481 posts • joined 12 Mar 2007
BT were one of the pioneers of ipv6, they even used to run a free ipv6 tunnel service a few years ago... I wonder what's happened since those days.
Access to data
"no Google staff would be able to access the data"
WTF? of course they would! how naive are people?
Just because no member of google staff would have an account on the frontend application that's typically used to access the data, doesn't mean they don't have administrative access to the underlying server on which the data is stored or even physical access to the servers/drives its stored on.
It is obvious that any number of google staff could gain access to the data if they wanted to, and to claim otherwise is ridiculous.
Any gains he made might have occurred in the most recent tax year for which he hasn't filed yet... And even if he does, he would also be able to offset the losses against anything he made, so he might even be down overall and thus not liable to pay any tax.
Because MS always seem to get a free pass...
Any other vendor with such onerous licensing terms, poor security and dangerous level of lock-in would be excluded from any remotely sensible tendering process.
Various security standards have over the years been relaxed to accommodate MS, and in some cases actually require non-ms systems to comply with a much higher standard.
Kids will learn better when they are motivated, and are learning about something they are genuinely interested in...
That said, learning the basics of coding is really just an extension of maths and language.. And while the majority of people will never use these skills once they leave school, the same is true of many other subjects.
On the other hand IT related teaching is badly in need of reform... Teaching kids how to use specific versions of mundane applications is extremely counter productive. By the time they leave school the software they have learnt will no longer be in use having been replaced by newer versions or even by something else entirely (when i was in school we were taught wordperfect for dos).
What's needed is to teach general concepts in a multitude of different applications, so that people can easily adapt to different applications.
Re: ...they can be persuaded to switch to a Mac
Simple tasks like writing an occasional letter is all 99% of people ever do, why would they waste 300 for msoffice when libreoffice does the job for free?
Vulnerable behind the firewall
Most organisations are like this, they use the firewall as their one and only line of defence against external attack, and do absolutely nothing about internal threats. Once you're behind the firewall at 99% of organisations you can rip through the network trivially.
And this is EXACTLY why these documents should be preserved in fully documented file formats. Storing them in proprietary formats is extremely dangerous, as you have no control and no way to properly diagnose any corruption that might (And does) occur.
The idea of using PDF isn't for making content impossible to edit, in fact that's an impossible and therefore pointless goal, as there will always be ways to edit data.
The purpose of PDF is for data that isn't intended to be edited, and thus the format doesn't include metadata that is unnecessary for simply viewing and is only useful if you want to edit. A similar analogy would be providing the document on paper, or providing a program in precompiled form.
Re: Lessons learned
The postal system is also unreliable, and i have had various things not turn up over the years...
But the fact is you know your bill is due every month, so if you don't receive a statement you should have noticed this and contacted the bank to find out why.
Re: Dedicated mining ASIC chips etc won't crack passwords without modification
// The real question is how secure is the authentication DB on an AD server...
Not very... and windows passwords don't even need to be cracked, you can authenticate using the encrypted hash without ever knowing the plaintext.
You have it backwards, only geeks need a full OS...
For the average user, a minimal system controlled by someone else (ie someone actually technically literate to manage a computer) is what they need. End users don't want the complexity or risks involved with a full blown OS, they just want to get stuff done. This is also why ipads and games consoles are popular.
What we do need however, are alternatives to chromebooks which aren't controlled by google (but are still controlled by someone, since most end users are not capable of managing their own internet connected computers).
Re: Verizon USA knows your passwords
Several memorable words strung together is relatively easy for a password cracking tool with a dictionary, have a look at the -rules option of john the ripper for instance.
Mozilla CTO Eich: If your browser isn't open source (ahem, ahem, IE, Chrome, Safari), DON'T TRUST IT
Re: Open source is safe...
Nothing is safe...
Open source has a better change of being safer than closed source.
Nothing is perfect, but i'll take the best available option.
