17 posts • joined Tuesday 13th November 2007 13:22 GMT
I'd have though battery hens are a slightly better metaphor than cattle and pets, as they are really interchangeable, and can be treated as disposable in large quantities. You don't want to think about the life of a factory farmed chicken...
Anyway, everyone could keep them (almost anyway - a small outdoor space is all that is required) but most folks don't need so many eggs, or to be tied down, and prefer to buy the product in small quantities.
Kept in homes (small businesses) they get named and nurtured.
On smallholdings (large businesses) selling a few eggs they get managed, and looked after humanely
But on factory farms (resellers/cloud/multinationals) they get the heck managed out of them!
Re: Shiny, shiny, shiny boots of leather...
Absolutely Venus in Furs - humming all the way through until I saw the video and realised it wasn't TVU.
Didn't even recall the nonsense at the bottom after listening to the first 20 seconds (all I could stand). I am heading towards the top of the 40's but even so, the only other "Shiny" track I could recall was "Shiny Happy People" - REM.
Currently the "Best of Velvet Underground" is in rotation on my (non fruity) MP3 player... 8GB or random, but tonight on the commute I'll dial up TVU for some nostalgia.
...the .edu version will be free from the horrendous DRM that the general release version appears to be saddled with?
From what I've read, punters cannot play off-line (at all, as in ever), cannot install on multiple machines they own, and are forced to play in a persistent multiplayer universe with other punters affecting their citystate. Add in no save and revert option, and no matter how good the simulation, the real world reviews (i.e. not the leaching gaming press) are going to be looking grim.
So bright side up: this edition could be the only thing that turns a profit for this version of SimCity.
Re: normal people prefer to talk than to type.
Only for your experience of normal.
I would rather *not* talk to MOST people... if I could possibly avoid them.
Re: Ye Typo
Of course most of the UK don't use thee, thou, thine much if at all now (especially not in church) but in at least one geographic area it is still common, even the norm: the small isles of Orkney.
Conversations between 30/40/50 year olds can be a little like dropping back a hundred years linguistically - and that's without the increadible accent!
...is the biggest BUG left in MS-Windows. Quite WHY MS have never fixed this nonsense I don't know.
Flashing on the bar - fine, poping to front and then taking the next "o" I type as OK, well that's just plain wrong, and gets me in trouble at least half a dozen times a day.
Of course learing to type without looking down would help... but where's the time for/fun in that?
Multiwindowmultitasker all the way...
You would be shocked...
I buy as close to 100% off frameworks as possible - for a start it's MUCH faster!
I've seen several equivalent or smaller Gov orgs that didn't know about frameworks, let alone use them.
I spread light where possible.
It's called Buying Solutions (at least I don't think the name has changed in the last year).
Very useful they are too!
Loads of framework contracts for just about everything ICT types could want (and way more too).
Just avoid the SPRINT 2 framework like the palgue unless you've already got comparative quotes!
There is a Scottish version too - Procurement Scotland - with a slightly narrower remit.
Install Office and have it run, quickly, regardless of LAN / WAN or other connectivity/traffic...
Cloud it and suffer whenever things change. And because everthing changed for everone, at that time the LAN, WAN and Internet pipe will already be stuffed beyond capacity.
That completely ignores the economics of Office365 which I had to research last year... and ran screaming.
Not sure how it is for other IT managers, but my LANs, WAN and Internet links are the most expensive parts of my infrastructure, and are all, always, teetering on the ragged edge of their capacity as more and more systems and services are "cloud", "on-line", "browser enabled" and "Web service" based.
Does "the business" understand what is proposed?
Nope - £500 is not enuff...
Sadly, by the time I load all the required software, including security, a suitable laptop (tough enough, light enough, etc. as defined by Gov procurement I hasten to add - although I agree with current choices) is north of £600 before MS costs are added. Of course you *have* to buy with them with an MS license, which I then have to throw away under the terms of my enterprise agreement... sigh.
At least we sweat ours. Some folks still replace every 3/4/5 years automatically: we run things until they die in service, or fail during upgrade (hello Win7 - looking at you).
That said - an average cost of 666 is is only interesting because we don't know what the figure includes? Deployment? Software? Build? Disposal? It's either good value, or just not great depending on the answers!
No shit sherlock...
There's a very good reason that "we" IS/IT professional in Government have reservations: it's a clusterf*ck waiting to happen that we, as professionals, cannot recommend to our organisations due to the increadible risk and sky high cost (both money, time, and the ditto lack of same on the business critical projects that will have to get bumped in order to do this nonsense).
There's a very good reason that the big consultancies will say it's possible and bid like pigs at a trough: it's a clusterf*ck waiting to happen that means they'll be rolling in change control gravy for a decade before the Auditors pull the plug... and then criticise the commisioning Gov Officials (us) for the mess.
It's a lose lose situation - Please, please, won't someone think of the taxpayers...
Not quite that simple...
Although I agree in principle (about not running hundreds of exchange servers), centralising them into clouds does not in and of iteself make savings at any point.
First, you are increasing WAN networking load and potentially increasing bandwidth to another party. WAN costs are easilly the most expensive commodity I buy (off framework), and bandwidth is always at a premium. I have three "cloud" options available on current Buying Solutions frameworks, and even with staff and license reductions, none would "save" enough to pay for the bandwidth hike alone, let alone the change costs. Don't think the Audit and Risk groups would approve the move to a system with so many single points of failure for ALL systems either!
Second, we're all at the virtualisation and storage centralisation game now, and x86 hardware is phenominally cheap for the loads we can run. Our DMZ servers cost 1/10th (invoice price, not depreciated) than the 6 year old kit they replaced last year, and are way more powerful and vastly more power efficient. If it's "outsourced", however you figure that, you ARE paying profit margins... the providers are in this for their shareholders, not the public!
But I do agree about the ill-though out projects! THAT is where the real waste lives, breathes and lines corporate pockets.