Post: Why is anything in the kernel?
Why is anything in the kernel? →
Posted Friday 10th April 2009 18:16 GMT
In IBM fingered over early Linux mistakes
For that matter, why is there even a Linux kernel?
Why is there SCSI support? Because a curly haired, bow-tie wearing SCSI user wanted it.
But now it's a Bad Thing® that IBM wanted its things in the kernel too? And worse, was willing to employ people to accomplish its goals? The hypocrisy is shocking, simply shocking. And oh so typical of Linux in my experience. You don't often see this sort of nonsense in the BSD world. Well, not if you ignore Theo anyway.
Paris, because nobody is shocked by her behavior.
Top stories
Popular Whitepapers
- Robin Johnson: Questions and Answers
Dell CIO Robin Johnson discusses the process of transforming its own IT infrastructure - A Cure for Server Sprawl
Dell Global Infrastucture Consulting helps DeKalb Medical - Virtualization with the Intel Xeon Processor 5500 Series
A proof of concept - Data Center Savings
Realizing Data Center Savings with an Accelerated Server Refresh Strategy - Business-Critical Applications
The Benefits of Intel Xeon Processors and Windows Server 2008 R2 for Business-Critical Apps - Total cost of ownership of Dell, HP and IBM blade solutions
A comparison conducted by Principled Technologies
