Re: Excel Co Authoring or not?
No real-time co-authoring in Excel. Apologies for confusing wording, this refers to the feature in Word, PowerPoint, OneNote.
57 posts • joined 10 Apr 2006
No real-time co-authoring in Excel. Apologies for confusing wording, this refers to the feature in Word, PowerPoint, OneNote.
Yes it is a preview; but there is not much point in trying stuff out if you do not report honestly on the experience. I like Windows Phone / Mobile etc and would love for Microsoft to get this right and revive the platform somehow. At the same time it is fair to say that Microsoft's media player efforts have a long history of not working right - Windows Media Player has always been slow and prone to throwing up obscure errors - and this stuff is important to the user experience. Streaming your own stuff from OneDrive is a great feature but only if it works reliably.
Thanks, oversight corrected.
It's any shortcut, not just Metro apps
The back panel does come off and you can easily upgrade the SSD.
The EULA specifically refers to "system and app updates".
I hope you are right, but my guess is that WSUS will not let you off the hook here. Win10 is different from W7 and W8 since "Windows as a service" means that the OS is being incrementally upgraded. Now, how does MSFT make security patches for every possible variant of Win10 since first release? Likely answer is that it will not. It will make security patches for every variant over the last n months, where n in this case appears to be 8. So if you have WSUS and Win 10 Pro, and block all the feature updates, then after n months it won't be possible to apply security patches because the OS is in effect unsupported. Or maybe some security patches will work and others not.
If you want to avoid this, LTSB is the only official solution and that means Enterprise.
Fair point, the rationale is that Surface was created to work properly with Windows 8 and I wanted to bring out that context.
True :-) but it still seems to me that a search in the Start menu should find it.
Check the FAQ: "True “console” apps aren’t really going to be supported for the IoT core OS, headless or not. You can still deploy and run a standard win32 console app here, it just won’t be connected to any on-device console. When running headless you should just get that black screen. When running headed the only supported UI is via the UWP UI stacks (XAML, HTML, DirectX)."
Should be HDMI, apologies for the typo!
I think the idea is that your active data is always local so that perf is maintained. Microsoft also says "As core transactional tables grow in size, you may need to archive historical data to lower cost and to maintain fast performance" so I guess shunting stale data to the cloud could help with that.
Nope, I wrote it because new commercial C++ IDEs are uncommon, plus the JetBrains tools are pretty good IME.
More info on this is now available here:
There was, but couldn't fit it in. Just for you though: "there was a style of identifying variables known as Hungarian notation that I imitated and perhaps propagated more than was desirable (laughs)." Almost a confession :-)
Another way of putting this is that enterprises are not busy closing their datacentres. So to the extent that they have any interest in public cloud, it is hybrid.
OK, so you are beating me up because you can right-click the bottom left corner in Win 8.0 too for the admin menu (or press Win-X).
True, but the reason I mention it is that I most often right-click the Start button in Win 8.1 for the "Shut down or sign out" option which was added - it is not in Win 8.0.
The right-click menu is also more discoverable in Win 8.1, which does not matter once you have discovered it, but that discoverability is improved is also important.
There is another thing you should know about this review. After discussion we agreed not to repeat everything that we had already said about Windows 8.1 Preview, which was reviewed here last month:
Hence the focus on some of the business features. We should have included a link to the earlier piece though, so apologies for that.
The date was for the Unix version but I couldn't find that one easily, so made do with Windows.
It's a typo for "closer".
It's meant to be "closer".
@ArmanX I believe Nvidia is thinking along these lines - a GPU with some cores based on the ARM CPU rather than simpler GPU cores. That's what Tesla CTO Steve Scott told me anyway.
Just to clarify - while Office Web Apps works on SharePoint 2010, included in SBS 2011, it is not in the box - it is a "free" download if you have an Office volume licensing agreement.
"Some two years in the making, it aims to simplify the building of business"
... the clue is in the word "aims". I'll add that I'm not sure any tool which generates 4500+ lines of code gloop can be described as creating a best-practice design; but it may still be better than tools like VB which positively encourage bad design.
I still think it is an interesting effort. One of the points not brought out in the article is that LightSwitch does model-driven development under the covers; it is even conceivable that some future iteration might target different platforms - HTML 5 for example - from the same model.
Whether it will survive long enough to get there is an open question though.
Yes, Win 95 had pre-emptive multitasking, for 32-bit apps:
"In Windows 95, all 32-bit applications are scheduled preemptively. Preemptive multitasking allows Windows 95 to switch between 32-bit applications whether those applications are prepared to lose control of the CPU or not. No cooperation between the application and the operating system is required for 32-bit multitasking."
Well, PDF is in effect the print engine. Since Silverlight doesn't print (yet) and browser printing is not precise enough I doubt Microsoft had much choice. The fact that it uses Adobe technology wasn't mentioned in the press briefing :-)
Yes, you can host in-house; the web apps are a feature of SharePoint 2010.
> BUT, a word-processor that doesn't print? Gee, that' IS only something that MS could come up
It is Excel Web App that can't print in the preview. Word prints; it does so by converting to Adobe PDF. This caused me some confusion at first, because printing prompted me to download a file. The reason is that I have Acrobat browser integration turned off. I imagine that Excel will work in the same way eventually, but who knows?
As far I can tell from the release, Walmart is only ahead of Amazon in overall music sales - the 14% is for download + physical combined. In downloads, it is iTunes 69%, Amazon 8%, and Walmart not stated but around 3% by rough calculation.
