16 posts • joined 19 Nov 2007
"Are you saying that the gormless cretin, that vandalised her car out of petty spite and jealousy, should be let off because her classic car didn't have a modern proximity alarm?"
No, people are saying - to extend your analogy - that he should pay for the repairs, but *not* for installing a modern proximity alarm that wasn't there in the first place.
But what does she mean?
Clearly she's a closet liberal.
I assume you mean "by and large". It's an old nautical term implying that a ship could sail into the wind ("by the wind") as well as when the wind was behind the ship (or "large").
It's a pretty common mistake, so as long as you don't say anything about intensive purposes I'll let you off.
Jeff Williams wrong?
Perhaps Mr. Williams should have examined the sample exploit more carefully before commenting?
I thought I recognised the name
...and not for any particularly good reason - Gregory D. Evans currently has pride-of-place at the top of attrition.org's charlatans list (http://attrition.org/errata/charlatan/gregory_evans/) and has been there for a while. The various claims compiled there make for interesting reading - basically, the guy appears to have serious truth issues.
"3.5 million CVs exposed"
"no CVs or other personal information was accessed"
...so which is it?
Er, not really, not since 2007 - these days it's just a command key. It doesn't have the apple logo on it.
Interesting - I now intend to pay my O2 contract off and switch back to Orange as Orange provides significantly better converage in my area - O2 barely manage 2G, and it drops out frequently; Orange have blanketed the area with 3G.
@Mectron, John Molloy, Geoffrey W
Oh for the love of Pete. I was going to stay out of this one, because Mac vs PC discussions always devolve into religeous flame wars, but really.
Geoffrey, you can't attack one side of an argument for making an ad-hom attack in response to an ad-hom attack. And yes, "idiots with a IQ in the lower single digit get a Mac" is an ad-hom attack, and it *is* grammatically incorrect. If (Mectron) you're going to insult me, please try to get it right.
John, he's right. And there's several better ways to point out the holes in Mectron's arguments; such as for example the fact that my Macbook's case is made of solid aluminium, presenting a rather more solid form-factor than the average Dell. Or the fact that a Mac *is* a personal computer, and is such is *part* of the competition.
Yes, I have a Macbook. However I'm typing this on my office desktop PC, which like my home desktop runs Windows. Vista here, W7RC at home. I'm also personally responsible for several Linux (mastly Debian, one Ubuntu) servers, so I feel sufficiently to say the following:
Windows historically presents a pretty bad user interface. This has been improved with W7 and Vista, although Vista screwed the pooch with UAC (which has been toned down in W7). The downside to that is that the old familiarity has gone away. Popular Linux window managers (both Gnome and KDE) make me grimace; other WMs tend to be insufficiently well-featured. OSX provides a wonderful UI - it is widely acknowledged that Apple are the masters at this - and being based on BSD it allows me to Get Shit Done(tm) in the same way that Linux does. However, yes, the hardware is overpriced.
Basically, it boils down to what you can afford. Windows is okay because it's familiar (up until recently, anyway) and is much better from a stibility perspective than it used to be; Linux is stable, powerful and very customiseable if you've got the time and inclination to learn; and OSX is stable at the cost of expensive hardware, powerful and very easy to use.
There. Now can we please learn to live and let live?..
"After that, there's an enterprise edition that provides 500,000 monthly page views for $50 per user and an unlimited edition that provides one million page views at $75 a user."
Presumably that's "unlimited" in the "actually, no, limited" sense then?
Daily Mail journalists
"a barren wasteland inhabited only by cockroaches and Daily Mail journalists"
...I can't help but feel that some part of that sentence is redundant.
Accurate as far as it goes
Of course, with Microsoft pushing heavy changes to both the Windows and Office interfaces, a "Windows skin" on a Linux window manager and a copy of OpenOffice actually provide more familiarity than new versions of Windows do. It's an anecdote I know, but my mother (the only typical user I have to support) is much happier with this setup than she was with Vista and Office 2007.
A proper drunkard types his late-night laments on IRC. And nobody understands them.
<^RaK^> athiue giy who lkills em all?
<^RaK^> fgtmop the insiden and wqsway
<^RaK^> tsrust my self with you
Oh, for the love of Pete
Why on Earth are people still doing these studies? What has been proved - conclusively - by several studies before is that people will quite happily tell a researcher a word that may or may not be their actual password in exchange for a reward.
Hell, I'd be more than happy to tell a researcher that my password was "scr3wball" in return for £5 worth of loot. It's not, of course, but how exactly are they going to know that?
@Paul Brain - I run AV on UNIX
Paul, you've not considered that Clam AV is often used to scan emails that will be read by clients on Windows machines. Clam doesn't just scan for UNIX-targetted viruses, y'know.