back to article Phablet for the biz fleet with easy typing: Microsoft Lumia 640 XL

One of my surprising reviews last year was Nokia’s huge, budget phablet, the Lumia 1320. It's fairly similar to the most recent Lumia 640 XL. Microsoft Lumia 640 XL Microsoft's Lumia 640 XL: available in 3G and 4G versions The previous Lumia 1320 was hard to find in the retail catalogues and even Nokia didn’t seem to care …

  1. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Good idea

    I use a Sony Xperia Z Ultra as a tablet when travelling. It has a better screen (1080p) and is available at a similar price, but if this had been around at the time I would probably have bought it based on the removable battery and the known durability of Nokias. The Sony always gives me the feeling it is a bit fragile.

    A small tablet with a PAYG SIM is the best of both worlds as it can be used out of range of wifi. I was on a site a couple of weeks ago where Three was giving me 20 down and 3 up and BT was struggling to maintain 13 down and 1.5 up.

    1. AndyS

      Re: Good idea

      All true. I wonder if it would be possible to put Android on it? :)

      Actually that raises an interesting question, which maybe someone here can help answer for me. Phones now are much more powerful, with more RAM, more disk space and faster processors than computers of 10 years ago were. However, installing a new operating system is still much more arduous than it ever has been for a proper PC. Since there is a fairly small selection of components in modern phones, why is it so hard to install across different hardware (a trick that live Linux CDs have had for 12 or 15 years now)? Why do I need to download a ROM developed specifically for my exact phone?

      If I want to run Ubuntu, I download a generic installation CD image, which will work with virtually any hardware. If I want to run Lollipop, I need to find an image exactly matched to the precise version of the phone I'm using. Why the difference?

      1. dogged

        Re: Good idea

        Mostly because ARM.

      2. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Good idea

        I think that phones are actually more complicated. For one thing, the OS and the hardware need to be tightly integrated to minimise power consumption. For another, I'm not sure there is a small selection of components - there are a lot of SOCs, some custom. A generic laptop doesn't have a magnetometer, a complex camera, GPS, a variety of wireless transceivers with different frequency bands for different regions, brightness sensors and multiple microphones. Although a Ubuntu install will work with a lot of fairly generic laptops, it won't work with a lot of the more unusual components, and in my experience the best compatibility is with older machines - everything works on my 7 year old Lenovo but the speaker doesn't work on a 5 year old netbook.

      3. bpfh
        Go

        Re: Good idea

        ^This!

        Why the downvote? I agree with this, after major pain in reinstalling a different firmware on a Samsung phone that took several hours to find the correct version with the correct baseband and set up, install, etc etc etc, or just the absolute PITA to get root access on some android tablets... especially as a complete OS install or live CD boot takes less than half an hour and works off the bat...

      4. big_D Silver badge

        Re: Good idea

        Because.

        The longer answer is, whilst each individual model has a relatively small array of components, they are complex and often custom built.

        An ARM processor is not an ARM processor, most have custom extensions. Likewise there are different modem chips etc.

        Until the S6, the Galaxy used a Xeneos processor in most of the world, but had to use a Snapdragon in the USA, because the LTE chipset for the Xeneos wasn't compatible with the LTE implementation in the USA. If you used an international Galaxy in the USA, it wouldn't get 4G - the same is true of the Lumia 930, it is an LTE device, yet all the reviews on American sites claim it is only 3G; because it suffers from the same problem, the Lumia Icon works with Verizon LTE, but the 930 is stuck on UMTS in the USA.

        Different memory controllers, different cameras, different sensor packages, different fingerprint sensors etc. All "common" features on many modern phones, but all different, so they need their own drivers. That means the manufacturers need to create custom driver packages - and test that everything works together.

        The AOSP based ROMs then need to reverse engineer many of those drivers in order to get them working.

        That is why you need a custom ROM.

