It's not even the real McCartney
Check out the cover of Abbey Road ...
This imposter has no right to block the release of the real Beatles' music.
970 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Oct 2007
Retailers have two options with a lower VAT rate:
1. Pass it on to the customer. Customer sees cheaper prices and buys more. Net gain.
2. Don't pass it on to the customer. Customer sees the same prices and buys the same amount. Retailer makes more per unit. Net gain.
Why would retailers not support a VAT cut?
Next time any chance of a three-paragraph article containing a LINK to the forums for anyone who wants to know what a dozen idiots think?
Gordon Ross, another disgruntled reader, said "Let's see: A "feature" two-page story on how some new software is slow. You read it, and what do you find: It's just a load of copy 'n' pastes from the Parallels forums. Did this take much effort to write ? You being paid by the word ?"
Sounds like your "experts" are as uninformed as 0.2% of your readership.
I just located and viewed it in under 30 seconds simply by Googling for "urchin.js".
Here's the link:
http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js
Simply fire that link up in Chrome and you get the full source code. Here's the first few lines for the doubters:
//-- Google Analytics Urchin Module
//-- Copyright 2007 Google, All Rights Reserved.
//-- Urchin On Demand Settings ONLY
var _uacct=""; // set up the Urchin Account
var _userv=1; // service mode (0=local,1=remote,2=both)
//-- UTM User Settings
var _ufsc=1; // set client info flag (1=on|0=off)
var _udn="auto"; // (auto|none|domain) set the domain name for cookies
var _uhash="on"; // (on|off) unique domain hash for cookies
var _utimeout="1800"; // set the inactive session timeout in seconds
var _ugifpath="/__utm.gif"; // set the web path to the __utm.gif file
var _utsp="|"; // transaction field separator
var _uflash=1; // set flash version detect option (1=on|0=off)
var _utitle=1; // set the document title detect option (1=on|0=off)
var _ulink=0; // enable linker functionality (1=on|0=off)
var _uanchor=0; // enable use of anchors for campaign (1=on|0=off)
var _utcp="/"; // the cookie path for tracking
var _usample=100; // The sampling % of visitors to track (1-100).
//-- UTM Campaign Tracking Settings
var _uctm=1; // set campaign tracking module (1=on|0=off)
var _ucto="15768000"; // set timeout in seconds (6 month default)
var _uccn="utm_campaign"; // name
var _ucmd="utm_medium"; // medium (cpc|cpm|link|email|organic)
var _ucsr="utm_source"; // source
var _uctr="utm_term"; // term/keyword
var _ucct="utm_content"; // content
var _ucid="utm_id"; // id number
var _ucno="utm_nooverride"; // don't override
I always find it touching when people outside the industry think that game code is anything other than a huge collection of hacks intended to give interesting visual results.
The idea of using it to simulate actual stuff in actual industry, on the other hand, fills me with dread. No way I'm tendering for that contract. World of pain as expectations crash head-on.
"The software industry already has problems writing and compiling multi-threaded software so that the threads can be spread across the cores and execute in parallel. The more thread bandwidth there is in a chip the harder the job gets."
Well, there's a reasonably well-known maxim here about how Amdahl's Law is kind of irrelevant. You don't make the same workload go faster. You make a bigger workload go the same speed. This applies perfectly to games and simulations. So I dispute that more threads really make things harder. This is received wisdom but in practice it's kind of wrong for the kinds of applications that actually suit multicore systems.
OTOH, for applications that don't suit multicore systems, the job doesn't get harder, it gets impossible.
"Sony's PS3 has a Cell processor running 9 cores, one a controller core, the other 8 replicated graphics cores which do all the render work stuff, and very well too."
Actually, the Cell processor used in PS3 is only specced at 8 cores and one of those is used for "security" leaving 7 for the application. The 6 available SPUs are not typically used for rendering. PS3 has a traditional GPU for that (from the NV4x family). SPUs can be used for preparing data for the GPU, or at a pinch for doing image processing, but are equally likely to be running physics workloads or even game scripting code.
"radically better data centre application bandwidth"
Using a multicore system to run massive numbers of VMs is a clear non-starter. Everything bottlenecks at the serial devices. You only have a certain amount of disk bandwidth, memory bandwidth, disk IOPs and memory IOPs. Sharing this across 80 VMs is not going to give you 80 full-speed VMs, or anything like. Unless your VMs are all running compute-heavy tasks which require little I/O you're screwed. And if your VMs *are* all running compute-heavy tasks which require little I/O, you're probably in the arena of games and simulations. GOTO 10.
What it does allow - and this goes against the grain somewhat - is for languages to be very very inefficient. If a language now takes a thousand cycles to add two numbers (I'm looking at you, LISP) then it's fine because you're going to be waiting about 10,000 cycles for your last memory transaction to complete. You may as well interpret ASCII source code directly. Parallel graph rewriting languages become viable. It's a good day for computer science.
This same factor allows emulation of other hardware. At the bit level, if you like. These systems will be awesome for Verilog. It's a good day for computer designers.
So Intel's products might just presage a revolution in how software is written and in how hardware is designed.
But I can certainly see why your typical data centre guy is thinking "why bother?"
Sony are of course at liberty to prevent X360 users from streaming their movies. Perhaps they don't trust Microsoft's security? :LOL: Actually it's a bit of a piss-take when WMP will happily talk to your PS3 over DLNA and when Sony basically rely on DevStudio to provide a decent IDE for PS3 software development. Maybe Microsoft should block the SN Studios plugin in a future revision and use that as leverage. But ... no ... actually Microsoft don't tend to get that petty.
On the subject of the high-ground, note that you can upgrade your PS3 with any standard-sized SATA drive with nothing but a screwdriver and without paying Sony a penny. You don't have to pay a fee for the online stuff either. But that's boring and you know all this already.
