Why do radar pictures show sunlight and shadow? Those are normal pictures.
US radar paparazzi snap 'Halloween Asteroid'
NASA has served up some radar images of the so-called "Halloween Asteroid" - a 600 metre diameter ball of rock that whisked past Earth on 31 October. Mercifully, Bruce Willis' services were not required, as asteroid 2015 TB145 - to use its official title - came no closer to Hollywood than 1.3 lunar distances (480,000km). NASA …
COMMENTS
-
-
-
Wednesday 4th November 2015 17:28 GMT kryptonaut
"Because the radar signal was sent from one dish and received by another several thousand miles away."
That's what I thought at first, but given the asteroid is several hundred thousand miles away, I don't think that can be the reason. Could the asteroid just be more radar-reflective in some parts than in others?
-
-
Wednesday 4th November 2015 21:18 GMT Brewster's Angle Grinder
I am not a Radio Astronomer, but
It's not a picture, it's a delay-Doppler image -- which is a graph.
A radar pulse doesn't come back as a 2D spacial signal. It's come back as a "point" spread out in time and smeared across frequencies. That's plotted as:
x= frequency
y = time
pixel[ x, y ] = intensity
Image a plotter with multiple heads drawing wiggly lines on a roll of paper -- like a cinema polygraph. Each column of pixels is the output of one plotter head, plotting the signal received at a particular frequency. The brighter the pixel, the bigger the spike the plotter-head produced.
So the (y-axis) is just the distance from the receiver (the path-length). I'm using Radio Astronomy 101 here, but I presume the top pixels are the ones received first so produce the strongest signal.
The x-axis comes about because the asteroid is rotating and so the frequency of the pulse is Doppler shifted.
-
-
-
-
Wednesday 4th November 2015 19:57 GMT asdf
Re: And when, eventually, one stikes earth . . . .
My guess is the biggest danger globally of an impact event is whether it causes a flood basalt near the antipodes to its impact (600m wouldn't I believe). The link between massive volcanism and extinction events is stronger than impact events. Especially since volcanism has also been found near the same geological time of most of the big impact events as well.
-
-
Thursday 5th November 2015 07:15 GMT Pascal Monett
480,000 km
Well that settles that then.
On the previous article on this subject, there was argument over this sentence :
The asteroid will come within 498,896 kilometers of Earth
Some people deemed the number suspiciously exact and thus called NASA's results into question. Well I think we can all agree that NASA wasn't so wrong after all.