Am I reading this correctly?
So when they were doing this in secret, it was illegal. But now we know they're doing it, it's totally fine.
That does not make a lick of sense!
234 posts • joined 18 Oct 2007
Am I reading this correctly?
So when they were doing this in secret, it was illegal. But now we know they're doing it, it's totally fine.
That does not make a lick of sense!
That was my first thought, but according to Scott Hanselman there won't be a shell.
So while possibly not a super-cheap office PC, I can still see loads of uses for this.
MS have achieved one thing with this though, getting up to speed with Universal apps is now looking like it may just be worth it.
I believe the barge is a remote controlled drone, so no humans in danger at any point.
If MS or any other vendor ignore reports of bugs, then they should be disclosed in order to shame them in to sorting it out.
However, in both the recent cases, MS have said they have a fix and have asked Google to withhold disclosure for a short amount of time until they can get it out. Where a software vendor is clearly taking the bugs reported by Google seriously and is doing something about it, but just needs a little extra time to issue a fix, Google should be more flexible and work with the vendors in that situation.
In my work, we have a few software packages that run on WES7/8, XP, 7 and 8. To fix bugs and fully test them can take a week or more depending on their severity and how many platforms the issue is present on, and I dare say MS have a lot more platforms to test against. Testing takes time, and sticking to the 90 day limit rigidly either exposes users to flaws unnecessarily or will encourage vendors to rush fixes out without proper testing, which may cause more damage than it prevents.
My last phone was a HTC One X, a great phone when it came out with good battery life, but successive Android updates rendered it unable to last a working day, otherwise I was satisfied with the phone. If had been able to just buy a new higher-capacity battery module for a reasonable price, I probably would've.
The other reason I eventually went with the Lumia 1020 was for the excellent camera as my existing separate digital camera was no longer up to the job. Again, if I'd been able to just buy a better camera module for a reasonable price, I would've done that.
Having the upgradeability that the Ara range provides for a reasonable price probably would've kept me on Android.
If MS had completely ignored Google and not given them any information on when a fix would be available, I would have less of an issue with what Google did and the blame would be on MS for not communicating properly with them on the matter.
But MS did tell them that a fix was coming with a release date and asked them to delay disclosure for a couple of weeks until it was out. Google had a definitive time frame when a fix would be available and they stuck to the 90 days anyway, knowingly creating risk for users who may be vulnerable to the exploit.
So in this case, Google are firmly in the wrong IMHO.
“By removing the ability of a vendor to withhold the details of security issues indefinitely, we give users the opportunity to react to vulnerabilities in a timely manner, and to exercise their power as a customer to request an expedited vendor response.”
Which doesn't apply in this case as Microsoft told them there was a fix and asked them to hold off for an extra couple of weeks until it was released.
Seems like Google stuck to their guns just to generate a bit of bad press for MS, to the possible detriment of customers.
Excellent, that'll save me excluding the browser choice updates on every new PC I set up.
The question is who has the stronger claim to using LCA?
Am currently at work so can't do the research to see who, ahem, came first.
Facebook vs Yammer is a bit of a tenuous link, but how is this going to compete with Google Drive? Surely it's a competitor for Google+, shouldn't be too hard to lure away the 6 Google+ users..
I think the 930 is the current flagship, From the Reg review it seems to be a decent phone but I don't know how it stacks up against the phones you mentioned.
Although HTC are releasing a WinPho One M8 so that will be interesting...
No Microsoft, No. Don't for the love of <deity/> put your name on it. Lumia is a good brand and it would've served them well to keep using it and keep their name off of those devices.
I say that as a very happy Lumia 1020 owner and Windows 8 user, but you'd have to be stupid to not be aware that Microsoft's name doesn't necessarily have the best reputation amongst consumers these days.
Couldn't agree more.
What he said last week was terribly phrased, no denying that, but it must take a massive act of wilful ignorance to not be able to clearly see what he was *trying* (very badly) to say.
MS CEO gets paid a s**tload of money, not exactly a headline story there El Reg. So far Nadella has made one cock-up, and seems to be receiving a disproportionate amount of attacks for it.
The MS hate seems to overriding proportionality and reason even more than usual.
I see where he was going with it, but he did say it very badly.
