Re: open source Windows XP
Persistent Rumour is that there are bits with no source.
Why else is Services tab changes never remembered or same bugs in parts of Explorer for over 10 years?
3104 posts • joined 23 Nov 2007
Persistent Rumour is that there are bits with no source.
Why else is Services tab changes never remembered or same bugs in parts of Explorer for over 10 years?
If you use Disabled Autorun on all media, Libra Office, Firefox & NoScript, don't click to install Tool bars or addblockers or codecs from random sites and an external Firewall the risk is very very very low.
Because they can.
This only makes sense on a phone if the phone can use TWO different Mobile bands at once. Then you can get more speed.
Variations of this have been used in specialist Routers for some time before the recent spec, such as 2 or more ADSL Modems when multiple phone lines exist but speed is only 1Mbps to 3Mbps due to distance. The ISP then supports it and the LAN devices and Internet Servers don't need to know.
But it illustrates the cluelessness of Apple to implement this between WiFi & Mobile unless there is an option to turn it off. I seriously doubt the iPhone can make two simultaneous connections on say 900 UMTS and 2100 UMTS. bands. Two connections on the same band will in most cases give the same channel so give no net increase in speed or reliability.
So there are two use cases (aggregate multiple phone lines or multiple bands), but the iPhone doesn't do either. Also the problem of lack of server support vanishes if the ADSL ISP or Mobile carrier implements it. Such a specialist link aggregation is useful, but Multipath on the Public Internet between Mobile and Fixed is stupidity.
Switching between links (changing between Mobile and WiFi) is a different trick to true Multipath or Link aggregation. It doesn't need any NAT support at all or Multipath. It does require application support at the Server and Client. It can be done purely at the application level on the client and with some persistent object (cookie like) at the server so when client reconnects with a different IP the server Application regards it as the same session. Plain vanilla web servers of course can use a browser cookie.
Yes, the ultimate non-replaceable phone "battery" you won't worry about replacing. A power source that lasts for 5 years screen time would be good.
Why does a Smart phone battery go flat quickly? Screen is 80% of power consumption.
I wonder what you could do with a large 2D array of these "rice grain" accelerators?
Not destroy the company. actually make little difference except more innovation and competition. Especially from startups.
The current "to easy for rich people to enforce a trivial patent" situation harms innovation and only helps the big company bottom line a little. Actually some companies spend so much on patenting that if only genuine patents granted they might save more than they would lose in competition.
Such a feature should never be allowed a patent anyway.
That was Peritel, a French attempt to block imports to France.
But not actually White Space at all. It's fully managed
TV transmitters can't change frequency.
Proposed TV White Space is unmanaged and the idea is the ordinary public buys devices using the TV band. There is no way to Police it, ensure all TV users are OK or detect gadget users adding too big aerials, more power or disabling database.
With so called TV White Space there is no mechanism for TV receivers to report which channel they are really using due to local topology. Which may not be what the official database predicts. Nor can the TV transmitters change.
This Nokia scheme is fully managed sharing and can work. Not really white space at all. TV White Space is a totally evil concept making broadcast users into unprotected secondary users.
There is no Over population nor would more Family planning education fix anything. The human issues are down to greed and corruption. South America is good example as is Africa.
Let's say it was 100%, probability of 1, totally certain and proven that Global Warming is Man made.
But what does that give us? There has never been any verified prediction of actual warming, climate change, ice changes or sea level change. Not Ever.
Those are the important bits. Till there is model that actually remotely matches reality so that what is forecast for 5 years and 10 years time is at all close, the models are useless and thus planning about what to do is largely points as there is no way to gauge the effect until a decade has passed.
So everyone needs to calm down, collect better data and better analyse it. The predicted "up to 84cm sea level rise by end of century" at present seems to be a guess even if we are all 100% convinced that it's 100% proven there is man made global warming.
Two CD drives so there is no gap.
Entire collection in Carousel
16" 4 x 3 screen to show the sleeve art (camera and case in carosel if you can't be bothered scanning.
Loads of Technic and a Raspberry Pi.
Also does DVDs with suitable drives. hmmm...
Use desert solar power to both electrolyse and distil water at the nearest coast. Use waste carbon to synthesize hydrocarbon with hydrogen.
Ship the LPG to Edinburgh. The released CO2 won't really matter as you used CO2 or other carbon sources that would have gone to atmosphere to make the LPG.
Hydrogen can't be economically shipped except in Blimp envelopes.
"mistakenly writes mW "
Well a miniaturised 100mW to several watts would be interesting for portable gadgets. No charging or batteries.
