Posted Saturday 31st May 2008 15:50 GMT
OO No No
OO is not appropriate for the vast majority of websites.
Script/includes/css are all you need, and, if sensibly written, are far easier to maintain than .net/ruby/blahblah. The latter have nearly doubled the cost of developing in my company.
The detail of websites simply evades encapsulation.
OO is for stuff the website calls, not the website itself.
