Post: @Henry Wertz
@Henry Wertz →
Posted Thursday 22nd January 2009 10:47 GMT
In Kentucky reverses 141-site net casino land grab
I think you are missing the point. The ownership of the domains was changed. At that point, the original owners would have been unable to modify any of the DNS configuration that the new owner specified. For ownership to change back requires intervention by the applicable TLD management organisation.
I agree that the domains were probably only down as long as it took for the respective companies to purchase new names and set the DNS records. Bearing in mind that a DNS change can take up to 24 hours to propagate, an on the ball administrator could have had the new domains set up quickly enough that the site would have been available on some domain all the time. Add a mail-out to all your current users with the new URL and you're sorted.
Top stories
Popular Whitepapers
- Virtualization with the Intel Xeon Processor 5500 Series
A proof of concept - A Smart Path to Virtualization
Virtualization and Flexible Computing - Systems management simplified
Guided tour: Dell Management Console - Data Center Savings
Realizing Data Center Savings with an Accelerated Server Refresh Strategy - Optimizing the data center for cost and efficiency
Control costs and add value to the business - Staying committed to server refresh reduces cost
Can a server refresh help your company?
