@Eddie Edwards
"Prevention of Terrierism Act!"
You owe me a keyboard, you mongrel!
842 publicly visible posts • joined 17 Nov 2007
I read that as "John Thomas" which would be in light of his bullshit, more appropriate.
Information on individuals should be classified as the private property of that individual with no implicit consent given to commercial or state entities to use it, ever. If explicit consent for the use of sensitive information is given, that consent should be explicitly renewed after a given period or destroyed by default. Non-compliance punishable by death, or worse.
.NET in non-windows isn't silly and mono ( from what I've seen) does a bang-up job of providing what every woman wants, but rarely gets - good interop.
Now as for the JVM, if one could target a half-decent language at it, then maybe it wouldn't be such a eye-piercing knob of a platform, but as it is, oh well.
Quite right, the modelling similarities are many-fold, and there is a case to be made for throwing computing-power at some of the problems.
However "The weather" is subject to limits imposed by immutables like the laws of thermodynamics, etc. In economics they can and do remove these limits at will - like say, abandoning the gold standard and imposing fiat currency, or invoking an arbitrary "utility function" when results go out of band for example. It's not "science", it's voodoo, and it is a reasonable baseline position to regard anyone who describes economics as a "science" as a fucking charlatan.
"As a note, however, I am voting for McCain/Palin in the hopes that they win the election and the leftists/Marxists of the world will be so upset that they die of burst aneurysms."
As good a reason for the removal of your franchise as anything. What this has to do with "leftists" escapes me - these GOP idiots are not "sceptic septics" as you seem to imply, rather they are oblivious to evidence-based reasoning and logic.
Creationism and other religious-inspired pap are not "theories" because they are not evidence-led and their deductive conclusion is also their axiom. Of course what these twats really want is to discredit the scientific method completely so that they can punt their sophistry as truth and turn critical thinking into political dissent. That's what makes them (and in turn you, as their anonymous sponsor) a danger to themselves and to normal people as well. Leftists my arse.
"that it isn't his job to interpret the law, it's the judiciary's."
.... But it's the CPS's job to bring a prosecution. The lickspittle plod bsatards didn't even hand it over to them. Will someone please rid the UK of these corrupt wnakers before people have to get violent to protect their rights?
"There are few things as funny as liberals picking on a crippled man, especially one who sustained his condition while being tortured."
ISTR He was tortured after being captured bombing farmers half way round the World in the Second Indochina War. Tough titty, John-boy. Now if the Vietcong had kidnapped him in Colorado and tortured him in Taiwan.....
"The report recommends that investment should be encouraged by an array of initiatives, including establishing standards so local groups can press ahaead with their own deployments."
Yeah, right. S'pose it'll create a whole new "market" for companies to supply "connectivity" between several hundred incompatible fibre networks. Preemptive Balkanisation - just great.
You would never get away with vicious commentary like "Not the Nine O'Clock News" and "Spitting Image" nowadays. We have PC, the Septics have litigation - same shit result.
Being arrested for "Urinating in a public convenience" FTW!
Mine's the one with the lyrics of "I've never met a nice South African" in the pocket.
Aside from the drubbing you have received from subsequent comments, please bear in mind that Saakashvili is a bona fide Stalinist lunatic that apparently thinks nothing of shelling civilians with impunity - not to mention that much of his opposition has died in very mysterious circumstances. Just because he is in the pay of the Bush mafia doesn't mean he shouldn't be committed to an asylum.
Russia had a far better legal case for attacking Georgia than the US had for attacking Iraq or Bombing Serbia. Just because so-called "democracies" decide international behavioral norms don't apply to them is neither here nor there - the precedent was set with Kosovo and Iraq. Those who set the precedent can choke on it as far as I'm concerned - they've just allowed Russia to play the same game, and Russia knows there's fuck-all (aside whinge like the stinking hypocrites they are) that the "democracies" can do about it.
