Re: cant this be solved
In the UK you would be committing another offence by refusing to reveal the password.
1741 posts • joined 14 Nov 2007
In the UK you would be committing another offence by refusing to reveal the password.
Possible countermeasure - heat keypad to 37C.
"Why didn't he knick the PC?"
ITYM "nick" unless perhaps it's lingerie theft.
... all use full english, and so do their friends. In my experience it is those in their 40s, who were in their 20s when txt spk was necessary, who still use this antiquated form of message compression.
... for friends of Alistair McGowan
They worked fine - if you remember their purpose was to part idiots from (other people's) money.
No idea whether it work, but maybe adding a bit of PEG400 to the PG/VG mixture would help with solubility issues?
>>How many legally obtained files do you have that are over 2Gb?
A TrueCrypt container? A zip archive? Home video? There's dozens of possibilities.
... until you observe them?
Correct. If f(n) is n! / a^n, then think about what f(n+1) is -- It gets bigger by a factor of (n+1)/a and therefore the growth of the factorial increasingly exceeds that of the exponential as n increases.
... containers don't need to be smart if it scans in and out and the shelves have weight sensors. If it knows that you have taken a 1pt carton out, it got 595g lighter, and when you put it back in it only gets 205g heavier again, then it knows you've used 390ml milk and that you have 178ml left.
But I think it's more likely that your supermarket could tell you than that your fridge could: "Hey, John, you used to buy 2pts milk a day and one box of Cap'n Crunch a week but you haven't bought much milk recently, do you need more?"
This approach is still fallible, of course: "No thank you, Tesco, now that my sons are teenagers I just have milk piped from the local dairy. And when we run out of cereal I have to call Eddie Stobarts"
Yes - but the flip side means that very efficient solar cells may be hard - there's always been a lot of evolutionary pressure on photosynthesis, but it's still not that efficient.
"surely this would require all electric cars to have a BFO "E" stencilled on the bonnet in flourescent paint"
No, it would be done like the Congestion Charge in London - number plate recognition and checking in a database of those who've paid.
Matt, you actually made sense in your previous post and presented a cogent argument. In this post you have reverted back to ad-hominems against everyone with whom you disagree. In contrast, there is some pretty decent conservative / (sometimes quite far) right-of-centre writing on El Reg, what with Tim, Andrew and Lewis, and they generally present a coherent view with which one who holds a differing perspective can engage -- and even in some cases be persuaded.
You are of course right that this is conjecture. However, your statement that this conjecture is "based on the paranoid dribblings of Internet wannabees" (whatever they are), along with your terms "Sheeple fantasies", "A$$nut" and "Snowjob", adds very little to your argument - I would say it detracts from it.
"We're offering £250/day"
"No problem, do you want me to work mornings or would you prefer afternoons?"
+form addressing is a very good tip, and I came here to say that too.
However, an awful lot of web forms regard '+' as an illegal character. Thank goodness for 10 minute mail.
"compression followed by XORing with a 32 bit secret which is sent in plaintext by the server"
Wow, that is truly weird, after all the apparent effort in setting up botnets and C&C servers. So I'm guessing you would only need one unencrypted copy of any of the encrypted files, use a few different compression algorithms on it, and you'd soon have the key, even if they'd sent it securely.
I'd have paid up or given up, as I'd have been expecting to crack AES256 or something of that ilk.
Now, I'm probably going to risk downvotes here but ... I firmly believe you should be able to click a link without worrying. Otherwise what is the point of QR codes? URL shorteners? The reason why clicking some links causes problems is because there are still far too many vulnerabilities in browsers.
I should be able to point a pdf reader, graphics program, word processor or *browser* at any input whatsoever in perfect safety. The fact that I cannot tells me that software writers have been pissing away their time tweaking the interfaces and adding nice-to-have features rather than addressing the real purpose of these programs.
... or comparative analysis. Maybe the author was on a deadline. Maybe it was a side effect of something fun." -- Don Jefe
As is often the case with El Reg, the real insight sometimes has to wait until the comments, not the least your own. I shall bear the words of your mentor in mind when I come accross 'militarized' corporate-speak, as I have always found it quite jarring.
What fascinates me is what determines when a company can change tack, and do it successfully - I guess I'm thinking of cases like Nokia moving into mobile telecomms (and, it seems, your own company) - and when it results in a fatal split of focus. Even when a split is avoided the new direction may still end up with the company sliding into irrelevance and eventual failure. Is it mainly the foresight of those steering the organisation, or is it their luck?
