back to article Apple faces Beijing blackout for iPhone 6

Apple has lost a patent infringement lawsuit that could see the iPhone booted from China's capital. The Beijing Intellectual Property Office this week ruled that Apple's iPhone 6 and 6 Plus ripped off patented designs held by Chinese smartphone maker Shenzhen Baili, which flogs a handset called the 100C. Apple has appealed …

  1. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    "Don't do business in China" - Carl Icahn

    "We no longer have a position in Apple".

    China changes laws everyday , and the general trend is to shut down foreign presence in China. Get the message???

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: "Don't do business in China" - Carl Icahn

      The general trend as I experience it is that China really, really wants their foreign presence on my networks.

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: "Don't do business in China" - Carl Icahn

      India can be unfriendly towards business in some regions as well and if ban them as well now you just eliminated over 1/3 of the world's population. Still have to agree in general about China. Had several opportunities to work there even with a significant raise and declined. Lots of problems everywhere but at least you generally understand the ones at home or even most in the developed world.

    3. goldcd

      Re: "Don't do business in China" - Carl Icahn

      Lots of Chinese companies are doing fine in China - been doing so for a while (you might have noticed the rise of China).

      I suspect the real takeaway message is simply "Be careful of wading in where you don't have lobbyists".

      Apple's kicking of Samsung in the US was equally as dubious as the kicking they're currently receiving in China. Slapping "Designed in California" on the back of your phones? Not enough to convince the "Made in USA" brigade, but probably enough to piss off China a smidge.

    4. frank ly

      Re: "Don't do business in China" - Carl Icahn

      "China changes laws everyday , ..."

      and they vary from city to city?:

      "... and the decision – if allowed to stand – only applies to the city of Beijing itself, ..."

    5. P. Lee

      Re: "Don't do business in China" - Carl Icahn

      > the general trend is to shut down foreign presence in China. Get the message???

      ... as if the West doesn't do the same. We are more subtle with it and we done it for so long there is little need for additional legal protections.

      We call them, "industries of particular national importance" and we don't outright ban imports (that would be "in restraint of trade") we use tax money to subsidise our local industry so it can undercut them furriners.

      That's how we end up with corn mountains in the US, wine and milk lakes in the EU. It leads to the ungodly sight of food either being destroyed while much of the world is starving or the food being dumped on the world market - tax money from the rich nations destroying the markets and livelihoods of the poor around the world who might otherwise make a living growing crops.

      The US corn over-production is what drives the HFCS market leading to really cheap sugar which makes its way into so much food, resulting in ill-health.

      Does anyone (apart from Apple) really have a problem with what the Chinese are doing? Isn't "making decisions that the market wouldn't make" the role of government? Having seen Apple's attacks on Samsung, they might come to the conclusion that Apple manipulate the legal and patent system to increase their super-normal profits and it is therefore quite legitimate to rebalance the playing field to help with local industry develop.

      Or it might just be corruption. Which is bad, and our governments would never take money from lobbyists which may influence their decisions, would they?

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: "Don't do business in China" - Carl Icahn

        Picking up your point about "milk lakes" etc. I think surplus in the EU is generally passed on to poorer countries (and food banks internally within the EU) so that it doesn't all go to waist.

        I believe that there have also been years (according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Agricultural_Policy#Oversupply_and_its_redistribution) where the surplus has been used when there were shortages and this resulted in calls for more storage.... ironic really.

        I think milk production has recently seen quotas removed in the EU.

        I've no idea what the US does with its excess corn.

        As for trading in China: It seems to me that you have to understand their culture and rules and not expect everything to work as it does in the US. From a third part perspective both the US and China have, what my culture would consider, dodgy practices. I can't really see that one is worse than the other although personally I found China easier to deal with.

  2. G.Y.

    He who lives

    By the rounded corner ...

  3. G.Y.

    He who lives by the rounded corner

    Shall die by the rounded corner

  4. Mark 85

    From what I've read, the Chinese are almost as bad as the States on patents. Only a Chinese citizen/company can file a patent and thus, no other patents apply. In this case, rip the design off from any non-Chinese company, patent it and you've got that company by the shorthairs. Applies to copyrights also.

    Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

  5. mark 177
    WTF?

    Where's the actual phone?

    So many news articles on this subject. And not a single one with a picture of the phone that Apple allegedly ripped off.

    Why not? I want to see it!

    1. BasicChimpTheory

      Re: Where's the actual phone?

      Here you go: https://9to5mac.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/baili-100c.jpg

      They're both pretty clearly phones. An open-and-shut case, if ever I saw one...

      1. Paul Crawford Silver badge
        Trollface

        Re: Where's the actual phone?

        Isn’t the case and extra cost option?

  6. John Savard

    Encryption

    Of course, since Apple is designing the new iPhones so that even it can't decrypt stuff on them, I doubt the Chinese government wants them in the country in any case. But having some other reason would help distract people from the human rights angle.