      5. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Good idea

        Have an upvote, even though I loathe Android and Ubuntu. Nokia actually had a few decent OSes, but alas... Microsoft.

        The reason switching mobile OSes is such a pain: too much locked-down proprietary hardware, and douchebag manufacturers and carriers. OSdevers have better things to do.

      6. Richard Plinston

        Re: Good idea

        > If I want to run Ubuntu, I download a generic installation CD image, which will work with virtually any hardware.

        No, it won't work with *any* hardware, it will only work with an x86-64 (a different version will work with x86) CPU, an IBM-PC clone BIOS (or UEFI) with PCI interfacing, a range of graphics cards and some other things. You seem to think that is what _every_ computer is. It happens that many are like that because they have become a commodity.

        Some years ago it seemed that there would be greater variety with PPC, Alpha, MIPS, Itanium and others vying for top spot. There was also ACE as a spec. But AMD brought out x86-64 as a cheaper high performance chip and the others were forgotten.

        ARM does not have a unified (ie like IBM-PC) BIOS to hide the implementation details yet so each ROM has to cater for the SoC differences.

      7. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Good idea

        " I wonder if it would be possible to put Android on it?"

        Why would you want to downgrade the security, battery life, performance and enterprise functionality? Just buy an Android phone in the first place if that's what you want...

  2. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Another day

    Another day, another Microsoft puff piece from Orlowski. Is there anything Microsoft sells that he does not like?

    1. dogged

      Re: Another day

      But I bet you think Al Taylor slobbering all over the latest Android phones is an exquisitely balanced piece of journalism.

    2. Arctic fox
      Thumb Down

      Re: Another day

      Well AC old chap, one can at least say that Andrew puts his handle on his postings - how about you try it sometime?

  3. h4rm0ny
    Mushroom

    NOT suitable for enterprise.

    I like WP generally, but unfortunately I have found it unsuitable for enterprise use (and personal) for one simple reason: It is incapable of exporting SMS messages. There is no way, short of selecting each one individually, hitting copy and pasting it into a text editor, of getting them out. And even then it would just be raw text with no timestamps or sender information.

    This is basic functionality available on even simple phones for well over a decade and easily possible on rival systems. But it cannot be done by WP. It's been raised with MS by many people but has not been addressed and the reply keeps coming back that you can "backup" your txt messages which misses the point by a staggering degree. We're not talking about restoring them to your next phone, we're talking about export. I know of one case where someone had to individually copy some thousand or so messages because they had to hand over records as part of a court case. And even without such cases, you still want to be able to have a searchable record of your messages or be sure that they are safe.

    We can save emails, keep letters but as far as MS are concerned, txt messages are designed to be thrown away. It is a dumbfounding lack that basically excludes WP from consideration for many.

    1. Dan Melluish

      Re: NOT suitable for enterprise.

      Losing all my text messages when moving between Android and Windows Phone (and back again!) was a bit painful. Anyway,sounds like this might have been resolved quite recently - MS have released a message backup app.

      http://www.windowscentral.com/microsoft-releases-contactsmessage-sd-card-backup

    2. Sandtitz Silver badge
      Go

      Re: NOT suitable for enterprise.

      "I like WP generally, but unfortunately I have found it unsuitable for enterprise use (and personal) for one simple reason: It is incapable of exporting SMS messages."

      "There's an app for that."

      Won't work with phones without an SD card, though.

    3. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: NOT suitable for enterprise.

      Wrong, you can view the backup of your SMS text messages online on outlook.com, as well as exporting them via the "Transfer My Data" app.

    4. Mike Taylor

      Re: NOT suitable for enterprise.

      Did you try the Nokia move data app? Supposedly that works :(

    5. Fungi Legume

      Re: NOT suitable for enterprise.

      This is possible now. The contacts+message backup app was released by Microsoft into the store a couple of weeks ago. Install it and it appears in the settings menu and can backup your contacts and/or messages to SD card.

