible:
DEC gets bought by Compaq and all the best stuff thrown away.
HP buys Compaq and seems to chuck the best Compaq and HP stuff away in the Product rationalisation.
HP was once a leading Test gear, semiconductor and optical device company. They became very successful at selling PCs and Laptops that frankly always seemed less than best.
Do they make anything in US still or is it all Foxconn or other Chinese anyway?
Obviously they think the best strategy is to copy IBM.
Not an iPhone5?
Then they will be sued by Apple :-)
Really it's nothing like a Cat brain.
As cats don't have owners, they have hosts.
Need multiple separate RAM
Thorn EMI was of course about the worst possible owner.
Maggie Thatcher of course didn't believe in Manufacturing or Industry. It's not all in China.
'Task Switcher' for jumping between and closing down running applications.
Eh? Hasn't Symbian always had that?
Not Really Space
It's not a revolution. It's a niche.
Likely to cause a lot of problems too.
Apple And HTC take note
But for Different reasons.
Google now has REAL phone IP instead of the toy phone patents of Apple.
But it puts HTC etc in a Quandary...
Apple + iOS
Microsoft + Winpho + Nokia (but who wants to come on board with an OS in a nose dive )
Google + Android + Motorola.
Also Android isn't "really" open source. Honeycomb is only the start. If it's more advantageous to Google to put all the eggs in Motorola and Closed source they will.
Google has no real commitment to Penguins. Only committed to Google.
don't need a mouse and keyboard.
People that actually create information DO need a keyboard and mouse.
No-one is taking away my laptop.
I'll have one of every size Tablet to go from 4" to 12" though to go with it. That's the bit that Trek git wrong.
He may have some point, but hardly coherent.
Physical damage from "cyberwarfare" is overstated. Stuxnet isn't typical and there are simple methods to protect against such threats.
Computer configuration and user training is more important than any AV package.
Two settings on
Neither of these default on settings existed originally:
* Manage Social Advertising
* Turn on/off enhanced advertising
No HDMI or DVI out?
Are they serious?
Has the reviewer made a mistake? Is there not even DVI out for DVI to HDMI (which is just a connector and does support HDCP)
Component out only is use really just for obsolete or US HDTVs.
No, not an Idiot.
For the new strategy, the worst that could happen is that a mass market buys the N9.
I'd guess they are only selling it at all because the plan was in place before the scrapage and contracts signed to make some initial quantity.
Because they never pay dividends and really only have 3 products, Mac, iPhone and iPad.
World wide the Mac is < 10% of PCs and iPhone including ALL phones is tiny. 18% of Smart phones?
They are the leader in the Tablet Niche. Though didn't invent it and won't stay leader.
Of course market share isn't everything.
Anyone here old enough?
Remember the hype about "The Last One"?
Mine's the one with Z80 Instruction set in the pocket
QNX is not Linux
Linux is a bloated copy/clone of 1976 UNIX. Kernel release (only) about the same time as entire NT 3.1 OS release in 1993.
Phones work best with a RTOS, unless you have a 2nd CPU to run the Phone stack. QNX is a RTOS, Standard Linux is not a RTOS, though it's been kludged.
Linux is a Macro Kernel OS. QNX is not UNIX like, no matter what Wikipedia claims, unless you think NT3.1 or Minix are "UNIX" like.
NT had "POSIX" subsytem for years like QNX has, that doesn't make it UNIX like.
QNX is *REALLY* old, dating from 1988, but unlike Linux is a complete design for embedded systems and was really only used for Industrial Controllers, SCSI subsystems and automotive systems till RIM bought it.
Is it a good idea for a phone? I don't know.
Does it need the latest and greatest CPU? No. It likely needs as little or less than Symbian, much less CPU than Linux + Java, (Or Android Davik which is really Linux + Java).
Though X windows was ported to QNX somewhile ago, QNX is more known for NOT having a GUI. RIM has their work cutout. They might have been better going for Meego, Windows phone 7 or Android.
- NASA boffin: RIDDLE of odd BULGE FOUND on MOON is SOLVED
- Apple winks at parents: C'mon, get your kid a tweaked Macbook Pro
- SOULLESS machine-intelligence ROBOT cars to hit Blighty in 2015
- BuzzGasm! Thirteen Astonishing True Facts You Never Knew About SCREWS
- China in MONOPOLY PROBE into Microsoft: Do not pass GO, do not collect 200 yuan