back to article International Space Station astros prepare to rejoin us Earthlings

Three astronauts from the International Space Station are expected to fly home tomorrow after spending 172 days floating in space. Expedition 48 Commander and NASA astronaut Jeff Williams, Soyuz commander and Flight Engineer Alexey Ovchinin and Oleg Skripochka from Roscosmos, the Russian space agency, will leave the ISS in the …

  1. allthecoolshortnamesweretaken

    That's about the only 'slide show about my last trip' invitation I'd accept...

    Safe landing, guys!

  2. Baldy50

    The O’Neill cylinder?

    Other designs of course.

    Since the lack of gravity is one of the main problems this has to be something they're considering?

    http://www.scifiideas.com/sfi/10-space-station-concepts/

    Could Passive magnetic bearings be used for friction free support of the stations rotating section using permanent magnetic attractive, repulsive forces or both?

    Though if the solar panels were on one end of the station facing the sun they could spin too.

    unlike a traditional motor bearing design with a small surface area it would have to be far larger I guess.

    Though if the solar panels were on one end of the station facing the sun they could spin too along with the habitat section.

    1. Yesnomaybe

      Re: The O’Neill cylinder?

      Giant spinning space-stations seems a little ambitious at our current technology-level.. However: Would it be so difficult to have a centrifuge that astronauts could sleep in? It could be relatively small, housed entirely inside a non-spinning pressurized container. 8 hours (OK, so I don't know how long these guys get in bed but let's say 8) of the equivalent of 1.2 G should be enough to offset some of the damage surely?

  3. Long John Brass

    Honkin big engines

    Don't understand what all the faffing about trying to solve all the medical issues WRT low-G space travel. Strap on some humongous engines and drive there at 1G; at halfway point start braking at 1G

    Simples

    1. Pete 47

      Re: Honkin big engines

      You've done that deliberately haven't you?

      1. Long John Brass

        Re: Honkin big engines

        > You've done that deliberately haven't you?

        Yes

        But seriously, there seems to be a trend for "Oh it's not efficient enough" or "how do we protect the crew during a 6 month flight", "We need a new set of ultra light, ultra strong materials"

        How about a MSR style rector(s) driving a VASMIR style set of engines, bolt on more until you hit the ability to make 2 Gravity's, then run the damned thing at 50%

        Sometimes the right answer is in fact a bigger hammer

        and MechJeb, cuz you always need a Jeb on board :)

    2. A Nonny Moose

      Re: Honkin big engines

      Wouldn't you then have a problem that all of your gravity was at the back, until you start braking and then it's suddenly at the front?

      Well, unless you flip the ship around to do the braking. Still, you'd have to design your interior to be like a skyscraper and not like a submarine.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like