3578 posts • joined 28 Feb 2007
'what does sparkly unicorn flesh taste of?!'
A little like griffin.
Just one of these could cause more destruction that either of his nuclear weapons.
And heaven only knows how powerful they'd be mixed with kimchi (think nerve gas without any of the pleasant aspects).
Start at about £270 go up to £400ish depending on the model and what else they throw in the box.
I have a 560 (recently discontinued but still available whilst stocks last) which cost about £350 for which you get the robot, mains supply, docking station, two navigation lighthouses, replacement filters and some maintenance tools. Further up the pricing you get bigger dust collectors and a remote control.
It is a vacuum cleaner
So don't worry. The rotating brush is there to bring dirt into reach of Roomba's terrifying maw.
New models vs old models
If you can - get the 560 rather than the replacement 555.
The 560 comes with lighthouses that allow you to confine Gromit (come on you have to name them) to one room making sure that is spankingly clean before moving on to the next. The 555 only has a virtual wall which stops him from passing certain points.
But Roombas are wonderful including the little reversing sound when he rolls off his charging station.
An unpaid position I assume?
Since we keep being told that MLF is rich beyond the dreams of avarice I'd hope this was an unpaid position.
And while I'm here, can anyone please explain MLF's contribution to the history of the Internet? Was lastminute.com even an original idea?
It was heat that killed the TCs by blowing their capacitors. It was probably made worse by the all-plastic construction and a nice thick layer of rubber on the bottom. After my original one went bang, Apple replaced it with one of the newer designs which runs much cooler - the top surface is barely warm.
The MM will probably also benefit from having an aluminium case that doubles up as a radiator.
leave Meg alone!
She's fabulous entertainment value.
This week she was being interviewed and said that the moves to scrap ID cards and the ContactPoint database were evidence that the Conservatives were taking us backwards rather than forwards.
I hope the Register continues to feature wacky New Lobster MP Meg Hitler long into the future.
If they were clever
They'd offer a separate premium service for all those who sign on to Chat Roulette in the hope of seeing man bits.
“If he doesn't make a dramatic move soon to clean up the service, the brand will be permanently tarnished,"
Didn't the Chat Roulette brand come pre-tarnished?
Very pretty - but
It's practically unusable.
Navigating around the magazine is a horror as its sometimes completely impossible to work out if an article has more than one page - when you flick up to bring up the next page, or if it is one of their quirky pieces that just suddenly stops - in which case flicking up does nothing and you have to flick left. Wired's pages are so busy that there are graphical doohickies that might be clues as to where the next page might be found, or they might just be the flourishes of someone buggering around with InDesign - certainly they're not consistent.
There's no bookmarking of interesting stuff so you can refer to it later and no search - pretty basic stuff for a reader application. It's like they put all their effort into jazzing up adverts for crappy American cars rather than what the reader might want.
As a demo of what's possible it is a blinder; as something actually useful - well that 500Mb install per issue is the least of its problems.
There is a god...
...and clearly his name is Thor.
Was to leave Bruce Willis on the asteroid 'just in case'
Admit it - you haven't seen him recently.
This is usually the point
Where someone points out that Finland isn't in Scandinavia and Finns were never Vikings.
Ah that'd be me.
...shark fin soup with extra meaty chunks.
Having trouble visualising this one
I'm fine with the quantum hijinks, but I need more details about the scantily-clad women - preferably in the form of photos (with or without their Eee netbooks) bonus points will be awarded for going the extra mile and providing their phone numbers.
'I'm aiming for an aggro-reduced Tuesday.'
Even if she has to kill someone to do it.
And half of those
were probably issued to Meg Hillier just to make up for those she kept leaving behind.
How many engines did the Energia stack have? I think it was at least eight - four on the core and whatever were on the boosters.
This is a good strategy for cost-reduction - make lots of reasonably reliable engines and a design that can tolerate a certain amount of failure rather than a few highly reliable, highly expensive engines which has traditionally been the American approach.
The Soviets of course had no choice with their engines on both the R7 and N1 - they simply couldn't build big enough engines, so they clustered lots of relatively small motors. Worked though - even the N1's engine has turned out to be a star on the Atlas V.
Opt out form
You can print this out and send it to your GP's practice here:
(Though bearing in mind this is an opt-out you might want to hand it in personally)
Didn't lose his job
He chose to resign as a financial supervisor in a car distribution company.
