PWRs are indeed old, but not as old as BWRs. Which is what Fukushima had. Um... you can read that on Wikipedia.
2859 posts • joined 12 Oct 2007
PWRs are indeed old, but not as old as BWRs. Which is what Fukushima had. Um... you can read that on Wikipedia.
Prof. Stephen Thomas is talking about LWRs. That's only one type of reactor. PWR? Thorium? Pebble-bed? CANDU? Those have safeguards against LOCA.
If the cert is valid since 25 March, 2012 ... someone didn't do their job. You should be replacing the cert as soon as you get the new one (and it's valid) instead of waiting 'till the very last moment.
1) Anti-abortionists are by default conservatives, in the sense that they do not tolerate any kind of abortion at all. Those who think about it as a human-rights issue have more leeway; support for first-trimester abortion exists among this people.
2) Something I realized after posting. Yes, anyone can claim 'I am anonymous! hahaha!!' but most of the big cases have usually been related on either anti-corporativism (attacks against RIAA/MPAA or the DDoSers from India, ACS:Law) or anti-conservatives (Tea Party, BNP, Fox News) so it does seem weird to see someone with opposing views to claim that. In fact, it would be interesting to see what the collective Anonymous thinks about that. They're not too keen on their image being used for random stuff.
I thought the Anonymous bunch were free from these kind of idiots. I actually like how they've gone against racists (BNP), wannabe fascists, islamophobes and more recently ultrarightwinger trolls in Mexico, but this is something I'd see more as a rightwingnutter action.
It won't have a power cord. It won't need it, because it will be powerd by Steam!
Given that Jobs hated Java's guts during his last years, this smells like Apple's version of Pearl Harbor. Delay the fix, then get OSX infected, then push out the fix and say that Java will be disabled "for your protection" in a very Norsefire way. Hm...
Java is mostly secure, though the recent vuln cracks have been quite shameful. It wouldn't have bit OSX at all if they had patched up the vuln earlier.
No, not the one that actually got made.
I refer to the one that didn't make it... the one with Jack Black. Which would've been the kind of movie you'd see Jack Black in.
Also, any of the Seuss books that hasn't been made a movie ... starring Mike Myers.
Too late, The Asylum already did that one. It involves a *literal* Titanic II, which gets smashed by an iceberg traveling at supersonic speeds.
No, I didn't pull that script out of my ass, I actually watched it. They ripped off not only Titanic, but also Poseidon (the crappy remake that is) and The Abyss...
I guess that the true problem is all this widescreen craze that has infested the recent batch of laptops. Now you got wide-ass screens that are too short to read stuff. Somehow laptop mfgs think everyone uses laptops to watch 16:9 movies instead of actually working. This is worse on netbooks, where some stuff won't even show up thanks to the height restriction.
Also, there's something weird with Vista and win7, I swear that I can't make the letters small enough anymore. I've seen XP on the same screens and it's noticeable, so much that win7 looks like a Fischer Price "my first PC" baby UI compared even to XP's candy theme.
At least they aren't trying to push iCrap to the military. Though the NSA seems to be smart enough to know that putting iThingys as "secure" smartphones is a bad idea.
Though if the feds REALLY want secure smartphones, why don't they simply get the Sectera Edge? Come on dudes!
That can be done if someone charges dumping violations (selling at a loss). If Apple/other e-tailers haven't done so, that isn't the DoJ's problem.
Or maybe most if not all books aren't being sold like that.
Seriously, when will people stop buying DLC packaged as "new games"? FIFA 12! FIFA 13! MADDEN 12! MADDEN 13! WITH NEW PLAYER SWAPS!
Miffed that BioShock Infinite is so low on both lists. At least Resident Evil 6 seems to be up there in the top spots.
"If Apple had acted to control the prices Amazon charges then the DoJ would have case."
They did, by colluding with publishers and by their "most favoured nation" clause.
