That is all.
259 posts • joined 9 Mar 2007
Would you look at that, an actual case involving intellectual property that can actually be called theft - copies were actually removed from someone. But apparently that's fine.
what about just making the no man's land left & right a pale pale grey? make my screen a little bit less of a search light? give me a little bit less of a tan whilst reading?
the image at the top of each article could be presented at about 20% of its current size. one of those rare situations where css actually considered the use case during design of the specifications, something float was actually designed for instead of all the contortions is actually used for in practice, i think the coder will probably jump at the chance. let there be some text down the side of it, let some of the article show below it.
im not too bent out of shape about it over all. the content is still there and its really not much if any more difficult to get to.
What do people think that HTTPS is going to hide? These are static pages!! The "metadata" is still out there, what do you think you get out of obscuring the content when all someone has to do is follow the link you followed to see what you saw? It's useful for something like Facebook where what you are looking at is customized to you and possibly private, but here would it not simply be a waste of processing power??
"Offence? Should be offense."
Only in Canada's pants.
Simplified spelling and inexplicable units of measurement.
To be expected to find something else to do besides lay on the couch and watch TV, at CHRISTMAS TIME OF ALL TIMES!!!! What, spend time with family?!?! The horror!! Was there a statistically significant upswing in domestic disturbances? lol
I will pay. I will pay admission for a live concert. I will pay for authentic collectable physical media with inserts and artwork. I will pay for various other authentic collectable paraphernalia.
If a friend lends me a copy, and I pay for my own blank media and my own duplicating equipment, and make myself my own copy, I'm sorry but there are no fees coming out of me for that. Extrapolate out to all the other ways to make copies, my concern remains at the same level. Make war on me for that and I'm sorry but you will lose.
I will pay for access to a well curated collection with features.
Them's the breaks. Artists and all your various hangers on: figure out what to do with that. Or don't. Whatever. Quit your fucking whining already, I might find that yes I actually can somehow care less.
"I want convictions."
How about the death penalty? Revoke their corporate charter.
If yourself and Mr. Andrew "limits operators’ ability to manage networks and recover costs" Orlowski ever physically cross paths, would it come to fisticuffs?
"Canadians a bunch of bootlegging movie thieves"
They seem to think that we should be concerned about this or something? lol
I think Netflix should structure their pricing differently. $8.99 for Netflix, unless you use one of the ISPs who are double dipping then it's $12.99. Pass the extortion costs on to the appropriate customer. I sure don't want any of my subscription money going to prop up any of these monopoly dinosaurs, how is that fair?
So, reasons for the occupation of Iraq:
1. To eliminate the imminent threat of the use of weapons of mass destruction. Nope, there actually weren't any, so let's not talk about that.
2. For oil. The fact that Iraq was abandoning the use of the USA dollar for trading oil is just conspiracy theory, so let's not talk about that or pipelines and whatnot.
3. Because Iraq was ruled with an iron fist by a dictator who brutally crushed all opposition to him. Let's talk about this, but only if we separate out the reasons from the events???
The events were that we crushed all opposition to our rule 10 times more brutally than Saddam ever dreamed of doing. So yes, if we leave out what actually happened, with a huge dose of selective amnesia you could maybe feel pretty good about ourselves. But not me man, sorry.
> But all of this is off topic.
This is a story about a drug dealer, and OP mentioned the Islamic State, it seemed to me like the right place to post the link.
> I am not one for war or for interfering in other peoples' affairs but there is a chance here to take action and prevent a greater problem while it is still in it's (relative) infancy.
That's exactly the attitude that got us to this point. What kind of Islamic State do you think there would be today if bunker buster bombs and drone launched hellfire missiles hadn't rained down on Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya, Palestine, Yemen, Somalia, etc over the last few decades? Now more of the same will somehow solve the "problem", this time for suresies? I'm sorry but that's fucking madness.
> Unchecked it will very likely spread quite alarmingly.
Is it too late already? That's what has worried me the most, especially since the massive <AppropriateWordDoesNotExist> that was the invasion and occupation of Iraq, that our chickens would finally come home to roost and it would no longer be an issue of guys like us typing our #FirstWorldProblems scholarly internet discussions on the pros and cons of the deaths of hundreds of thousands of other people over there, but being able to look out our windows and see it in our streets like we've made happen for so many people around the world for so long. I'm scared we will keep this shit up until we actually are facing an existential threat and have no choice but to actually defend ourselves, as opposed to these idiotic adventures over there we keep on somehow convincing ourselves are reasonable ideas. Why wouldn't these people band together and exact vengeance? What would you do? What will we do? Fuck.
