Re: How to destroy your competitors
React OS?
They can't look at it, but they can have a separate team look at it and draw up specs for what an API should do?
9270 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Nov 2007
Viber works on everything. Syncs tablets or Windows & Linux desktops to iOS or Android phones.
Not owned by Facebook.
Does video (inc multiway but only 1:1 on Linux), audio, phone out, file transfer, groups and text chat. Simple to install and use on tablets, desktop/laptop as long as you install on your phone first.
Same people that just sold Overdrive and own Kobo, Japan's Rakuten.
Skype became rubbish long before Facebook bought WhatsApp.
Was that it got broken by MS:
Netbooks suddenly going to near 100% CPU, that had worked when eBay owned it.
Migration of login to MS Passport
Removal of features.
Dumbing down of text chat.
Death of Linux Version.
Some people even moved to QQ.
It was dying long before Whatsapp was popular.
I was installing VT100 emulators on Windows (both kinds) in the 1990s for companies that replaced VT100s with PCs but also still had the minicomputer or Unix box.
I don't think this is especially clever or newsworthy because I've never seen an OS/2 or DOS or Windows Console program that used VT100.
Actual Terminal Programs for Windows that support VT100 must be 30 years old. Or 27 years old for NT aka real Windows.
Not if it's reflowing on a small screen.
The ENTIRE point of PDF is to proof for Printing. Or Print. You need a big screen.
We have two superior techs to read documents on small screens: The epub based ebook (a Kindle AZW/KF8 format is basically the same) or HTML.
No-one needs this and it won't work for many existing PDFs. It will encourage idiots to use PDFs when they ought to produce ebooks (PDFs can be books in electronic form, they are NOT eBooks) or HTML. The only sensible use cases for PDFs are to proof something for print (so it CAN NOT be reflowed!) or to distribute for print or as a wrapper for a scanned multipage document, superior to multipage TIF, that can optionally have OCR for search. PDF forms are a stupid evil invention.
Does Edge do the Chrome stupidity of automatically adding www or m and automatically changing even clicked links to https, because yesterday the top level of the site you were testing DID support HTTPS, but for various reasons it doesn't now and you really really want to load the http:// version?
Also a wildcard *.<mydomain>.<tld> isn't a true subdomain wildcard as https://www.<myssubdomain>.<mydomain>.<tld> will fail. Though Chrome is sure that's what you mean by http://<myssubdomain>.<mydomain>.<tld>
You can fix it with a rewrite rule AND totally clearing Chrome's Cache. Sometimes.
Because IE is dead. MS even killed IE8, so any OS using it for Windows or MS Update, say reinstalled X-Ray machine, can no longer connect to MS Servers. Fails on HTTPS and FTP. VMware ends IE11 support next year. MS has even killed their own Edge, and is using the guts of Chrome (Chromium?) in it now.
I was trying to get updates and converters for Office 2003 and Office 2007. MS's site search is now useless for that, you have to search cnet instead. MS wants to rent you Office 365. Not office as you know it. But then The Ribbon (Office 2007 and later?) isn't Office as you know it. Easier to find the third party "Recreate the Traditional Menus" plugin than any MS service pack or plugin for real versions of Office (i.e. ones that came on CD and didn't need the Internet, even the phone activation still works, though you may need to search the Internet to find the phone numbers).
1-800-930-031 to activate all MS Products in Ireland. No quiz any more on why you are reinstalling, fully automated.
Sounds like Google has won?
I believe MS has scrapped IE and their previous in house Edge on Windows for an Edge Branded Chromium.
Google has what percentage on each platform and what with Chrome and what % of what's left is based on Chromium?
I had to switch to Brave on Android, because Mozilla made Firefox nearly unusable. I've been using firefox derived Waterfox so as to have Classic Theme Restorer. I wonder how long that will last before I have to use Chromium.
So more about the total failure of IE and Firefox vs Google than Windows vs Linux. Firefox was a market leader and strangled themselves with copying Google.
I have CapsLock as Compose. The only sensible use. Double Shift is Caps Lock for silly forms wanting all caps. A hang over from typewriters.
I don't want a keyboard without the |\ key beside Z, or at least near it.
The one key less US keyboards are nearly as bad as the US Date formats.
It seems about x10 over priced. I got a nice Microsoft keyboard and mouse (wireless sharing a USB dongle) for a 1/10th of that that uses Alkaline cells. I also have a small USB Keysonic with the ¬ key beside the 1 moved beside Alt (which is also AltGr using the Func key) and the |\ key from beside Z between that and the space bar. About 10.5 x 22 cm and has the four cursor keys as PgUp, PgDn, Home and End via the Func key, which also maps F9 and F10 to the seldom used F11 and F12. It's excellent and was under €20.