A device using a 4-digit PIN to "secure" any kind of crypto key? Not unless there's something else protecting stuff. Androids have got FIPS 140-2 according to this article, I'd think that those handsets are closer to certification.
I wouldn't bet on an iPhone as a secure device. If I were the US Government, I'd use the Sectera Edge instead; they developed a truly secure smartphone. This already came to light when Obama got elected.
First used to fire up Test Drive, the day my dad bought the 1541-II disk drive.
I never really knew what LOAD "*",8,1 meant though. I did save stuff with SAVE "BLAH",8 and load 'em in a similar manner though. :)
Given the Spaniglish words on that, I doubt it was an actual Hispanic d00d. It reads more like stereotypical stuff more than what someone who was actually from Mexico would write, at least. ("Puñeta" gives it away. The only time I've heard that in the last 2 years referring to a person has been while watching Machete.)
Maybe he's channeling Cheech & Chong?
Nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
Oh that dream sounds nice, but it wouldn't really work like that given that Jobs was for all the ugly things we hate Hollywood for (inane copyright extensions, DRM, "IP protection", stupid patents) so it would be more like the Rise of the Empire.
Of course, Jobs is no more, Cook might just stray away from that nonsense. Time will tell..
The sooner we get out of the garbage x86 arch, the better!
link-local and other types of address remove the need for NAT, which used to be "I need private addys to connect to my junk w/o being ISP dependant".
The mandatory 64-bit host segment removes the need for NAT in consumer networks, as you have 2^64 IP addys to use from your ISP, and it'll work automagically.
The only thing you don't have with IPv6 is the "hide my public IP address", which is mostly security theater. The real protection you have with "NAT" is actually the fact that all NAT implementing devices will also have firewall rules by default that block outside traffic from the inside.
By definition, end-users will get a 64-bit host segment with IPv6, which means you will always have at least a 2^64 address range, eliminating the need for NAT in most consumer markets. Consumer routers can simply implement the same firewall rules they do today, but they'll get a load off their back on preserving state for NATted connections.
Local connectivity can be done with link-local addresses or the site-local ones if you really need to subnet the local IPv6 addys.
And contrary to what this article's poster said, you *can* set up static addresses on IPv6.
You didn't quite read the article, did you?
- Mall A puts up banners in its own property
- Mall B sends "security" goons to Mall A's banners
- Mall A's security lines up to protect banners
- Mall B's goons don't give a shit and tear down the banners, all gangster-style.
No tearing down for security reasons, this was squarely lawlessness showing up. I do wonder why the hell didn't Parkland Mall call the cops?
All of these allow you to do these avatars, and the patenty stuff e ven looks like something ripped off from the Wii's Mii. This is getting stupid!
Cracking that passphrase will make the cracker insane!
Wonder how this'll work over here. Most bankcards (debit, that is) don't even bother putting our name on the card. Whenever I swipe one of those, I end up being called "EL CLIENTE". Oooh!!
Get into a specialist niche market, you'll find that even in a big sprawling megacity, the IT industry is extremely well connected. That dude who was a code monkey at your previous employer? He might be the one offering you a good job 3 years from now!
The only ones that would benefit from SIMless handsets are the operators. Try using your Sprint phone on Verizon? Mexico's Iusacell? Can't? That's because unlike the SIM-toting handsets, the phone itself has all the identity stuff and thus can be thoroughly gimped by the operator.
I ditched Iusacell because they went down the CDMA SIMless route. SIMless phones are for me a relic of the 20th century.
The US beat schools on that, given that DST begins at the beginning of March instead of "right after Spring", so maybe that's why schools are teaching the stuff like that. DST before the equinox does sound daft, doesn't it?
So this is what they threw out Mubarak for? I thought they were fighting for freedom, not for more stupid restrictions!
I had the idea that it was more like the Poles cracked it (by brute force, but they did crack it), then built the bombes, then realized they were going to get 0wned when the Germans beefed up the Enigma scramblers and sent all their research to the Brits right before they got themselves 0wned.
