back to article Greek PM Alexis Tsipras brings the EU to its knees

Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras managed to bring the European Parliament’s live streaming service to a standstill this morning. The Greek leader was giving an unusual speech to MEPs in Strasbourg following Sunday’s referendum, but despite much crowing from the EU Parliament press department about how everyone would be able …

  1. Mage Silver badge
    Facepalm

    Streaming isn't scaleable

    There is a Satellite service, but not on Continental Phobic 28.2E.

    Terrestrial and Satellite is scalable, makes no difference if everyone watches at once. Internet feeds can't be economically feeding everyone as it's NOT broadcast.

    1. JeffyPoooh
      Pint

      Re: Streaming isn't scaleable

      Multicast is *supposed* to help in this regards.

  2. JeffyPoooh
    Pint

    Many TRILLIONS of market losses from a $300B debt

    There's a lesson learned here, and the other debtors won't miss it.

    1. Gordon 10

      Re: Many TRILLIONS of market losses from a $300B debt

      A) What's that got to do with the price of fish? This is a story about media streaming.

      B) markets go up markets go down - pointing out 1 event and making a big deal of it is disingenuous at best and utterly fails to undersmoronic at worst.

      1. I. Aproveofitspendingonspecificprojects

        media streaming.

        You have to feel it to believe it and you can always pull the other one as that is what trojans are all about innit? Perhaps the speaker was horse?

      2. Ken 16 Silver badge
        Pint

        Re: Many TRILLIONS of market losses from a $300B debt

        A) That's the only reason people were watching the stream.

        B) Websites go up, websites go down, it's not much of a story without context.

      3. JeffyPoooh
        Pint

        Re: Many TRILLIONS of market losses from a $300B debt

        A) The Internet is big. There's plenty of room for off-topic comments prompted by the word "Greek", as well as the more-verbose rebuttals.

        B) "making a big deal" <- that didn't happen. However, the point remains (possibly) valid. Time will tell if or when the other PIGS (G = Greece) reach the same point; and how this painful lesson changes future EU reactions.

  3. Dan 55 Silver badge
    Devil

    "This live broadcast cock-up is a failure of democracy by the EU"

    No, I'm pretty sure that's the Commision threatening to leave Greece in a state which requires humanitarian aid if Greece doesn't come up with a proposal which is worse than last Tuesday's, which was rejected decisively by referendum.

    1. Charlie Clark Silver badge
      Thumb Down

      Re: "This live broadcast cock-up is a failure of democracy by the EU"

      Because Greece's referendum on an expired proposal is somehow more democratic than decisions of other member states? How exactly?

      Tsipras knew that this would be the situation when he broke off negotiations and called a referendum in the first place.

      1. Dan 55 Silver badge
        Flame

        Re: "This live broadcast cock-up is a failure of democracy by the EU"

        The proposal wasn't expired at the time the referendum was called. When it did expire Merkel said that there would be no further talks until the referendum was over. There was a concerted effort by the EU to change the terms of the referendum from a vote on the proposal to a vote on whether or not to stay in the eurozone.

        Now that the referendum is over and the result was resounding 'no' Juncker said that the referendum didn't matter, Greece would have to propose something tougher still, and if they didn't like it then they would be ready to supply humanitarian aid - if the result were 'yes' you can bet he wouldn't be saying that. Dijsselbloem said that the result is regrettable for the future of Greece. Schulz said that Greece was just one country and 18 others have voted 'yes'.

        I object to people being used as pawns and threatened in political games. The mask has slipped and Zappa's quote is bang on.

        1. I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

          Can the Eurogroup count?

          For your information I include this piece from an EU thinktank. www.bruegel.org-linky

          Now before you think that this is some wimpy old marxist Greek sympathiser, this is the guy who designed the Troika "bail-out" of Ireland, as he was head of the IMF's European department at the time.

          So when he says that the IMF and Eurogroup have just spent the last few months negotiating in bad faith, and that the IMF should actually be forced to take losses on their Greek lending as a punishment (losing their super-seniority for the first time ever), you should listen.