The MagicBook Pro is an inferior display. PDFs of A4 are marginal on 1080, the 1440 is far better.
Comparing inches/Cm without considering aspect ratio and actual number of pixels and actual DPI is meaningless.
However it does seems physically a little challenging if you don't have it close and have suitable reading glasses.
I'd rather have about 15" for a 3:2 screen.
I have a late 2016 Lenovo 14" 1920 x 1080 screen. My 2002 1600 x 1200 screen ( a bit over 15") was better.
So called Retina screens are no better for PDFs or A4 unless they are larger. Simply having twice as sharp pixels isn't useful if you can only see the same amount of document as a 1080 screen.
1200 is a minimum vertically, but you need more than 1200 or even more than 1440 if the pixels are more than 133 dpi.
Acorn Archimedes was released in June 1987 is 33 years ago
It had Risc OS and there was a Unix before 1990.
There may have been TEN models before 1990.
I welcome another option. Keep ARM on their toes. Just think, if it wasn't for AMD keeping Intel alert we'd be using Itanium laptops! Ugh!
68K CPU
Power PC
Intel 32
x64 only
Also OS 9 and earlier are almost unrelated to OSX.
Apple's solution has always been for the faithful to buy a new Shiny and new programs. Though they have had compatibility tools in the past, maybe to run Power PC or OS9 stuff on x86-32 OSX, I forget.
It would be nice if I could run MacOSX x86 old 32 (which doesn't run on current OSX) and Mac OSX x64 on a VM on Linux, or any HW not supplied by Apple. But I'd be surprised.
I've an Android phone older than an iPhone 4s, it can USB load old apps and even install some from the Playstore. The iPhone 4s can only have music added by iTunes and nothing else. The previous owner hadn't added any apps, so it's useless compared to much older Android phones or tablets or PCs.
Just kill the stupid US date format.
I don't mind them keeping inches, Fahrenheit, the confusing pounds alone for body weight or their spelling. Or their own names for things.
Though I try to either write the month or use YYYY-MM-DD. I now use YYYY-MM-DD on all my spreadsheets etc.
The frequency response only for a few playings.
No, the S/N of Vinyl is worse. Which is related to dynamic range. The surface polish, track pitch and dust limit Vinyl S/N and dynamic range. The large hub area is to limit the drop off of frequency response towards the centre.
There are formats supposed to be better than CD, but they never succeeded because in the real world they are not needed. So since CDs are still produced, they are the pinnacle of consumer physical audio quality.
Note commercial CDs are pressed and home recorded use a change in a dye, so are very much less durable. Some CDs and DVDs are not well sealed so the reflective aluminium can corrode. Keep in a cool, dry dark place!
The 8 track (Lear Jet Audio) had high tape wear , no FF and no rewind because it was a an always slipping endless loop. Though 1/4" rather than 1/8" CC and twice the speed, it wasn't better quality than decent CC using home recorded tapes because of high speed duplication and the track width may have been slightly less than CC as the head is physically moved each time the metal foil is detected. Home recording gear did exist. Also the program had to be split in four.
Experimental wire recording existed maybe 1899. US and UK used Wire Recording till after WWII. The Germans started tape use in the 1940s. Ampex was one of the first post WWII copies.
1: RCA 1/4" tape cartridge 1958
2: Compact Cassette 1962. Originally for dictation.
3: Lear Jet 8 Track 1/4" endless loop demos in 1964. A refinement of earlier loop cartridges. Also called Stereo 8. Only widespread ever in USA and because of a deal with a car maker. Some small sales in UK 1968 to 1970, approximately. A dead format.
Radio studios/DJs used an endless loop cartridge that seems to have predated the consumer 8 track
4: Micro Cassette 1969. At half the speed of Compact Cassette and usually mono (someone mad MIGHT have done a stereo version) it was only ever for dictation. Now dead due to Flash memory.
5: Sony Elcaset 1976 1/4" tape, superior design to CC and RCA cartridge. Technically good, but too large for portable market (there was one portable that looks like a competitor to Uher or other reel to reel portable recorders used by journalists.) About 10 years too late, so a failure. Dead format.
6: CD. About 1982 to 1984 introduction. Still best solution for physical music
7: Sony Minidisc. A great idea killed by DRM, inability to copy off your own recordings digitally (journalists etc) 1992. Now a dead format. Also Sony was too late adopting MP3 as alternative to ATRAC.
7: MP3 Players using Flash, battery backed RAM or HDD: Available solid state and HDD from 1997, though prototypes using other codecs may have existed from 1982. MP3 as a codec only existed from 1984.