I've said it before, but ...
Ethnic Origin: "African"
Margin comment: "Aren't we all?"
IMHO, the book is great, but this particular advice is not always right --- sometimes choosing someone on first impressions is the right thing to do: a receptionist, a salesperson, and a complaint handler, for instance, will pretty much be rated by all your customers on first impressions too.
"The problem is that technology is advancing far quicker than the laws governing it. Partly because of the speed of the developments, partly because of the slowness of bureaucracy but mostly I suspect because vested interests are far closer to the ears of our elected so-called representatives than the the electorate is."
The irony is that advancing technology like this is probably one of the few areas in which lawmakers need to be moderately active, as laws governing well established concepts like theft, assault and homicide have largely reached steady state. Yet they prefer to waste their time with endless tweaking -- or berating us about what we eat, drink or inhale.
Buy mobile phone; permanently divert all voice calls to answering service; switch answering service into 'holiday mode' (i.e. doesn't take messages) and change message to "thanks for calling me, but please send me a text instead".
"self lowering toilet seat"
How about a device which detects when some barbarian is going to cover your entire bathroom with a fine mist of urine and reads them this message: "Do you think you're outdoors, seriously? Why are you lifting the seat, do you think it's ok to piss on the rim of the porcelain? If you're confident you won't, you won't need to lift the seat, will you?"
Honestly, if you think it's ok to piss standing up when you are in someone else's house, just try it in your own, turn off the lights, and go in there with a blacklight. Still feel happy about it? Toilet seats lift so you can clean them; that's all.
... democracy is a privilege afforded only to those who do not live in 'safe seat' constituencies.
Indeed - the very first thing you learn when you start to understand cryptographic techniques is that you will never* be good enough to roll your own.
*obviously there's always a slim chance that you are a maths genius in their twenties, and maybe you will have a contribution to make in a decade or two
^^ this is the paragraph that should have appeared at the front of the article :-) Thanks.
... page not available due to high traffic (presumably of people changing their passwords)
me too. Is this an ebay.com vs ebay.co.uk difference?
... I'm just loving that image
This is my new stock response; many thanks.
"... some poor project or IT guy just sent all of the keys to NBC’s servers to the wrong guy in one mistyped username"
Err, no. Those keys should never have been uploaded, unencrypted, in the first place, even if you know who all your GitHub users are; the mistake is a LOT bigger than mistyping a username.
I agree. However, although I'm more a sort of open source guy than corporate by choice (though I have to be the opposite professionally) I feel compelled to point out that change-for-changes-sake is not purely corporate, otherwise we wouldn't have had the Gnome / Unity fiasco.
... it looks even worse to me - by dumping $72,300 of stock just before it 'dived' 6.8%, they saved themselves less than $5000.
... 65536 ft?
"Worst of all, there is no standard, reputable way of evaluating the contribution each employee makes in the long term."
Only true if the employee's manager has no understanding of what is going on. This is such a common scenario that we almost take it for granted, but it doesn't have to be that way.
My first IT consultancy boss had it right - interview in the pub to determine whether candidate was good team material; take the CV on trust; be absolutely ruthless about insisting on success in trial period (that's when you realize if the CV is true); ongoing monitoring to determine who needs intervention (and of what kind) to keep them on or push them off.
Please tell me this is in W. Mids. If so, please tell me your postcode!
... and a vote for the innovative split/re-join on some of the Lego titles. But I've always thought that two player co-op is much more satisfying than playing 1 to 1 adversarial.
... would welcome Indian driving in the UK. They already drive on the left, don't they?
... and I hate working in it. Reason: much of the decision making, whether buying, selling or managing, is done by people who hate IT.
... and it was slightly weird finding out one is XYY whilst looking down a microscope in one's undergraduate Genetics class ...
A bum-selfie. Don't Google it at work unless you have images switched off or work in an open-minded establishment.
I find a resealable freezer bag perfect for waterproofing the nook when walking in the rain with the dogs. Resistive screen works fine through the polythene.
I've always thought there should be a metric ounce and pound
1 oz = 25g
20 oz = 500g = 1lb
Unlike g and kg, which are useful for nought but salt and potatoes respectively, at least the imperial units were the right sort of magnitude for cooking.