Questions over how Ian Livingston's peerage was granted
Work in journalism and illegally intercept messages?
Get taken to court over it and face criminal charges.
Force access to the internet usage of tens of thousands of customers as the MD of the retail arm of a large multinational telecoms company?
Get made a baron and given a house of lords (not to mention the possibility of claiming expenses for the rest of your life)
How could the commission miss something like this when checking the propriety of Ian Livingston before allowing the appointment? Or did they see it and simply ignore it? Or asked Livingston about it and took him blindly at his word (can't go about questioning a chaps word can they?)
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/suitability_of_person_nominated#outgoing-539696