Re: Translation from MS speak
I still use 'xv', which was written in 1994... Because it comes with sourcecode i've been able to compile it on everything from ARM or SPARC based linux to x86-64 based MacOS...
It does what its supposed to do, and is fast and stable. The only patches i have on it are patches to support newer image formats which didnt exist in 1994.
Re: Laughie Charlie Translation from MS speak
There isn't much availability of ARM in the server market, believe me i've been looking...
I can buy a proper 1U x86 box with a quad core cpu and lights out management for a few hundred, for ARM i have a choice between phones, dev boards and expensive boxes with lots of cpus from the likes of calxeda. Where are the sub £1000 1u ARM rackmount servers?
IA64 had pretty good Linux support, and if your workload was entirely based on open source software then there was no technical reason you couldn't run it on IA64... If you depended on any closed source software then IA64 was typically not an option, as most closed source vendors would typically not port their stuff to IA64.
The problem boiled down to price, all of the IA64 hardware that was available cost more and consumed more power than comparably performing x86 and x86-64. I would have seriously considered IA64 for my workloads had it been price competitive with x86.
For ARM this doesn't need to be a problem, if they can make servers which are competitively priced then they should sell just fine.
X11 only has any use if you're using a unix system as a workstation, which is actually pretty rare... Most unix systems are used as embedded devices or servers, and are unlikely to be running X11.
Also, how would an unprivileged user introduce an arbitrary BDF font to the X11 server?
Re: IT security? Ha!
Regularly changing the password can often be detrimental...
Chances are the root password for suse and mysql cannot be directly used externally, SSH is likely configured to disallow root logons and mysql is often configured not to allow remote connections, making the root password only useful if you have physical access to the console or access to an unprivileged account that is able to run 'su'...
Similarly if using modern hashing its unlikely a 12 character password will be cracked unless its dictionary based, and thats assuming you can get a copy of the hashes.. If you can get the hashes you usually already have root, but people reuse passwords across multiple systems and hashes can sometimes be lifted from backups or installation images.
If your password is complex and rarely changed, people who need it can remember it...
If your password has to be changed regularly, then people are unlikely to keep remembering new random passwords, instead they will cheat - either using simplistic passwords (dictionary words, formulaic and predictable passwords etc), or write their passwords down. Most companies require users to change their passwords monthly, and huge numbers of those users use a dictionary word as their password with a number on the end that either relates to the month/year in which the password was set, or simply increments with each change.
Personally i never change the root passwords on my servers either. To use them you need physical access, all remote access is via SSH with keys.
Re: So ... hardware manufacturers are now openly telling Microsoft to get stuffed
It was Microsoft who placed restrictions on netbook specs, not Intel... If your hardware was above a certain spec you were charged full price for windows instead of the cheaper netbook version.
Intel would quite happily sell you any spec hardware you wanted, and would prefer to sell the higher spec components.
Re: Google doesn't spy, it gets to know people
Only they don't plant tracking devices into their pockets, they make tracking devices available which people then choose to put in their pockets.
For every google product available, there is one or more viable alternatives. I don't like their information gathering business model either, but i know that i can avoid their products and suffer no ill effects.
What's more i can even use some of their products while explicitly avoiding the information gathering aspects, e.g. third party builds of android and chromium to name but a few.
I too use unique email addresses, and often meet with disbelief when i attempt to contact those who have leaked my address to spammers...
What we need is a common forum where we can report sites that do this, perhaps they would be forced to listen if a large number of people complained about the same thing and named&shamed them in a public forum.
A console doesn't need to be as high spec as a general purpose system, although the idea of steambox gives up some of the traditional console advantages in favour of flexibility...
On a system which is designed solely for gaming, you won't be running all kinds of other cruft in the background so at the very least you need less memory, less cpu and less disk space. It's also likely that SteamOS, although linux based will be significantly stripped down to remove things which are not necessary for gaming - similar to what MS have done with the xbox.