SACD / DVD Audio / HDCD Audio etc: Variously 1995 to 1999 introductions. All dead. Aimed at Audiophiles, a fickle market.
8: iPod. A very late MP3 entrant (2001) successful due to iTunes.
There was also a very large stereo / two track version of the Lear Jet cartridge also using 1/4" tape that was only rented to restaurants and hotels. Certainly in use in 1970s.
Cassette players and tapes are still made and sold.
Motorola was so named because they brought out a record player for cars, before WWII!
This proves that some trends are only fashion driven. There is no point at all to Vinyl over CD.
"RIAA historical data suggests 1986 was the last time vinyl revenue topped CDs, however that year was early in the life of the CD as a format and a time when the Sony Walkman and its clones were still cool. 1986 therefore saw cassettes account for 55.9 per cent of sales."
CD came out in force about 1985, though they existed earlier, demoed in 1982.
While cassettes are totally inferior in quality to Vinyl, they do have some advantages over CD and other formats. However the CC resurgence is also fashion driven, and nostalgia.
Ironically the really cheap or early cassette players have survived but the belts in the high-end ones turn to goo.
Easier to get steel needles for old windups and Stylii for 1950s to 1990s record players than some of the new ones sold. Most of which claim to do 78, but none have the fatter stylus needed for the wider grooves. A microgroove stylus thus picks up noise from the bottom of the groove, I doubt any use the briefly lived dual profile stylus for both.
It's a pity ARM was ever sold to anyone, but better that Nvidia has them than the Japanese Beancounters Softbank, who are clueless at tech and hardly more than speculators.
Though I can see why some ARM users would be unhappy. Still, better than the sell off of Inmos was.
But relistically, as ARM is going to be owned by someone, it's better a real tech company than a so called Fund Manager.
Unfortunately Philips is long gone as Electronics (Only lights and health care, semiconductors was spun off as NXP and sadly getting bought by Qualcomm who are almost just Patent Trolls). Who else other than Nvidia actually makes sense?
Texas Instruments, AMD, Intel, Qualcomm, Apple, Google, Samsung, LG would all be worse.
How?
The so called cloud ultimately is a real server in someone else's premises and with opaque information to you how it's managed. All the cloud vendors have had both fat finger, patch update and HW failure outages.
That's Turtles all the way Down thinking.
No, the games will really be developed for the cheaper model and won't be on physical discs anyway. The $200 extra is just for people prepared to pay more. You can develop one game and run it at different resolutions and frame rates. I just tried Civ 4 on PC at 1920 x1080 on a 4K TV via HDMI instead of usual 4:3 1024 x 768. Much higher spec PC obviously than when the game came out. It was fine. My Laptop can do 4K, but not that PC. However it runs Linux for work rather than gaming.
I have a BluRay drive to play video on the TV. Cost €29.
Are many new games going to be sold on physical media? The last PC physical game I bought was a con. The DVD (!) was simply a installer for Steam. It would have made no difference buying it online. It won't run without a broadband connection.
It's better DRM to only rent via the Internet.
So is the $200 extra worth it? No. Also you'd want about 72" screen less than 1.5m away to have much advantage for 4K over 1920 x 1080. I actually have a 4K screen. However I can't see any advantage over 1920 x 1080 decent HD sources. There are two shopping channels and two demo channels using 4K on Satellite. It's underwhelming.
Unless it's a multiplayer with the screen split a bigger than 19" screen can actually be awkward. Certainly the multiplayer in 4 windows of a 48" screen is worth while, though mostly the kids use that for Minecraft which looks like lego merged with a 14" VGA monitor expanded to fit the 48" screen. PS4.
Success is partly having the money to start, marketing, hard work and luck.
Not actually ideas.
Intel didn't invent x64, AMD did. Or Transistors. They got lucky with the 8080 because CP/M (Digital Research). They started as a RAM maker.
Apple didn't invent the MP3 player (iTunes & Marketing) or the Smart phone (Data plans & Marketing).
MS didn't invent BASIC (Dartmouth College) or DOS (Digital Research) or Windows (Xerox) or C# (based on Java).
Hovercraft, Concorde, Inmos Transputer, First electronic Computer. Also UK developed their own independent atomic weapons and space flight. The only country to develop either and give them up. US persuaded them to rent / buy from them.
Maxwell, Faraday.
The rot started actually before Thatcher, but she accelerated it. Being ONLY Services based and a Nation of Shopkeepers is not sustainable for a former Empire now a small island Nation. A lot of Empire wealth was asset stripping and exploitation. Ask Indians, Africans, Caribbean, China, Australia and Ireland.