          Basically the trajectory of this crisis is as follows. Corrupt Greek policians ran their country horribly badly. Given they were buying votes with government jobs, and few people paid their taxes, the Greek voters can't just get away with blaming their politicians either. But they were allowed into the Euro anyway, because it was a political project. And those of us who pointed out the flaws at the time were ignored/laughed at.

          I'd say that William Hague's description from the 90s was rather prescient. He said that in a crisis, the Eurozone was "like a burning building with no exits". As you can see from the Greek crisis, where they have the choice of totally fucking their economy by leaving, or slowly fucking it by staying in.

          When the crisis hit it was then decided to bail out the crisis countries. But in the most retarded way possible. They would be loaded up with unsustainable levels of debt in order to save the Eurozone banking system. In reality it was the French and German banks that were most exposed to Ireland and Greece. Spain were later forced to bail out their own banks, but the Germans and the French preferred to get other people to bail theirs out. Although actually Germany spent more than the UK did in its own bank bail-out, and still their Landesbanken are in a horrible mess.

          However various people wanted the IMF involved. Partly as a body to duck behind for political cover. But also because the Eurosystem didn't have much crisis expertise.

          However, again, the IMF's rules only allow bail-outs of countries if they're sustainable. This is normally done by making the creditors take haircuts, in exchange for some IMF loans to tide the country over until they can borrow from the markets again and tough reforms. This is also accompanied by devaluation to give a burst of inflation (and avoid the risk of deflation) and a chance of export-led growth.

          There was no creditor hair-cut whatsoever! There was no devaluation. The ECB refused to reflate these countries with QE, and even raised interest rates in 2010/11!!!!! Plus no QE. And even when they finally did QE this year, they specifically designed the program not to include Greece who have 2.8% deflation at the moment, and therefore need it most.

          This breaks all the IMF rules, but they re-wrote them for saving the Eurozone. Which to be fair, was probably sensible - as collapsing the Eurozone in 2010 would have buggered the world economy. Although the IMF board minutes got leaked and there were lots of objections given how awful this would be for Greece. Even the Swiss delegate said the austerity would be too harsh...

          The IMF predicted the Greek economy would shrink by 5%. It shrank by 11% that year. And the same the next year. Hence the 2012 second Greek bail-out. Because the first one had failed. All the governments refused to take any losses. So the few remaining private creditors of the Greek government took the brunt of the hit. This was basically the Greek pension and banking system. Which then needed bailing out, and is one of the reasons they're now saying the Greek pension system is unsustainable. Because they buggered it up in the last bail-out.

          BTW this is also what buggered up the Cypriot economy. And led to their bail-out. They were promised help, as many of their (actually well run) banks had lots of Greek government debt, as there wasn't enough Cypriot debt for them to hold as reserves. That help was never given, and they were given a deliberately crap bail-out to punish them for having too much Russian money on deposit. Interestingly the Greek and Cypriot banks were cautious, with lots of savings on deposit and reasonably high interest rates. Unlike the French, Italian, German or our banks - who had to be rescued due to their own incompetence...

          In 2013 the IMF admitted that they'd screwed up on their calculations on Greece. The Greek economy had now shrunk by 26%, government spending had been cut by 25%, unemployment was 27% and youth unemployment was 50%. This is 1930s territory.

          They also calculated that the Greek fiscal multiplier was more than 1. That means that for every euro of spending cuts or tax rises, the Greek economy would shrink by more than one euro! That means that the only way for Greece to pay off its debts is to stop cutting government spending (or raising taxes) until after the economy has started growing again. With debt to GDP of 180%, Greece would need to be running huge government surpluses until the mid 2020s, and their economy to be growing to get this paid down. The IMF tried to pretend that this was possible up until June this year, after the fucking negotiations had broken down, then admitted that Greeece needed €50 billion of debt relief. When it was too late.

          The IMF has been run by two French politicians with ambitions for later advancement in French politics, and both of them have ignored guidance from the technical (i.e. economically literate) department. I'm sure this is just a co-incidence though...

          Syriza have negotiated badly, and are inexperienced. On the other hand, the required debt relief has been refused discussion by the Eurogroup until after the referendum finally forced them to. Hence the original article I quoted, about negotiating in bad faith.