In that Chechnya is a de jure _and_ de facto part of the Russian Federation. (like Kosovo was of Serbia). That principle didn't stop Clinton bombing targets all over Serbia proper to let Albania annex Kosovo in stages. Furthermore, I suspect very, very few Albanians were in possession of US citizenship. Of course with Chechnya there will be no Western intervention.
Anybody with an iota of sense could see the malicious intent from countries like Germany and the US when precipitating the breakup of Yugoslavia and later carving up of Serbia, and the implications this could have for former Soviet republics.
SO has a greater case for secession from Georgia than Kosovo had from Serbia. It had a independence referendum that the same powers that pathetically fell over themselves to recognize an independent Kosovo didn't recognise, This incarnation of its borders are very new and included a secessionist minority on creation, and SO has had de facto autonomy within Georgia.
That the Russians are now playing the Western powers' vile game in Georgia can't really come as a surprise, can it? - after all you took the game to them, by threatening its borders and dismembering its allies. Tune into the same channel for updates on the Baltic states as the Russian minorities get emboldened.
"Nope, not if you use the Rolex brand name, logo and any other registered trade marks on it. And not if the design of the Rolex has been patented.
Similarly, it would be illegal if I made copies of my favourite CD and gave them away to my friends - or posted the same music on t'internet for anyone to download."
FAIL for not being able to tell the difference between copyright, trademark and patent legislations.
I tend to gravitate to the idea that copyright infringement _is_ theft - theft of _copyright_, but that copyright - not being a natural property right - is quite correctly not afforded the same protections as those property rights protected by larceny laws. Others disagree, but I don't give a monkey's.
As wildly off-topic as this is, I'll bite.
"Perhaps you could also elaborate as to the "30-year-long Babylonian atrocity" you refer to so I might reply?"
I'm so sorry, I erroneously said "30", when I meant "50".
We can go back all the way to 1959 and 1963 with your sponsorship of the pan-Arabists and Ba'athist assassination attempts against Qasim and the following purge against the communists that enabled Qasim to control Iraq. Assassination of a foreign head of state is about as clear-cut an act of war as it gets, and it destabilised Iraq for decades. You were complicit.
Fast forward to 1980 and your pet CIA-boy Hussein is in power, blatantly violating international law and borders, gassing Persians and annexing land all with your approval and support, to 1985 when you are arming both sides of the conflict to help you finance the destabilisation of Central America, to 1988 when he gassed the Kurds and your state apparatus helped him blame the Persians and Reagan had given him $40 billion in "aid". You paid for this. Amnesty International are howling at you for supporting the bastard, but they're just pinkos.
Don't even get me started on the starvation sanctions of the 1990s and the past 5 years' rather successful attempt to hand most of Iraq to the Persians on a plate. (Of course now you are going to have to fuck Iran over too).
Any more, take it to email. It's got bugger all to do with John Glenn.
"When it comes to charitable support, Mr Heffernan's arguement was much more relevent than yours. Are you stating that Luxembourg contributes more annually than the US? Or are you dividing it per capita?"
Of course I'm díviding it per capita - "personally" should have given a clue. It's easy to be a big-hitter when you're playing around with a massive economy and several hundred million people but your aid contributions per capita and as percentage of GDP aren't enough to justify bombastic claptrap like this.
Furthermore, few outside the US and the military bases you have in 159 countries would concur that the US "steps up to the plate" in most cases for anything except it's own interests. Of course there are exceptions to this, supporting heinous dictators and terrorists to the costs of billions while Amnesty International were being lambasted as pinkos for calling you on it not being among them.
There is a small town not 50km from where I live that has taken more refugees from your 30-year-long Babylonian atrocity than the UK and US put together - that is "stepping up to the plate".
"The US, and it's citizens, are the most charitable on the planet."
As a US citizen you personally donate 1/50th of the amount that a citizen of that mighty global power Luxembourg does, so pull the other one.
And no, the $500 billion you have "spent" bulldozing Mesopotamia doesn't count.