2210 posts • joined 23 Nov 2007
Re: Is it just us?
It's going to be MUCH worse in Ireland...
Also the Modem or phone "jams" cable broadband or Cable TV in the same room. No filter or solution other than moving the phone / modem about 10m away from anywhere the cable, connections, setbox or modem is.
I surprised Virgin hasn't been complaining more.
Really the whole "Digital Dividend" idea is stupid, The frequencies 900MHz to 2600MHz allocated for Mobile are poorly used and more than enough for Mobile.
Really future DTT services need the spectrum and the 800MHz band results in cells too large for good Cellular data capacity. The Digital dividend was based on idea of Digital only replacing Analogue, no HD, no 3D no Ultra HD, no extra channels no pay Channels.
Re: What about areas where 4G rollout will be a long time coming?
LTE isn't anything like as good as Broadband, and most broadband unless Cable or Fibre isn't good enough for even one IPTV channel. What if you have 2 or 3 TVs?
Note that the "headline" speeds are for Zero Interference, perfect signal and only one user connecting. Typically in less than 2% of mast sector area. Add ten users in one place and you may not even be able to do Youtube.
The ONLY "Web" integration I want
Is a decent secure Web Browser as isolated sandboxed separate application.
I have no wish to prostitute my computers on the Web or "Internet".
Also Web != Internet.
Just marketing for Hosted Services on real servers somewhere. It's no different at all to having servers of their own at a number of different data centres.
Whether or not their site(s) run on a virtual server or not isn't relevant either.
Virtual Servers and so called Clouds use real servers in real buildings in real countries.
I'm 100% opposed to pursuing downloaders or blocking people's internet to ANY server (doomed to failure) or cutting of people from the Internet.
But these people are no latter day Robin Hoods. They are at best parasites and at worst criminals. Just because the Media Industry is nuts and charges too much and doesn't recompense the artists and production crew enough doesn't give them the right to distribute.
I admire people that create, I admire people that pay to support that. I despise parasites and criminals dressing up their actions as somehow beneficial.
Re: four by two? 101.6 by 50.8.
101.6 by 50.8.
That's the un-planed size. So the "real" size is always significantly smaller.
It's a minefield buying wood. Unless it's for the stove.
Re: Inquiring minds...
No-one has ever been able to replicate Tooth reception.
I know not entirely serious, but Myth busters tried too.
I bet the barbed wire fence is long and near the transmitter. I've built "crystal" sets with better diodes than galena or oxide (copper oxide can be quite good) and you need large aerial (loop or long wire + earth) and very sensitive earpiece.
Re: Think of the Children!
You can get audio at the difference frequency between Video and Audio carriers, and harmonics, so 6MHz, 12MHz, 18MHz etc for 625 TV. About 4.x something MHz on 405, long time ago, I don't remember.
The Audio IF strip if on carrier rather than "intercarrier" is 6MHz below video IF usually, so about 33MHz approx for 625 line.
USA used 44MHz Video IF and Europe usually 39MHz approx for 625 line. Earlier 405 sets used various frequencies from about 12MHz to 44MHz. Earliest 405 sets simply tuned one 42MHz approx channel directly with NO IF, later in 1955 the first set boxes sold for Band I only sets to get ITV on Band III
Re: Inquiring minds...
Yes, it's been done and the "electro-sensitive" people would score as well tossing a coin to answer if the transmitter is on or off.
Lucille Ball may have started the fad with her probably fictitious account of receiving radio on fillings. Also tested negative.
It's a pity though that something the size of a pea could seriously damage the craft, depending on what it hits.
No, Nurse, I will not take the Tablets.
Which one is enough dots for A4 documents without scrolling and able to read super/sub script etc without zoom?
Which one can replace printing the datasheets?
We are going backwards ....
First low resolution Laptops and PC monitors that are WS and only TV HD
Now nothing for A4 datasheets etc. OK, the main demand is paper back size. but we need more than one size screen
They don't make notebooks. Wrong price bracket.
Re: Brings back memories
The full height 5.25" 5Mbyte HDD on the Apple II seemed like a lot compared to the Wimpy Apple floppies. Last Apple product I bought. I was too young to spot hype. It did need a separate PSU
Re: I’m worried that I under-specified the hard drive. At half a gig, it's not much
Though larger drives than 500G seem less reliable
The maps is a test
The next one will be seriously reduced in cost and functionality, while sold at same price. This will allow longer battery life.
They will sell just as well and make more profit. For phone calls it will actually be better due to less complexity and longer battery. Win-Win
Intel Inside isn't much help.
Re: What Theory?
It might be nice for describing interaction, but it's no help at all in design or evaluation of a UI.
Elop didn't kill Nokia
They strangled themselves years earlier. Getting involved with Intel was Toxic, but they had probably already wasted too much time, over 3 years.