Top-class British boffinry
Only let down by the inexplicable absence of anyone smoking a pipe.
I assume PARIS will be carrying a Playmobil payload?
Another classic headline from Lewis
And the second line's a cracker as well.
She's a class act
She even gets in the old warhorse:
'Except to say if you were a law abiding citizen you had nothing to lose and everything to gain from something that carried little more information about you than your supermarket loyalty card.'
Xbox was a blinder. Yes they burned money to do it and the 360 had some unforgiveable quality control issues, but Microsoft did a good job here.
Microsoft muscled its way into the game console market up against Sony and Nintendo (and a dying Sega hardware division). They've consistently made Sony look stupid and slow and wooed a deeply sceptical market. Not to mention the 360 is regularly still outperforming Sony's wonder console.
But their stroke of genius was XBox Live. So far they're the only console company which have got online gaming working well, fast and made it easy to use. The Playstation Network is a joke and Nintendo aren't even in the game. And using the Xbox as a trojan horse into the living room has meant that Microsoft can push other services like Netflix and Sky to their users.
As for everything else - I really like the Zune's interface and online store - they're both better than iPod, but the hardware is so m'eh and the marketing so piss poor that I can't work out why Microsoft hasn't closed down the division.
Not the robot, their use of 'thru'.
The cooling system projected outwards from the base of the system. Rather than having people tripping over it, Cray turned it into seating.
You'd be writing the score using hydrated calcium fucking sulfate.
Chalk may well be calcium carbonate - but as any geologist will tell you, it is a very specific type of organic limestone formed from the shells of coccolithophores. To have chalk you first need to have life.
Is never pointed at the Earth or the Sun since the amount of light hitting its sensors would cause serious damage.
No need for an iPlayer app
The iPlayer BigScreen works fine in Safari.
No escape there
You can watch iPlayer in Safari at:
New Labour in a nutshell
(with emphasis on the 'nut').
He knows the *cost* of cancelling Blunkettcards in pounds and pence, but doesn't stop to think about the *value* of cancelling them - ie. not living in an Orwellian nanny state.
Like the article says he's probably really pissed off that his ID and DNA consultancies might be drying up real soon now.
But there is one thing Blunkett has taught me - and that's not to automatically feel sorry for blind people.
iPad is different
The iPad is much closer to Jeff Raskin's definition of an 'information appliance' than the PC on your desk. The rules have changed, but it's hardly like Apple didn't announce loud and clear, 'buy an iPad, play by our rules'.
For a huge number of people, the idea of a computer they can pick up and use without worrying about labyrinthine interfaces or bastardly installations or keeping their security up to date is a dream. The iPad overcomes most of the problems of owning a PC - as the slogan goes - it just works. Apple control the hardware and distribution of software so you won't get the range found on a PC; but in exchange you get a generally better level of usability and stability over the mix-and-match install-what-you-like PC.
It's the way of the future, better get used to it. Every manufacturer is looking at the same model - think Gillette's razor blades - they tie you into the platform and then make money selling you disposable extras - except this time Apple have found a way of making the hardware profitable.
As for complaints to the OFT - on what grounds? The introduction of the iPad hasn't resulted in every other computer ceasing to work, you can still go and buy alternative machines.
You're thinking right
It was the HOrizontal Take-Off and Landing - HOTOL which brought a bit of Thunderbirds flash to the 1980s before vanishing in a big puff of bureaucracy.
Its designer, Alan Bond now runs Reaction Engines:
Oh I can't believe I'm rising to this... but needs must
'It predicted a spherical earth while many people were flat earthers.'
No it doesn't. Young Earthers like pointing to a phrase in Isaiah which uses the word 'circle'. They don't so often mention the mentions of God laying out the Earth with a compass in Job and Proverbs. You can't make a sphere with a compass.
And there were never many flat earthers. The concept of the Earth as a sphere long predates the Bible, it caused few problems for the Ancients or the medieval world. It's 21st Century Kansas that seems to have trouble with the idea of the Earth just being a lump of slowly cooling iron, nickel and silicon hanging around a gloomy part of the Milky Way that's been going gently downhill since the early Caenozoic.
'Genesis states God created light before the sun and stars which is consistent with the Big Bang Theory.'
