The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Post: Urm, maybe we should ... (again, again)

Anonymous Coward

Urm, maybe we should ... (again, again) 

In Police aim to stamp out virtual child abuse

Thumb Up

Sorry futher to my last post :

"Protection of Children Act 1978 (England & Wales)

To take, or permit to be taken, or to make any indecent photograph or pseudo-photograph of a child; or to distribute or show such indecent photographs or pseudo-photographs; or to possess such indecent photographs or pseudo-photographs, with a view to their being distributed or shown by himself or others; or to publish or cause to be published any advertisement likely to be understood as conveying that the advertiser distributes or shows such indecent photographs or pseudo-photographs, or intends to do so."

I rest my case that they are guilty ... Incidentally, before you all jump up and down on the "photograph" section, a lot of the Act refers to "images" not "photographs" ...

( Shoot them ... )