"Clarification of virtual property rights for more adequate theft protection"
Yes, I need clarity. Take chess: If my queen gets taken, should I call the cops? Or D&D: if a chaotic evil character knocks me out and steals my Wand of Healing, should I sue?
Also we need legislation to protect player avatars from monsters intent on killing them. Maybe get a posse together and hunt them all down to make the world a safe place. I *strongly* suspect that the game creators put these monsters in on purpose. There's an obvious class action suit in the making there.
Vista does not take 15 minutes to boot for me. It boots faster than any previous Microsoft OS other than DOS.
And who waits for their computer to shut down? Click shut down, leave. What's it going to do? Catch on fire while you're gone? Maybe this lawsuit is more about OCD than about boot times per se.
The other thing you can do is leave the thing on all night. It might not be "green" but it costs *far* less than 15 minutes of my time to leave a PC on for 24 hours.
I agree.
Apple's mistake, in fact, *is* to allow the amateurs in.
Compare this with another platform holder. Sony and the PS3.
The publication sequence goes like this:
1. Submit game design
2. Get it approved by Sony
3. *Then* you get the dev hardware + software, for which you pay *through the nose*
4. You must follow TRCs (technical requirements checklist). No pass, no publish.
5. Get through all this and you can publish online and/or on physical medium
Yet the world and its dog doesn't bitch and moan about Sony's practices, because they never said amateurs could publish, so the amateurs don't expect to be able to.
The pros, on the other hand, accept the restrictions and simply work within them.
What a fucking idea! Saves stress on all sides, saves misguided anti-Sony bullshit from non-developers whom it doesn't affect (such as El Reg hacks), etc. etc.
"No matter how smart the software the computer can only do stuff that binary logic can do. This means that artificial intelegence using binary computers is a huge waste of time no matter how big the computer is. AI needs a computer that does not resolve down to a simple Turing machine."
Ah yes, the old "you can't have AI without a soul" argument, favoured by Weisenbaum and others; the last bastion of received religious wisdom in mathematics.
Actually your brain isn't even as powerful as a Turing machine. It only has a finite tape.
"Do auto makers have to make sure their autos are not used for illegal purposes (speeding, reckless drivers, ignoring stop signs and stop lights, allowing drunk drivers, etc)? Do the alcohol brewers and distributors have to ensure that people don't drink too much and become abusive? Do gun makers have to find a way to make sure their weapons aren't used for illegal purposes? In all of those cases, the answer is a resounding "NO"."
Interestingly, in all of those cases, we have age barriers to use.
And - let's face it - we could probably stop most filesharing if no-one was allowed to use the internet until after they graduated.
This would also protect the kids from groomers and extreme porn.
It was mooted on El Reg a week or two ago and I'm starting to think it's a fine idea.
So you guys have tested 1.3 and found there to be no difference in network traffic usage from 1.2?
Coz I'm thinking Apple have done this and have found that there is a difference.
In the absence of any investigation more thorough than printing the developer's "new features" list, I'm siding with Apple.
"The true lemmings are the ones who continue to believe in global warming and climate change despite the mountain of evidence saying otherwise"
Hahahah.
What kind of animal is it that has no affinity for science but likes to be "controversial" and deny things that the scientific community accepts as fact? People like global warming deniers and creationists, who reject the most solidly researched evidence if it doesn't fit into their world view, but accept the most flimsy circumstantial evidence if it does? Is there a name for them?
I'm surprised you people have time to post on The Register. Surely you should be digging a bunker ready for when the LHC is turned on?
We're simply running out of acronyms. We need an IPv6 acronym space perhaps enforcing an ETLA rule.
The WWF has no right to software trademarks (or wrestling trademarks ...) Microsoft can call their code WWF if they like.
As for Palladium, wasn't that just a codename? I don't recall the officials of Cairo or Chicago ever having a problem with Microsoft's codenames.
But the meat of the article - the programming language 'M' - well, Microsoft are just being a little unimaginative there, aren't they? If they want single-letter abbreviations they have the whole Unicode space to choose from. I suggest codepoint 0x2639.
I'm a programmer and what goes on in the data centre is a mystery to me, so this question might be very very stupid.
If you have multiple backups of the same data, and you "de-dupe" it, doesn't that mean you now only have one backup of that piece of data, so only one point of failure?
How does that help? Surely if you're running full backups you want discrete copies rather than de-duped copies, which are more-or-less equivalent to an incremental backup?
And, conversely, if you want de-duped backup data you just run an incremental backup in the first place, without paying anyone a dime for de-dupe techonology.
What am I missing here? De-dupe sounds like a stupid idea for backup data.
Paris, because I wanted an icon with a question mark on it, and I can see the IT angle.
It wasn't a DDOS. It was a DOS sourced from a single location. That's just a DOS.
And the zero-day virus was no less silly than when Goldblum did it in Independence Day. Unless of course Russian subs run Windows.
And a signal at 500nm? That's not a radio frequency. It's the colour green.
The only good side to this episode was the killing off of the ultra-annoying Adam Carter.
Smiley, because he's turning in his grave.
So it's good that this guy is still Among The Living but I really hope that he hasn't been Spreading The Disease. I bet he's feeling the Persistence of Time in hospital though. The stuff the doctors are telling him must seem like the Sound of White Noise.
/me: That's all the Anthrax albums I've got, sorry.
My knowledge of the history of the Knights Templar has, admittedly, been pieced together from Dan Brown novels, but has anyone else noticed the profound similarity between Philip the Fair's destruction of the Knights Templar on Friday 13th 1307, and Emperor Palpatine's destruction of the Jedi Knights in Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith?
I think we should be told.