The protocol applies to lasers designed specifically as blinding weapons. These are laser pointers, not weapons; it's the same distinction as between a kitchen knife and a bayonet, or a nailgun and a pistol. Both can be used to cause harm but only one of each of the examples is designed for that purpose. The protocol doesn't apply to lasers which are designed to act as pointing devices. The wiki page even points out a number of military exceptions to the protocol.
1753 posts • joined 5 Mar 2007
Re: So basically, then ...
It's jake, what did you expect?
It's not the anonymous ones they have to worry about.
@paul Re: I Wonder....
Hate to nitpick (actually when I'm right love to nitpick) but iron will fuse quite happily with enough energy and pressure. What it can't do is produce more energy in that fusion than is consumed by the process which, as you rightly say, kills the whole reaction stone-dead in short order.
Either way, earth isn't going to turn into a flaming ball of self-sustained nuclear fusion any time soon.
Re: News angle?
I think the conclusion to be drawn from this is that all computers are a bit site.
Re: Ruptured oxygen cylinders
"That's still small beer compared with a few litres of liquid oxygen. Want to see steel burn to white hot rust? Want to see diamonds on fire beneath the surface?"
And when the insurance claims start piling in, all these memories will be lost, like tears in rain.
Re: proper posh notw (was Strongbow?)
oooh, well look at this la de da mister fancy pants posh man, pronouncin the aitch in soli'ull!
Re: Looks as though it requires a high-wing aircraft configuration.
Perhaps if they had said "large passenger jets". Military cargo planes favour high wings for structural reasons - a high-wing craft can have a larger internal bay - and to mitigate the possibility of their engines ingesting a large portion of the landing strip at makeshift airfields.
Re: What is death?
If you and he are right then your agreement is also a delusion and doesn't matter.
Re: I think they meant
More reasons to shop at morrisons, I guess...
@naselus Re: Five technologies you shouldn't bother looking out for in 2016
I suggest perhaps trying a different approach. Start by suggesting a distro by name, talk through the high-level advantages. Don't start blasting them with jargon. If they aren't capable of making informed decisions then you have to help them, and that means you have to narrow their choices and present them with options that you think might actually benefit.
Or you could keep being a stuck-up, pretentious nerd who likes to show off how much they think they know by flinging jargon and superfluous trivia around. They'd react exactly the same way if you started blathering on about the history of the Windows NT kernel, GDI and the necessity of using powershell in certain situations.
Re: Heavy Falcons
The spitfire was never designed as a bomber escort. Its purpose from the very start was as an interceptor, a role that it fulfilled admirably (though the Hurricane outperformed it in the interception of German bombers and their escorting heavy fighters). RAF doctrine for the early part of world war 2 did not call for mass-escorted daytime bomber fleets, but lone, unescorted, raiders. Because of this, bomber escort wasn't considered necessary until well into the war, and by the time any serious thought was being given to purpose-built heavy fighters the role was already being rendered largely obsolete by technological advances, doctrinal changes and the fact that Germany had been driven back within her own borders - meaning that escorts didn't have to fly as far in the first place.
Except they aren't selling the rockets, they're selling use of them.
Webbing would not guarantee a stable stop. In order for it to not be destroyed by the rocket exhaust the engine would have to cut out quite some distance above it, in the range of tens of metres or more, which means a long unpowered drop toward a hard surface and a net that will be much more likely to fail than a controlled landing. Rocket goes crack, knackered components, fuel everywhere, big boom.
To make the net robust enough to catch the rocket without tearing apart you'd have to make it of some highly elastic material that still has a very high tensile strength, which means you're then dropping your rocket several tens of metres onto a giant trampoline, which will guarantee that your rocket begins to ascend with the wrong parts pointing toward the sky and descend shortly afterwards in an unpredictable location. So, even if the net holds, you have something taller than a house and full of volatile fuel flinging itself about in random directions and making an uncontrolled landing. Assuming it doesn't explode, the engines will almost certainly be damaged beyond repair by the impact.