Applications for a laptop, medium touch tablet , TV set GUI and a phone are not just needing different GUIs but also need different design. On a decent screen multiple windows and floating & dockable customisable tool bars might make sense. But never on a phone, rarely on a tablet. TV is similar display needs to a 6" tablet, (because it's maybe 2m away) but due to very limited user input and navigation and usually no touch, no keys much beyond 0 .. 9 and functions and no trackball/mouse (why not a IBM thinkpad style or gamepad wobble pad/stick though?) is mostly limited to browse & select.
One App store, one name of OS and one GUI is just a confusion. At least Apple and Google differentiate a bit (iOS, OS X and Android, Chrome).
After trying to shoehorn the Win3.x then Win95 style on everything they make the opposite mistake of Zune interface on everything.
By all means have a single coherent API for all devices so programmers have less to learn and make less mistakes. But this doesn't mean you should normally do the same application identically for all platforms. Unless it's maybe a game with simple interface or a trivial program. Even then it might not want to be full screen on everything.
Even running phone apps on a PC in a "phone/small tablet sized window" is rarely going to work well. Touch vs keyboard and mouse with no touch.
Most phone apps are either too trivial, or awkward or more limited than many paid or free programs on a Laptop. Also I want to get away from MS dependency on desktop, not get locked into it.
I can use the phone on WiFi beside laptop anyway.
Not portable though.
But the Band II VHF is no use to Telcos.
Community radio would remain on VHF-FM anyway.
400 Hours on some 1950s battery valve radios. Though large batteries. But a 1929 radio with rechargeable LT and a staggering 80 x AA cells for HT runs for 450 hours on HT. vs 6 hrs for 4 x Alkaline AA on DAB set.
dividing 450 by 20 gives 25 hrs per 4 x AA, so 1/4 running cost of the DAB set.
Only LW & MW though.
An all band Tesco mechanical £8 radio (€10) is about 135 hrs on VHF-FM on 2 x AA, so comparing with DAB set 4 x AA, that's 270 vs 6, an incredible 45 times better. It also does LW, MW and many SW bands well.
Try and get a DAB set with LW, MW & SW. Many with FM don't even do RDS. The sales of DAB sets is purely because they are commonly available in the shop. Many are used for FM, or not used at all. Channel changing too slow and awkward User Interfaces.
Also a few weeks ago on Feedback BBC said Cricket is on R4LW because the BBC DAB coverage is 6% worse than FM, which is only 99%, that means about 1% of households = 200,000 Households don't get VHF-FM and rely on MW & LW. So if I interpret BBC correctly 212K households can't get DAB. That probably assumes an aerial. If so then about 1 Million out of 20Million households can't get decent reliable FM without an extended aerial (not needed MW & LW) and very many more no DAB reception without moving the radio to a suitable window.
If it's really cold I light the fire with some turf. Bottle or Mains gas is insanely expensive here. If we get really poor we can burn the bannisters, chairs, table etc.
Is any of it true?
I want the modern 3G & 4G + WiFi equivalent of my N9210i
Without OS provider Spyware please.
(given back to employer in 2004)
Remotely cloneable at about 3m or more.
Do the duties involve refilling the coffee machine?
I'd have thought you could save expensive office space and travel time by having someone work 50% longer from home.
There is this thing called Broadband.
1). It's new marketing speak for [Hosted services] what has existed almost as long as computers have (well actually really not so new any more, expect a new name for Hosted services soon).
2). It's sensible for some users and applications and daft for others.
3). It's mostly limited in performance by your "last mile" broadband connection. Forget it on a domestic ISP contract for business use.
4). Lots of hidden costs
5). Lots of hidden negatives the vendor won't highlight.
Are there other "themes" less eye bleeding?
But it's a monthly rental with "Cloud validation" so might as well be.
So I can't find a trial version of Dreamweaver to download. A cloud based subscription is the only offer (Dreamweaver CC). Though they still seem to offer Coldfusion Builder2 trial, but maybe it's pathetic compared to Dreamweaver with CF plug in to actually WYSIWYG layout Webpage appearance.
Stupidity. I only want to buy applications without subscriptions and that don't need potentially unreliable Internet connections to run.
Also have the top priced version at $50 if they are serious about World Domination or even making money. For new users the current prices are mad compared to Ubuntu. Not a valid comparison for those with an existing investment in Windows programs.
Nokia recently (before the MS deal) bought out Siemens from NSN.
Microsoft has only bought a failing phone division. They don't have the Nokia name for new phones (only ones already on the market). They have a 10 year Patent licence. They thus didn't buy any IP.