Well if you mean that there was light before the stars then yes, the Bible is consistent with the Big Bang theory (but then gets understandably side-tracked by the whole begetting bit when it could have been explaining the role of deuterium in the early Universe).
However, your theory falls apart when you actually - ummmm - read the Bible. Doesn't the whole 'Now the earth was [a] formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.' rather suggest that even if the light appeared without stars, it's irrelevant because the water got there first?
And if you do want to discuss creation in Genesis - which one do you want? There are two irreconcilable tellings of the act of creation in Genesis 1 and 2. Either God is even more unknowable than we thought, or there was some sloppy proof-reading going on in early Palestine.
Genesis is myth and epic poetry. It's about as useful at explaining the Universe as a copy of Lord of the Rings with the saving grace that it's out of copyright and there are no crappy songs.
'It describes cities that don't exist (for which it has been criticised), but archaeologists continue to dig them up.'
You're really going to need to explain that, preferably with the aid of diagrams - they don't exist but they get dug up? I'd like to see that on Time Team. If you mean cities that have been lost then that's a different matter; but no one is seriously saying there are no historical events in the Bible - it's just that they've been buried under layer upon layer of badly translated myth.
If Bible says there was a city in a location in a (fairly tiny) part of the world with relatively little habitable space which has been settled for tens of thousands of years - and we dig up human remains - that's hardly astonishing.
If on the other hand we were to find the Ark of the Covenant, some fossilised manna or an eye witness account of the end of Sodom (preferably in the hand of the author who had been pinned down under an easily carbon dateable catamite by a large lump of falling brimstone) - that'd be different.
'Science and faith can be reconciled'
No they can't; science won. Get over it and get a job.
Makes you wonder what their interview procedure is like
Do they concentrate on academic output or just media whoredom?
Warwick and friends are the embarrassing relatives to Kurzweil's Singularity.
"Twitter is uniquely dependent on and responsible for the long-term health and value of the platform."
We still haven't made any real money or come up with a business plan for this toy.
It's the details that count
Dell have done an okay job on this, but as usual they've skimped on the design. Those Home and Back icons are the wrong orientation when you hold the machine in portrait format. It's a little thing, but you just know Steve J wouldn't let that happen. Okay he wouldn't let a machine out the door with THREE buttons on the front...
I hope there are REALLY long scenes in a lift - otherwise it won't be anything like the original.
Were never a NASA project and the Soviets used felt tips for many years.
Is it really made from Lego?
Not sure this is an issue
From the project's press release:
'Along with out-of-copyright material from the newspaper archive - defined in this context as pre-1900 newspaper material - the partnership will also seek to digitise a range of in-copyright material, with the agreement of the relevant rightsholders. '
If rights holders don't want their stuff digitised they have an opt out.
I'd prefer someone respectable like the British Library was doing this rather than it not happening at all; or individual piecemeal preservation attempts by with wildly differing standards and technologies and no central repository.
Fraunhofer-Institut für Fertigungstechnik und Angewandte Materialforschung
Do their business cards come in widescreen?
...the suggestion that the Olympics should be represented by something associated with the venue, in this case the East End of London.
So it came down to a toss up between a giant plasticised Barbara Windsor and a cuddly plush Jack the Ripper.
Did they use lightning and the services of a hunchbacked servant?
When the BBC produces something that does badly in the ratings, the likes of the Times and the Mail come out and attack it for spending money on things that no one watches. The BBC can't win either way.
And I have no problem with the BBC making money abroad, the money comes back here and gets invested in new programming. Where does Sky's money go? The company doesn't even pay tax here. As far as I can tell it spunks its money up the wall on football rights and overpaying for TV programmes that have built a faithful audience on terrestrial.
'big bang approach to political reform'
I prefer Guy Fawkes' big bang approach to political reform.
And what's the betting they'll add yet another £1 charge to the cost on top of their insurance, card fee and booking fees and call it something like a 'convenience fee'?
- Review Ubuntu 14.04 LTS: Great changes, but sssh don't mention the...
- Vid CEO Tim Cook sweeps Apple's inconvenient truths under a solar panel
- Antique Code Show WTF happened to Pac-Man?
- HTC mulls swoop for Nokia's MASSIVE Chennai plant
- Study shows dangerous asteroid impacts hit Earth every six months