Apple's share of the download market seems steady at around 70% for the last three years, despite Amazon's efforts.
Microsoft doesn't care about Linux, but want to tick the box. That said, the Mono guys are working hard on this.
@Tony Hoyle you don't have to install to the app directory, you can install to System32 which I believe will be the preferred approach - as I understand it, it is "like VC 6". Yes, there is a risk of DLL hell.
@Anonymous Coward No, I wasn't referring to the way the pre-beta is delivered; I like the use of the VM.
@Neoc you are correct: perpetrate first, perpetuate later :-)
Windows can run an HTML file in a chrome-less IE if you rename it to .hta - stands for HTML Application. Same as Chrome's desktop shortcuts? No. The idea of .hta is to let you run desktop applications build with HTML and script. The idea is the Chrome shortcuts is to run web applications that look like desktop applications. One of the problems with .hta is that it runs with high permissions - good for admin scripts, bad for web apps.
What Google is doing here is trivial on a technical level, but when you combine it with the Gears API and the possiblity of clicking a web button to "install" a browser app on the desktop, it becomes interesting.
... are you suggesting that this is better than the way you can code most other web languages, that is on any platform with a text editor, or using a common IDE that is available across platforms like Eclipse.
Not all all; you can write your web pages / apps however you like. Chromium gives you the source code of the browser, so you can trace why some particular feature doesn't work as it should, or runs slow. Most developers won't bother - advanced coders only!
You're right, you could set a property twice, once as an attribute and once as a property element.
If you do, you get an error:
(in your example) "The property Fill is set more than once"
This is messy. On the other hand, if the spec did not allow the shortcut attribute properties, XAML would be considerably more verbose.
I agree with your recommendation: download the trial and try it out. You are right; there is a lot that cannot be said in a short review.
Some of what I said applies equally to Delphi for PHP 1.0, but I have the impression that many are not familiar with the earlier version.
I realise there is some Zend integration and mentioned this in another comment; but it is very limited at the moment.
> And Tim seems to conflate the open source VCL for PHP effort with the
> CodeGear IDE effort.
Well yes, that's the product. You could use the IDE without the VCL, but if you do you lose the distinctive feature of the product, RAD visual development.
> The announced but never released qadram IDE has long been morphed
> into D4PHP
Yes, I said this is its only incarnation. I think its origins are important though; it explains why it has a dedicated IDE, rather than using RAD studio. The VCL is open source, but I'm not sure this works to the advantage of the product at the moment, mainly because insufficient resources are put into it, and the open source community doesn't appear to be large enough to thrive.
I agree that the product has good potential. I spent a relatively large amount of time with it. Unfortunately it is also a frustrating product, thanks to inconsistency, limited documentation. Further, I don't much like the generated code.
But yes, I'd encourage anyone to try it. If a real community can form around Delphi for PHP and its VCL, or if it gets the investment it needs to deliver on its RAD promise, then it could still come good.
> Zend Framework recently annouced they would be integrating with the Dojo
> Ajax/Widget library - If the VCL was built around them then this would simply
There is actually a degree of Zend integration - but very limited at the moment.
> Don't forget the 1 Terabyte install for .NET
Just to be clear: I didn't forget it, it is not required. The cut-down .NET runtime is within the small download, less than 5MB.
> The astute person with knowledge of San Francisco area
> codes will note that MUCH of the example is WAY out of date
The astute person with knowledge of SQL Server will recognize the pubs database that is indeed ancient - but that was my choice, not Microsoft's; I just picked the first data that came to hand :-)
Gears uses SQLite, but not solely SQLite. It also enables a local resource store/server for other types of data.
The issue is that any plugin only has access to what comes over the wire to the extent that the browser's plugin API exposes it. This is only a subset of what actually comes over the wire, hence these limitations. The workaround would be for the plug-in to bypass the browser's networking stack, but that would cause other problems, like needing a separate login.
Re .htaccess - that's the point, really. IIS 7 is meant to have the convenience of .htaccess without the perf. penalty.
> system can only address 3GB, and the
This is a typo. Vista can address 4GB. However if you install 4GB then in many cases the BIOS will not present that much RAM to the OS. This was exactly the case on an Intel board I have just swapped out - 4GB installed, 3GB visible to Vista. A better-designed board can remap the memory to overcome this problem.
> It has nothing to do with Java.
I put the details of the machines used in the comment to the post here:
> Either way I'd like to know which one of your computers
> you would use for Vista and its current hardware configuration.
The lowest spec machine spends most of its time in XP or Ubuntu. The best spec machine runs great with Vista.
> Vista was optimised for speed in every possible little
> obscure way (because the regular install was being
> massacred in other tests, if I understood correctly).
> XP was left alone. And XP was STILL faster in general.
That's correct, though I ran the test with non-optimized Vista as well. The reason was twofold:
1. I was sceptical about the claim that XP is 2x faster.
2. Given that Vista is slower, I'm interested to know where it is slower, and what is most effective at improving its performance.
I agree that more tests would be interesting.
> e.g. Phar Lap ETS
Another factor is that Microsoft sometimes allowed this kind of integration on a case-by-case basis, if you asked nicely.
> Isn't the main goal of Mono to allow you to run .NET applications unmodified on a non-Windows platform?
That is a goal; but how about a designer for Gtk#, for example?