Post: Urm, maybe we should ... (again, again)
Urm, maybe we should ... (again, again) →
Posted Friday 2nd November 2007 17:49 GMT
In Police aim to stamp out virtual child abuse
Sorry futher to my last post :
"Protection of Children Act 1978 (England & Wales)
To take, or permit to be taken, or to make any indecent photograph or pseudo-photograph of a child; or to distribute or show such indecent photographs or pseudo-photographs; or to possess such indecent photographs or pseudo-photographs, with a view to their being distributed or shown by himself or others; or to publish or cause to be published any advertisement likely to be understood as conveying that the advertiser distributes or shows such indecent photographs or pseudo-photographs, or intends to do so."
I rest my case that they are guilty ... Incidentally, before you all jump up and down on the "photograph" section, a lot of the Act refers to "images" not "photographs" ...
( Shoot them ... )
Top stories
Popular Whitepapers
- Virtualization with the Intel Xeon Processor 5500 Series
A proof of concept - A Smart Path to Virtualization
Virtualization and Flexible Computing - Systems management simplified
Guided tour: Dell Management Console - Data Center Savings
Realizing Data Center Savings with an Accelerated Server Refresh Strategy - Optimizing the data center for cost and efficiency
Control costs and add value to the business - Staying committed to server refresh reduces cost
Can a server refresh help your company?