Your docking clamp idea suffers the same problems of height and heat and adds a shitton of unnecessary complexity as well, not to mention time and fuel use. The rocket would have to come to a stop to be grabbed by the clamp, which means it would have to hover in place, using more fuel than a controlled landing and obviating the clamp's entire purpose - if you can hover the rocket, you can land the rocket, and that means you don't need the clamp. The reason why it has to hover is simple: if the rocket is still moving, it will impart energy to the clamp, by which I mean it will damage a complex piece of machinery. That adds repair time. It adds risk. There's also the very likely outcome of the clamp damaging the rocket, which more than likely results in - again - a big boom, at which point you've not only lost your engines, but you've also destroyed your docking clamp and have to rebuild it.
This is all assuming you're on a stable surface too. On the barge, you'd either have that big net swinging around like a trebuchet or you'd have the clamp waving about like a gigantic bat just waiting to slap the returning stage out of the sky.
So that's why.
Re: "It's their choice and they choose not to, fair enough."
Yes, actually, they do. Usually it's written along the lines of "X had yet to respond to requests for information at the time of publication", or words to that effect. It informs the reader that the article is incomplete and may be updated or may be followed if X ever decides to call back.
As you're leading us to infer, Nokia's attempt at a linuxy phone failed more due to marketing and internal divisional conflicts than anything about the quality of the device.
<insert something about criminals going in through the wide open windows here>
Re: Routine Disasters
They use RP-1, essentially kerosene, which is also used in the first stage of Soyuz, the Delta family of rockets, Atlas and Zenit, and was used on the Saturn V first stage as well. It's pretty much the standard rocket fuel. The nazis used ethanol.
Re: @Voland's right hand ....you might as well put Jar Jar Binks in charge."
More than anything it was people saying "No george, that's stupid" in the originals that made them so great.
the first Star Wars as written was tight as an orphan's belt. The pacing was nearly perfect, at least partly in thanks to editors who told Lucas where he could stick his opinions. Nobody can do that now; he's too powerful. Nobody says no to him.
Without fail, practically every scene that was added to the remasters killed the pacing stone dead. Lucas has no idea about pacing, which is obvious from watching the prequels, which are a complete mess of meandering, go-nowhere scenes and pointless spectacle.
But that's George for you. He thought people liked Star Wars for the spectacle of its special effects, which brought him to blows with Irvin Kershner, who reckoned that telling a strong story about well-rounded characters was the key to success. Given that Kershner is the mind that brought us Empire and Lucas the one that brought us the CGI-laden farce that was the prequels, I think it's clear who was right.
@sabroni Re: Curious
the problem isn't that they've made the haystack bigger - you can still find a needle in an arbitrarily large haystack if you think and maybe use a magnet. The problem is that, by designating everyone as a potential suspect at all times, they've replaced the hay with needles and are now trying to find one needle amongst millions.
Off can mean deactivated, functionally an equivalent of death. La petite mort?
Re: Quite nice
We've still got the HMS Victory in drydock. She could probably be made seaworthy again without too much fuss.
Think they'll try competing with node. js?
3rd edition was probably the last good one.I still have my colonel schaefer's last chancers veteran unit lurking around here, a couple of cadian squads and a pair of leman russ, all done up in desert camo. I was pretty proud of that lot.
Then the dropped schaefer's squad before turning it into that generic shitty "penal legion". Basically every change since 3.5 has been one step or several further into the swamp. I gave up pretty quickly, not having the money to afford their rocketing prices, and abandoned the whole thing entirely for greener pastures. Looked back recently, find out they've completely nuked warhammer fantasy and dropped nearly everything that made the 40K world interesting, and realised that I'd got out at a pretty good time.
type node.js into your search engine of choice
They mean that hillary is the democrat equivalent of dick.
Re: As the Specials once sang "What a load of Bo**ocks"
I tried getting a job at my local Aldi once. Non-starter. They were full and expected no vacancies, unlike Tesco and Asda's constantly overturning workforce.
Re: Dual SIM
Been over a week and I still can't work out why I got downvotes for this. All I did was give a subjective opinion and then suggest a way people with similar thoughts might be better educated on the subject...
Re: Dual SIM
I keep seeing this mention of dual sim being a killer feature on a phone but I've honestly never encountered anyone in the wild who uses such a feature. It makes me wonder what sort of fields would favour something like that. Maybe el reg could do a survey?
@smudge Re: Paging David Cameron
Parse the sentence carefully. There's a change of subject from "the government" to "we". He never addresses the idea that "the government" wants to ban encryption, he only says that GCHQ doesn't want to ban it, presumably because suitably holed encryption is far better for GCHQ than no encryption. No encryption means subjects of interest make use of other, more secure means of communication. Encryption riddled with secret access tunnels means you get enough misplaced trust trust in the existing communication methods to give GCHQ a chance of nabbing someone.
I have a logitech C170 on my computer. Plugged it in, all worked instantly, even with the complete and utter shitefest that is Skype for Linux.
I don't know why people make such patently false claims like this when they know they're going to be proven wrong. I guess some people can't help themselves.
Re: Subtitle error
You've also created Trantor mk1.
Re: Might it be an opportunity?
Assuming we were capable of that sort of mega-engineering project (which we will be one day, one hopes), I'm not sure it'd be beneficial as such. You'd end up coating the planet with a lot of ionised hydrogen... that said, the surface of mars is absolutely loaded with oxidised iron and other oxides of various sorts. Blasting them with a hydrogen plasma might actually liberate a fair amount of water. Possibly. I'm mostly pulling ideas out of my butt right now.
@sawatts Re: pull yer finger out
When (if?) it goes into production it will get you to LEO, and as any fule kno, getting to orbit means you're 90% of you way to anywhere, at least in terms of energy expended. So no, a sabre-powered craft probably won't take you directly to Mars, but it doesn't need to. It only needs to deliver you to ship that takes you on the last leg of the journey.
They're making that later. Probably around a day.
Obligatory Topical Reference
It's like they watched Spectre and thought "hey that's a pretty good idea!"
I remember trying that for a couple of head-to-head games of c&c and red alert. Must have been the last gasp of that particular faff.
Re: A life without bacon
" Look at the vaccination BS spouted by a certain no-brain celeb as an example."
That's a pretty broad field.
Sun's too highbrow, surely? He should try the daily mail.
Re: Who needs this model anyway?
Nah, he's not camp enough.
@anon Re: Good.
You mean "far more than is sensible"?
Re: Didn't microsoft try that?
Jake, you're exactly backwards. MS pushed the graphics heap into the kernel in NT 4.0 in order to boost performance and it stayed there all the way through NT 5.0 and NT 5.1 (which you might know as Windows 2000 and XP). NT 6.0 moved most of the graphics heap out of the kernel and into userspace, but there is still a component running in kernel mode.
Microsoft? First? Allow me to point at my old TF101 and scream bullshit.
(this is of course ignoring the old, old "laptop that bends over to pretend to be a tablet but is really just a laptop" concept that MS pushed in the early naughties)
It's just a little airborne, it's still good! It's still good!
Re: Ferroelectric Memory
I don't know, but I'm pretty sure lobster sticks to it.
Re: Why call it a start menu?
Well. You have to start somewhere.
Re: @TitterYeNot, re Nail Gun.
That would be the Ramset FrameMaster powder-actuated nail gun. It uses a .22 cartridge to fire a nail up to 1200 feet per second.
Re: Why do people like to stay ignorant and keep poisoning themselves?
Don't worry, they'll swap it all around again in another six months.
Re: A9 business cards ...