Spinning disks are not "dead" then if cost and storage is more important than latency. Arrays do reduce the latency issue a bit.
It seems we are nowhere near the limits of increased disk density, though no large jumps in capacity.
Could it be that NAND Fab plant building isn't happening because perhaps it's still a premium price niche market as well as the uncertainty over alternate technologies. I think there may be more than the three mentioned in the article.
All semiconductors run on magic smoke. Because when it escapes they don't work. All that is left is a bit of glass like crystal and some wires.
Losev was tragic loss
Marconi's assistant told Marconi about the glowing crystal, but like many successful entrepreneurs, he had a single obsession, to make money from Radio. As it wasn't a good radio detector, he wasn't interested.
I knew Losev had published about LED. I didn't realise he had an LED patent though. He also described a "Transistor" (not called that then) but unfortunately most of what he wrote on that was destroyed in the War.
Re: Lollipop Anyone?
Except if you made the Sinclair kit, you were a genius if you could fit it in the black case
Not having root?
Anyone falling for this Social Engineering (not a flaw) has already done three stupid actions before typing the password into any "Password to install" prompt.
Clicking on link
little consistency across ARM-compatible systems beyond the basic processor instruction ...
I have a idea there are three main families of ARM instructions.
Also both endians
Various extensions (Neon? something for Java ?)
But "x86" you need really 3 or 4 kernels
The Magpie aka Curiosity is easily distracted by bling.
Indeed that was what I meant!
Well obviously if it still works with some nozzels failed, then x9 more likely nozzle failure is not a problem.
Actually the flight may be a very expensive failure for the Satellite owner as the next stage burn was unsafe to do. But undoubtedly a step forward vs Shuttle. I may not have worded the original post clearly.
with nine times as many nozzles, it might be nine times more likely to fail. In the early days there was experiments with "many" nozzle engines.
Duh, it's either a clamshell rectangle with screen and keyboard or a box that a screen & keyboard plugs into.
If it is portable it shouldn't be too heavy and the big innovation would be 8 hours + life instead of approximately 3 to 4 we have had for ten years.
The screen and keyboard shouldn't be shiny.
The keyboard should not get jammed with hair and crumbs.
It should be reliable and fast enough (1/10th second response worst case to any action).
It should have all the I/O required and spaced such that something in one aperture doesn't block the neighbour.
Stuff like ultra thin, alloy casing, carbon fibre, funky translucent plastic or what ever is irrelevant unless it is needed for above.
He is clueless.
Might be perfectly true ... But
"Huawei is entirely owned by its employees. No third party - including government institutions - has any ownership interest in Huawei," he said. "Huawei’s success has not been based on favouritism or subsidisation by the Chinese government."
But that doesn't rule out that Huawei does whatever the [Chinese] Government asks. It's certainly interesting to see who has been sold what for how much in Africa and what China gets out of it.
Some non-Chinese companies are no different and even do it for highest bidder.
Re: What's the point?
It's all pointless
A dock or plug makes more sense.
The chargers need plugged in somewhere anyway.
Re: It's all about timing
Actually the problem with Transputer was it needed a different way of programming and thinking. Traditional OS and programming and libraries and existing applications can't be sensibly run on such highly parallel systems.
So not about the timing. Transputer was only ever a niche product in a market that Intel with hugely more resources has struggled with. If the Transputer had been an Intel or US invention, animation Render Farms would be running Transputer based 1000s of cores per chip and 1000s of chips per rack today.
Re: What about memory bandwidth ?
Seriously multicore systems need a lot of memory per core. This is advantage of fine grained muliple core RISC etc vs 1 billion transistor Chipzilla coarse grained multiprocessing cores. You have space for RAM for each core on chip. With coarse grained cores using OS threads, you have a serious memory bottleneck beyond 4 cores. More than 8 off x86 cores is silly unless you have multiple external buses to multiple RAM.
Re: Intel & IBM & MS
I think some people that have never done parallel programming don't understand the differences between a language where the compiler or run time time takes care of co-routine / thread / process to core mapping and a language that only has libraries for the host OS (NT, LInux, Unix etc). Or don't understand the difference between OS based Multiprocessing and Language based. Or between multi-core and distributed system.
Intel's x86 multi-core are not hugely different to a Motherboard with 2 or 4 single Core CPU sockets. In both cases NT or Linux hard sees the difference. Most actual programs can't tell the difference at all and only run on one core. Beyond 4 cores the speed improvement is marginal for NT Windows or Linux.
Systems with 100s to 1000s of cores (ideally each with enough RAM to run instructions in parallel without a memory bottleneck) need a different way of thinking and programming to take advantage of them. While people have done clever stuff with patched custom Kernels and exotic C and C++ and Fortran compilers and clever libraries, that's a dead end for huge numbers of cores/cpus.
While all this is well known to those working in HPC, Parallel systems etc for 30 years, it seems not well known even to many programmers.
