USA says ...
Reform your own thieving Patent Office, your Spies feeding USA Corps etc.
4639 posts • joined 23 Nov 2007
Reform your own thieving Patent Office, your Spies feeding USA Corps etc.
No. It's a 3D simulation using a pair of 2D images at fixed focal length, Stereoscopic.
Seriously misnamed and overhyped.
Prolonged use will cause bad headaches and eyestrain.
USA Spies have been stealing European IP for USA Corporations since 19th Century.
The West German spies got too cosy with USA during Cold War.
C.f. the Flying Squirrel
1) It can't really fly but glides.
2) It has no belly button (see item 3)
3) It's not only not a Squirrel (or bat), but oddly a Marsupial.
Nature has stuff a guy inventing a Bestiary wouldn't make up!
And if CE mark properly policed none of the these spectrum hog Transmitters would be on the market.
The testing is a lie as they do not test correctly.
They are really transmitters. It's impossible to transfer at more than about 0.1Mbps on house mains wiring without out illegal transmission.
Notching Amateur bands is a sop! It proves they are illegal. The Broadcasters are entitled to the same protection.
More like 10 months before production.
Certainly many unlikely to meet SOGA requirements.
But the Fans will buy a new one in 10 months to 20 months. To match their new iPhone.
It's Stereoscopic overlays. It's not really 3D and not remotely ANYTHING to do with Holograms.
Real Holograms and actual 3D work with one eye and don't cause eye strain. This is an illusion (2D Stereoscopic), so for 15% or more it doesn't work. For most people there is the focusing distance conflict between real distances and the Stereo image which is in a single plane, a single distance. The 3D illusion caused by stereoscopic offsets thus cause eye strain as the eye fruitlessly focus to further or nearer but image is really at a single distance.
That would be people being enticed to post on Facebook and expose their private stuff to make Facebook money, while often reducing productivity?
Imagine the boost to EU economy if Facebook didn't exist?
No, NO ONE should be using iPad, Surface Pro, Kindle Fire or Domestic Android tablet for this application.
OS too fragile
HW too fragile.
At the very worse something like a Panasonic ToughPad, with Linux rather than consumer Android or "Windows" and locked down to prevent users adding applications.
While QNX was great on embedded systems and disk controllers, I'd not use a Blackberry either.
"specific software on its pilots' iPads"
Which ever moron picked a domestic consumer product for mission critical application. No, I'd not use a Surface, Kindle Fire or Consumer Android tablet either.
With eVoting there might have been no trace or evidence of fiddling. With paper the evidence existed!
This is the issue. Not the ease of voting or speed of counting.
The eVoting is pointless and no matter how secure can be "edited" by those with the keys. Yes, paper systems can be "stuffed" and "gamed" too, but it's very much harder.
Digital for the sake of being Digital is foolish and is simply "fashion".
The iPad is overpriced.
Posher and more 21st C than a placard
"I ain't dead"
Some are always rubbish:
The idea of a mouse with only one button that is round, only the cable to show orientation.
Disk drives on an Apple II, which was over rated. I fitted 8" floppies, 80 column card, full keyboard and Z80 card on mine. I'd have been better buying something else.
Some get canned just as they are getting good
Some just look "clean" when new.
No they haven't.
Yes it's nicely finished. But rubbish battery life, no use at all without an iphone and massively overpriced.
It's an Geek toy for people with massive surplus of disposable income.
The original reason of fixed selections was that only a few levels off encryption were available on Satellite and Cable.
Now it's done so people think they are getting "value" when in reality most of their channels watched are Free To Air (Over 92% of viewing time on Sky in UK).
A la Carte should be available on all Pay TV. The Technology now means it can be done and without phoning either, just web browser or internet connected Cable/Sat box.
ESPN have a cheek!
Only one of my many WP sites accepts comments. They are 100% moderated, you can safely see them on Admin page without risk and trash them.
How so many Google searches are now "poisoned" with eBay results that are 100% useless except to take me to eBay.
This misses the point.
Like most of Google's "good" ideas it's terrible for everyone else.
They love copyright too. As long as it's their IP.
I don't care at all about 1920 if it's x 1080. THIRTEEN YEARS ago we had 1200 line / vertical pixel resolution!
1920 is only a TV width resolution. for DOCUMENTS, you know actual WORK, the vertical pixels is what counts. If I want video, I'll watch on a decent size HD TV on the couch, not at a laptop!!!!!!!!
"Windows XP was the first PC operating system to drop the MS-DOS Prompt and change it to Command Prompt, due to a change to the NT kernel. The Windows NT family has used the newer Command Prompt since it started with Windows NT 3.1, so it was nothing new on that side of the fence."
All versions of NT from 3.1 to the 5.1 (XP) had choice of 32bit native console (looked like a DOS prompt) or running MSDOS shell via NTVDM (Real DOS prompt).
NT also could run OS/2 scripts and console executables as well as native NT scripts.
MS Services for Unix (1999) added Bourne Shell to NT4.0
While ARM is nice an ARM monopoly is no better eventually than an an x86-64 one.
It's a pity that there seems to be so little diversity?
On microcontrollers there is less diversity too. Interesting that there are 50 cent 32bit ARMs competing now with 8 bit chips such as 8051, Atmel, Microchip PIC and embedded Z80 and 6502 in ASICs. The 32 bit ARM cores now in ASICs and FPGAs replacing old 8 bit cores.
Yes, DAB is only a percentage of "Digital Listening".
It would be daft to turn off robust broadcasting in favour of unicast Internet, which has no privacy and is fragile. On the internet the provider (and probably Google, GCHQ and NSA) knows roughly where you are, when you listen and to what, and with Google's help maybe eventually who you are. Not pleasant in a Democracy, a disaster in many countries.
Probably someone in BBC, RTE, Ofcom, Comreg or NRK.
Or someone that thinks Digital = Better.
The gear to do DAB properly and professionally with a card in a PC is quite affordable. Why no Pirates? Perhaps they are more realistic than Ofcom, Comreg, BBC, RTE and NRK (Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation) and the Norwegian regulator.
Yes, you are missing a lot.
The only argument left for DAB is more stations. But 68 to 88 (with the odd gap) could be easily added. Some sets even cover this. A gadget costing £5 running for months on on 2 x AAA or a year on 2 x AA would add the band doubler to existing sets. Similarly 175MHz to 195MHz could be added. Amazingly some old FM radios have this too, as well as a few new ones. Gadget only needs 3 way band switch. 175MHz to 195MHz was used for 405 TV. The band now used for DAB.
Very niche stations can be replaced by Streaming or users MP3 playlist at 256k or 320kbps, they are not economic even on National DAB at 64kbps, but ego of broadcasters.
42MHz to 87MHz and 175MHz to 275MHz after close of Band I and Band III TV were assumed to be repurposed for private Mobile use and DAB. Very few fleets use Two Way Radio now, people use Mobile phones. 195MHz to 275MHz and other gaps between 275MHz and 470MHz are enough for Two Way Radio. Tetra is in the 400MHz band along with SRD, amateur radio and PMR446 walktakies.
The wrong (greedy) decisions made about Band I and Band III at 405 TV closedown in 1985.
There is no Digital Dividend for Band II FM as DAB can't ever be economic for local stations. Nor can it (or DTT Radio) be ever economic for a Consumer's radio.
Digital Radio with more than one mux also is too slow to change station.
DAB has become an expensive duplication of DTT. DTT renders DAB obsolete. DVB-T2 has been demonstrated to even give better coverage than DAB. It's more believable given huge market that a pocket DTT set can be used as a Radio cheaper than a DAB set. Also under £10 for DTT USB stick for Netbook/Laptop. In theory on a Tablet.
DTT phones existed before iPhone. A phone with DTT and FM makes more sense than DAB.
Most DAB sets about 6 Hours.
Many AM/FM sets over 300 Hours. Even a 1939 Battery valve radio (MW & LW) is about 250 hours, and about 100 Hours for late 1950s AM/FM Valve radio.
It's not viable from point of view of space or power consumption to fit a DAB radio in a Mobile phone. My Sony Xperia Z1 has a FM + RDS station ID and is easier to use than almost all DAB/FM sets on the market. Works better than any FM set I have (though needs headphones as aerial). About 20 local stations.
There is no "digital dividend" application for Band II. Even the TV "digital dividend" was mostly a windfall for regulators selling licences and allows Mobile operators to build fewer basestations in Rural areas (= lower capacity) for same coverage. The Mobile operators are not interested in Best coverage or capacity, Their licence doesn't demand it. Instead they want to maximise return on minimal capital investment. It makes no sense for them to have x5 as many bases so that consumers get better speed and coverage as they would make hardly any extra revenue and a loss considering running costs, never mind CapEx.
Digital Dividend is a fraud.
DAB only is advantage for NATIONAL broadcaster with multiple channels. Also they are having DAB at about 1/2 to 1/3 the cost it should be due to sub FM quality bit rate (DAB+ is only used to fit in twice as many stations, never for more quality, beside at 192kbps or 256k bps the saving on AAC for the same quality for those with impared hearing is closer to 10% to 20% rather than the 50% of a 128kbps MP2 -> 64kbps AAC on DAB+. Even then some material will sound worse, especially to those with less than perfect hearing.
Well, 1920 x 1080 (HD) is 6.75 times 640 x 480 (USA SD resolution).
So they are actually improving.
Most of these Energy Directives are nutty. Like Energy ratings of a Toaster, Kettle, table top grill or Electric fire.
Won't fit on any of my main TV's HDMI ports. Really given size (depth and width), power consumption, need for a keyboard, mouse etc, a box with an HDMI socket makes more sense.
It's a gimmick making it into an HDMI "stick". Even if final version has narrower elongated swivel head.
So a slave.
The US Intern system (also now imported to UK and Ireland) is such an opportunity for corruption compared to properly regulated Apprenticeships leading to a qualification.