  7. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Someone is seeking bribes

    Eventually, though, the Chinese are going to overstep their extortion shenanigans and find themselves without Western technology or the resulting manufacturing jobs.

    Apple has been slowly but inexorably moving away from Samsung as a supplier and they could do the same with China. Apple has the scale and the cash to pull it off. Admittedly, it would happen at a snail's pace. By the time the Chinese would notice, it would be too late.

    1. allthecoolshortnamesweretaken

      Re: Someone is seeking bribes

      So? This isn't Mao's 'cultural revolution' China any more. Not by a long shot.

      1. allthecoolshortnamesweretaken

        Re: Someone is seeking bribes / Nor Mao's China any more

        I know, I know - it's frowned upon to reply to one's own post. But as this one just fits so nice:

        http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/06/20/china_topples_united_states_as_top_supercomputer_user/

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Remember, Foxconn is Taiwanese

      Apple would only need to change the location of the iPhone's assembly to leave China, not the company that does it. Alternatively, they could decide to automate it a lot more heavily instead of relying on so many people, making it feasible to move manufacturing to the US. Even though that would cost more, it would score them a lot of political points on an issue that has been one of the hot buttons that helped Trump's rise.

      While Apple alone moving their manufacturing out of China would be just a drop in the bucket in an economy China's size, it would be devastating if many other US and western companies followed suit. Apple makes a lot of money selling iPhones in China, so they aren't going to make wholesale changes anytime soon. However, if China closed the door on imports, western companies would have reason to look elsewhere for their manufacturing needs.

      China no longer has the lowest manufacturing labor cost. Moving manufacturing operations to a new country is something many companies are comfortable with, having successfully executed it within the past 10-15 years to move manufacturing into China!

      Look to Samsung. Apple had a dispute with them, and it has taken them years, but they have been slowly disentangling themselves from reliance on Samsung wherever possible. By sole sourcing the manufacturing of the A8 with TSMC, Samsung's fab division suffered massive losses as they were left with tons of unused capacity.

      1. x 7

        Re: Remember, Foxconn is Taiwanese

        Foxconn may be Taiwanese, but where is the majority beneficial shareholding? My understanding is they're held by proxies for the mainland goverment

        1. PhilipN Silver badge

          Re: Remember, Foxconn is Taiwanese

          "My understanding is they're held by proxies for the mainland goverment"

          Total balls

      2. Flocke Kroes Silver badge

        Re: Look to Samsung

        Do you have any evidence Samsung suffered from losing a chip fab contract with Apple? I found some speculation that they might, but the journalist only gave 50/50 odds on that speculation, and he believed Samsung could find other work for their fabs. I saw some speculation that Samsung would delay opening one of their new fabs, but with hindsight, we see it started production in good time. Samsung also invested $3.5billion in a fab in Texas, and $14billion in a new fab in Korea. Hardly the actions of a company worried about lack of orders.

        Apple may make a vast amount of money, but they do not make that many phones. Samsung sell far more than Apple, and a wide range of other kit too. Apple are notorious for demanding low prices from sub-contractors. Loss of a supply contract with Apple probably boosted Samsung's profits. The best way to suffer from losing an Apple contract is if you do an exclusive deal like GT Advanced Technologies. (Apple used to buy displays from Samsung. When they stopped, quality problems with iPhone displays hit the news, followed by Apple doing a deal with GT to make Sapphire glass).

        This patent spat in Beijing is a storm in a teacup compared to Apple vs Samsung, but it couldn't happen to a more deserving company. (Unicode has a square with rounded corners: ▢. Is there a reason for lack of a similar rectangle?)

        1. John Brown (no body) Silver badge

          Re: Look to Samsung

          Maybe China is just using Microsoft tactics. Embrace, Extend, Extinguish.

          First they open the markets to the outside world.

          Next they import the manufacturing, offering to do it cheaper

          Then they make it themselves and undercut the competition.

          Now, foreign companies are having more than the usual "difficulties" in China. Apple aren't the only company having "problems" there.

          China has 1000's of years of form playing the long slow game.

        2. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: Look to Samsung

          Apple sells enough iPhones, iPads and Apple TVs to order nearly 300 million A* SoCs per year, that's larger than the number of PCs that were sold last year (which means Apple probably buys more SoCs than Intel sells CPUs now) That's not insignificant in anyone's book.

          While it is true that Samsung sells more phones than Apple does, they use their own SoCs in a minority of them. They will need to use their own SoCs in all their phones, or start selling them to other Android OEMs, if they want to fill the massive hole in Samsung's foundry utilization that Apple left behind. There are rumors that Qualcomm will have Samsung fab some of their lower end Snapdragon SoCs, that could also do the trick, if true.

  8. cdilla

    鸡爪蒂姆·库克

    Tim Cook Chicken. Lol.

  9. Francis Boyle Silver badge

    Who'd have thought

    Beijing and Texas would have so much in common?

  10. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    The Chinese don't negotiate

    They dominate.

    He who plays with fire gets burnt.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like