Ofcourse on a traditional console the hardware is static, so you can do away with the overhead of an OS and driver layers entirely. Many Amiga games did this because performance was significantly better, and AmigaOS is considered extremely lightweight and efficient compared to modern systems.
Re: lost the plot
IA64 was killed by closed source software... If you were running all open source code they actually ran quite well, i had a couple of them running linux and all the typical stuff compiled and ran on them just fine.
If Intel were to introduce a new architecture aimed at Android, ChromeOS or Linux it would have a much better chance of succeeding as not only could Intel port these systems themselves instead of relying on someone else, but most of the existing applications would run with little more than a recompile anyway.
Arguably Intel should come out with a new architecture, the legacy baggage of x86 is a millstone around their neck such that even being a step ahead on fabrication tech they are still having trouble competing with arm. If they were to come up with a new architecture designed specifically for power efficient applications they could easily get themselves ahead of arm.
x86 is only beneficial for users who are stuck with a lot of legacy closed-source code...
Linux and other open source is architecture agnostic, we used to run linux on alpha when it was the fastest available, and we run linux on arm or mips now for low power systems.
It was closed source code above all else that killed itanium... Linux runs quite well on it, but windows as a joke - the core os would run but you had virtually no apps and 99% of windows apps dont come with source so you cant recompile them yourself.
When it comes to content creation, Apple are a big player... Wintel is mostly relegated to boring business desktops and gamers.
A big shake up will happen sooner or later, the idea of an extremely complicated system like windows being used by average users is ridiculous... Why should users be expected to manage updates for a myriad of different applications, maintain antivirus and firewall rules etc. Non technical users are better off with walled garden devices like ipads or chromeos devices.
Even business desktops will eventually ditch windows, once there are a large enough set of users running non-ms tools then interoperability becomes essential, at which point the only real advantage ms ever had is gone... If they're no longer locked in, very few businesses will choose expensive, insecure, unreliable windows, and will go for something else install - probably linux.
Indeed they did...
They removed the otheros option through an update, and in doing so if you had already installed something you lost access to all your own data too (it was still there but you had no way to access it). You then have a choice between not updating and being able to keep the os you installed but not being able to connect to psn or play any new games, or update and lose access to the software you had installed.
Re: What a bunch...
The assumption is that if you're in zone 1 you're either extremely rich or running a business, and should therefore be going for business class leased lines instead of consumer grade connections like DSL. Zone 1 is a complete ghetto as far as consumer level broadband goes.
Media tends to be massively overpriced in Australia compared to other countries, and then there are artificial barriers in place to try and prevent Australians from buying cheaper copies from foreign countries. Is it any wonder then that people are pissed off and turn to alternative sources?
Screw your customers and they will stop buying your product, and if they cant get it from other sources they will do without it at all rather than feel cheated by exorbitant prices.
Re: I guess the issue is.....
You don't sell or rent ip addresses of either the v4 or v6 variety, doing so is explicitly against the ripe rules... You can only charge a one off "admin fee" for provisioning the addresses to the customer.
What did these developers honestly expect when they developed for a proprietary API locked to a proprietary service provided by only a single vendor? And now they are reduced to getting down on hands and knees and begging that vendor not to screw them over.
If you'd made SIP compatible devices then they would all still be working and you'd have literally hundreds of providers to choose from too.
I have always avoided skype, and this is one of the main reasons why.
nobody complains that iPads can't run OSX software
Apple never did anything to make people believe that the ipad would ever be capable of running OSX software, it was always a standalone product with its own identity.
Anything branded as "windows" will cause people to believe that it's compatible with other products using the same branding, which causes disappointment and/or anger when users find out thats not the case.
Re: Windows RT
Windows RT is to iOS as Windows is to Mac OS - with one very important difference - BRANDING.
