Freetard?
Entitlementard, more like.
"You owe it to the public and to the medium that made you successful to solve this problem..."
Google owe precisely sod all to anybody except their shareholders. They're a business, not a charity. This idiot might want to look up those terms in a dictionary and educate himself.
Maybe if the FSF could whine a little less, cut out the tiresome politics and actually DO something for themselves instead of constantly demanding that commercial entities give them a free ride, they might be taken a little more seriously by those who actually have to earn a living.
So far, the sum total of the FSF's output is a mediocre clone of an OS first released in the 1970s, clones of outdated, equally mediocre software, and a big, steaming pile of petty, balkanising "licenses" which don't do anything the existing, legally-endorsed concept of Public Domain didn't already do far better—and with NO strings attached.
If "Free* Software" cannot stand on its own, it has no business trying to coerce other entities into supporting its failed model.
* (Albeit a peculiar definition of "Free" which comes with an awful lot of strings attached. Unlike Public Domain, which is entirely unencumbered with such strings and genuinely involves giving up control over the fruits of your labour—you know, like one of those "gift" or "donation" things. The hypocrisy of FSF fans railing against Apple's control-freak design philosophy is truly spectacular. At least Apple don't go around calling it "Freedom" in a display of Orwellian newspeak.)