          The economic argument is unarguable. Greece needed debt relief in 2010, or it would never be able to pay back its debts. Surprisingly enough it's still failing to cover them. It's made the biggest cuts of any economy in modern peacetime history. It's had the deepest depression of any economy in modern peacetime history. The programme offered it by the Troika in recent negotiations is designed in such a way that it can't do anything but fail. So leaving the Euro is Greece's only option, as the Troika program would have put Greece back into recession by now even if Syriza had accepted it in January this year.

          This will go down as the biggest economic fuck up in modern history. Because everyone involved knew the Troika programs would fail, but did it anyway.

          1. Charlie Clark Silver badge

            Re: Can the Eurogroup count?

            Some good ideas come out of Bruegel and there is no doubt that the IMF has been playing both ends against the middle. It's hardly owed anything now by Greece with most of the debt having been transferred to the ECB and the Eurozone. Still, not paying the money due to the IMF in June was a totally stupid decision. It has given the IMF the stick it wanted to beat Greece with.

            Greece has had considerable debt relief in the form of a haircut of private creditors, artificially low interest rates, even a moratorium on repayment and very long maturities for debt. The latter two are a more politically acceptable equivalent of a debt write-off. And where have the reforms been? If Greece ever gets round to reforming its sclerotic state, relief will be easy to get. Otherwise it's going to be handouts only.

            1. I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

              Re: Can the Eurogroup count?

              Charlie Clark,

              Greece has made massive reforms. It's gone from developing world levels of transparency, openess and ease of business to Southern European levels, in the last 5 years. At least according to OECD charts.

              That's not wonderful of course, but it's much more than the lying wankers of the Troika are willing to acknowledge with all their shit about "Greece having to do its homework", and Greece having done no reform.

              Also notice that when they keep saying Greece hasn't brought proposals to Eurogroup meetings, at least three times, that's because the Commission technical teams have refused to pass their proposals on because they were trying to force the Greeks to only produce proposals that fitted within a very narrow scope. It was then extra convenient that they could then lie about having no proposals to discuss. Although there are also times when Greece has been late with stuff, which I susepct is because their civil service doesn't function properly at the best of times - and is helping Syriza even less than it would the established parties (given it's so full of their clients). The head of the Central Bank is a former New Democracy finance minister for example.

              Greece's underlying problem is political anyway. It doesn't have a functioning civil service or a fucntioning political system - and because of that people will never trust in the system and pay tax. It also doesn't have all those civil society institutions like think tanks and independent analysts of government policy. There's no way the UK government could get away with cooking the books in the way the Greeks did in the boom years, it would get spotted. The information exists, for people to draw their own conclusions on UK debt sustainability.

              The Troika have never touched the political area. Which is where Greece is crying out for reform. And of course they had the almighty carrot of debt relief to offer in exchange for particular reforms too. Another proof that they haven't been honest or beneficial actors.

              On debt sustainability though you're both right, and totally wrong. Greece cannot safely exit the program until it's in a position to get market access again. Even if just for 3 month paper to tide it over between high tax months and low ones. Plus the next recession - if it ever gets out of this one. No one will lend to a country with debt-to-GDP ratios of 180%, even if that's actually manageable because the interest rates are low - and maturities long.

              Secondly the Troika's own failures make the debt unsustainable. The ECB, by allowing deflation, means that even if Greece grew by 2% this year, it would still go backwards on debt-to-GDP levels. This is the same for Italy, but at least Italy finally gets QE. The Greeks don't. And should have - if their central bank were politically neutral. Making the ECB a creditor was a disastrous mistake. Then again, so was creating the Euro...

              But it's the Troika that keep on insisting on insane levels of Greek government surpluses, that if implemented will push Greece further into depression. The more they squeeze them for debt repayments, the less money they'll get. The Germans, of all people, should know this lesson by heart.

        2. Charlie Clark Silver badge

          Re: "This live broadcast cock-up is a failure of democracy by the EU"

          This is getting way off-topic but let's look at the facts.

          I object to people being used as pawns and threatened in political games.

