7 posts • joined Tuesday 20th November 2007 21:46 GMT
It would be "King's Heath" if the Heath is owned by just one King.
It would be "Kings' Heath" if it is owned by more than one King.
Additionally, "Kings' Heath" could refer to a singular owner if, for example, the person in question is named "Kings".
The contraction of "King is" is, as you say, always "King's". The existential contraction for more than one King would be "Kings're".
Mine's the one with the leaves and pistol in the pocket.
As Cartman might say ...
Respect my securitah!
I was going to buy this game. Now I won't.
I am certain that this election result will have wide-ranging effects in many areas of life for people in the USA and throughout the world. Those effects are quite likely to include IT-related issues but this article does not cogently discuss or even wildly speculate about them.
So, which bank/building society is going to be the first to offer to change the account numbers and issue new cheque books + cards for all affected customers to prevent money being lifted from these (potentially) compromised accounts?
- World's OLDEST human DNA found in leg bone – but that's not the only boning going on...
- Lightning strikes USB bosses: Next-gen jacks will be REVERSIBLE
- Pics Brit inventors' GRAVITY POWERED LIGHT ships out after just 1 year
- Storagebod Oh no, RBS has gone titsup again... but is it JUST BAD LUCK?
- Two million TERRIBLE PASSWORDS stolen by malware attackers