Proper 1080p projectors
... can be had for under £1,000 anyways online. What's the point Samsung?
113 publicly visible posts • joined 6 Nov 2007
ITV are a bunch of arseholes for not letting us Sky HD box owners to see the new ITV HD channel. (This is despite everything being in place for it to be viewed on Sky's system, bar some flag on the transport stream.)
Good job England aren't in this Euro otherwise I might have been really annoyed :)
I had a keyring taken from me in Birmingham Airport 'cos it was an empty bullet case (with a massive hole in it for the keyring part). I said "What am I going to do, throw it at someone?" -- this didn't go down well at all!
I can't believe how many people have dissed the wearing of the t-shirt just because the guy is 30... what fucking losers!
It let me pay twice for the same ebay item, which just goes to show how little checking/validation must be going on with PayPal. (Paying twice was a result of an error on their site, I'm not that much of an idiot!)
Of course, I couldn't really contact them for any type of help. After going through several hoops trying to remedy this on their site, i got to a dead end that said because the transaction was already a done deal, there was nothing I could do but ask for a refund from the other party.
Luckily the ebay seller was honest enough to give me my money back to PayPal, but I'm not allowed it back for several days for some reason.
Sky already do the iplayer-esque Anytime service, which uses the box's hard drive to save overnight streams of programmes for a psuedo on-demand service. It's entirely feasible to get something similar for the BBC on the go, but probably not for *every* programme.
There's always the ethernet port on the back of Sky boxes that could be used... Despite how much Sky don't like the bbc/iplayer, getting it on their platform would still be good for them.
Nvidia's drivers last year were awful really, which is the main reason my media center is still using MCE. On my desktop, major features that are in the XP control panel were missing for most of last year in Vista. Even now, every time I update my nvidia drivers, it crashes my desktop PC without fail as part of the install.
I'm used to paying over the odds for new stuff, but paying for a 8800gtx and experiencing the borked drivers was the first time i truly felt gypped by a company.
For starters, I only paid £130, a key part of my buying decision!
I would dispute the review saying it's not a 'performance' choice, as that argument is a little flawed. I use it with a 4 tuner media center, quite often with 4 recordings on the go and watching something else, all from the same drive and it handles this sort of load fine.
A 1tb drive is only really suitable for a secondary storage drive anyway I would say. I certainly wouldn't suggest having any 1tb as your main drive, and if you really needed massive performance for some HD video editing or whatever, RAID is the only way to go, probably via a nice IcyDock eSata box.
So assuming a 1tb is only every going to be storing a bunch of video and mp3 files, any of these drives would be perfectly suitable, and I'd say go with whatever is cheapest :)
Also, I know from experience WD have a no-quibble return policy for up to 5 years on their premium drives, so it's not as if you're losing out on support because of a cheap drive.
I've often wondered why the iplayer needs to be, and why we have all those annoying +1 versions of channels. All the data was sent out and received already as TV signals already, which is lot more efficient than using the net.
Local storage is cheap. I've got a media center PC with 4 freeview tuners in it and it's recording pretty much constantly. It's very easy to start grabbing anything interesting like all the movies, the local news, and anything else goes on a series link. I don't watch it all, but it seems with my set-up I've already out done any 'on demand' service.
In fact, I've wanted one for a while now.
The best thing they do is hook up to an all-you-can-eat subscription music service, with browsing/downloading done on the unit itself via wifi.
I understand most people don't like subscriptions like Napster, but I appreciate them, and that coupled with the entire library accessible on the player itself is a real neat feature.
What hope for the comments when the whole article is trolling?
To set the record straight:
Vista is faster than XP on my machine (dual boot, easy to spot)
On my laptop I stream music and browse wirelessly just fine, contrary to AC comments.
+1 happy vista user
Ultimate is the only version with the media center functionality and Remote Desktop available without hacking around with dodgy dlls. That's why I bought it last January. (I've been a happy vista user since)
I just wish they'd decrease the price of the anytime upgrade. I've got Vista Business installed on a new laptop. It's chock full of software and drivers specifically for the laptop that I want to keep, so I'd rather not install a fresh OS. However, to upgrade to Ultimate is around £140, which considering they already got paid for the original license is a complete rip off :(
The PS3 is entirely silent (well mine is). My 360 on the other hand is very loud, even without a game in :(
The HD-DVD is still a decent proposition. There are over 500 HD-DVD title out there, and you can use it for DVDs as well, so you can have a movie and a game in your 360 at all times for the uber lazy. It also adds an extra couple of USB ports to your 360 round the back if you want them (for usb drive/cam etc).
After a few sessions playing with 4od/sky anytime/bbc iplayer, I've decided not to go anywhere near all that corporate p2p again. However, the flash iplayer is fast and quality is adequate. For something that was tacked on at the last minute, it's probably the thing that's saved the iplayer's reputation.
I don't know how fast the o2 edge actually is, but bored in Birmingham airport, and refusing to pay a fiver for an hours wifi, i found out that my laptop connected to my t-mobile phone as a modem via bluetooth was fast enough to watch the iplayer anyway.
This is pretty reactionary isn't it?
"how much encouragement does the paedophile community need!"
I'm not sure I even follow this excitable forumer's train of thought. Does the average fiddler think things like "Hmm, I wasn't going to molest any children today, but that Woolworths bed has really got me in the mood?"
Yes, it is a stupid name for a bed, but the reaction is, um, stupider :)
Well, some poor user has to stick up for the OS in a barrage of obligatory Vista-hate, so it might as well be me.
I like Vista, I have no software / hardware problems, and it runs faster than XP does on the same machine (dual boot). It's taken a while to get used to it, but now I find myself trying to do 'Vista things' at work where I still use XP.
Releasing Windows 7 so soon would be a mistake I reckon. XP only got where it was by sticking around long enough for everything to work. MS need to stick with Vista until it properly matures.
As probably the only remaining happy Bulldog user, I guess this Tiscali cheapness will have to rub-off eventually :(
I get 16meg down / 1meg up 24/7, seemingly uncapped. I know I'm very lucky, but with stories like this, It's only a matter of time. I can't get cable where I live, and Be insist they can't provide their service to me- who else is there if you want a decent connection and don't mind paying extra for it?