back to article Google: Trust us with NHS AI

The cofounder of Google's artificial intelligence company DeepMind has responded to widespread concerns that the biz is being granted access to more than a million people's private healthcare records in the UK. Mustafa Suleyman reckons his company is highly qualified to look after the information given Google's long history of …

  1. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Trust us, we're an advertising company masquerading...

    as a tech company... At the very least Google should be forced to make a statement about what it intends to do with the data it mines.... That can't just be left blank...

  2. allthecoolshortnamesweretaken

    "Suleyman stressed that the contract signed between DeepMind and the Royal Free NHS Trust prevented the data from being shared with other parts of Google and that it is required to delete its copy of the database when the agreement ends"

    Yeah, right. Everything in Google's own cloud*, but not shared. Everything deleted, except for that odd backup someone forgot.

    He did not say what would happen to the extremely valuable intelligence built up through analysis of that data, however.

    It will be used to further mankind, of course. Which from Google's point of view means monetizing it via it's advertising business.

    (* Would that qualify as a private cloud in this context, btw?)

  3. Dan 55 Silver badge

    Look, it's deleted

    We've set the deleted flag and everything.

  4. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Google, Please Fuck Right Off

    As per title

  5. Primus Secundus Tertius

    Beancounters' wheeze

    Everyone knows the British National Health Service is stoney broke. This looks like desperate NHS 'management' taking the money offered by Google, egged on by the myopic British Treasury..

    Google are only partly to blame; there are many faults in the NHS.

    1. BebopWeBop

      Re: Beancounters' wheeze

      Google are only partly to blame; there are many faults in the NHS.

      Nt only confounded, but aided and abetted by British politicians - both those of the current administration and the last Labour one.

  6. inmypjs Silver badge

    What backup program doesn't have an encryption option?

    The one google built into android which by default backs up every single bit of information to google servers.

    If they had any respect for personal privacy they would at least provide an option to protect it.

    That is reason enough to not trust any part of google with anything.

    "As Googlers, we have the very best privacy and secure infrastructure" - you couldn't make it up.

  7. Steve Channell
    Facepalm

    Surprised they can afford to pay for it!

    Really expensive projects like going to the moon, sequencing the human genome, mass observation of clinical data are so highly expensive that for-profit simply can't afford it.

    Here in the UK, the NHS owns the clinical data and the NPfIT billions can only be justified by the value of information.. Surprising this massive fee didn't get into the budget statement from the treasury.

    In a parallel universe where managers are numpties, they got pennies

  8. zen1

    I'm sorry, but...

    Am I the only one who found the whole second paragraph entirely laughable, insulting, as well as a complete and total lie.

    Any government department head, minister, director or secretary that would suggest, let alone authorizes google access to that much deeply sensitive and incredibly private information, should be fired.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon