Re: Hmm
That gorgeous dial-up which limited websites to basic low res graphics and huge advancements in compression. Or do you have blazing speeds offering websites quickly with graphics pleasing to the eye that has created the interactive long distant communications we love? Be hard/expensive to facebook message never mind video call previously. Now people do it to avoid mobile phone call charges!
One person's graphics pleasing to the eye is another's pointless chrome. Everything you mention can be done over open, established mechanisms without being dressed up in a frock and monetised. The mechanisms developed to create the dynamic web we see today have been driven not by aesthetics but by a desire to hide things from view such as web beacons, supercookies and offline storage. That Javascript, for example, can be used to create engaging content is a side-effect.
It also required (note, "required" past tense because we've pretty much hit a ceiling for general purpose computing and the upgrade hell is now the sole preserve of mobile telephones) consumers upgrade more and more just to display this needless chrome. Now we've hit a plateau, one wonders just how fast the web could be without all the cross-site tracking, advertising pulls from the bare minimum specified kit behind load balancers, surreptitious insertion of unique identifiers and content delivery as a service. I suspect that metric is far, far better than what we have at present and it would seem that these data fetishists and ad bureaux are wasting your, my and everyone else's time, money and sanity for very little return.
Governments are inherently untrustworthy as anyone who wants power over others is exactly the type of person you don't give it to. However, they are removable, at least partially democratically elected and accountable here in Capatalistia. The likes of Zuck and Google aren't accountable to anyone.
In short, old boy, you're talking out of your tail-feathers while defending the indefensible.