Right Time and place and luck:
Serious Engineering Effort
HP start up in late 1930s.
RCA & EMI producing Electronic TV.
Serious Marketing Effort and right Time
Hollerith Business Machines (later IBM).
Helmuth Von Moltke in the mid-nineteenth century?
Probably in Sun Tzu's "Art of War". 孫子兵法 perhaps 512BC, at least between 205BC and 220AD. I bet he could do a good talk on entrepreneuring. While in a sense some of the points are a bit screwy, the overall flavour is right.
Talk to any sensible accountant and you'll always see how you don't have enough money or resources to start etc. But how many big company are:
1: Started by people with a passion to do it VS an Accountant
2: Are asset stripped by an "accountant" later.
3: Gradually run into the ground after founder has left/retired/died by watching cost centres and "bottom line" rather than a passion for the "product"/"service"/"customer".
Mines the one with Government Development Authority leaflets in the pocket.
Also ever noticed that outside USA (UK & Ireland esp.) you can only get money if you prove you don't need it?
No, that will make people MORE upset.
It's zero use at all without an iPhone.
"but in these cloudy days it's not as if your kids are going to be suffering for lack of access to storage."
What a lot of cloud hyping garbage.
Of course you need a lot more storage than that, or it's just a terminal, like Chrome Book. Unless you have un-capped fibre connection (which isn't very portable outside your own WiFi) with redundant connection, you need your own storage, kids. too.
Back to 1960s and central controlled storage eh?
Also typically Arrogant of Google. Do it and then try to make it legal, get suitable spectrum.
This project is currently abusing the wrong bands.
Scalability, spectrum, backhaul and running costs are an issue with Loon. They most know this. So why are Google doing this piece of arrogance? Publicity?
So they don't trust couriers or the postal system?
Apple becoming Argos? Order online and collect in store.
"We notice that you called ABC plc yesterday. You might be interested in the better deals that ZYX have to offer."
They are more subtle than that.
"Positng AC because we know that Google reads everything posted here that mentions them."
That doesn't work, as Google gets your IP via Analytics, Adverts etc. Unless you already were clever with NoScript domain blocking and possibly your firewall.
Indeed more ways for Google to spy on the Advert Consumers.
Laptops are generally upgradable in Browser / OS / Applications. Tablets less so. Built in "smart" on a TV / Blu Ray player? Waste of money.
The problem is beyond just YouTube.
Expect Netflix to fail on "Smart" stuff too.
Now with Android they don't need the War Driving.
Fungibility is the property of a good or a commodity whose individual units are capable of mutual substitution. That is, it is the property of essences or goods which are "capable of being substituted in place of one another." For example, since one ounce of gold is equivalent to any other ounce of gold, gold is fungible. Other fungible commodities include sweet crude oil, company shares, bonds, precious metals, and currencies. Fungibility refers only to the equivalence of each unit of a commodity with other units of the same commodity. Fungibility does not relate to the exchange of one commodity for another different commodity.
Everything Google does is to sell Adverts.
They are using all the information they gather from all their services in a way that breaks privacy law and is very creepy and immoral.
They are able to do this because of the way the Internet has to work. A server must know your IP to return data to you.
In the real world the "providers" don't know if you look at the Bill board or listen to radio or watch the TV or DVD or read the paper book.
In the Internet connected world, they do. But worse is that most providers are using Google services in some way, so even apart from Google knowing your email contents (gmail) or documents (Google Cloud / Google Docs) or searches, they know what pages you look at, programs you listen to or watch etc, how long, how often, where you are. Probably often they know who you are.
There is a good reason too why Google wants a single sign in for everything. The near monopoly on many Google services (not just search) is mildly worrying, but not the biggest issue.
The "inventors" and pioneers of Internet and Web were naive in extreme about . But also about "how social pressures" work. It's almost inevitable that security and privacy on the Internet is a huge problem given inherent design. Perhaps each ISP needs to be a "Tor". But also you'll tend to have monopolies. One auction site, one encyclopaedia, one search, one Social magazine, one messaging, one video sharing. It's interesting that "competition" tends to be purely different social groups or languages.
I don't know what the answer is, but it's truly bonkers to believe the "Market" will sort it out on it's own, that anyway only addresses the lesser maybe necessary "evil" of monopolies, not privacy, state control, manipulation of users etc.
Certainly it bodes ill for human race if this overpriced nearly useless iPhone Accessory outsells any watch that doesn't need a phone.
That can be done easily on VHF-FM.
It's about MONEY.
Not about the consumer or Public Services.
Complete idiots that have given the Broadcasting keys to Bean counters. Digital TV works. Digital Radio (no matter how it's done) is inherently a poorer system than AM, never mind FM.
The People need to rise up and complain. It's not as if the spectrum is even any use for anything else. If they want to save money and have more stations then extend FM down to 76MHz and turn off power hungry Digital Radio, which uses x6 power for the consumers.
Couldn't have said it better myself.
April 1st was ages ago and had better rubbish.
This is the stupidest article I ever read on El Reg. It wasn't even amusing.