Who has written such a thing for Chrome??? When I said better browser I meant better than Chrome. It's horrible.
136 posts • joined 18 Oct 2007
Just use a better browser. What's the big deal?
When there is a Pacquio fight on national TV here, you get a 3 minute round followed by AT LEAST 15 minutes of ads. His second fight against Marquez - I was watching on cable live and chatting to my friend who was watching on the national channel. Totally spoilt the result for him. It was unintentional but he didn't talk to me for a week!
I've never signed up to Facebook. But I know they have pictures of me on the site. So they must have a profile of me on there. Do tell me how I opt out then, given that I never agreed to their terms.
Will it warn you on sites where the unwanted program is "Chrome"????? The number of times I have unchecked for Chrome to be installed....
It's apparently the devil's action when programs are installed as bundleware by Microsoft, software sites and anyone else but when it's a Google program it's an angelic act. The hypocrisy is incredible. And the irony of it is that Google is malware... it installs in a non install location on Windows, and spys on all your browsing.
I guess none of you play browser games... The top 10 games in Facebook all use flash. What would the wife do if there was no flash I ask you? Is it not a good way to keep her quiet?
Alanis? She has absolutely no idea what irony is...
Almost any song... what?
"Google correctly claims that almost any song in the world is already posted on YouTube, somewhere."
You are kidding right? There are so so many songs I want to share with people but they are not on YouTube. Do you only like Taylor Swift or something?
Moka pot for me. Bought one in an Italian restaurant for under 20 quid in 2005. It's still going strong to this day and I use it on average once daily (mostly one a day in the morning, occassionally a second one in the evening or no coffee on rare occasions).
Lavazza Rossa is my coffee of choice.
Google bribed many to bundle their browser with their software installers.
Re: Cool Desktop
Well... many reasons I can think of. It's not intuiative at all to get it to do anything. There is no start button, menu, or anything. Nor any explanation that you need to right click (I assume that is how that menu appears) to do anything. It's like when users first got to windows 8, it was almost impossible to do anything and users would sit perplexed and eventually give up.
Secondly, I doubt they could care less what tasks are running or how much processor each are using. Nor how much they have downloaded. This technical information is useful at times but it's not needed all the time. It's just extra unneeded bloat.
When you run apps how do you see what is running? There is no taskbar? Or is it transparent and nothing is running there? The thing is.. I shouldn't need to ask these questions; it needs to be obvious from the start.
So really this desktop is fine for an experienced nerd but for most people it's useless.
Finally... why are buttons, scrollbars and text so ugly in Linux?
Some days I like lightly toasted and some times well toasted. This toaster is therefore utterly useless? What the hell is "properly toasted"?
Re: A storm in a tea cup
I just renewed for another year today. It cost me £28 monthly.
Re: A storm in a tea cup
I do not know wat EXR or HDR files are so forgive me. I just use the main CC apps.
I don't use GIMP.
Re: @ Jan Hargreaves - A storm in a tea cup
I don't have a single file on the cloud storage. I would not use it as the only location for files but it is useful for some people nonetheless.
A storm in a tea cup
People saying that apps should not be in the cloud really should read up on what they are talking about before making complete fools of themselves. The apps are not in the cloud, they are installed on your machine.
The subscription part is in the cloud. I've been a little low on cash lately and my payment failed. I finally had enough to top up my credit card and even after the subscription expiring I have been given an extra five days grace period to sort out my billing. You are given plenty of warning and it's only your own fault if you cannot sort out your own finances.
I love that I can pay £28 monthly and have the full creative cloud with all the bells and whistles (inc 50GB of cloud storage). I could not afford the £3000 or whatever it was for the master collection on dvd while it was still around. I thought a subscription model would be great in about 2008, at least for small businesses. And finally Adobe now provides that.
And finally, for people saying I should just use some other software... they have not heard of the killer features in the CC editions. One example is Content-Aware. I did a club flyer this week and had to clean up bits of an old newspaper. I remember doing this years ago with the cloning tool and it would take hours and still not look right. Content-Aware did it perfectly for me in about 5 seconds. Do that in GIMP......
One of my clients uses Rackspace and I am in the middle of signing up another. Can you call Google, Amazon or Microsoft? Well... yes but after being passed around several cities globally with people for which English is not their first language, you may finally get some help. Once they have taken over your computer as they can't just tell you what to do. Sometimes the wait for answering a call is an hour or more.
