Could they do a 'Fedora'
& have a bleeding edge community OS that no phone maker would use, but I could download & install it on my phone? Are there any FLOSS phone OS's in existence now?
601 publicly visible posts • joined 30 Oct 2007
Software being unpatentable is the normal, obvious way to go. Software patents are a crazy idea. They're the sort of thing the Mafia would invent - only a country like the US would adopt them. I cannot see how patenting software enhances innovation or competition, in fact it has a chilling effect - look at all the FUD surrounding GNU/Linux.
The worst thing about them is that, contrary to what some posters seem to believe, its not about patenting an application & its specific source code(copyright & licensing protects that). Software patents can be for say "a method of updating computers over a network" or something vaguer than that. You don't have to write a line of source code.
Its just a scam.
Your comments are not even true. A decent CS grad will have spent most of their time learning to program, or learning about the algorithms behind the code. Are you trying to claim that most programmers are not CS grads? The course you're describing sounds like some dodgy post-grad "How to be an IT manager" crap or something.....
are rather sad people in my experience. You killed anyone recently, PirateSucker, eh? Because you must be a sniper judging by your closing remark.
Supported the last Iraq debacle too, didn't you?
Your remark about "The Middle East" for example - the UK & US have been "befriending" Saudi Arabia for decades - a country exactly like the one you describe, so why haven't we adopted their ideas yet? For the same reason they haven't adopted ours - they're not us & we're not them. Do you really think that "we" declared war on Germany in '39 because they were " being thoroughly unpleasant and murderous"? No, "we" declared war on them because of international treaties(same as WW1). If they'd stuck to being "unpleasant" to countries that weren't in any treaties or not worth cash to us, then "we'd" have done bugger all (like the US did until their interests were threatened - if they'd had a more right-wing pres at the time, we'd probably be speaking German now)
Remember when "we" loved Saddam Hussein? Until he thought that "us" not doing anything about his murderous genocidal activities meant that he could invade Kuwait. Or how about Darfur?
"We" do 1) most of the time, except when "we're" forced to do something.
Perhaps worth pointing out that MS's SQL Server was based on Sybase's own database & they still share a lot of similarities in SQL syntax,underlying architecture & internal protocols. Their versions of SQL are both called T-SQL(Transact SQL). Owning a cross-platform pet enterprise quality SQL DB (that has lots of Java support) , will surely reduce their reliance on MS, improve optimisation & integration & give them a bigger profit margin to play with, if their customers aren't put off by the "not MS" tag.
So maybe it's about MS as much as Oracle - I'm no expert though, so all this is probably rubbish
thinks the cops will get better under a Tory govt must be too young or stupid to remember the last lot. The cops will get a lot worse before they get better. Tories think cops can do no wrong & that the sun shines out of their large & spotty arses. If this isn't you & you voted for them, you've been mugged.
that the public's political views are far more diverse than they were in say, the 50's/60's, when Labour v Tory really meant something, the Unions were large & powerful & the Tories were people like Home the Skullman. Proportional voting of one form or another is the only way to re-engage with politics. Many smaller parties deserve some seats, and the big two need their wings clipped. For all the Tories supposed hatred of big govt. they still like the idea of "strong" govt. which is exacly the same in reality. Consensus needs to be forced upon the political class, as the only way they'll ever get anything done. Also a multitude of views would break down media influence, as politics would become more about issues, than tribal support.
The problem now is that the public don't fit into a handy box. Most people are a mixture of left & right wing.views. New Tory have tried to come off fiscally conservative & socially liberal, no doubt a popular stance - but they're not really - Back To Basics, here we come (again) - in fact I fear that for many people, the Tories will actually be a distillation of the worst of New Labour & Old Tory. Ugh!
judging by your nick, you are a supporter of a political position that originated in nineteenth-century Britain in opposition to proposals for the disestablishment of the Church of England, that is, to remove the Anglican Church's status as the state church of England, Ireland and Wales.
And I thought my nick was a bit silly
that one has a "right" to buy something from a seller. Some years ago (OK, many years ago) I worked in a garage when there was a tanker driver's strike. The proprietors issued 'regular' customers with a card so they could buy petrol, but refused passing trade. Loads of non-regulars went mental when I told them they couldn't have any petrol. They all said "You can't do this, it's not legal, I've got a right to buy petrol if I want" - they just didn't get the idea that the petrol belonged to the garage & if they didn't want to sell it, they didn't have to.
I must admit it was pretty funny saying 'No' to them & watching them get their knickers in a twist ( I was 15)
the fault of old Thatchler. I was under the impression that BT offered to fibre the whole of the UK in exchange for a monopoly for a few years, but she told them No. Throughout the Tory 80's & 90's they were too interested in making a quick buck, instead of investment in infrastructure.
(Icon = Tebbit)
If one is going to do that, surely one would a) use a different internet connection if possible, and b) not use a nick that contained the same name( probably best to pose as a different sex).
Difficult to detect then, I would think - unless I'm being stupid & missing some obvious flaw in my reasoning.
Statute of Limitation is a US thing I think. In the UK there's no time limit AFAIK.
This reminds me of the case where this guy was shagging a goat in a field near a railway line, and a train came along & stopped right opposite him. "Mummy, what's that man doing?"
He was quoted as saying "I don't know what my mates are going to say" like anyone would admit to knowing him after that.
the guy who says he's using the private browsing feature to buy his wife a present - yeah,right.
Although maybe his wife likes the same porn or sex toys as he does - although looking at him, he's probably into something scary.... like something unspeakable involving Steve Ballmer and a chair
a) Do you really expect all journos at a news outlet to have a unified line? I don't want or expect that to happen
b) Don't misuse the word "schizophrenia" again. It doesn't mean "split personality", its a horrible, debilitating mental illness, that's about as funny as carcinoma of the brain, i.e not very
It was a Panorama report , broadcast on April 1st 1957. It was a big deal at the time, because in 1957, no-one had done TV april fools jokes. Especially on an authoritative (at the time) programme like Panorama, which was presented by Richard (father of David & Richard) Dimbleby, who was a current affairs god in those days, and believed 100%.
'spaghetti tree hoax' gave me over 5000 hits on Google.
your example is rubbish. RTFM is not a abbreviated word, is it? Its a *phrase* which hasn't been abbreviated to RdThFckngManl like your example.
A better example would be say TCP for Transmission Control Protocol.
An acronym has to spell another word from the initials, like say LASER for example, which I think was the point you were failing to make
"Outsource all their thinking to support" - spot on. We support some people like this, although they don't usually do it again if they have to speak to my boss, who can be breathakingly sarcastic in a very irritating way, for example sp-eak-ing ve-ry sl-ow-ly or just talking louder and louder over them if they try to interrupt. Though not to anyone who pays the bills :-)
I went to school with a bloke like you - any woman short of "perfect" (whatever that means) was denounced as a "pig" or "dog" (& regardless of looks would always refer to them as "that" or "it").
The funny thing was, he was fat, spotty, greasy with a horribly obnoxious personality. In the 15 years I knew him, he never came close to kissing anyone, let alone have a girlfriend or any sex.
Of course, you're not at all like that are you? I'm sure you have to go out in disguise to avoid the mobs of beautiful women hunting for you. Grow up FFS