Re: Who will buy this clothing?
Not interested because they cannot spell. Where can I get Beatrix Kiddo's shoes?
4551 publicly visible posts • joined 19 Oct 2007
Their initial master stroke was getting a per-machine license fee for software bundled with early IBM PCs. When someone else came up with a killer app Microsoft bought a third rate competitor, pissed on it until they liked the flavour and bundled the result with their monopolyware. The vast majority of customers could not measure quality and did not see the value in buying software that worked when they could muddle through with the rubbish that came pre-installed.
For some reason Microsoft did not follow their winning strategy with phones. They tried creating the OS themselves even though writing software is not one of their core strengths (they excel at licensing it). They did not require all new PCs to come with a bundled Microsoft phone. Using a monopoly in one field to gain a monopoly in a new one is illegal because it is so effective you can pay the fines and still make a huge profit. If Microsoft had played to their strengths we would all be waiting ten minutes for our phones to boot up and would have to end calls when the virus scanner was active.
My largest computer has 2GB so I expect that is plenty for many use-cases. When I buy one Pi 4 it will have 4GB in case I need it for some reason later because it will be cheaper than "upgrading". The obvious use case for 2GB is if you are buying a hundred. You might actually notice £1000 off the bill that includes boxes, PSUs, video cables and installation. If you are buying monitors, SDHC cards, keyboards, mice and installing ethernet cables too then the extra money for 4GB becomes rounding a error.
I too am surprised that 2GB is expected to be popular but Pi's often end up in places that are price sensitive. That must be a bigger market segment than we think.
I have 3 spinning disks attached to a Pi via USB (and three more attached so something similar which does have an SATA port attached to an SSD). With an SATA port I would need a new box to hold the Pi and one disk + power for the disk. There are SATA hubs so I could connect all three but then I would need vibration mounts so the disks do not trash each other.
With eSATA the disk can go in a different box but it still needs power. With eSATAp, the disk could get power but not from the Pi. If there is an eSATAp hub then each disk would then need adaptors to separate the power from the SATA. (I used to own two eSATA devices. They were fine until they broke and I had to switch back to USB to recycle the SSDs.)
Boxes with a USB->SATA bridge plus power are cheap. If I run out of USB ports USB hubs are cheap. In seven years I have had two of those 6 disks fail. As all the enclosures are USB3 I could swap out the broken disk, attach it and its backup to a USB3 device and restore the data in a couple of days.
USB may be ugly but it is cheap and I have spare parts lying around. An SATA solution would require buying multiple expensive parts for redundancy and extra fiddling with a screwdriver to move disks around during a restore.
That other box I have is not noticeably faster for having the OS on SATA SSD instead of SDHC like a Pi. Mythic Beasts run their Pi servers with network attached storage and those have been hosting www.raspberrypi.org for years.
If you have a use-case that fits on a small cheap computer but only with SATA, try a cubox or something similar. A Pi 4 can solve plenty of problems without SATA so I can see why they chose to save money there.
Dave Chinner wasn't driven away. Brilliant contributors can explain why they are right and Linus is wrong. Mediocre contributors have a strong incentive to read, understand, think and test before contributing. Time wasters get a thorough scolding and hopefully do not waste other peoples' time again until they get a clue.
Have you ever been on the receiving end of a frothing-at-the-mouth swearing rant screamed so loud that they can hear it in the car park and enjoyed every second of it because you know what is going to happen when you calmly explain why the ranter has entirely misunderstood what is happening?
They fill row X with either zeroes (or ones), then repeatedly make pairs of connections to sshd, and by magic arrange for sshd to put its decrypted key in rows (X+1) and (X-1), thus hammering row X and possibly causing a bit to flip in X. Later they read through X looking for the bit flip. ECC should detect the flipped bit and correct it so they should read zeroes (or ones) but with a tiny delay.
In increasing order of fictionalness:
Soyuz: $60M to $80M per seat. The price went up when they became a monopoly and will probably fall again when there is competition.
Crew dragon: $20M-$25M.
Starliner: $54M (My guess is this number was chosen to be cheaper than Soyuz so it might change with the cost of a Soyuz seat.)
Dream Chaser: There are two flavours: crew and cargo. They are quite different. NASA has ordered launches of the cargo version to ISS but cancelled funding for the crew version. There has been talk of Crew Dream Chaser launching from Stratolaunch, Ariane 5, Atlas V and Falcon 9. Falcon 9 is the cheapest: ($50M+Dream Chaser)/7
BFS: 100,000kg to LEO for around $10M. If we call that 100 people + 900kg each for luxuries like air, water, food and a small car that makes $0.1M per seat. That many people aboard the ISS may well be too much for the life support systems so passengers would have to spend most of their time on BFS (which has a similar pressurised volume).
Blue Origin: New Sheppard cannot get anything to ISS but New Glenn could. The Blue Moon lander is a bit small but the stretched version could carry passengers. The system would be massive overkill for sending a few people to ISS. Perhaps passengers could stop there for lunch before going to the moon. No information on prices but there may be a discount with Amazon Prime.