Rackspace have direct numbers all over the world. You phone support and within 1 or 2 rings it's picked up and answered by very polite and competent support staff. They are courteous, open and fix problems very quickly. Frankly its worth the extra expenditure and I'm sick of the lowest common denominator where as long as it's really cheap people put up with pathetic service. I applaud Rackspace for sticking to their principlies and offering an alternative. It's my favourite cloud provider currently.
I've been delighted by finally being able to subscribe to Creative Cloud. You can say what you want about it, but for me it was a godsend. I don't have $5000 to buy Master Collection. But $50 a month to have it is perfect for me. It will take me 8 years to spend the same as buying the boxed set. I would imagine that by then, there will be significant new features and upgrades that I will continue to receive as part of my subscription.
If you are in a huge company with a large budget for software, I can perfectly understand why you would prefer to have a boxed version. But surely you also want to keep up with the new features of the software? I really think that it is a great deal.
People complaining about getting cut off - well pay the bill. If your card is expiring it might be an idea to update your details before going off to work on location... There is a 30 day window for you to let the software communicate to Adobe servers, and warnings show up around a week before your subscription will expire, with periodical reminders.
And to the person who said that there haven't been any significant changes for the past 4-5 versions; you are either a troll or just totally ignorant. I cannot begin to imagine how many work hours Content-Aware has saved me. It must be in the hundreds.
WebP - So that's why images uploaded to facebook so are so horribly compressed and smallish text is almost unreadable. Yup, what innovation.... Go Zuck!
Is there something in css3 to tilt your exclamation point by 9 degrees? El Reg surely needs to use something like that for all future Yahoo headlines. Just to make them look as junior as that logo looks...
Very sad. The box was a great resource. Stuff you just could not find anywhere else.
And I just upgraded one of my clients to their "Unlimited Exchange Online" which is not accessible via IMAP but is just a stupid folder that can only be seen in the browser. And it was a minimum 12 month contract... One person is going to be happy!
That is one ugly homescreen. Couldn't PR come up with something better than that? It's ghastly...
And people say iOS looks like a toy...
Re: I'm Sick Of This
Er yes you can. It's a program called StarDock
Re: And yet, and yet ...
Do you not do any re-touching in your business at all?
I would be surprised at any design business that doesn't have at least one program from Adobe.
Ahh fair enough then. The pricing seems extremely reasonable to me and I was somewhat surprised considering the level of abuse the MPEG-LA receive from freetards/ the VP8 brainwashed.
The previous suggestion of a 20 cent (ish) addon in the Ubuntu store seems very sensible.
It's free for up to 100,000 units, 20 cents up to 200,000 units and 10 cents after.
You are saying this is too expensive? What do you think they should be charging?
Can somebody please enlighten me... what file(s) over 500MB would someone want to send that are not pirated?
Re: @Jan Hargreaves
"If you've been following the whole Win 8 thing for a while (your use of TIFKAM indicates you have,) then you should know the answer."
So is that anything other than... you can't? For example you want to watch a video online out of the corner of your eye while doing an email. Can't see how this is going to work in TIFKAM. What happens when somebody suddenly skype's you. It's just a complete and utter mess.
"And a lot less painfully then the generally suggested "Tell people to use Linux instead."
Photoshop under wine in Linux would really be painful. I've been saying for a long time that Linux advocates can come back to me when there is Photoshop or good enough equivalent on Linux. Still waiting...
For the record, I use Windows 7 myself. I looked at the upgrade options, including the special offer to update quickly. And quickly thought.. forget it. They are really not offering me a worthwhile upgrade.
Re: @Jan Hargreaves
Tell me how you can use excel or word, or photoshop with only 25% of the screen? And I mean productively.
TIFKAM is for content consumers. Not really for doing any real work at all.
What's the 's' for? I thought it was Just Window 8 now.. since you can only use one at a time
Both of you are there. I don't think anyone else is interested....
The problem with VP8 is that it is a vastly inferior codec. It's compression looks much worse, at larger file sizes.
The fact that Google is pushing it is only holding back everyone from just getting on it with and standardising H.264.
Competition is good in certain areas.... but with some things we just want one that fits all. HTML5 is really taking ages to get going because of the squabbling over the video codec standard. Guys... H.264 is the best, get over it and move on please.
Beats? No thanks. I don't need all the levels pre-f*cked for me. I guess I would like it if I listened to R'n'B/Pop.
Isn't it now illegal to jailbreak your phone in the US now. Perhaps this is a now a requirement for operators to do what they can to prevent users from breaking the law?
Re: @Jan Hargreaves
About as much as Microsoft are paying you I would imagine...
