Hang on a minute...
Why are yo utalking about Android reviews here?
524 publicly visible posts • joined 20 Sep 2007
You don't have to enable the facebook support if you don't want to, it's not obligatory by any means. Also, Zune is used primarily for media sync to your phone, so if you're using it for Business, you won't need Zune at all, except for doing OS updates, and let's face it, OS updates have to be handled by some piece of software or other, and it may as well be Zune, which is a well liked app.
For putting office files on your phone, there's sharepoint support, and coming soon is full Skydrive support too.
So put down your axe, switch off the grinder, and enjoy.
Zune is infinitely better than iTunes, you needn't fear using it. It actually makes syncing media to your phone really, really easy. Pictures, video, music, podcasts, zune channels, the lot. It also performs phone backups and Wifi syncing, as well as pulling photos and videos off your phone into your libraries.
It's a lot more functional than direct USB mass storage.
For instance, if I drag an artist onto my phone icon, it doesn't just copy all the music by that artist onto the device. It also creates a sync object for the artist, which means if I buy new music by that artist, it will automatically get put onto the phone. That is the kind of grooviness Zune provides that mass storage does not.
I'm staggered anyone buys anything else. I mean, Android.....come on, choopy, laggy fragmented bollocks made by an advertising company. iOS....locked-down piece of overblown marketing bollocks made by a marketing company. Blackberry....oh, please. Do I even need to -
Look, before you diss WP7 at least be in possession of a sense of irony.
I see The Register doesn't have a problem with biased reporting then, the anti-MS force being strong in this article.
I assume by "both of them" you mean "both millions of them", way more than that by now.
That jibe was even more eye-rolling considering Nokia are now on the bandwagon. Someone might have to eat their words soon.
But I guess it's still trendy to insult Microsoft isn't it, even if they have made an awesome phone OS that's smoother than Android and more open than iOS.
Purile.
Yes it is. What's your point? You seemed to be arguing WP7 didn't have multitasking, but now you're saying it's existing functionality and I've completely lost track of what you're trying to say.
Multitasking exists in WP7, all MS are doing is allowing certain apps to utilize it, and giving users a nice interface to it. It's not that hard to grasp, and yes it is a step up from what WM6.5 had, because WM6.5 allowed all apps to multitask, which is an exceedingly bad idea and leads to performance and battery drain. Plus WM6.5 did not have a visual interface to the open apps, it just had a task list.
WP7 already has multitasking, it's just that MS locked that down from 3rd party developers. Now they're going to allow it on a limited basis to apps that need it, such as IM and music streaming apps, and they're adding the interface to allow the switching. They always said they'd start out locked down for safety, then open up as required. Now they're doing that. So don't go all "we've had this for years", WP7 had the capability from the start, it's simply a question of who's allowed to use it. MS's approach is pragmatic.
Great to see WP7 ploughing ahead - with Nokia, the world's largest phone manufacturer, onboard, it now has all the manufacturer support it needs. It's already the smoothest, slickest phone OS on the market and with these coming updates it will become one of the most functional too. IE9 renders HTML5 much faster than Safari, so we'll be seeing rich HTML5 applications running like Olympic sprinters on WP7 and like shackled asthmatics on iOS.
The implementation of Cut 'n' Paste and Multitasking should shut the whingers up, and it's nice to see that background-running music streaming services will have access to the pop-up media controls accessed via the volume buttons. Twitter integration into the people hub will really make the phone a proper social networking device, and the use of Windows Live, Facebook and Twitter will be completely seemless.
Nokia sell 100 million phones a year - and that's with a shite OS on board (Symbian). With WP7, the sky's the limit and Nokia know this, as do the carriers who seem very upbeat about it all. I look forward to watching WP7 carve out a decent market share, it's an OS that really deserves its place at the top.
I don't give a shit if I'm the only person on the planet that thinks this, but I'm very happy that Nokia have climbed on board the WP7 bandwagon. This will help WP7 become a true contender with iOS and Android in terms of sales - WP7 is in my opinion already a contender in terms of UI. I like it a lot and think it deserves to succeed and turn the marketplace for smartphones into a 3-horse race. The increased competition can only be good for consumers in the end, after all.
I don't understand why anyone would want the market to be dominated by one OS or another. Let's make sure the consumer has CHOICE. Today's announcement will help that happen.
Nokia make outstanding hardware and that will help them obtain a lead over the other WP7 phone makers.
People will only be reporting the issue if...
1) They use Yahoo mail
2) They use IMAP to access Yahoo mail
3) They have high volumes of emails
4) They are checking their data usage
5) They actually notice their usage has gone up a lot
6) They sync with Yahoo often
7) They back-sync more than a couple of days
So, quite a narrow section of the WP7 using fraternity then.
And yes I'm another WP7 user, but I'm using Hotmail so no problems from my end.
If Yahoo are not implementing the IMAP protocol correctly, and it certainly sounds like they aren't, then it's definitely not Microsoft's fault. Although you would have thought that MS would have discovered the fault in pre-production tests, and that they would have released this info a lot sooner to those affected and presumably paying excesses on their data plans.
...this is basically going to be a PSOne emulator.
Whoop-de-fuckin-doo. I'd love to see how they're going to emulate all those controller buttons on a touch screen.
