Norton bans kernel.org Bad news for Linux users: security suite Norton thinks that the Linux repository kernel.org is rife with threats. Norton Linux.org page Er, no Symantec's automated analysis system claims to have identified four threats to Norton users on the site and has red flagged it for anyone thinking of visiting. That will come as a …
...why you shouldn't let others run your browser. In many cases black / white -lists are only hurting your options, nothing more or less.
And just to explain how utterly ridiculous this is: kernel.org doesn't even run advertisements (#1 source of virusses and other nasty malware).
Still.. I wonder if their javacode code has anything to do with this. Opera (developer mode) spots a lot of javascript code from an "unknown domain".
Kernel.org is only visited by those who roll their own Linux distros. So if they have a need to download stuff from that site, the odds are they are already on a Linux environment and wouldn't give a flying f**k about what Norton think.
Now, if Norton blocked Ubuntu, Fedora or similar sites that have complete distros for downloading and replacing Windows with on the basis that the Linux distros were virus and trojan-riddled software packages, then that may be newsworthy of a moderate reader outrage among those who want to avoid Windows 10.
Just because it's kernel.org doesn't mean that it hasn't been compromised somehow. Unlikely I grant you but it'd be interesting to know what Norton thinks it's found before criticising. If you are going to run a heuristic checker (and previous Reg articles have said that signature only av is nearly useless) then there will be false alarms.
It says it's found 4 threats.
Seeing as the new super short article doesn't take the time to list what those might be could we assume that it MIGHT not be the site itself but something it is serving that it's not meant to?
It's not beyond the realms of reason to think that someone might have fucked about hand have some page on the site spewing malware?
I mean it's probably not, Norton is a bag of wank... but my point is it COULD BE, the should have elaborated on the reasons.
https://safeweb.norton.com/report/show_mobile?name=kernel.org
I don't know if it's possible to see what the threats are believed to be, while they are shown. You could try putting in a risky site name. Note that 4ch*n.*rg is also "OK" apparently, so goodness knows how bad it has to be.
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2024