Mexican drug cartels are worse than ISIL
Western obsession with the Islamic State is fueled more by bigotry than any genuine assessment of risk or atrocities
Eureka! You want to keep the authorities out of your digital bits, just sprinkle them with "trade secrets".
No kidding. Pretty much what I was going to post.
"Bristow expressed concerns that US and UK pullout from Afghanistan might lead to an increase in the volume of heroin reaching Britain’s streets."
No, that happened when you went in, idiot.
Let's say you make a home movie and make it available on the internet. No matter where you are in the world, or where the internet servers involved are located, the long arm of the law of the USA may reach out for you.
-if it includes any unauthorized music in the background or even just a TV on in the background it can be censored, people can have civil suits filed against them, and any internet services involved my also be in trouble.
-if it includes anything of a sexual nature, depending on the age of the participants and the various ages of consent in various jurisdictions, and depending on the specific acts involved and the various standards of decency in various jurisdictions, it can be censored, and people can be charged with crimes, and any internet services involved may also be in trouble.
-if it includes anything of a politically sensitive nature (say advocating for communism in the past, or advocating for islamism in the present, or even just environmentalism and/or anti capitalism), it can be censored, people can be "interviewed" by security forces and from there anything can happen to them, and any internet services involved may also be in trouble.
Internet services being in trouble can be anything from fines, having domain names taken, payment processing ended, physical servers taken, other assets frozen, right up to criminal charges against staff and management or even rendition or even assassination.
The USA can't go on about freedom of speech while any of the above is true. And if it is claimed that these are reasonable restrictions on freedom of speech (which I don't necessarily entirely disagree with), then why are white power websites advocating Nazi ideals considered fine when they are blatantly illegal in other countries. Once you go down the road of saying that some content should not be allowed, and the USA is quite a way down that road already (along with pretty much every country), then where do you draw the line, and just whose laws can be considered valid.
It is obviously not the case that the USA has Freedom(tm) and other countries don't. It is only a question of degree.
the first rule of commentardery is you do not speak of downvotes
and furthermore... yeah never mind.
"Eurotrash" "chickenass" "anti-cop idiot" "moron"
It's pretty clear you have already made up your mind and convicted me before I ever had the chance to let you know even a single thing about me.
Some light reading for you regarding my "version of reality":
Our streets might not be quite as psychotic as yours, but I don't really think it's fair for you to say "you spout off about something you have NO IDEA about."
"puts his life on the line every day"
it would be much easier to swallow a line like that if it wasnt a case of simply executing someone at the first sign of the slightest danger, could maybe still give the benefit of the doubt if it wasnt the umpteenth case with similar circumstances, could possibly still even get a little sympathy if any previous case had ever resulted in anything besides total impunity.
but no, so no.
is terrorist getting all used up? now we need to resurrect the marxist boogeyman too in order to keep up the emphasis?
"Marxist <illegal immigrant pedophile welfare case music pirate environmentalist> terror gang"
there spruced it up for you. copylefted, have at er.
Can you point to a form of society that has lasted forever?? I hate to break it to you but capitalism always fails eventually too. Actually that was quite enjoyable ;-) Just because there are a few capitalist countries that have managed to precariously teeter along to the current day balancing on the top of pyramid scheme empires built on imaginary fiat money commanded by misguided theories about capital based on measures of gross domestic product that have almost no basis in reality, well that doesn't guarantee that you and yours won't be picking through refuse for scraps to eat and fighting off your neighbours amid the decaying riot burnt rubble of your cities within the next six months.
*by unlimited they mean limited to what this particular corporation is currently licensed to offer you online - "IN YOUR AREA", or approximately up to 1% of what was available on Napster, for $20/mo when other services range up to $12/mo.