I wasn't asked to give alternatives though. And I intentionally didn't give any examples because sometimes you can end up sounding like a car salesman or employee of said company. Since you are now asking specifically though, I'll bite.
I use VoipStunt.com for sip calling. It's actually brilliant. A tenner of credit every 120 days and you get 120 days of free calls to about 30 countries. The tenner of credits is still good after that has expired. I've been using it since 2003. You used to be able to get London numbers through them, but you can pick them up for a couple of bucks a month from flynumber.com or just get an 056 number for free if you don't mind that prefix.
With SIP you only need 64kbps for a voice call, and there is no leeching of your bandwidth or CPU. I prefer a hardware device for calls so I have a phone that I can use even if my pc is shutdown. They have a crappy client, which works fine mind you, but you can use ANYTHING you want by just plugging in the settings (unlike Skype). We're even setting up a proper answering machine service on our server to handle calls for our company now.
For chat I use Pidgin.im - again there are plenty of alternatives and I have several accounts of several protocols running there (different clients use different protocols).
Skype is the horsemeat equivalent of a juicy aussie steak.
You act like skype is the only thing in the world that makes calls. You are trolling or what?
There are PLENTY of programs/alternatives that offer what it does. It seems to do everything it attempts very badly. Can't think why anyone would defend it honestly.
Those two (Niklas Zennström and Janus Friis) have been responsible for some awful software over the years... Anyone remember the failure that was Joost? Kazaa was equally awful.
Wish Skype would just die. It's horrible.
- The call/video qaulity is pathetic (epecially for the bandwith it uses).
- The rates are extortionate.
- The application GUI is disgusting. You can't even exit the program from the menu (how stupid is that).
- It eats your connection and makes browsing, VOIP calls, and other uses slow or unusable.
- Oh and it's responsible for killing MSN messenger on Friday (except in China).
It's Microsoft's 'push the self destruct button' week. On Friday they switch of MSN Messenger.......
Popcorn is ready!
If you will pick the cheapest service... then you get what you didn't pay for. Move to a proper host.
I really don't get the hate for Flash at all. When used right, it's bloody fantastic.
When used wrong (or when you could achieve the same results without using it), yes it is awful and horrible.
So shouldn't all you flash haters be calling for the banning of every other language/ development engine because if it's used badly it's horrible... so therefore let's make it extinct. We would have nothing left....
Re: It is all so very simple.
Can't you each have your own user account?
err... look at the website. it just looks stretched.
Why does MATE look like a 4x3 TV feed stretched on to a 16:9 screen?
No. I have to admit that I was probably later than some other designers, but about 7 years ago I stopped using tables for web layouts. I still use them sometimes for tabled data, and I use them every week for email newsletters (gotta love outlook right?).
Honestly.. Chrome is far worse than IE at not following standards. I really cannot fathom why people in the tech community love it so much.
I build websites for a living, and Firefox, IE, Safari all tend to behave and do what I want. It's ALWAYS &#)(%@$ Chrome that has problems.
Or maybe it's just me? haha
Re: Oh dear ....
What happens if you pull out the hard drives on your system? I bet it goes tits up. Pull the drives out of a mac pro and the desktop still functions, mouse and menus and clicking on stuff. Slide the drives back in and away you go.
It's a wonderful piece of kit that lasts for a decade or more. There are many good things about it, and the case is a lot better than any case you can buy anywhere else. If you don't like OSX then fair enough, that's your opinion.
It's just like an iPad is a bit more expensive than your bog standard chinese android tablet, but all the useability tests say it is miles ahead. 80% or more of the mobile browsing usage is on apple products. You pay a little bit more and you get better quality.
If you want to build your own machine then go ahead, it is a lot of fun, and you can mix, match and change everything that you want. A Mac Pro is obviously not for you.
Whoops, you got me. 0.65 cents per play it is.
As you said, though, even then... this is way more than they actually pay. I was also wondering whether they sold the branding of his song's page for an extortionate amount. Still don't believe the final figure. It's propaganda.
Regardless... it's still misleading, to paint a picture that Google is helping artists. They are worse than the record companies.
Now... if the label/artist did receive 0.65 cents per play... that would really help the music industry. Anyone have any idea how much Google charges the advertister for each play? You know.. they only made $50 BEEELION last year.
65 cents per play? Is this guy for real? I work for a company that has a large catalogue in YouTube and from the last month of sales figures available, our highest earning track on YouTube earned $3.84 with 19,997 plays = 0.000192 cents per play.
Must be the same propaganda machine that Spotify uses...?