Touch screen phones need touch-screen-optimized games, not 20-year-old multibutton games with shit graphics that'll require the manual dexterity of a career-typist.
And if you're going to have touch-screen-optimized games, there's not much point in doing it through the Playstation Portal, now is there?
MS chose to concentrate on the consumer in the initial release, but included the Business Bits that were completed already. Policy support and full Skydrive support will come soon enough as they start to home in on the Business side more. Eventually we'll end up with an OS that's awesome for consumers (Zune / XBox integration) AND awesome for Business (full office, sharepoint, policies etc etc).
WP7 is a work in progress, but then so are iOS and Android.
As the specs age, the price of the phones will drop and soon enough they'll become mid-tier and eventually budget phones, at which time they'll have full market penetration. The reason they started out with a high spec was so they didn't end up with the kind of performance disaster that is low-end Android phones. Oh, Angry Birds Lite, anyone?
Yay a phone! That doesn't have the latest version of Android! And from a manufacturer with a track record of not giving you the latest version! And....and....Android's UI is so great they replaced it with one of their own! Sorry did someone say "fragmentation"?
The phrase "Lipstick on a pig" comes to mind, like it did for WM6.5.
...This is why Google created Android. They hope to dominate the mobile world of apps as well, so they CAN still mine all the data for their own nefarious purposes.
They've also come up with Android tablets to thwart the iPad and Chrome OS to try to thwart Macs and Windows PCs.
Google are running scared and have tried to put everything in place so they can continue to slurp everyone's data.
They can't afford to lose.
Good point - after all, Angry Birds has a specific list of compatible Android phones doesn't it? So whereas any app runs on any IOS phone* or WP7 phone, with Android you have to make sure you've got one of the compatible handsets. What does that remind you of? Oh yes - Windows Mobile, that ugly child of the last decade.
*ish.
Bloomin' heck! What kind of a bloatware phone OS needs a dual-core CPU? Not surprised the battery's so hefty. Even IOS and WP7 manage to be speedy on a single core. And how come no 2.3 already? How often do Android manufacturers promise updates but not deliver or deliver very, very late?
Getting really fed up with Android - heck, even new games are coming out for WP7 before Android due to fragmentation making development take so darn long.
Why don't we just wait patiently for the official sales figures, eh?
I suspect that facebook slurps done by the OS are treated differently to those from the App, so these figures probably only cover one or the other anyway.
Personally I only rarely use the app as the built-in integration is pretty good.
The word "Adults" doesn't appear anywhere in my posting. I said it seats 4. We're a family of 3 with the occasional mid-teens passenger.
The iQ is pretty much the perfect car. I think the insurance is £178 per year and that's with my driving ban on the convictions list. Road Tax nil, servicing about £100 once a year, 60mpg yields monthly petrol costs of around £45.
My Toyota iQ does over 60mpg, seats 4 and costs £10,000.
Why would I spend and extra £10,000 to get an extra 2 or 3 mpg? In order for the slightly better fuel economy to pay me back (forgetting the higher insurance - the iQ is group 2) I would have to run it at my 6,000 miles per year for a total of 366 years!
The iQ is a normal petrol-engined car, and also attracts 0 road tax due to the 99g carbon emissions.
Go figure.
Figures are fun.
For instance,
40,000 sales in US per day, * 365 = 14.6 Million per year.
If there are 0.3 billion people in the US and 20 times as many in the rest of the world (i.e. 6 billion) then we can multiply by 20 to get an estimate of worldwide sales in the first year.
14.6 Million * 20 = 292 Million. Plus US figures of 14.6 Million = 306 Million.
That's quite a lot of phones, and as an estimate it's probably as reliable as the original 40,000 figure it's based on.
Go figure, as they say Stateside.
Rolex Submariner Oyster Perpetual Date. A proper clockwork blokes watch which is self-winding, waterproof to 1000ft, and has a virtually scratch-proof window made of white sapphire. Requires no batteries, glows in the dark. A timeless classic. *sigh*.
I actually mentioned this watch in my will because it was worth deciding who should inherit it after by cloggs have popped. I can't see anyone mentioning this E-Ink thing in their own wills...
The answers are "Nothing" and "No" respectively. This is Dell's PR "stunt", not Microsoft's. It stands to reason they would want their staff to use their own products, no?
Have you got some kind of pathological MS hatred complex? If so you should see a shrink. Probably sooner rather than later, if those latest figures showing developer interest in WP7 for 2011 matches iPad and exceeds iPhone, and is nipping at the heels of Android, are correct. You're going to be seeing a lot more MS product in your face.
I'm a fan of technology, yes, and a Java and XNA developer, yes, and I have tried iPhones, Android, WM6.5 and WP7. As far as I see it, WP7 is the best.
If that makes me an MS fan then hey, fair enough. But don't assume everyone that's praising WP7 is necessarily an MS fan, because if you do, the world must be swarming with MS fans. It's time for MS haters to admit that this time Redmond have got it very, very right.
...it is a genuine supply issue - various sources believe that at least in Samsung's case it is a lack of AMOLED screens.
What makes you think Microsoft are able to somehow magically prevent Samsung and HTC from shipping phones to Orange?
Apple can restrict supply because they control the manufacturing process. Microsoft just make the OS, so the same simply isn't true in this case.