I think what he was trying to say is that you shouldn't need to ask for a raise, but the company you work for should reward you for your hard work, regardless of whether you are male or female.
In my current job, I was going to ask for a raise at my last appraisal but my boss beat me to it and gave me a raise before I had to ask.
I realise this isn't how things work in the vast majority of companies, but it is really how it should be which I thing is what he was trying to get at.
As it is, it just sounded like "don't ask for a raise dear, you'll get one when your boss thinks you're worth it", which has a much more sinister tone to it!
It wouldn't surprise me. Microsoft, like myself, should never be allowed to name things EVER.
That being said, as long as the phones are decent, I don't care whose name is on them. But Microsoft isn't a name that most people will want on their expensive shiny shiny. If I were them, I'd just use Lumia and not put the word "Microsoft" anywhere on any of their devices, their sales will thank them for it...
MS have been warning for years that this would be removed, admitting that it was a stupid idea to add the setting in the first place. Plenty of warning has been given and no one in their right minds should have this set to false anyway.
"rapid technology cadence "
as a Windows Phone user I'd have to take issue with that, while the rest of MS has moved to a faster cadence, the phone division seems to have gone the opposite direction, the current 8.1 update being the first in a while.
Is this a sign of future change or just marketing fud?
Apparently the alien is called the Failien and was originally a placeholder for when errors occurred, but they seem to have adopted it as their mascot. I don't see any harm in it as long as it doesn't get in my way.
I'm not a fan of the new portal either. I can see how, when all services are over there and you can use resource groups to group individual services by application, that it *might* be useful from a "DevOps" perspective which is where they are aiming it, but in terms of just doing something to a particular service, I think the existing portal is far superior for that purpose. Sometimes you don't need to see the whole application, you just want to work with the website or the database without having everything else in your face.
Also, it keeps forgetting every change I make to it which kind of defeats the point of it being customisable.
It would appear it is not just the UK government who are completely useless at IT projects.
You can tell it was designed for touch because it works really well on both phones and tablets. Most of the niggles I have about using it on a desktop disappear once I'm on a tablet although the integration on transformers like the Lenovo Helix is a little rough.
It's being reannounced because they screwed it up.
Win8 was supposed to facilitate write once-run anywhere, due to internal politics it failed miserably at this, ending up with APIs for Win8 on Intel, Win8 on Arm, and WinPho which were very similar but different enough to be incompatible.
Here's hoping MS can get it right second time, the fact that they seem to be teaming up with Xamarin on the mobile side makes me optimistic.
I think the purpose of self-host is to support scenarios where you want every Kb or memory available to your application. IIS is a lot lighter than it used to be but for simple scenarios it is probably overkill.
Also, vNext is supported on Mac and Linux where there is no IIS, so they need to fill the gap there.
I don't know what their excuse is for not doing it up this point. From various interviews and blog posts, I get the impression that the old compilers were bears to work with so maybe that had something to do with it and they have spent the best part of the last 5 years on Roslyn.
I'm only saying why they probably haven't added more in VS14 given all the other work they are doing.
At least now with Roslyn, if they don't do it, it will be a lot easier for someone else to.
I'm sure they'll get to it. In fairness, they have rewritten the compilers and are heavily altering the entire framework and rewriting MVC/WebForms/WebApi from scratch, I'd say they've got their hands full.
Now that it is easier with Roslyn, you'll probably see a whole load of Resharper-wannabes popping up.
Also, keep in mind this is still just a preview, I suspect there will be more by RTM.
I think this is the point of what they've realised.
So many people have realised that they don't need a PC for browsing the internet and playing games, a cheap Android tablet or shiny iThing will do for that. Every individual who comes to this conclusion is lost revenue, so they need to ensure their products work on other platforms or the browsing and playing consumer market will continue to move over to Android and Apple.
This is evident from the next version of .net officially supporting Mono. They need to get out on to other platforms and stop restricting themselves to Windows. Every product will now have to survive on it's own merits, not just keep going because it is dependent on or depended on by another product (ie Needing Windows to run virtually every MS product). As these products become cross-platform, Windows will have to stand on it's own 2 feet or die.
The only worrier is the comment about their services being best on a Windows device. If this just means added features and integrations that's fine. But given MS' form, it probably means they will be horribly crippled.