The "Windows" brand is associated with desktops and a large block of existing software, something with the same brand but no compatibility results in angry users who can't run their existing apps. iOS may be based on the same kernel as OSX but it never did anything to imply any level of compatibility between the two.
Similarly, the "Windows" brand is toxic, it's not popular its simply ubiquitous, people are stuck with it and aren't aware of competitors in its core market, once you take a toxic brand to a market where it does have visible competition people will try to avoid it.
Stick with watermarking
They should stick with watermarking, and ditch the attempts at encryption and access restriction...
Let me watch content on any device i choose, let me exercise my fair use rights, let me make copies for personal use, let me format shift etc...
Stop screwing over the users, and the users will feel less inclined to screw you back.
Only if you are counting from 2005, you could not have purchased a mac in 2005 which would still be capable of running the latest version of OSX... You would have bought new hardware at least once in that time, which would have come with a then-current version of OSX anyway.
Doomed to repeat...
Despite all the pain associated with being locked in to xp and various other microsoft technologies, very few of their victims seem to be looking at ways to prevent this happening again. If you just migrate your apps so that they are now locked into windows 7 (or 8) instead of xp, then you will have the exact same problem a few years down the line.
Now is the time to look at cross platform, especially open standards html based applications... Not only will they run in multiple browsers today, but they will still work in tomorrow's browsers and will run on ipads etc too.
Re: Here we go again
Largely because the only people i've ever seen buying windows phones are those migrating from dumbphones, who simply aren't used to browsing from a mobile and are often on prepay sims without a data allowance so wouldn't use it anyway.
Basically they use them as dumbphones, and only bought them because they were being offered very cheap.
Re: Are they splitting hairs?
Unless google actually host services in france, why should they follow french law?
There are thousands of websites out there which are perfectly legal in one country, but highly illegal in another... What makes the law of france any more valid than any other country?
Pornography is illegal in many countries, as is criticising the government etc...
What is needed however, is education for the users... Users should have it made clear to them that by submitting their data to a foreign site they will not be protected by their own local data protection laws, and depending on the laws in the country where the site is operated they may not have any data protection whatsoever on their side.
Re: More and more frustration...
Most of us like the idea of competition, but dislike the idea of anything from microsoft.. As you pointed out competition is good and monoculture is bad, yet the biggest example of how a monoculture is bad is microsoft and the risk that they could do the same to the phone/tablet market is one that cannot be ignored.
A monoculture of android is undoubtedly a bad thing, but they are not there yet... There is still plenty of viable competition from apple and i would rather support blackberry/webos/jolla/firefox/etc than microsoft.
That said, a monoculture of android is nowhere near as bad as a monoculture of microsoft... If google stagnate, then third parties can continue development, just look at the recent announcement from cyanogen.
Yes competition is good, but given how much microsoft have done to stifle competition in other markets there are many of us who want to avoid them ever getting any form of traction in other markets out of fear of the same things happening again.
There are plenty of other competitors to android/ios who would be far better for the overall market.
Oracle are systematically destroying everything they got from sun, including any good will sun ever built up over the years...
Many former sun customers, as well as former solaris users are now going out of their way to migrate to something else.
Re: "The idea that rpm and dpkg are anything like as user-friendly as setup.exe is a joke."
The state of updates on windows is even worse than that...
The core windows update is buggy, it's not like a proper package manager where every file belongs to a specific package, and every package has specific versions... Windows updates are binaries which may replace files, may add files to be replaced on the next boot, may make other changes or perform other actions, all with no central control... It's common for updates to fail, or mark themselves as installed even while failing (e.g. those that mark files to be replaced on the next reboot will often mark themselves as applied before the reboot has happened, and the file replacement may fail on the next reboot resulting in a partially applied update.
And the situation is even more ridiculous for third party apps... With no central update system, third party apps have to handle updates themselves and all the methods they use seem to be flawed in one way or another.
Some have an update service running in the background, a few of these and your system soon slows down...
