But an HDMI cable works better. Most will not able able to deliver HD on WiFi. Especially if other users of the WiFi.
3242 posts • joined 23 Nov 2007
But an HDMI cable works better. Most will not able able to deliver HD on WiFi. Especially if other users of the WiFi.
It WON'T work on its own to the Internet via the WiFI.
WiFi limits the quality. Decent HD over WiFi is not assured.
Since you need a decent gadget with a Web Browser ANYWAY... what value is it over an HDMI cable or Wirelss HDMI (which will do real HD).
The hypegasm has been amazing.
They will take the solution in the past.
Put it in a more expensive box, raise the price make their garden more walled, go up market and be a higher profit margin Niche player.
I'd be surprised if they go the other way and bring out $99 Tablets.
It's pointless. It's a Google controlled Wireless HDMI spyware cable as it ENTIRELY relies on Google SW running on a gadget which can often use an HDMI cable.
No Content only on screen
Cheaper than Wireless HDMI.
Allows Gadgets with no HDMI to feed TV
Google might be "spying" on what you access.
Needs a Gadget (Phone, Tablet, Laptop) etc able to view the content.
More limited than an HDMI cable to Laptop.
What is maximum reliable data rate of video streamed?
Because it needs a Host Laptop/Notebook/Tablet etc.
So $35 is basically a cordless connection to replace the HDMI lead from your "host device".
This is not important and simply a Google Walled garden cordless connection to HDMI. An HDMI cable will give more functionality.
It does get round the cost and problems of a pure HDMI wireless adaptor pair.
There are a few Hookers in Galway
in the Bay.
<tinfoil_mode> Snowden is obviously the agency false flag, a paid actor who takes all main-stream media attention while telling us essentially what was already widely known. Now the real house cleaning steps up. </tinfoil_mode>
Fixed for ye
I'm going to run out of popcorn.
Keep up the the good work El Reg.
Unless they were going to ditch their own NOS, what was the point of the UNIX purchase? They never sensibly built on it. So they sold it again.
Wordperfect and Quattro Pro (was Supercalc and Lotus better on DOS?) once leading products totally screwed the Windows transition and wiped out by Word and Excel, probably MS's best two products ever and ironically released 1st on Mac. (SQL, Visio, MS-DOS, MS-Basic (DOS & CP/M) all either copies or bought in, and even NT owes a lot to OS/2)
So those three purchases evidence EVEN THEN (I remember) that they had "lost the plot". I remember thinking wait a few months or a year and you'll get WP and Quattro for nothing. Why? So pointless they sold it again. Why did Corel bother to buy it though?
Almost all small businesses were "cheapernet" coax and BNC T-pieces up to 1995. Still some Token ring till 1998.
By 1994 the majority of new installs in small businesses NT Server. or even a WFWG 3.11 box designated as a server. Or clueless people with no server and sharing all on every PC.
In 1989 though when MS had parted with IBM few knew or installed MS OS/2 with LAN Manager and realised that its successor would be the death of Novell. File, By 1994 Print, Files, Wingate Internet Proxy (dialup or ISDN), SQL, Mail Server, Central User database, Native TCP/IP, NT tape backup, Fax Gateway/Server all on one box with a familiar GUI. Novell was toast then for the small business.
My two sons and I have all 2 x Smartphones each, but only one has a tablet (he has Kindle too), I have a Kindle too.
But though phone ownership is 120% here and most that want a Smart phone have one, we are not far off Tablet saturation. People that never go anywhere and have a laptop are poor prospects. At bottom end of Market even normally expensive Archos has a €60 / £50 tablet.
The Surface RT was obviously x2 to x3 to expensive for general public, is Apple stuff too expensive for people that haven't bought it yet? A high proportion already of Apple sales are to existing users upgrading. That won't run at current level forever. Apple change strategy and produce a £50 iPad or £99 phone? I doubt it and if they do it will be the beginning of the end.
3,000x faster (3Gbyte, 30 Gbits) would still be over a day to fill one. About 300 times faster is about 2 weeks for 360 T byte, or a bit more than 1T byte an hour which is acceptable. Only 30x faster on a production version would still be usable, but not so nice.
# 1 :
The main problem is that Filters and Block lists block stuff that is NOTHING to do with Porn or Sex.
# 2 :
The second problem is who decides? If a Government they can eventually just add anything that annoys them (again need not be Sex related).
In 1920s Ireland the Film Distributors had to pay for the censorship, and a flash of too much leg might get a film banned, so more and more films not even submitted.
The US today fines TV companies millions if there is an accidental flash of nipple. More exposed flesh and more pornagraphic is Free To Air in Germany and Poland (after the watershed times though).
# 3 :
The third problem is that the main issue is the source, if it's illegal content the source ought to be brought to court and tried.
So while I agree with the argument of accessible content vs Shops and Cinema and UK TV, in practice this will "break" innocent content and can be subverted for political ends.
This is extra judicial, un-democratic and doesn't work in so many senses. Today in Ireland the the usual "suspects" are howling that this brilliant UK idea should be copied.