It seems pretty astonishing that Satya is saying that MS experiences should be available on any platform, all in the same week they reveal that they're shutting down Nokia X, the only part of the Nokia business that ships any decent volume.
Unless there are some major profitability issues with Nokia X that we don't know about, the ability to keep them as an "on-ramp" in to the MS and WinPho ecosystem would've been the best thing they got out of the Nokia acquisition.
We are very small (<25 staff) and we don't have a dedicated sysadmin nor do we have the space or time to support running in-house infrastructure. The developers do the maintenance and I can tell you that running our web applications on Azure requires a fraction of the management time required when we were running on a rented server in a data center and on an in-house server before that.
We are not alone in not having a dedicated sysadmin, it seems be a pretty common thing among small businesses, hence why the maths works out in Azure's favour for us.
If you've already got the infrastructure and the admins, that will undoubtedly be cheaper than any cloud offering.
On 4, we are an SMB and using Azure allows us to do things that we could not otherwise do. I did the sums before we started using Azure and once you factor in power consumption, time to market, and the wages of someone to look after it all, Azure won easily from a cost perspective. If you're just comparing the cost of renting servers against the cost of buying them, on-premise will look more attractive but you're not getting the full picture.
5. Couldn't agree more, I cringe every time I see the Windows 8/WinPho adverts, they're just so bad and don't convey any information whatsoever.Suggesting that people need to be brave to use your products is Ratner-esque.
@Steve Davies 3
"There are lots of highly skilled people at Microsoft. It is a shame all your political infighting at the top is getting in the way of some fairly decent products. Just look at the number of people who leave MS and startup their own company..."
Agreed, if you look at what the .net and Azure guys are doing currently, they're coming up with some really nice products and embracing open source as something that will help them build better products and make more people WANT to use their platform, the future looks bright for .net developers. Microsoft needs more of that kind of thinking in the rest of the company.
This is the second El Reg review that has referred to Tiles as deprecated, is that actually the case? They are no longer the only notification method but that does not equal deprecation. Given how MS are pushing tiles generally, I find it unlikely that they would deprecate them on the phone which is actually where they work the best.
I know some have had issues with 8.1 but it is not completely broken, I have had no issues with it whatsoever, not one.
"Microsoft gave up on integrating social media deeply into the OS" - I would personally say that is in 8.1's favour.
Overall I would say I have lost nothing through the 8.1 update and gained Notifications and (eventually) Cortana which sounds like it will be useful, but given I only got my 1020 a couple of weeks before signing up to the Dev Preview, it's possible I never got as far as using some of the features that have gone backwards.
It's great that they've bought this back for the people who want it. I just hope they give us the option of sticking with the current start screen as I personally prefer it to the start menu.
Dublin most likely.
Not that that will stop the NSA giving MS a court order + gag order if they ever want anything. NSA think they can do what they want and they'll get away with it because, in their opinion, USA is the leader of the free** world.
**Their ever changing definition of free.
I HATE any advert with that tune with a passion.
If pink slips are being handed out, the marketing department should be the first to go and whoever (if anyone) outside of the marketing department approved those bloody adverts.
Microsoft's products have improved IMHO but their appalling marketing is one of their biggest problems at the moment.
Apple stole the Nokia camera guy, they should steal some Apple marketing execs as, despite refusing to own an iDevice, I actually quite like the Apple adverts.
I'll give you point one, although I would hasten to add that AWS wasn't a great deal better at this point in it's life. Their numbers of failures were less, but they tended to be a lot bigger.
No cloud provider has stable pricing, If they had stable pricing, they'd be priced out of the market within 3 months as everyone else continue to drop their prices.
Here's a quick way to get the shortcut.
On the start screen, search for the application you want, right click > open file location. This will take you to that application's location within the Start Menu file heirarchy, then you can just copy and paste the shortcut to the desktop.
It's not quick by any means but certainly quicker than trawling around the file system. Would be nice if they added "Pin to Desktop" in the right click menu alongside Start and Taskbar...
Will someone please tell the yoof to stop making up stupid words?
I've had one of these for a couple of years now, but successive updates have rendered it unable to reliably connect to the shares on my NAS and it is now getting replaced by a Raspberry Pi running XBMC. Shame really, as it was a great little box initially.
That is all.
