Hear bloody hear!
1432 posts • joined 14 Nov 2007
Hear bloody hear!
... for endless repeating signals from the past.
Never has a problem with me mailing truecrypt containers to people, using the subject "call me for decryption instructions" - so maybe some mailserver just objected to the .zip extension?
For a brief moment, I felt like I held the world's most powerful remote control in my hand.
I had almost exactly the same experience. Had not read in the local rag that the council were going to switch off the streetlights. Went out to walk the dog at 10 seconds to midnight and tripped on my extension lead on the path - and all the lights in the town went out!
... knew that it was failing from the grapevine - for goodness' sake, it was even in Private Eye - how can they claim to not have known?
... that my clients know that I can "do stuff" before I risk turning up to the office on rollerblades. I still wear a suit - haven't had too many tumbles with sartorial consequences - but I'm not a hugely ambitious skater.
A young woman who is sexier before she's supposed to be than she is when she is.
No; I was expecting a nice infographic.
If you want to sell laptops, stop pissing about with ultra low res "HD" screens and give us something worth upgrading to. It's not the only reason the tablets are kicking the arse of laptops, but I'm sick of seeing all new laptops being announced with last decade's screens.
peredur: "... or perhaps redirect to a really boring site"
More boring than FB? Last I looked, PylonOfTheMonth was no longer being maintained.
James51: "The whole 'they have poor people but have a space programme too, bad kitty' arguement always annoys me."
It will hold less sway when we stop giving them aid, in about 2015.
... whilst still laughing my ████ off.
... this is weird: we are talking of a minimum of 35+ transactions a week and it took 3 years for them to cotton on? I also really cannot understand how the approvals system could be set up so that the only limit applied was a ceiling on individual transactions. If I were a shareholder I would also be wanting to hold some of the senior management accountable for this - are we sure it didn't require someone higher up to look the other way?
... just ban crime, then nobody will have to go to prison in the first place.
"And so it goes. I'm generally happy with a Boss who either wants to know nothing about the hardware and is happily ignorant OR with a Boss who wants to know every little technical detail and is able to provide intelligent insight into our activities, but a Boss who wants to know everything and yet still be ignorant is pushing the envelope as far as my patience concerned."
To enable one to select appropriate employment, all organizations should have X:Y:Z ratings (like NPK values for fertilizer) to measure these three categories.
... from Orange. It was the proceedings of a disciplinary sacking of a member of staff for breaching a customer's privacy. It contained full details of the customer who complained, the staff member concerned and transcripts of several very sensitive meetings. Unbelievable.
"It isn't definitely going to happen, but there is a definite chance that it will". Sounds a bit light on information to me, because I don't think anyone would claim there is a zero chance of it happening. If he'd quantified it, even very approximately, it would have been more useful.
It's for cleaning parabolic antennas
We all used to know what 'trolling' meant and it did not mean making threats of aggression, sexual or otherwise.
Conflating the two is a serious mistake, not entirely dissimilar to the current conflation of the issues surrounding "sexual material that children might see" with "sexual material in which children are seen": the former arises from the law of unintended consequences (of having a free and open Internet); the latter is a hideous crime already covered by existing legislation. Nevertheless, in both cases, some people attempt to use the existence of the absolutely indefensible latter as a reason to take draconian against Internet freedom, by banging on about the former as if it is somehow related.
One of the lessons in Orwell's 1984 is that by altering language it is possible to create tramlines of thought which are very difficult to leave, and therefore those who control the language control - to a large extent - the minds: threatening someone with rape is trolling; threatening someone with rape is a terrible thing; trolling is a terrible thing; trolling should be banned. Of course no-one should be convinced by such invalid enthymematic logic, but the sad fact is that many voters cannot even dissect such arguments - and if the popular media continue to refuse to help them in this regard or, as in this case, actively assist the political class in maintaining the confusion, we are all going to suffer.
El Reg has an agendum? But surely if agenda can be usefully translated as 'to-do list' then it can also be singular - I have a to-do list. I'm pretty sure established English usage means 'an agenda' is acceptable now, even if it wouldn't have been for the Romans.
... job blow?
If Starbucks could just look after my internet and power requirements, I'd be happy to make my own coffee --- as long as I was allowed to turn the roaster off when I wanted, rather than burning the beans for hours, as per policy.
I came here to say the same thing. It's significant when politicians say stuff like that because it either shows that they are tragically stupid, or that they think we all are - either of which being sad state of affairs for an elected representative.
