Space-cadet Schwartz blows chunks out of Oracle's Java suit

Headmaster

Re: For completeness...

"This is remarkably unbalanced and only shows Googles side of the arguement."

Errm, the article quotes Schwartz, who doesn't work for Google. The article quotes McNealy, who doesn't work for Google. The article quotes "fake Steve", who doesn't work for Google.

So, umm, for 'completeness', who do you work for?

BTW: you do know how trials work, right? One side calls witnesses who testify, and the other side gets to cross-examine. Then it is the other side's turn to call witnesses. Multiple days can be spent on each side. As in this from the article "This week it was Google's turn to defend itself against Oracle's copyright infringement claims..." So the article is *about* this week's testimony. Google's turn this week. So, you know, you're basically saying the courts are biased because they let the defendent have a turn.

33
1

Back to the forum

Forums