I think these idiots are probably a minority. If they bought in to the platform in order to get things they hadn't heard of and expected to have some sort of exclusivity of all WP features, then I've no sympathy with them as they are clearly not the most intelligent of people.
I've got a WP and the possibility of Cortana ending up on IOS and Android has absolutely no effect on me whatsoever. Come to think of it, it can only be a good thing as more users = more development. If Cortana turns out to be a good technology, then the more people who want it and can get it, the better.
I look forward to getting it myself (damn US-only Beta!)
"would have to be 100% reliable fully automated travel on our roads"
It doesn't have to be 100% reliable, just more reliable than the standard meatbag-controlled vehicles...
What difference does the XP EOL make to the code quality of TrueCrypt?
Has anyone taken a look at the Siri and GoogleNow Terms to see if they contain a similar clause? This seems like the kind of standard arse-covering legalese that the lawyers would apply regardless of the company's faith in the product.
MS have relaxed the rules recently, this and allowing an absence of hard nav buttons were two of the bigger changes. They also made WinPho free for phones below a certain size.
The only gripe I have with that review is that the Live Tiles haven't been deprecated, they're just no longer the only way to get information to the user. These two things are not the same. In certain scenarios, Live Tiles work better than the Notification pulldown and vice versa, so having both is the best of both worlds in my opinion.
Seems more like a demotion, Head of PC and Printers to Secretary? Bet it pays well though...
It's actually based on Server 2012 (not 2008 as the article suggested) and from the demo at TechEd, you don't see any of the OS, just the app itself, so the OS is not even a factor here I think.
It looks interesting, I'll wait to hear how much it costs before getting too excited...
I just got one a few weeks ago and it is excellent, best phone I have ever had, with or without the camera.
"developed by Partinen and others" - there's still hope...
Probably not a great deal for Joe Public but probably resulted in some games developers leaving, although they probably account for a relatively small portion of Candy Crush's user base anyway.
King's fortunes will continue to slide as long as they are a one trick pony. All of their games are just cheap re-skins of Candy Crush, that cow isn't going to be milkable for ever...
My work have both a Surface Pro and a Lenovo Helix and the experience is pretty good, Windows 8 is at it's best on a touch device (no surprise there).
I agree with both of your niggles, the All Apps views is an appalling UI IMHO and I avoid it whenever I can, the improved search on Windows 8 facilitates that nicely. Keyboard is a pain, I wouldn't have thought it would be that hard to add a setting to suppress the on-screen keyboard when a physical keyboard is present, seems like a no-brainer to me as it is surely the most suitable option for most people.
It's a shame the Surface is so highly priced because it is a fantastic piece of hardware, but the high price means it gets excluded pretty early on when put up against cheaper equivalents with a more traditional laptop form-factor.
So one browser maker does what is probably in the best interests of the consumer, and everyone who stands to make a loss from that runs in the opposite direction.
The elephant in the room is, of course, that as long as DNT is off by default, it's unlikely to cause any major harm. As soon as it's on by default, revenue goes down so it is no longer a usable standard from their perspective.
When a service is free, you're the product.
"If you use their site, it needs JScript. If you use hotmail it uses an utter ton of JS"
As is the case with about 99% of sites on the internet, what's your point?
I hope the Services division takes some advice from the Azure guys here. They make a point of ensuring that Azure SDKs for non-MS languages are at feature parity with (and sometimes ahead of) the .net SDKs. The thinking is exactly that they want people to use Azure,let them do it in whatever language they want.
If they go the same way with the X models, it could work out very well for them. As stated in the article, it shouldn't matter what device people use, they should all be able to access MS services if they want to. Being cross-platform gets people dependent on and familiar with your services on their current platform, making them more likely to think of MS when their next upgrade comes along.
The Trojan Horse theory, while vaguely plausible, I still believe to be far less likely than the two simplest and most obvious explanations.
1. Rightly or wrongly, he liked Windows Phone and thought it was a good way to differentiate from all the Android makers out there.
2. He was promoted above his ability and, faced with not having a clue what to do, did what most people do when that happens: He went running back to what was familiar, in this case Microsoft and Windows Phone.
One day I will want to update my 1020. If Nokia can keep producing phones of that quality, they'll have me for as long as the platform and the devices serve my purpose.