Re: Intel & IBM & MS
Occam was a good idea for programming stuff like list. As was Co-routines in Modula-2
Instead we have been stuck with the portable Assembler for porting UNIX, aka C
Intel & IBM & MS
This idea goes back to the 1970s. Early implementation in 1980s with Transputer.
The x86 PC, MSDOS, UNIX, Windows and Linux have held back parallel RISC SW development and mainstream adoption for 20 years.
It was too expensive.
In reality by the time you have a case that size with and LCD and ports, it's not much more expense to put an ARM cpu in it.
absence of WiFi connectivity
Because it's a horror story to support.
I worked in an ISP doing cable broadband. I argued that since unlike DSL people can't buy their own Router, the modem should JUST be a Modem and then people buy their own router with whatever flavour of WiFi they want.
You'll find very very few TVs or setboxes with WiFi. Especially ones sold by people that might have to support it for "free". Ethernet is far more reliable and needs little support.
Re: "a major espionage centre like Vienna"
or on a radio link ...
Ian's Brother was probably the "real" spy
Peter Fleming's books are less numerous and more intriguing for what they don't say.
The Bond books are "Chitty Chitty Bang Bang"* for adults, escapism and not meant to be realistic at all.
(* Yes Ian Fleming was responsible. At least there wasn't a dreadful fake Cockney accent, I think it's possibly better than the Bond Books. I think Leslie Charteris then and Clive Cussler now are better authors of "Bond" type books. The success of the film franchise can't be denied. Sean Connery is my favourite Film Bond.).
But how much will go in the till drawer when it opens?
The purpose of most papers is simply for the author to keep tenure. Many universities you have to publish, the quality of your research, lecturing, tutorials, lab sessions etc isn't measured. Just the number of times you get published and better still getting cited.
So maybe a jury of reps from Intel, Microsoft, Nokia, Qualcomm, ARM, Huewei, Sony, Ericsson etc?
Meanwhile Google are busy compiling the mother of all prior art databases...
Don't they have some relationship with a search engine to help them?
I think they may have scanned a few books too.
Re: Game Over
Even the "shake" detection would need to be very innovative and not just reading an off the shelf accelerometer.
Who is worse?
The idiots that file this stuff or the idiots that approve the patents.
I would love to see Apple use some tiny part of their cash mountain for R&D. I'm fairly sure their current 2% is including the army of Patent Scribes.
It once had about 98% install base, but few users had decent data packages.
Out of the gate, most iOS users used the phone on the Internet while only a few % of Symbian users did.
So it's not just market share of sales today or % install base but the data packages and sort of usage. If you only want to make phone calls why buy an iPhone or Android at all?
Bulls, Hippos and Rhinos are herbivores. Swans don't even need to peck to break your arm.
(You should see how Hippos deal with crocodiles)
How hard would it have nipped? How aggressive was it?
I'd rather meet a friendly carnivore than some Herbivores
Icon for the fangs of course.
Speeds are ALWAYS headline speed, for perfect signal and no other users!
So average cell location = 1/5th of speed or less.
just 6 simultaneous users streaming video
Real speed becomes (40/5) / 6 = 1.33Mbps! Not 40Mbps.
now you know why 3G's 21Mbps is poor.
With about 15 users the "code noise" of CDMA of course means that you have 1/30th not 1/15th speed. So everything else being equal, LTE is twice as good (in same spectrum) but only to the extent of getting say 0.5M to 1Mbps instead of 0.2 to 0.5M, or letting the operator connect 20 users instead of 10,
The other "speed" improvements are simply having more spectrum. Which won't apply at 800, 900 or 1800MHz generally, but only at 2600MHz.
5MHz = 21Mbps (same as 3G HSDPA!)
10MHz = 42Mbps
20Mhz = about 100Mbps
But only for perfect signal. Speed at cell edge is typically 1/100th! All for only one user!
see comparisons of performance vs distance and numbers of users.
Yes, LTE is better than 3G. But if Everything Everywhere get an economic number of customers it will be a slightly faster poorer coverage version of 3G that costs more. No SMS and voice to cross subsidize it. SMS on GSM & 3G costs nothing. Voice is about 1/150th of the traffic for same revenue on 3G. Which is why Three makes no money.
Is there a decent BT keyboard that works with it and about the same size?
A compressed ball of hydrogen of sufficient quantity that it spontaneously fuses to Helium without need for external compressing lasers or plasma containment fields.
- The land of Milk and Sammy: Free music app touted by Samsung
- The long war on 'DRAM price fixing' is over: Claim YOUR spoils now (It's worth a few beers)
- Privacy warriors lob sueball at Facebook buyout of WhatsApp
- 20 Freescale staff on vanished Malaysia Airlines flight MH370
- Dell thuds down low-cost lap workstation for
cheapfrugal creatives or engineers