    6. Jambo Widetrousers
      Thumb Up

      Re: NOT suitable for enterprise.

      I hadn't looked this up for a long time but had reason to want to back up my SMS archive the other week. Imagine my surprise when I found this (just released 2 weeks ago):

      http://www.windowscentral.com/microsoft-releases-contactsmessage-sd-card-backup

      Does exactly what it says on the tin. XML output files for texts and contacts. Sadly it needs a micro SD card to export them to - but my new HTC One for Windows has a slot... (purchased in the US, why oh why did they never release it in Europe??? Very capable handset indeed).

      1. h4rm0ny
        Pint

        Re: NOT suitable for enterprise.

        Thank you, hugely, to both you and Fungi. This has been a huge lack on WP for a long time. You've just made my day if this works as promised. I'm downloading to try it out now. And XML export format is fine by me. Obviously wont be ideal for the less technical users, but there are people around to help with that and ultimately it's actually even better as XML.

        THANK YOU! :D

        1. Dave 126 Silver badge

          Re: NOT suitable for enterprise.

          On Android I had to use a 3rd party app to backup my SMSs from my old phone and restore them to my new phone.

          It did strike me as a strange commission from the basic OS.

        2. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: NOT suitable for enterprise.

          "This has been a huge lack on WP for a long time. "

          The Nokia branded version of the same app has been out a couple of years...

    7. jason 7

      Re: NOT suitable for enterprise.

      Well as standard my Nexus loses all my SMS messages if I do a reset. It doesn't back them up as standard.

      Doesn't even do that greater job of backing up all my contacts even if I check to make sure they are in the list of contacts in Gmail. I always seem to lose around 10-15%.

      Not the end of the world though. Just one of those things.

  4. csw.reeve

    Windows phone is awesome

    I love windows phone. And you should know that it is really awesome because I've used Linux on my desktop for the last 5 years and still love Windows phone.

    Android sucks.

    1. This post has been deleted by its author

    2. cambsukguy

      Re: Windows phone is awesome

      But obviously the poster who wishes to export text messages for legal reasons can disagree.

      If that were a likely happenstance in the business I worked in, I would ensure all communication were carried out within a corporate account on a data-connection based messaging system.

      This would be for multiple reasons:

      1. Texts do text. This is rarely sufficient to cope with everything so therefore there are multiple communication paths required if files need to be transferred etc.

      2. Data connections can ensure that the message is delivered, that you know it is delivered and that you even know they have seen it perhaps.

      3. Data messaging systems allow multiple users in multiple groups with individual communications perhaps.

      4. Data allows one to switch to any number of devices to continue the same conversation thread.

      5. Backing up a data system is trivial, the server can do it as part of the overall system. Restoration is automatic and trivial.

      6. Any number of suitable systems are available to run on anything and are free.

      I am sure there are more reasons but the above seems sufficient to avoid a text-based system.

      Obviously, I see no reason NOT to have an export mechanism, especially as the messages are stored on the OneDrive if enabled. Well, apart from the extra coding and testing etc. - the selection mechanism is already there after all, albeit only a basic one.

    3. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Windows phone is awesome

      And based on Market share I would say your opinion sucks.

      Since MS is looking for ways to get beyond there, at best, stagnant market share they don't share your views.

      1. menotu

        Re: Windows phone is awesome

        Well, untill Windows can have Flappy Birds, etc there's no chance that the IOS and Android crowd switch.....

        1. Tom 13

          Re: Well, untill Windows can have Flappy Birds

          And here I thought the problem was that Windows didn't have a sufficient variety of farting apps.

      2. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Windows phone is awesome

        "Since MS is looking for ways to get beyond there, at best, stagnant market share they don't share your views."

        Microsoft sell more Windows Phones in a quarter than Google do all Chrome devices in a year....

