So Phorm are upset because FIPR are 'pushing their own agenda'.

Given FIPR exists to advise on Internet Privacy , what other agenda , other than pointing out illegal interceptions, should they be following?

or does kent mean 'infamy , infamy -- they've all got it in for me' .

One suspects the latest 'statement' from phorm is a very good indicator as to how worried they currently are.

Attacking the motives behind the FIPR release rather than addressing the concerns within it.

Although that appears to be Kent's modus operandi in recent times.