Brilliant geniuses!!1!!! World domination ahoy!! lol
"he talks about a nicer and fairer world. but he has some money! that he got from corporations!! and he isnt living the amish life!!! obviously entirely nonsense qed. ps - anyone who disagrees with me is hopelessly retarded."
yeeeeessssss. thank you very much for that valuable addition to the discussion.
not just that there are a ridiculous number of prisoners, but the conditions with the rape culture and the violence and the solitary confinement and the slave labour.
the no mans land of the usa - mexico border where hundreds of people die every year.
the mercenary drug war fought all around the world.
the secret no fly lists and the border crossing rejections for any minor criminal record like marijuana possession or being involved in a protest, or even for just having spoken your opinion online or writing the wrong book or saying the wrong thing at the wrong conference.
the censorship. the compliant media. the crushing of unions. the privatization of government services into corporate hands. the tent cities and squats and renting a parking space to live in your car and the foreclosed neighbourhoods. the rising protests and the rising repression of them. the desperate rush to exploit every last resource.
get all that sorted already eh ;-)
"Global warming is real – it is man-made and it is an important problem."
Can't find the consensus with all these agreeing scientists drowning it out with all their agreeing.
"Why is hiway 63 so terrifying?... a problem everyone is aware of and one that the entire province agrees must be dealt with" "I agree with you that the economic hit of oil production tapering off is indeed coming" "Alberta has made mistakes, sure. We've let companies get away with some really bad stuff, damn right." "I'm no fan or friend of the tar sands at all. I think they are disgusting and wastefull and we need to be moving away from them sooner rather than later."
OK! Let's be pals then! :-)
"The issue I have with your pointless blitherings is that they have no connection to reality whatsoever."
Wait... what? My only issue was with you saying all problems would be solved if only we could overcome the mighty power of the evil hippies and put in a nuclear power plant. I said it would still be a filthy mess, and you respond basically saying I should be put up against the wall for treason for daring to suggest that it's not all a Shangri-La Garden of Eden full of happy smiling workers with flowers in their hard hats dancing around with the beavers and the caribou who are breathlessly waiting for the huge improvements to their environment once reclamation makes everything better than ever.
I never said it should be stopped, and I don't think it should be. I definitely think it could be slowed down, that it's expanding way faster than the infrastructure needed to make life liveable for the workers, and that it's going ahead leaving problems like tailings to be figured out by future generations. I'm not even against a nuclear power plant, I agree that would be much better than burning coal, I just don't agree that a different source of electricity is the magic bullet. I'm not even really against pipelines, safer and more efficient than rail (Lac Megantic) or road (Lemon Creek). But I don't trust the people in charge any further than I could chuck one of their 400 ton dump trucks, and every time anyone says anything like "there could never be a spill" or "we're doing the best we can for the environment" I feel the need to speak up. Never heard of Mike Hudema, but now that I read the Wikipedia page about him he seems like a principled and committed person. I glossed over the political realities because I don't live there, so I can't vote there, so I couldn't care less who is the nuttiest. I don't expect that my posting here will do anything besides give a non rose tinted alternative viewpoint to anyone reading. And take a conversation about Obama meeting Putin in Russia way way way off topic ;-)
" In fact, it has been estimated that we are using less than 10% of the possible extraction capacity given the supplies of equipment, manpower and the traffic density of hiway 53."
You mean highway *63*? Do you know how many nicknames that bit of road has that include the word DEATH? Of course wages are high, conditions are terrible, and do you know how much it costs to rent a leaky garden shed to sleep in up in Fort McMurray, if you're lucky enough to find one available? Do you know that production is planned to double or triple this decade? I guess they could go faster if they started conscripting workers and housing them in tents, if there were enough tents? And you must be a special kind of stupid if you truly believe that the companies will put everything back the way they found it, even if huge amounts of taxpayer subsidized cheap energy was available and we count burying the toxic metals along with the nuclear waste as a job well done. And then what? That economic hit you exaggerate is coming any way you slice it, the stuff isn't endless. The bigger we build it the harder it will be when it runs out.
But I'll leave it at that since I've had about enough immature bullshit like this from a corporate-cock sucking spaz who knows nothing about me: "bullshit, plug it" "Read my fucking post before gnawing on yet more of your leg" "rampant anti-corporatism" "flat out wrong and deeply misinformed" "completely fucking ineffective and worthless" "ranting-by-eco-pamphlet" "no actual understanding" etc
BC Hydro will build Site C on the Peace River, as far as you can get from the Pacific, as close as you can get to Alberta. Helpful. (Really, the Peace region of BC should be given to Alberta, meanwhile the Alaskan panhandle should be part of BC, along with the rest of the Fraser Valley - Bellingham and the ridiculous Point Roberts. Soon the USA will be so weak we can just annex them like they did to so many others, but better to wait until they are so poor that they beg us to simply purchase them ;-) Also Vancouver Island should be its own province. Once that's sorted we can start working on the Cascadian Confederacy and get out from under the yoke of all those idiots thousands of kilometres away in Ottawa and Warshington. But I digress...)
The power used to melt the oil out of the bitumen is a huge problem yes, but like I said even if the power is beamed down from orbiting fusion plants we are still left with digging up thousands of square kilometres of precious boreal forest (you say muskeg??) using heavy - very very very heavy have you seen some of those things! - diesel guzzling machinery, combining that with trillions of litres of precious fresh water, and and turning it all into highly toxic "ponds" that you can see from space. Oh and cash, there's the rub I guess.
"Of course, it's far easier to simply demand a province - and frankly most of a nation - live in abject poverty" - I'm sorry but that is retarded. I agree with a lot of what you have to say, but saying that we will all live malnourished in stick huts if we don't exploit the oil sands as fast as corporately possible is seriously retarded.
The tar sands would still be filthy even if all the required power plants were run on organic unicorn dung instead of coal. Nuclear would not fix it.
That's why we call it Mordor.
"tired reflex and shrieking"
I WANT TO BELIEF
seriously, i would take 10 extra edons for one less matt bryant. hes like amanfrommars but less amusing.
the quotes are in the wrong spot, it should be like this:
doesn't "collect" any cell phone locational information
kids these days are making glow in the dark pigs, growing human ears on the backs of rats, building pocket supercomputers, virtual reality systems, wiring up a nervous system for the planet, building space stations and planning trips to the moon and mars.
kids these days are getting their heads cracked at protests against the wto, the war in iraq, the g8, the 1%, permitted free speech zones, kettled up into mass holding pens, denied permission to travel.
i wouldnt call kids these days docile.
kids will (hopefully) always end up laughing at whatever primitive clubs the old fogeys come up with to try and control them. things are getting strange for sure, but dont lose sight of the fact that nothing lasts forever. there are ways to tap into relatively recent innovations in communications, but faster and faster that will change. im doubtful that usa intelligence will ever again have as much access to global communications as they do currently.
but should Canada shoulder some of the "blame" here? We built one of the largest navies in the world during WWII, and we sank dozens of U-boats, and not a lot of people seem to be aware. North Atlantic Run and U-Boat Hunters by Marc Milner are fascinating reading. Cheers, carry on then :-)
"How exactly did that turn out again?
Oh right the library was a central depository for all the world's information, meaning noone felt the need to independently keep track of it, and when it burned it set humanity back a century."
Sort of like Napster?
"And yet when REM tried an experiment in voluntary pricing they got well and truly reamed - by their fans yet."
Radiohead released their album In Rainbows with voluntary pricing for the digital version. The physical CD that came out afterwards was still a chart topper.
Nine Inch Nails released their album The Slip under a non-commercial share-alike license, and still sold physical CD copies.
Beck released his "album" Song Reader exclusively as sheet music, obviously giving up royalties as he explicitly encourages everyone to play the songs themselves.
Some artists are experimenting, and I think it's fabulous. There's no guarantee that just because you create art it will make you rich. Just because one artist wasn't wildly successful with a particular approach does not mean that another artist couldn't find a way to make it work well. These are heady days, and we are still figuring out how the world will work beyond the inevitable demise of yesterday's culture hoarders. GAME ON! 8D
We've had them in Canada for years, not sure what you mean by recently?
because its always sunny in doucheville
Seriously. "Dabbled"? My Mastercards have been PayPass enabled for years now. I almost exclusively use Interac, but I'm pretty sure that almost every terminal I've seen for years has accepted them.
"Since its national launch in 1994, Interac Direct Payment has become so widespread that, since 2001, more transactions in Canada were completed using debit cards than cash."
Up till when you can get your domestic fusion power plant like you get your fridge and electronics are got by the gallon and painted onto everything and the internet is a global full spectrum wireless hum with everything everywhere boosting the signal, well then we will look pretty silly with all our our utility poles (firewood?) and enormous piles of hazardous waste.
At current monthly subscription rates that must have been almost $0.25 worth of service we each lost there, no joke if they keep that up the whole economy will soon grind to a screeching halt! One less option for ignoring friends and family, on Christmas of all days when you all know we need it most!! Think of the children!!!
Wii would not start Netflix. Could look at the website on the pc, could not get account details to come up.