Orion/SLS: $666M. Most of that cost is SLS. You could launch Orion on Falcon Heavy. As FH is not man rated you would need to launch the passengers separately on a Crew Dragon but it would still be far cheaper than SLS. Further savings could be made by not launching Orion at all. (I am being a little unfair. Orion is intended to go to LOPG. SLS could get it there. If launched by Falcon Heavy, another launch would be required to get the Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage into orbit to push Orion to LOPG. Like New Glenn/Blue Moon, SLS/Orion is overkill for ISS.)
My most common use of Windows is the self-service checkouts at the super-market (I know they are Windows because I have seen them crashed). Next on the list is probably ATM use. They were (are?) XP. Once every five years I tell a Windows device that I have arrived for my regular check-up at my local surgery. It is possible there are some other Windows machines I use less frequently that have successfully hidden their OS by not crashing when I see them.
If you are too lazy to walk around a chain-link fence get a friend to stand behind you and pull on both sides to create a little slack then you rotate one of the wires. The wires are flattened helices. Each rotation moves the wire up (or down) a notch. Repeat until you have a big enough gap to get through - or you divide the fence in two.
Alan Turing thought it would be difficult to make a machine that could pass a Turing test but ELIZA did just fine in the '60s because the vast majority of testers did not know how to exploit AIs' weaknesses. The key to making money from AI is not faster computers or better software but a steady supply of rich and powerful idiots. Truly we are entering the golden age of AI.
NASA gets that budget on the condition that they throw about $2B/year down the SLS toilet. One of the reasons they could not build a a rocket in a decade was because they were required to keep their old contractors in business by ordering modified space shuttle parts. NASA gets to spend a little of their budget on science and exploration and have achieved wonders with it. Imagine what they could do if the US senate did not tell them how to spend their slice of tax payers' money.
You found a cob-web on spacex.com. The original plan was two people in a crew dragon launched on a Falcon Heavy. Falcon Heavy will never be human rated so the new plan involves about ten people on a shiny space ship.
For now, Falcon 9 wins on size (L=70,⌀=3.66) and reaching orbit but size will matter when Bezos launches New Glenn (L=82, ⌀=7m). Perhaps one day when the supply of pork is seriously threatened SLS will launch (L=111, ⌀=8.4+2x3.7m). Not to be out-done, Musk will answer with a Spaceship (L=118, ⌀=9m).
For now, Bezos in winning on reuse and it is hard to predict whether Bezos or Musk will put people in space first. No matter what, SLS will massively exceed everyone else combined on cost.
Actually the Trump method is to order services complain about them and not pay the bill. He has been famous for not paying contractors for decades. All twitter has to do is present a bill for Trump not to pay, Trump will think he has won and everything is sorted.
I am not so sure about that. I just checked a Google image search for Trump and five other idiots make the top ten. For some reason he does not even appear until fourth place. I blame the Democrats. When Republicans had a majority they worked hard to maintain his position. The Democrats just aren't making the same effort.
Possession of external storage devices has been a criminal offence for years. You are required to upload everything to a cloud via GCHQ and make it available to all businesses so you receive more relevant advertising. Next you will be trying to make notes with a pencil and paper. Quick, buy yourself an Apple pencil so you cannot accidently make that mistake.
Krebs researched publicly available information on Hutchins. In short, Hutchings wrote and distributed malware which might possibly count as legal free speech in the US if he did not know any of the recipients were going to use it to a commit a crime. This pre-dates Kronos. Hutchins' pseudonyms from that time stopped doing anything naughty (eg: hiring others to sell his malware) long before Kronos.
Beyond all possible doubt Hutchins is guilty of talking to the FBI under caution and without a lawyer. [Do not sign the form that says "I have been read my rights" because between that and the signature box is says "I waive my right to a lawyer". The three things you say during an FBI interview are "Am I free to go?", "Where's my lawyer" and "No comment".] He is also guilty of saying something that can be interpreted as suspicious while talking on a prison phone.
The plea agreement is all about conspiring with Vinny to sell his Kronos malware. Now that there is a plea agreement the FBI are unlikely to show any evidence they may have. From the outside it will be impossible to tell if Hutchins signed because he is guilty or because of expediency.
The FBI have done all the standard tricks to (make themselves look guilty) / (convict a criminal with minimal expense to tax payers). I think plea deals cost a large amount of public accountability and confidence in the FBI and legal system.
The Falcon Heavy centre core fell over before SpaceX employees could secure it to the deck. The robot that does this task for Falcon 9 does not fit Falcon Heavy but apparently this will be fixed for STP-2. As there is a centre core in the garage this should not cause delays.
The Bible has plenty of references to Israelites being berated and punished for idolatry and polytheism. Christianity and Judaism have made a thorough effort to forget their polytheistic ancestry. Their god used to have a wife - Asherah, the Queen of Heaven. It was a bad break up and she got edited out of the bible but the archeological evidence remains.
amanfromMars 1 is a more entertaining parody generator. Try mixing in a bit of Ezekiel. There's a man who know his mushrooms.
Gods get created over and over. The primordial Greek gods got demonised when they were replaced by the titans and the titans got demonised when they were replaced by the Olympians. The Greek Olympians were a bit too Greek for the Romans so they got recreated with a stronger Roman flavour. The god of Judaism was a bit Jewish for the Christians so they created an updated version closer to their own values.
Every culture creates their own gods - sometimes by recycling older ones. Hundreds of different gods and I have never seen any of them. Not even the invisible pink unicorn.