I think it's a cynical attempt to curry votes by Cameron. It will cost subscribers money and make totally unrelated content impossible to access unless you set up a proxy or vpn server in a less stupid Country.
Worse, it will unintentionally block valid innocent content.
Though should be people be protected from the truth about Scunthorpe?
Forget about your idea of Virtualisation, unless you want back to dumb graphics terminals, several single point of failure (server & switch) and needing fast network.
Unless the applications are all server centric SQL based. Starting point is What do they need to do (not even the applications).
99% of the time unless you need separate Windows Server Instances or separate instances on a workstation for development there is no point to virtualisation. It adds massive extra CPU and RAM overhead for 30 users. A linux server and Windows or Linux laptops makes more sense. If they "must have" a bunch of traditional Windows applications like Sage, Adobe xxxx, Act2000! etc they need windows. If it's spreadsheet, Letters, email and Internet and shared database/CMS on server, then Linux server and Linux laptops.
Virtualisation is useful for Windows servers, Test Labs and Development. Usually pointless waste of money and less reliable for anything else.
A Raspberry Pi with screen, mouse, keyboard, box, PSU etc can easily add up to the price of a cheap laptop.
Since you need screens, mouse, keyboard and something to drive them to the LAN, how does virtualisation save money?
Yes, I've been in US of A.
But most of us will never be in Kansas, Toto, even if we click magical Apple iHeels.
I'll need my coat. It's a long walk.
Why not have a piece of fuse wire in-line on the cord? Or is that not strong enough?
Er ... if they aren't taxed how does Russia make more than peanuts?
The problem is that even the "Havens" are making very little out of these rich companies.
There are Russian companies based in Ireland, not for tax reasons, but for safety! Unless you are making or selling in Russia you wouldn't put your financial "eggs" in that basket.
Glass isn't a liquid. That's a myth. Old church glass panes are thicker at the bottom because they were made that way.
Actually a nickname in the "real" Ireland for Dublin Area is "Western Britain".
Ben Bova's 67 Million Years ago was too recent?
Mars & Return to Mars.
Surely ANY fire or risk of fire is worse in this plane than the older ones. Surely it needs higher standard wiring and LOWER fire risk design parts.
Was too much outsourced and cost reduced?
How do you make brittle Teflon (PTFE). That's an achievement.
Also other than Glass or Ceramic or Fibre glass about the most fire proof cable insulation*. Used since WWII for expensive wiring.
*You can burn it, but it needs a lot more heat than say PVC.
I know someone that bought a Nokia Windows Phone because he realised he didn't use Android Apps or Widgets any more and thought maybe better camera and battery life. He thinks the GUI is like a toy though. But how much GUI do you need for phone calls, photo taking, music playing, maps and Browser?
Problem is that a Desktop PC needs more than that. Even a tablet needs better than the Zune GUI Ver 2013.
Dying more slowly is not recovery.
But not new or original. Just expensive.
We'd need to discover some fundamental under pinning of Physics and Mathematics is totally flawed:
Laws of thermodynamics in simple English:
You can't win
You can only get close to breaking even sometimes.
you can't even leave the game
Shannon - Nyquist:
For any particular communications system (transmission, storage) you have a finite capacity that can't be exceeded. We get pretty close to that on Storage and Wireless. Ultimately this is based on the three laws of Thermodynamics. Speed / capacity (transmission/storage), power, noise, bandwidth all related. On storage the physical size sets the power noise and bandwidth equivalents of Transmission systems to limit your capacity.
Entropy is a bugger.
I think we are heading to having only three services:
Wired (Coax, fibre, xDSL).
Nice and simple for Regulators and maximises the revenue. No technology that causes interference to Mobile will be approved. Any other Wireless Spectrum user is a 3rd class citizen. Satellite is a 2nd class citizen as they pay little or nothing to Ofcom, but tolerated as it will help get rid of pesky TV & Radio. According to the BBC, listeners to the Archers wanting the unique bits on 4Extra can use their TV to make up for poor DAB coverage, poor power consumption and lack of decent models and a minority of owners.
Soft Touch Regulation, the National Regulators and the "Market" are a failure at protecting vital infrastructure and the consumer.
Public Service broadcasters are now using spurious financial arguments to justify AM closures, IT outsourcing, program outsourcing.
We are doomed.
I'm reminded of the SciFi book where the character wakes up in ruins of the Hospital in the Future and discovers most modern tech is badly done fake. The car has "sound effects" to make it seem more powerful.
The Interplanetary spaceship tech is faked too but used as a prop on chilling "final solution" to overpopulation.
Today Bling on computer GUIs is more important than any real improvement in underlying performance, security or usability for the last 10 years.
Doomed I tell ye!
Heading for over 150% many places.
But yes 143M is the Population of the Federation.
I thought Icahn was a serial asset stripper rather than an investor in it for the long haul.
I'm surprised he didn't recycle Eircom a few years ago.
Putting real money in = Investing
Putting debt in = asset stripping, not investing.
It could only run 32 bit Application programs using win32s?
