Fitting that Bezos has got 'em.
After all, they went up into the clouds and then came crashing back down again.
9436 publicly visible posts • joined 5 Oct 2007
...Skype as an unsecured P2P network...
The routing may be all over the place, but as the stream is encrypted, why does that matter?
Presumably, in your world, the NSA have that massive bounty on offer for a route into Skype just for a laugh. In the real world, if they are stuffed for cracking it, that's as good as (if not better than) any other solution.
Yup, magnets.
A couple of steel contact patches on Lohan's skin and a pair of wires from the external power pack ending in small magnets should do the trick. The slight drag on detachment should not be an issue if you ensure that the wires are short enough that this will occur while the spaceplane's still travelling along the launch rod so the trajectory cannot be affected.
If, as seems to be implied, it's happened more than once recently, the most likely explanation is that the building's owners are having some electrical work done and the muppets have triggered the fire alarms. Again.
I was in an office with that problem not so long ago. Worst bit was that 'cos it wasn't a planned drill, every time it happened we all had to stand around and wait 'til the fire brigade tipped up to stick their noses in the place and say it was all OK.
I always make a point of nipping back to my office and grabbing my jacket and cigs if the alarm goes off. I reckon that the 0.00001% chance of it being a real fire, a serious one and the slight delay caused making any difference in that situation is vastly outweighed by the 100% chance of being fagless and frozen while waiting outside.
.....hence the conspiracy tards claiming someone simply walked up to the rover in the deep Arizona desert and took a photo of it....
Well that's just bloody ridiculous. If it had held out its camera and taken a self-portrait while on Earth, there'd be someone behind it pulling a silly face.
This from the company that produced the genuinely brilliant design of the Xperia Arc S, with the sculpted side trim accentuating the slight curvature of the back and cunningly adding apparent thinness to an already anorexic object.
Now, I'd have thought it was the Ericsson side of Sony-Ericsson that was the staid and stodgy bit. Apparently not.
More to the point, if something of yours goes titsup.com, it's almost invariably one of your somethings and most of your business will carry on while you deal with it.
When it pisses down in the cloud, the whole lot drops on the floor and everyone gets to sit there and twiddle their thumbs until it comes back.
Also worth remembering that the first of these results in TPTB looking for someone to blame, while the second results in them looking for someone to sack.
Yes. For a start, on this side of the channel they don't seem to have quite grasped the concept of hot curry. They seem to think that "very hot" means "slightly spicy" and not "will remove paint from battlecruisers" as one would expect.
Even the Thai food seems to lack any of those dishes where the first mouthful causes the dawning realisation that you may well have made a terrible mistake and a frantic flagging of the nearest waiter for additional supplies of Singha.
On the upside, steak is actually steak and not cremated shoeleather.
Ours have come up with a slightly more cunning approach than that.
They look at it and decide that, yes, that is a problem. Having figured out that there is a problem in there somewhere they convert the service call to a problem ticket, which doesn't have a TRT........
Oh, I dunno. I got; <THWACK>, "Aaaargghhhh", <THUD>, <roll, roll>, <heave>, "Brrmm, brrmm, brrmm", <shovel, shovel shovel>, <sprinkle, sprinkle>, <heave>, <KerFLUMP>, <shovel, shovel>, "Brrmm, brrmm, brrmm", "Six pints of lager to celebrate a job well done please barman".
Not "Kzzzerrrt".
Then again, there's always the diplomatic option. E.g. a mysterious Active Directory glitch remapping the CEO's shared spreadsheet directory to "the Boss's secret porn stash". A.k.a. a folder full of foetid filth with everything owned by the Boss's user ID and which the server logs and backups show has been there and actively added to for some time.....
It means that some 'tard has forgotten to configure Word properly and left it in US Engrish along with the matching stationery defaults.
What it actually means is; "Good morning/afternoon/evening. Some 'tard has left Word configured in US Engrish. If you have any, you can stuff some of that weird 'US Letter' stationery in the bypass tray, or you can just thump me in 'continue' and I'll print it on good old A4."
Google want what Facebook has.
Unless they can dream up something that'll cause a max exodus of sheep from Faceberk to GooPlusUnGood, they are SOL there. The massive user base is a prerequisite for all that data mining being worth any more than sod all.
The phrase; "throwing good money after bad" springs to mind.
Even GPS tracking came later, with Cruise Missiles in the Gulf War 1 (earliest).
They were still using terrain guidance on Cruise then, at the very least for final guidance onto target.
I remember a hack who was in Baghdad saying he was standing at his hotel window and a Cruise Missile went past the window, following the street. He said it turned left at the junction down the way and then obliterated the TV centre round the corner.
He also said that he almost expected it to stop, as the lights at the junction were red.
So which option have they gone for? Have the complaint ignored by the recipient or have it mangled into incomprehensibility by autotranslation?
Yes, I know autotranslate systems are quite good these days, but they do require clarity and are significantly aided by grammatical context. Now imagine the results of running them over unpunctuated txtspik turdspurts from the proles.....
"...the broad nature of the permissions..."
That seems to be the rule rather than the exception these days. I'm wondering how much of this is due to the app itself and how much is the result of the GooCruft (tm) 1.0 (beta) shiteware that always seems to be embedded, even on the non ad-supported stuff.
I was fairly surprised to see that the current version of Chrome now requires full access to the phone side of things (WTF for?). Back using the stock browser now.