"If there are lots of other tablets selling, I don't know what they're being used for."
If I want the mobile version of a website I'll ask for it in the URL and don't want it assumed on the basis of my user agent string, which is consequently set to masquerade as a desktop. Maybe I'm not the only one?
... I'd be focussing on all those areas where being restricted to 2D can be problematic - modelling tools such as Blender and some of the game level creation kits (like Bethesda's GECK).
I completely agree that pedestrian walkways and cycle paths should not have so much horseshit on them that you cannot easily walk or cycle on them - which is what you appear to be suggesting. But it's difficult to take that seriously if you think horse shit is more offensive than dog shit - surely you can't be serious?
A person riding a horse, although they should avoid areas where droppings will cause a problem, can absolutely not be expected to clean up! What do you suggest ... get off, scoop it into a giant rucksack and get back on? A reasonable size horse drops several kg per hour, cannot safely be expected to stand quietly unless tied - and also may not be that easy to get back on if you aren't near a mounting block.
If you have a problem with the horses producing the "obstacles", have a word with the riders about taking a different route. Suggesting they poop-scoop (except within about 50m of the yard gates) is likely to fall on deaf ears, for a very good reason.
Ceci n'est pas une pipe?
I'm surprised that single DES was still considered acceptable recently enough to be in cards like this - IS2R that 3DES was being advanced in the late 1990s as a result of single DES being considered vulnerable (although, IIRC, that was mainly because the key length was two short).
- maybe a different format (IRC chat, G+ hangout etc) would be a useful way for a few of us to get together and thrash out a few ideas?
I'd be tempted to try something like this - you can do one old windows machine at a time.
What I said was we need to be able to start working on it. Not that we need to be working on it, just that some of the laws forbidding automatic control of brake and steering need to be relaxed for us to make cars even safer.
Driverless cars will, of course cause accidents. But the bar has been set very low by human drivers. AI cars do not need to me very much safer before they are saving hundreds of lives per year.
I don't care how brilliant you think you are at driving - an automatic warm-body-detected-autobrake would require no actual AI worth speaking of. But it could brake a car from 40 to 20mph in the time that a human would require to see the person, move the foot from the throttle to the brake, and begin to press on it. It would be stopping the car even before a top-gun fighter pilot could have reacted, let alone Joe Average Driver.
I see this legislation as opening up the way for increasing automation of driving - it doesn't have to go immediately to fully driverless in all circumstances, but we need to be able to start working towards it.
"Anyway, I drive an old but high end BMW (bangernomics yay!) and a similar spec Audi. I let people out at junctions just to confuse them."
Me (although in a little A3 cab) too ! I stopped for a cyclist yesterday and he looked *really* confused. My wife pictured him at the cafe where all the MAMILs (middle-aged-men-in-lycra) hang out: "Hey this Audi stopped for me on a single track road and waited for me to pass" Chorus: "No! Don't be stupid, what do you take us for? Have you been drinking? .. etc."
You may have hit the nail on the head - the demographic for identical watches is probably the same as the one which wears Star Trek costumes to parties....
Plaintiff wins, gets costs & possibly some damages
Plaintiff loses, pays own costs, may have to pay other sides costs, but not necessarily.
Plaintiff judged such a fuckwit that they have to pay other side's costs + massive fine for wasting courts time.
We have the same problem here (in a less extreme form) where no-win, no-fee suits against public organisations such as the NHS are effectively risk free, and where the costs of settling are less than the costs of going to court the organisations just swallow the bill. Which means the taxpayers do.
"How long will it take me to securely erase that many hard disks using the Guttman method?"
Even Guttman would say that this is irrelevant (used to be here: www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/secure_del.html but it's not loading today). One or two passes of random overwriting would be fine. Of course it would take you far too long to extract the disks, load them into DBAN stations and queue them all through sequentially.
So - don't do it! Before unplugging a desktop from the power and the network to cart off to the store room, boot from a DBAN USB stick and leave it chugging on the desktop. The machines should be wiped before they even leave the users desks.
"Complexity is irrelvant in passwords,what's important is length."
What's important is the number of bits of entropy in the password (although I guess you could say that's the length when expressed in binary). I reckon your second password counts as about 60 bits. Written English has only 1-3 bits of entropy per character, so there's a good chance your passwords pretty similar in strength - it's certainly not definitely the case that the password you say is better really is the better one.
... I don't know where you're based so your pint is virtual.
