Net neutrality? Meh. But don't you dare slow my video streaming Advisors to the European Commission have found that consumers do grasp the principles of net neutrality and make choices based on it — even when they don’t really know how traffic management, which is key to net neutrality, works. “Attributes of an internet access service offer that relate to traffic management and net …
Between 60-80 per cent of respondents were happy for ISPs to manage data traffic in order to keep their net experience stable, but slightly fewer, 50-70 per cent, were happy for applications to be prioritised for users who pay extra for this type of service.
In other news, motorists were in favour of speed limits as long as they didn't get slowed down themselves, and were happy with the idea of building toll roads to reduce congestion on their local roads, as long as someone else paid and the local roads remained free of charge to them.
Meanwhile bears continued to defecate among the trees, and the Pope is still taking mass.
It would be interesting to see the questions in the survey. It's very easy to prove anything with the right inputs:
Do you want:
a) Lots of internet for a low price, with well managed network profiling to keep it stable,
b) Slow internet where everything is broken and it costs more, and the young'uns watching porn can make Granny's 999 call drop off, leaving her to die cold and alone on the kitchen floor.
Hey, look at my groundbreaking research! Consumers don't want net neutrality!
Surely the results of the survey have to be a contender for the "No sh*t Sherlock" awards ?
I think most people see the point of "neutrality" - as long as you don't actually talk about it, and especially don't use any even vaguely technical terms, at which point their eyes glaze over and an attitude of "meh" takes over.
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2024