So Nokia still exists, will have an extra 7 Billion (approx) and what exactly has MS got? The existing products, and a licence. Not even the brand for the future. A better deal than Ericsson got from Sony (who unlike MS have in the past sold a very wide range of consumer products successfully, though have made some grave mistakes). MS: The mouse, Kinect and Xbox (and overall no profit). The vast bulk of MS profit has always been OEM and Business, despite a retail presence.
Microsoft becoming a combination of Google & Apple seems as likely as IBM succeeding in TV, BD player and Mobile phone / Tablet sales.
MS even managed to lose the OEM set box market and earlier PDA markets and previous Windows Phone which once before Apple iphones etc was over 20%. Zune, Kin all failures. Surface Pro (x86) and Surface RT (ARM) both failures. Dedicated OEM Media Centres based on XP a failure. XP Tablet a failure outside niche markets.
BT even remote "upgraded" existing users set-boxes from WinCE to Linux!
A museum needs to preserve the ordinary, failures, average and stupid to put the exceptional in context.
Rediscovered in 1940s Germany.
Yes, I think I mentioned last year it's logical for Apple to ditch Intel and make the macs more "walled garden" appliances.
It won't be OS X as you know it.
No, that 640K was always stupid. The competing "real" 16 bit platforms had 1M to 16M. The 8088 wasn't a "real" 16 bit chip as it could only address 64 K byte without changing the segment register.
The PC Memory map could have been done better too. Purely IBM / Intel / MS stupidity. It's not comparable between 32bit CPUs able to address physical 4G to 16G byte and 64 bit CPU with up to 48 Gbyte physical memory.
Of course virtual memory isn't the same thing.
Also there is no direct connection between general CPU bit width and addressing as otherwise 8 bit CPUs could only address 256 bytes but they use 16 bit to 20 bit addressing registers for 64K to 1M byte of RAM.
The Intel 80286 used in the AT was the first "real" 16 CPU in IBM PC, but DOS still used it much like an 8 bit CPU. You needed to run UNIX on it to address more than 640K or 1M Byte, 24-bit address andup to 16 MB of RAM without segment registers. With 8088 and 8086 you had 16 bit address and overlapping 16 bit segment register for 20 bits (1M)
The first iPhone used no Apple HW chips. The CPU was a Samsung part not even developed for the iPhone, which had Windows CE (default on dev system) and Linux on it a few days after we got the platform from Samsung..
4G Byte direct addressing and 16G Byte via PAE.
Even a 64G byte phone / PC / Tablet probably only needs 4G byte direct addressing. The rest can be "filesystem".
64 bit in some circumstances increases code size and no real increase in performance. Any performance increase is usually other changes not the increased addressing (which isn't physically much more than PAE can do on a 1998 32 bit PC).
Really twice the battery life would be better.
P.S. It's not about better Floating point but 64 bit Integers, which often means you can avoid slower less accurate Floating point. 80bit floating point has rounding errors, hence the "currency" type in VB which was really a 64 bit integer.
Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
Windows 2K is 5.0
XP [32 bit] is 5.1.x
Windows [Server] 2003 R2 SP2 is version 5.2.x
But confusion ... 64 bit XP is 5.2.x also
Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] (Pro 32-bit SP3)
Microsoft Windows [Version 5.2.3790] (Windows XP 64-bit) [x86 or Itanium? Both exist and are incompatible. Itanium version removed 2005]
Microsoft Windows [Version 5.2.3790] (Windows 2003 SP2)
Microsoft Windows [Version 5.2.3790] (Windows 2003 R2 SP2)
The 64 bit XP is based on Server 2003, hence the version number.
Each of these last three are delivered as separate OS's; as separate products (you had to pay to go from 2003 to 2003 R2), and yet they have the same major, minor, build number?
Vista, Win7, Server 2008 and Win are all 6,x versions
WinXP was Win ME & Win2K upgrade. (Though Win98SE better than Win ME crapware). Win ME people should have got XP or Win98 free. Maybe Win2K people should have got free XP, though at least Win2K mostly works, as Win XP was the finished version of Win2K
Win 7 was Vista upgrade. It 100% should be a free service pack. Look at version numbers!
The main market for Windows is real laptops/notebooks/Desktops, not relying on "cloudy" services . This STILL penalizes Windows users.
The ONLY reason to use Windows [on real laptops/notebooks/Desktop] rather than Linux is having loads of traditional Windows applications that invariably need local storage, a real keyboard and a mouse.
If I need an OS for a tablet / Touch screen device (which is painful for traditional Windows Applications) why on earth would I want to pay for either the x86 or uselessly incompatible ARM version? I'd go for Linux, Android, Chromebook or iOS even.