... those single column displays? A single column of rapidly switched, very bright LEDs that worked through persistence of vision. You looked directly at it and saw a single thin column of sparkling red points, but then moved your head or eyes and you could see the word SMIRNOFF spelled out on your retina.
Did I just dream this? Or was it done with lasers?
... does not imply that graduates outnumber jobs 70:1, although I'm guessing that's the shock factor they're going for. In the extreme case, with 70 suitable jobs, and 70 suitable applicants, each applicant applies for all 70 jobs, and there's no problem at all.
If they weren't just attention seeking, a figure representing the ratio of graduates to appropriate opportunities would be a much more useful measurement of the problem. And if you provided figures broken down by specialism, that would be a seriously worthwhile thing to do. Unlike this, which is not just a pathetic waste of time and money but a retrograde step in that it can only serve to encourage various forms of discrimination.
To me, BYOD implied a requirement to run a Standard Operating Environment. If you are 'just' allowing network access and possibly web-based applications, surely it's only half the problem?
My company, I think, would expect its employees to have an SOE with Lotus Notes, Microsoft Office, our selection of anti-malware tools, particular VPN clients and so on - including a few options based on role (e.g. Visio). Furthermore, there would be full disk encryption, in the expectation that documents and other assests you create for the company have to stay in corporate controlled storage. Getting that working on a bunch of different devices that the staff might choose is a completely different kettle of fish to just giving them network access and the URLs for a few server-side apps.
<sheldon>... I refuse to contribute to the devaluation of the word genius ...</sheldon>
If that were true I'd be insane for correcting this every time I see it, rather than just foolishly optimistic ... but here goes.
Firstly, there's no evidence that Einstein ever said this (best evidence is Rita Mae Brown paraphrasing a NA text which contain the much justifiable Insanity is repeating the same mistakes and expecting different results.. (The line is on p 25/68, end of fourth paragraph). Secondly, without the crucial emphasis on repeating mistakes, the quote makes little sense and could almost be seen as self evidently false: you could argue that significant ability in almost anything difficult - kung fu, piano, running, software development - can only be achieved through a huge amount of repetition.
Phil that sounds like a good idea, although I understand that most fprint readers let you use alternative fingers in case you have, e.g. a sticking plaster on one of them, so you'd need some flexibility for that.
TeeCee, thanks for the info about that - I didn't realise that it had been debunked, I'll look out for that episode.
I absolutely agree about two-factor authentication (I use it for my work VPN) but I'm not sure I agree about password visibility. For instance, when you are in your own office, mounting an encrypted volume, you are fairly sure about having the requisite privacy. But you still want that password to be extremely strong so that your data remains safe if your server is stolen. This is even more true of mobile devices - sometimes you know you are in a safe environment, and mostly you know you will also be frequently taking that device into a less safe environment.
However, if there were a hidden hi-def camera of which you were unaware, I'm pretty sure that a slow-mo replay of you entering the password, even as a ten-finger typist, would yield so much information about the content of the password that it would make it relatively easy to crack. Even if you can only identify the hand and the row you have narrowed each character to about 5 possibilities.
On balance though, I think you have convinced me that it's a dumb idea, and if I value security I should just accept the occasional need to retype a long passphrase. Who knows, maybe it will even improve the accuracy of my typing!
Stop accepting medieval beliefs dreamt up by a bunch of high-on-mushrooms bronze-age goatherds as certain, or even likely, to be true in the face of all the evidence that this is not the case.
You totally missed the point. What is your interfaith dialog but simple respect of each other? You don't believe in Allah, they don't believe in Jehova. Neither of your religions allow for a dualistic approach where you are both worshipping the same God. You can say you respect their religion but really you are dissembling.
I similarly count people of all beliefs amongst my friends, including the moon hoax and cost-effective off-shoring I mentioned.. Doesn't stop me believing they are completely wrong and that their beliefs are stupid. I'm just honest enough to say that their beliefs don't make any kind of sense when seen against what I know to be true.
It is the monotheistic religions themselves which say "my religion is the only way" - it's just that each religion's shouty bigots are less embarrassed about saying so. Your diplomacy towards believers of other faiths does you credit, but plenty of antitheists like myself have read your holy books and we KNOW what your religions say. They are not mutually compatible beliefs, at least some of you are wrong, and to my mind you all are. And more importantly if you are a Christian who thinks Islam is a valid belief, you are probably breaking your own rules - they are there in black and white, e.g. Commandment 2.
... I look like an infamous Norwegian maniac