        1. Richard Plinston

          Re: Windows phone is awesome

          > Microsoft sell more Windows Phones in a quarter than Google do all Chrome devices in a year....

          And Google (and others) sell twice as many Androids in a week than WP in a quarter.

          Also Microsoft phones went from 40% market share (US) in 2007 to less than 3% worldwide currently while Chrome devices are still growing at 80% or so per year.

    4. Tchou
      Alert

      Re: Windows phone is awesome

      I must say I'm pretty happy with my Lumia myself.

      The Metro UI is really good for this format and general usability is awesome.

      Alas as often with MS, the last major update introduced some bugs, like the sms app hanging (no longer typing), and occasional OS crashes.

      I must agree on your last sentence Android really sucks big juicy donkey c**ks.

      - Sent from my FreeBSD computer

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Windows phone is awesome

        Same here, my previous phone to the 920 that I have now was android (HTC one), like the HTC, got a little slow in the end. When i switched to the 920, first i thought, what have i done, cant find anything, didnt really like it as it was different. Then after a few weeks that changed, the interface is very good, generally quick, except currently ( after the latest update) having some problems with browsing being a little slow and battery usage.

        But when I go back and use other android phones, my wife has a galaxy s5, and some work friends have nexus, I find them a mess and not really that user friendly like i used to think they were. I would not want to go back to an android phone.

  5. JimWin

    8G RAM?

    Most mobile phones are music players too. Indeed, where I live - almost no signal - music storage makes the phone useful. Ditto when travelling and getting a patchy signal. My Xperia P has 16G and that's just enough for a basic library. 8G is minimal.

    1. Tchou
      Headmaster

      Re: 8G RAM?

      I doubt your phone have 16 GB of RAM, as your post title suggest.

      Probably you mean permanent storage.

      Obvious icon, but still...

    2. Anonymous Coward
      FAIL

      Re: 8G RAM?

      My cheap as chips 535 has 70gb of "RAM", you see they have these things called microSD cards.

      The 640 supports up 128gb cards.

      1. tabinnorway

        Re: 8G RAM?

        No, adding a microSD card does not change the amoun of RAM in your phone.

      2. Tchou
        WTF?

        Re: 8G RAM?

        Samrtphone do have RAM and mass storage.

        SDcards or µSDcards are mass storage, not RAM.

        Different concepts, different uses, different speeds. An SDcard is closer to a diskette than to RAM.

        The only thing that comes close to RAM is RAM disks.

        Cheers,

  6. Tommy Pock

    Camera protrudes gracefully from the back

    That sounds marvellous. The camera on the back of my Lumia 1020 protrudes from the back with aching vulgarity

  7. Kar98

    "RAM has been upped to 1GB"

    The 1320, at least the Latin American country variant I have, already has 1GB of RAM.

  8. bengoey

    I was abroad in Asia for two months, needed a Dual Sim mobile phone. As the 640 XL just came out, I bought one for approximately 150 Pounds. It is the dual Sim 3G version ( both Sims are 3G ), used it for nearly two months. I am very satisfied with it, the quality of the camera surprised me ( I have used Nokia Pureview 808 in the past and still have it ). This relatively 'cheap' phone produces excellent pictures, you will be surprised. On the dual sim phone only one Sim can use data for browsing, BBM , whatsapp etc., you choose which one. Call quality is good. One minus point is I think the radio ( reception / antenna) is not as good a my wife's Blackberry Z30. There are places where signal was poor, this phone did not function at all even for text message but the BB Z30 works for BBM, Text and calls. we used sim cards from the same carrier. Z30 is superior in this respect. I was surprised as usually 'Nokia' phones are good as far as radio is concerned. I am back using the Blackberry Passport in the UK. I have used Nokia Pureview 808, Nokia 620, Nokia E71, so I am not biased hopefully in my assessment. I always use windows phone when I am abroad as I like using the Nokia Here Map. By the way for some reason Waze app does not work on the 640

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like