          I do, too, for what it's worth. Doesn't stop it happening.

          The proposal wasn't expired at the time the referendum was called.

          But it was called for a time after the proposal would have expired. This is what made the referendum a farce. Clever politicking by Tsipras: "I'm doing what the people want me to do.", but a terrible way to negotiate.

          There was a concerted effort by the EU to change the terms of the referendum from a vote on the proposal to a vote on whether or not to stay in the eurozone.

          It was hardly concerted. I agree it was ill-advised but they were basically telling the truth: with the expiration of the bailout programme at the end of June, it would no longer be possible to offer such good terms again. Nevertheless, it would have been smarter to say nothing.

          Merkel said that there would be no further talks until the referendum was over

          She did the smart thing: wait for the result of the referendum and be seen not trying to affect the outcome of it.

          Since the referendum it's perfectly okay for the democratically elected representatives in other countries to express their opinion of it. Nobody should be surprised if patience is wearing thin. The Lithuanian president and the prime minister of Slovakia are no longer mincing their words.

    2. Gordon 10

      Re: "This live broadcast cock-up is a failure of democracy by the EU"

      Maybe Greece should have sorted themselves out in the last five years even the Italians and French has made some progress ffs.

      1. Brewster's Angle Grinder Silver badge

        Re: "This live broadcast cock-up is a failure of democracy by the EU"

        Well, Paul Krugman opened a recent post by saying:

        It’s now clear...that the Greek program was doomed to failure without major debt relief; no matter how hard the Greeks tried, austerity would shrink GDP faster than it reduced debt...

        Then there's the graph in this post which shows that, if you control for all the variables, Greece has the biggest surplus in the Eurozone.

        And while we're here, the graph in this post shows what the IMF predicted would happen to Greece (mild recession and then sustained growth) compared to what actually happened (massive slump that bottomed out).

        The situation post crisis is not Greece's fault; they are victims of expansionary austerity. What they should have done was quit the Euro in 2009. By now they'd be doing fine. Of course, it would have shafted the Eurozone, but who cares about other countries' voters, right?

        Personally, I think they're behaving like Germany's battered spouse. But if they want to stay they need first aid. They fell down the stairs and walked into a door to keep the Euro marriage alive. So give them massive debt relief and a sustainable deal.

  4. Zog_but_not_the_first
    Trollface

    For an opener?

    THIS. IS. STRASBOURG!

  5. Charlie Clark Silver badge

    Despite the huge amounts of money the parliament spends on its streaming service…

    Numbers please.

    Streaming video just eats bandwidth and should be handed off to specialised content delivery networks.

    1. P. Lee

      re: Streaming video ... should be handed off to specialised content delivery networks.

      We call them, "torrents."

      It isn't live, but that rarely matters.

  6. zmousm

    Greek Parliament live streaming, on the other hand...

    I do recognize the complexity involved in the European Parliament streaming service, due to the large number of languages and the sheer amount of content, and I admit I have no knowledge of the whole setup (whether they use a CDN or not, for example) or the demand they experienced in this case, however (no pun intended)...

    The live streaming service for the Greek Parliament has withstood huge surges of traffic in recent years, up to 17 Gbps or approximately 25K simultaneous viewers most recently. It does not make use of CDN services and runs on a very tight budget overall. You may find some stats here:

    http://zmousm.github.io/parltv-bursts/

    Full disclosure: I work for the entity that provides this service on behalf of the Greek Parliament.

    1. Charlie Clark Silver badge

      Re: Greek Parliament live streaming, on the other hand...

      Thanks for the info. Pretty impressive but what do the cache stats refer to if not some kind of content federation?

      1. zmousm

        Re: Greek Parliament live streaming, on the other hand...

        We serve HTTP for most streaming traffic, so we use caches to scale out the service, currently to five spare physical servers and two pools of virtual machines. The latter are all spare systems/resources in the data centers where we run VPS and public cloud platforms both for our own services and our constituency; this is all engineered and operated by the same entity (my employer). By the way last night there was another surge in viewership with traffic peaking at 20 Gbps.

        Sorry for the late response, as I don't get any notification about new comments.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon