32 posts • joined Thursday 15th November 2007 14:36 GMT
Cameraphones aren't much cop as cameras anyway
Tiny lenses and tiny sensors will give you crap pictures. That's a limitation of the laws of physics. Other phones might have better kit than the iPhone but can any of them replace even a cheap compact camera?
All cameraphones are equally convenient and no more. No point trying to find the cream of the crap.
Drop in the ocean
Still, the bureaucrats need to keep busy somehow.
AMOS with a GUI already exists - one of its original programmers developed it. Significantly more complex with Scratch but then it's not designed specifically for beginners/kids.
But on the subject of Scratch, anything that gets people young or old interested in programming is good in my book. Talented, impressionable kids need the same kind of exposure the rest of us got in the 80s/early 90s to stave off the Java-drinking code monkey dregs.
Programmers that give a damn about a good language to work with purposely avoid PHP.
The ones that don't care will obviously be more than happy with PHP, especially with all those code samples to copy/paste.
I'll bet it's easier to offshore PHP work...
One only has to ask them what they think produced the oil they fuel their cars and heat their homes with.
Answer lies in the grave...
All very pretty but
How long will the screen last for before it loses quality or breaks down altogether? Dead pixels?
I wouldn't be the first to dump £3k. Luckily for Sony I can think of some who would.
Not time for kernel to pop
As far as I can tell there isn't much wrong with the Vista kernel other than the DRM - which is a good thing if it stops people buying DRM content. If Microsoft strip out all of the crapware in Windows 7 (yes, you too, Aero) and make the OS itself better to work with, I might actually want to upgrade this time...
We already know that lossless audio on decent hardware = good.
iTunes sell medium-quality tracks and the iPod has poor quality earbuds. This is what the rant is about.
You obviously don't have a golden eye :)
Company tries to stamp on others' rights and fails
In a better society this wouldn't be newsworthy. Oh well - at least the world hasn't gone to pot just yet.
It's all fun and games until you're a victim
There are lots of idiots around who will whinge because they think they deserve everything now and have no patience. Good luck keeping them away. If you have a website like this you'll get that kind of user, and anyone who's been on the internet 5 minutes will know this.
What's amusing is that one 'hater' had the cheek to say a lot of people will be leaving the site because of this. Well, they will one way or another, but what's more important is that I wouldn't be surprised if *any* kind of criticism over the whole thing gets you kicked off the site. Apparently just ignoring them for a few more days was too much for the admins to handle. For the people still left on the site, watch what you say or you might be kicked off in a future temper tantrum.
Faceparty has millions of users and all their personal details, AND it's taking people's money - just a hobby? More like a failed business. Grow up, stop defecating on your users and live in the real world like the rest of us.
You'll give NASA ideas
As soon as they realise they can profit from it, you'll get Hubble Plans... including one of the following for free every month:
25 picture messages
60 minutes off-peak calls
If you go for the free calls, then among the silence of space you may faintly hear boffins laughing all the way to the bank...
Not for having hacking tools, maximum sentence on that is 12 months, or a fine.
In any case the law says you have to intend to gain unauthorised access with it before you're guilty. Not as worrying as you may think, I'd be more worried if I was making programs specifically designed to break security though.
Methinks it's the round socket to the right. Passive power brick PSU is fine by me!
So what about the genuine people who don't qualify for legal aid and don't have the cash to pay legal fees and have a roof over their heads?
The culture is the problem, not the mechanism that facilitates it.
Good for him
Good for him for doing something. Pity he didn't spend his time on more practical work like a 14 year old I know - but that'll come soon.
The real question is, has he actually learnt anything other than this 'ethical hacking' business in this past year? They teach you all that stuff at school for a good reason y'know.
Chicken and egg
Why is filesharing popular? So people can get music they wouldn't pay for/can't pay for.
Why can't the labels lower prices/improve legal download quality? Because they think filesharers have eaten away at their profit margins.
Unfortunately until they realise how to monetise the filesharers by giving them high quality, easy to find, cheap music (perish the thought) they will stick to their "home taping is killing music" mantra and keep their heads in the sand while revenue plummets.
Ironic that legal download sites fail to give me 'audiophile' quality DRM-free music that I actually *want*, yet mp3sparks does it without skipping a heartbeat. Well done record labels.
Java sucks, jar, jar, jar :)
Incidentally I also liked the article and its predecessors - it's good to have a refresh of times past and note how it may have influenced things today. (or not)
I think the Internet is already a 'ping dynasty'...