back to article Packet.net strong-ARMs cloud for $0.005 per core per hour

Packet.net, a bare-metal cloud aimed at developers, has flicked the switch on cloud-running servers powered by a pair of Cavium's 48-core ARMv8-A ThunderX processors. CEO Zachary Smith told The Register that the company's cooked up the cloud for a few reasons. Price is one: Packet will offer ARM cores at a tenth of the price …

  1. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    "If we can get the open source ecosystem rebooted..."

    What about the H/W ecosystem?

    Like Torvalds said, isn't that a big part of where ARM falls short of Intel?

    1. Frumious Bandersnatch

      Re: "If we can get the open source ecosystem rebooted..."

      I think that if you're just looking for number crunching or high-level stuff, then Torvald's comments probably don't apply. Porting the kernel to a new ARM board isn't straightforward because there's no standard equivalent to the PC BIOS to arbitrate between hardware and OS at boot time. ARM provides reference implementations, but then chip and board manufacturers can go off and make their own proprietary changes. Chip and board manufacturers (eg, Samsung) are often quite antipathetic to free software guys, not wanting to open up the platform unless you pay.

      However, we have guys like Linaro (plus other small hardware manufacturers like hardkernel) doing a great job on getting the main components (like boot loader and kernel, and maybe GPU?) working. Once you have that (and we can assume they have this for the board mentioned in the article), as a user you can pretty much forget about it and start thinking about the over-the-top stuff like Docker instances or some sort of parallel/distributed number crunching framework (eg, MPI or Hadoop; unfortunately, OpenCL is a bit sketchy on ARM thanks to vendors not fully/properly supporting it).

  2. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Ugh, bullshit artists

    Sounded interesting, so took a look at the detail page here:

    https://www.packet.net/bare-metal/servers/type-2a/

    They have a section "How we compare to others" on there... which frankly is complete bullshit. We already use Rackspace (Cloud), however this packet place is either extremely outdated in their marketing or just frankly lying. Saying stuff like Rackspace doesn't support IPv6 (bullshit), doesn't support NVMe SSD's (bullshit), doesn't support hourly pricing (bullshit).

    With that level of dishonesty showing right from the start, there's no way this crowd should be trusted with anyone's business.

  3. jacob.packet

    Guilt about Bullshit Artistry

    Responding to the comment above - looks like our comparison table is pretty outdated and has a few obvious errors, which we'll definitely correct. Thanks for checking us out, and for calling us out where appropriate!

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Guilt about Bullshit Artistry

      Checked again... and it's still unchanged.

      Perhaps the "we'll definitely correct" is scheduled for sometime next century?

      1. Jamie Jones Silver badge

        Re: Guilt about Bullshit Artistry

        ah man, if you were too busy to update it, you should have removed it the minute you were aware!

      2. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Guilt about Bullshit Artistry

        1 week later... the info is still bullshit/misleading.

        1. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: Guilt about Bullshit Artistry

          Two months later, that page has not been corrected at all.

          "Jacob Packet", you are full of shit.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like