Some check for updates when you actually run the program, which falls apart if your running as a non admin user, or happen to be without internet connectivity when you run the program.
Some do nothing, and expect you to manually go to their website to check for updates!
And with all these different inconsistent update mechanisms, its hugely painful when you actually want to update everything.. There are plenty of reasons to want updates to occur on demand, or only at specific times... For instance i want my laptop to download updates at night, and only when its on my hime network and not on my traffic restricted (And slow) 3g dongle.
The end result is that apps don't get updated, and become a prime target for exploitation. It's much less common for a linux user to be running a large number of outdated applications.
Re: Nice idea, but...
It has long been claimed that people won't understand or will dislike the linux package manager concept...
But those arguments are wearing a bit thin given that the two most popular smartphone and tablet platforms have copied the concept and been hugely successful.
Fact is the vast majority users much prefer having a single place where they can search for and easily download/install software and keep it up to date. It's far more convenient, not to mention safer faster and more reliable than fucking around with removable media or running the risk of downloading arbitrary binaries from potentially dodgy websites.
Re: Nice idea, but...
It's likely that your wifi wasn't supported by the version you initially installed, and some subsequent updates added a driver for it...
Similar problems occur on windows, chances are it won't support your wifi out of the box and it doesn't make it easy to find out who even manufactured your wifi card which you'd need to do before you can find the manufacturer website.
Generally when you get an OS preinstalled, it will already be configured appropriately whereas if you install it yourself there are often going to be problems with missing drivers, or worse - oem hardware which is *slightly* different to the generic versions of hardware based on the same chipsets and thus doesn't work with the standard drivers.
The biggest problem with linux is that it generally doesn't come preinstalled in its standard form, you don't hear of people having problems with android or chromeos devices, or any of the other myriad embedded devices which are linux based.
Doesn't the Linux kernel already support ARMv8? And most of the rest of the Android userland could be recompiled, or just used as-is for now since a 64bit kernel will have no problem running 32bit binaries.
Re: Reverse psychology
Only they won't simply not bother using SSL, they will try to find a more secure alternative instead...
NMap has always been a slow tool, and faster tools have existed for years... Google for `synscan', a stateless tcp port scanning tool... It just fires out packets and a second process waits for any responses that might be received.
While i disagree with what Google are doing here, considering how many times MS have done this kind of thing to others i am glad to see them getting a taste of their own medicine.
Google were always pretty clear (if you bothered to read the agreement before blindly agreeing to it) that the cost of the gmail service was that they would parse all of your email and use it to target advertising at you.
It has also always been clear that google is a us based company, and therefore beholden to us laws, and if you bothered to read up you would find that us law only applies to us citizens and non us citizens if they are located in the us. As such, the us laws which offer a right to privacy do not apply, and once your data has left your country and entered the us your own laws no longer apply to it either.
This information has always been available to anyone who ever signed up to gmail, so anyone who signed up has either decided they don't care, or blindly agreed to terms that they couldn't be bothered to take time to understand.
You can't provide an email service for free, the servers have to be paid for somehow... either indirectly through advertising, or directly via a subscription... some greedy providers may even use both methods. If you don't like the advertising model, find an email provider where you can pay for the service directly, or host a server yourself.
That's hardly surprising, the protocols outlook uses to talk to exchange (and back again) are not the sort of thing you want to be opening up over the internet... Such protocols are usually restricted to LAN use, or possibly over a VPN... And good luck getting a vpn client installed on windows rt.
- Vid Hubble 'scope scans 200,000-ton CHUNKY CRUMBLE ENIGMA
- Bugger the jetpack, where's my 21st-century Psion?
- Google offers up its own Googlers in cloud channel chumship trawl
- Interview Global Warming IS REAL, argues sceptic mathematician - it just isn't THERMAGEDDON
- Apple to grieving sons: NO, you cannot have access to your dead mum's iPad