Then GCHQ built up on this (enter: Knox), but the really damn good speed up was thanks to one Alan Turing who designed the bombes that didn't depend on the repeating day-key.
Oh yes, I've read a lot on this.
Meh. The account @LiamStacey9 seems to have been axed already. So it isn't visible except by the youtube link.
So x86 will plague the mobile market as well? Grim future you have there, prophet! I expect ARM to take over the x86 market, not the other way round!
That's what Cable TV has done here in Mexico when TV Azteca upped the price. Don't know if it will work though. But given the content of channels 7 and 13 ... TV quality actually goes UP without those channels.
I already submitted Pootie Tang, which I hope doesn't cause brain damage on our reviewers.
The one time I had one "assigned" by my employer, was because we got a handful of Jornadas from one of those boxes.
But hey, that one had useful stuff like:
- a SCSI PCI card
- internal SCSI cable
- DDS4 DAT drive
- a Palm Tungsten
some other stuff, but those are the ones that we actually used.
So it should come out of the Sales or HR budget. "Looking good" isn't IT-related.
He'll probably call it BARSOON.
Now, if only someone could use this heat to get the world governments to cut back copyright down to 50 years.
Someone made my brain recall this. I was fooled into believing this was either a Natural Born Killers type of movie, some corny reference to the Doom videogame or something like that. It isn't. The whole thing turns boring 20? 25? Minutes in and nevr really recovers.
In fact, the ending *improves* the movie because at least something happens!
The Tom Cruise one was much closer to the book than the original... But then Spielberg had to stick that damn annoying girl...
And this is one of those movies my brain had deleted from memory. Yes, most of what I remember from that one was the eye pecking scene. GROSS.
This one's improved if you swap it out for the OTHER Jack Frost... The one with a killer snowman!
American Cyborg: Steel Warrior
Manos: The Hands of Fate
I think the other bad movies were so bad, my brain erased them from existance.
ITU relaxed what 4G actually was. Some carriers went on and used this as an excuse to start relabeling 3.5 or 3.75G tech as "4G". At my country, only one carrier has engaged in these lies (IUSACELL), but they've always lied on this, calling CDMA2000 1x "3G".
"The request to sue during Bankruptcy proceeding has been made to avoid the sales of said patent which belongs to Apple in the first place and could make a complicate situation worse."
They either own it or not. If this is truly the case, it would be the same as me going to my childhood friend and take back the R/C truck I gave him on his 7th birthday because I don't like him anymore.
Dear Metavisor, you seem to ignore this:
"rule 1) You must not let anyone else sell something for less than we sell it."
That's even more of a competitor-killing practice than the supposed price-setting Amazon was supposed to be doing (if you believe the iFans). Apple and their fanboi army made a point of deflecting all attention to the 30% comission being lower, while conveniently hiding the fact that:
- Apple was forcing publishers to give them the best price,
- Apple was forcing other platforms (like Kindle) to pay 30% of purchases made from iDevices,
- Apple was forcing other platforms to *offer in-app iDevice purchases* which were subjected to the 30% shave-off.
One of these policies got axed, but I don't remember which one. Any of these things remaining is pretty much anti-competitive anyway.
"3) Would you tell someone who'd spend $2k on a cartier watch they could have bought 200+ casios with that? Actually you probably would."
Yes, I consider those people snobs. However, putting down $10k on a supercomputing project actually serves a purpose; the ubercomputer will actually do stuff faster, while the $2k cartier will have *less* functions than a casio.
At $600, people actually expect to buy something that can at least do the same stuff they do on their PC. The iPad can't. Only wealthy people are buying 'em, the rest of us remain unimpressed and keep on using PCs for real work.
Even though people hate using Windows PCs, it's the stuff where they actually do *real work*. Can you do your job on an iPad instead of a PC?