So they continue to alienate the only market they realistically can have (OEM/Enterprise/Legacy Windows) for the market they realistically can't compete in and has no major Applications/OS upgrade value. Who will pay for a newer version of Office or Windows for a Tablet?
I don't want a windows with a baked in Cloud and Tablet GUI. Actually I suspect 90% of windows users especially Business would rather pay for a choice of new Windows XP or Win7 (Win7 should be free to Vista Users) service pack. than any "new" flavour of Windows.
Which is a bigger Market anyway? £20 Service Pack to ALL XP, Vista (inc Win7 upgrade) and Win7 users every 1 to 2 years (and included on new PCs at same OEM cost as Win8) or trying to flog two incompatible tablet OSes one of which is Mashed into non-tablets?
How much is any OEM going to pay for a Tablet OS?
How can MS possibly sell OS upgrades, and Desktop priced Applications to Tablet users. They are deluded and dreaming with the idea people will "rent" Cloud based MS apps such as Office for Tablets.
Yes re: Win7 vs Win 8
If you subtract Win 8 that was pre-installed and kept and add XP, you indeed ought to rethink strategy if you are MS.
It only seemed that way.
They always did the GUI that bit more slickly than anyone else. Even back to Mac vs Windows 2.x
By then you didn't need to. The original was commodity parts. The GUI and case was custom. It was 90% marketing and 10% GUI software for development.
I had a Samsung SC6400 development kit back then too.
The roaming charges badly affect people near borders as radio propagation ignores bizarre lines on maps.
Also in reallity it costs nearly nothing. The "compensation"/"sop" offered is to allow Pan-EU operation rather than buying a separate licence in each of 28 Countries. They next need to abolish the corrupt & incompetent National regulators, especial examples are Comreg and Ofcom. Maybe the French on is bad too?
I have my suspicions about the Italian one protecting spectrum outside towns.
This is good.
They already use SDR
But you can't "software" define sensible physical aerials nor decent full duplex filters.
SDR lets you easily have any bandwidth (within constraints of aerial, duplex filter, RX LNA and TX PA) and any scheme of modulation (QAM, APSK, COFDM, CDMA etc as used by GSM, CDMA-1, EDGE, 3G, HSPA, WiMax, LTE). SDR isn't really any help at all in doing different bands. You need different physical components.
Without SoC there wouldn't be an ARM industry, or at least a very small one.
Almost all portable devices with Linux are ARM SoC.
Don't make me laugh. The folks that defended the Mobile Operators grossly inflated Roaming charges.
Their track record is laughable. They don't even regulate and protect Spectrum properly and someone expects them to understand the very much complex BBC?
Also will folks stop using the STUPID American expression that suggests the spectrum is empty.
It's not and this is vandalism against the Broadcast spectrum which is supposed to be protected.
It's unbelievable naivety to believe that:
* People won't ignore the Database
* The Database can be accurate enoungh
* That people won't add Yagi or high power
* That it won't destroy reception for some people in "local" blackspots having to use further off transmitters.
People WILL NOT know what is causing pixellation or freezing nor know who to complain to.
What are Ofcom, FCC and Comreg smoking?
People don't read those, or manuals.
That's why you need to make products intuitive to use.
However, the association between the word "British" and the United Kingdom causes use of the term to be regarded as implying appropriation or overlordship of Ireland by Britain. Alternative terms include "Britain and Ireland", "Atlantic Archipelago", "Anglo-Celtic Isles", the "British-Irish Isles" and the Islands of the North Atlantic. In documents drawn up jointly between the British and Irish governments, the archipelago is referred to simply as "these islands".
There is a slight controversy among more enthusiastic Hibernophiles.
Personally I don't have a problem as British != UK and British != English.
Little Briton is in France (Brittany) and most of the real Britons are the Celts in Wales and Cornwall as successive Angles, Saxons and Normans chased them out of England. Actually it's a mystery as to why the UK doesn't speak Dutch, seeing as the last "conqueror" was from there. Though he was actually invited and perversely the Politicians in London were upset when he threatened to take his army away... Sort of the opposite of the usual.
Umm.. I'm sure had this years ago between the VM running Linux and my native XP desktop. At least 2006.
Which VM are we talking about?
2800 x 1200 @ up to 96Hz 96 fps* progressive with 2.34:1 Aspect makes more sense than 4K x 2K @ 50fps or 60fps in the living room.
(* It's daft that current HD went to multiple incompatible frame rates, 24p, 25i50Hz, 30i60Hz, 50p, 60p etc instead of a fixed 48 fps, so we are doomed to need pointless 100fps/100Hz & 120fps/120Hz incompatible with each other and Cinema modes. Cinema using better than 4K x 2K but @ 48fps progressive already)