Tories don't do State Aid, not really. UK doing about 1/2 the EU average. Most unlikely they really want to do any aid that would exceed EU rules, except they already had refused to implement Banking & Tax and Offshoring stuff even Switzerland has added to law. Particularly relating to IOM, Channel Is, Gibraltar and the transatlantic tax havens that are British Colonies, though renamed to Overseas Territories.
But what about Bruce Schneier?
I had an Analogue Nokia Mobile. I had then some other Nokia for a while and then I got the N9110 in Jan 2000 and the N9210i some time in 2002, about the same time as my third laptop. Both were real smart phones, better than 1st Apple which was GSM only, I had a Nokia E65 when the first iPhone came out. I'm on my fourth laptop now, nearly 2 years. Old. I left the job that supplied the N9210i and had half a dozen rubbish phones before a Sony-Ericsson Xperia, maybe the last joint branded one. It still sort of goes, but I use a generic style 6" Alcatel/TCL now, not sure if it does 4G. I'll not bother upgrading especially for 5G.
Most of the so called Smart Meters in UK and Ireland and many burglar alarms are GSM only. So I wonder exactly what is happening?
SOGA says goods like a phone should work for 2 years. Yet local shops are still selling cheap GSM only phones. Some are dual sim and old Nokia styled but with SD card space inside, FM Radio and MP3 player as a well as the snake game and interchangeable battery.
USPTO makes more money by granting patents than refusing and lower costs by not checking that they are not too broad, not easily thought up by someone versed in the Art, not considering Prior Art (especially if not in USA or decades ago) and not considering novelty.
They are about making money and protecting the larger USA based Corporates. Not about patents as originally envisaged. But this problem started in the Victorian era. Edison exploited the system. Then from the 1920s it was RCA.
Scrap UWP. It was designed for phones, or have a completely different GUI not called Windows. One GUI for all kinds and sizes of screens and systems doesn't work. Also calling DIFFERENT OS "Windows" since early 1990s (CE, win on Dos with Program Manager, Win9x/ME, Embedded WinX, NT, embedded NT etc).
Also have three distinct levels apart from HAL: The GUI (only called Windows on desktop/laptop WIMP), the OS excluding Kernel and the Kernel). Different names for different families. Only call the Desktop/Laptop WIMP version's GUI (only) "Windows".
Local voice dictation to text is over 20 years old as purchased package. Available free for over 15 years.
The main reason to use the cloud is allegedly to train the recognition engine's database (there is no real AI, it's just pattern matching). The real reason why it's now promoted as something in the cloud?
Available as free OS plug in to work with anything since XP and in MS Office since 2003? Without a corporate possibly storing it and no online connection needed.
Also on Mac and Linux for years.
Possibly also on iOS and Android, though the Android one seems to send everything to Google first.
These satellites are not really for poor countries. They are getting or have mobile and fibre. The fact that many are mortgaging their resources and other infrastructure to China to get it is a separate problem.
The fact is that almost no-one actually needs these. The real use is a very niche market and the quantity isn't needed for cruise ships (which are stupid) or air travel (of which there is too much). Even with 10,000 the capacity is tiny for any given area because they are in LEO.
The economic and technical case for LEO internet is weak. It's better to increase rollout of fibre, coax (fibre to street) and more mobile masts.
Perhaps in 10 to 20 years these will be gone.
The capacity per 10 km is a tiny fraction of mobile which is a tiny fraction of fibre or fibre to the kerb solutions. They also have a poor operational life and the launches are environmentally poor.
See title
Completely gone Google/Microsoft.
I've been using Waterfox for ages on the desktop because Mozilla lost the plot ages ago. So not surprised.
What do I install instead of this abomination so as to have the equivalent of Umatrix, no accidental installing of stupid apps from sites and know that 3rd party cookies are blocked?
It's opaque as to what it blocks. Changes to GUI are poor too. Tablet got this stupidity last night.
No, because Epic will not have access to iOS tools.
It's not like Android or Windows (and especially not like Linux), because on those you can build apps to latest API etc without any MS or Google support. You only need Google agreement for the Playstore distribution.
You can in theory develop for Android and let people download direct if they change the security setting on their phone or tablet.
So you can ALSO install old Android and Windows apps for products no longer on on the stores. With Apple your phone/tablet is doomed to NEVER have even an out of date VLC, epub reader or whatever UNLESS you installed it from the store while BOTH the phone/tablet was supported and the App was current.
So apart from the double dip of taking any ongoing income from an app as well as the sale, they totally control and eventually block the device you bought. In the name of "security", but it's ego and greed.