Yup, took me a few moments to work that out when I first saw it.
Once I'd figured out what was going on[1] and stopped fruitlessly trying to drag things to and from it, it became obvious that it's actually an astonishingly good idea.
[1] Other "KDE fun" moments include figuring out how to get the bit that shows all the running things back when an errant mouse swipe removes it from the bar at the bottom (it's a "task switcher panel" apparently - the hard bit's figuring out that that's the right one of the multifarious widgets on offer). I thoroughly recommend locking the widgets and such once you have it the way you want it.
I doubt you'll get a response.
He's probably in a coma from the total brain meltdown caused by finding out that his beloved MS swiss cheese security is mostly everyone else's swiss cheese security.
Either that or the first case of spontaneous human explosion has just occurred under a rock somewhere.
I guess one reason that people don't host their own advertising content is that this would make tracking much harder, so the ad slingers won't let them.
I wasn't suggesting that they did. I was suggesting that the ad-slingers should rather than just flogging the slot to the actual advertiser and fetching their content, as seems to be the case now. As things stand, you do not have control over what's in an ad, Google/Doubleclick/${other_bunch_of_bastards} do not have control over what's in an ad (or even give a shit as far as I can see), but some advertising weasel or scammer who's bought the slot? He has....
The current way of doing things is like flogging souvenir chunks of semtex on eBay. Some of your purchasers may not be planning to leave theirs on a shelf as an ornament....
I've said it before and I'll say it again.
The way the ad-pushing industry works at the moment is fundamentally fucked. The correct way is to take the ad from the owner, check it to see that it meets standards and host it themselves.
The current method of flogging the slot and fetching the content from the advertiser is an open invitation to advertisers to fill their boots when it comes to bending the rules and also one of the most prevalent attack vector for malware.
I doubt we'll see any change though. It seems that no major behavioural change in the way that the internet is used occurs these days unless it is championed by Google. In this case the status quo probably suits Google as much, if not more than, anyone else.
Re: Dishwasher.
Sod the solenoids. Just get an old-skool dishwasher with proper pushbutton switches and an analogue programmer rather than one of the electronic ones. Then thump the "on" button after loading and you can just turn the mains supply on and off to play/pause it.
Of course, if you already have an electronic one, it's almost certainly got a timer function built in if you RTFM......
Never seen Zardoz. Will now even just to see how bad it is.
I'm going to go against the grain here and say it's actually not bad. Very clever in it's own way, but firstly its way is very much Boorman's[1] way and secondly it is a product of its time.
[1] Quite possibly the most "marmite" of directors.
It's not generally known as "Star Trek the Slow-Motion Picture" for no reason. Yes, you can pad out a single episode's plot into a two-hour movie, but why would you want to?
That aside, I reckon it's biggest problem was in trying to live up to itself. It was the first one, had been eagerly awaited for many years and was unmercifully hyped throughout production. To stand a chance of living up to its own reputation it needed to be the SF equivalent of Citizen Kane........and it wasn't.
I suppose someone had to mention it.....and there goes my "pet hate" button.
If only they hadn't reworked the thing to "bring it up to date". What's wrong with leaving it as personal shields 'n swords (the "slow knife" sequence would have actually made some bloody sense then), pointy-nosed rockets, artillery and the family atomics? No, they had to give it a "ray gun" makeover and remove all references to anything "nooculuh" to keep the plebs in the audience on-message.
It all made little sense after they'd butchered the plotline. The implementation and visualisation is fantastic, but the script is unfortunately utter crap.
I hate it for promising so much and yet delivering so little.
Oh, definately "Ghost in the Shell". Required watching that.
Original DVD version played on a decent upscaling player is the way to go. Downside is that you don't get the sumptuous soundtrack of the HD remaster, upside is you get to see all the artwork rather than most of it and some CGI.
This is one that must be watched in Japanese with subtitles. Whoever did the Motoko free-diving soliloquy in the English dub should go back to flipping burgers for a living.
If you like that, the two "Standlone Complex" spinoff TV series' are also well worth watching. As it happens I've just finished watching the whole lot.
I remember seeing Leslie Neilsen interviewed about his career. One of the things touched on was Forbidden Planet. He said that he thought he had it made when he did that. He was the hero, he got the girl, the reviews were good and it sold well. Pretty much everything an actor could ask for to endorse their credentials as a box office draw in a lead role.
He said he sat back and waited for the phone to ring. It never did and to this day he still wonders why it didn't.
I'm with him. I thought he was bloody brilliant in it.
That would be the fault of, er, the EU.
The big networks would love to give you preferential treatment when on one of their overseas tentacles, but they're not allowed to as this would severely piss on the picnic of the small, local providers.
Put it this way. If your Voda, O2, T-mobile, etc phone contract gave you pan-European coverage on their networks, what would happen to 3's market.......? Ok, maybe not a serious problem in Blighty (although 3's continuous bleating about roaming rates leads me to believe that they think it is) but a really big, fat, hairy deal on the continent.
As far as I can see it doesn't say anything about not being ad-funded, only that you cannot siphon off the user's details and flog them to the ad-pushers (or anyone else).
Or in other words, a bloody sensible thing which should be implemented in every educational establishment.
It would probably have been better if MS had kept their noses out though, that seems to have muddied the waters courtesy of the usual MS-hating arsehattery.