By 1994 you could have decent 32bit TCP/P, 32 bit Disk manager/VMM/Paging, Video for Windows, Win32s to run NT applications. and reasonable reliability if it was all properly configured.
But at release it was mostly 16 bits, no Win32s, no 32bit Applications, no decent Video for Windows, no decent disk / VM/Paging.
Is it April already again?
I think Linus would only be sued calling it Windows For Workgroups. <anything else> for Workgroups isn't an MS Trademark?. "Workgroups" predate Microsoft. Though originally "work groups"
Really it's not April?
Really the main difference with initial Win95 vs last distributions of WFWG 3.11 was Explorer, not really any more "32bit" than WFWG 3.11 + Win32S
Apple are up to the neck ...
They have lots of money to waste on lawyers for appeals.
A trivial addition of software should never be patentable.
I think some army had these ages ago...
If they don't like what they see they lob ones without a camera.
So actually you can drive this from a laptop running windows or linux too.
Perhaps even from an Android phone / tablet using USB to Serial without the RS232 line driver.
Return to Mars
Do we want Space Tourists?
16 years ago a computer with modem took up a lot of space and cost much more than a TV and usually couldn't drive a TV. A laptop was about x2 price and 1/4 performance.
Today a gadget with a web browser and screen built in might cost as little as 1/2 a TV. Also you don't need an over priced "smart" TV. A cheap netbook/laptop/tablet is usually more featured than a Smart TV and can drive HDMI on an HDTV. Often that + HDTV is cheaper than a Smart TV with no decent UI, you can even have the computer on your lap and cable to TV.
So the product concept is dead. Even if it had Fibre.
Many commercial Lithium based batteries have less charge cycles than some NiMH. After a year's use many are less than 50%.
I imagine the buffer material looks more like paper or toilet tissue. Pine can be made into paper. Though "good" paper has a lot of non-tree fibres, often recycled rag. Electrolytic capacitors used paper to hold electrolyte for maybe the last 90 years.
So I wonder exactly what is new about this.
We all know what happens with mismanaged batteries (even Turbo charged NiMH).
I said it would never be acceptable. Even without glasses, stereoscopic video can never really work properly. Even when it does work (and for nearly 20% of people it's poor to non-existent) it's exhausting as real distance (which you will focus on) doesn't match the stereoscopic clues that rely on near perfect binocular vision.
Only a Stereoscopic image processed locally into simulated 3D with real Z-axis for your eye to focus on will work. The Stereoscopic camera and transmission are feasible, 3D camera and transmission isn't.
Currently 3D displays of any decent contrast are like small fish tanks. A decent 3D display will be deeper than a CRT. Otherwise you'd get tired watching, A flat panel has only one focus distance,
Why did the BBC waste money on this. They of course obviously ignore their own R&D Dept as the recent 100M fiasco proves.
Don't just plug any old mouse into your computer
Taking it apart is no use, you need a USB sniffer.
Mines the one with a tin foil hat disguised as my lunch wrapper.
So to get a weeks publicity in top 10 if your app sells at $1 you buy $28,000 which will really cost you nearly $9,000 (Apple gets 1/3rd?), right?
If you were really selling 4K copies a day at $1 then that is about $20K income per week, or about $6.5K a day?
You need to be as desired as a $1000 PC application probably to sell an App at more than $20? So this suggests there will be very few heavyweight Apps in the iTunes / Play store, unless they are a port of a high reputation expensive PC Application.
Vulcan can be used for something larger.
N.I.C.E. is the organisation maintaining the "Head" in "That Hideous Strength".
Someone told Lewis he was only criticising Science Fiction because he couldn't write it. Note it's the 3rd volume in a trilogy but readable on its own.
Add a taser and it *IS* a Dalek
Really should be taller and more like a skinny Dalek in shape, but with the flat top.
It could then have a manipulator to re-orientate boxes to see what they are.
What could go wrong?
My 2002 versions of Word and Excel use MS's free compatibility pack for DOCX, but I've been increasingly using Open Office and now Libre Office. I actually prefer the Charting interface on Libre Office.
I had a variety of MS Select, MSDN and Technet subs between 1994 and 2003 when I cancelled.
I remember the last subs needed you to register and download keys for nearly everything instead of pre printed keys. The keys also got to be a damm pain in the neck to enter.
I've not done IT support since 2005 and I am SO GLAD.
Server 2003 and Office 2003 etc was the last stuff I got that way. Then they talked about doing away with the CDs and DVDs even though loads of IT companies had poor Internet Access. Also "the cloud" only makes sense if you have redundant fibre to the premises. Useless for most of the Real World outside HiTech Business campuses.
Another few years and MS will be as hapless as Polariod, Kodak, Yahoo and now HP. I don't think any of them can keep re-inventing themselves like the Victorian Era Hollerith Company, latterly known as IBM.
Does anyone wear them any more other than jewellery?
Wristwatches made first for ladies (no waist coat for the pocket watch?), then popularised by WWI for men.
A phone is today's pocket watch and the ladies all have jeans or jacket pockets.
They might appeal to teenagers, but who can tell what teens will like?
Perhaps less stupid than Google's Googles.