My, my ...
“the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.” What will the Americans think of next?
A New York City Police Department auxiliary deputy inspector faces charges of hacking into a restricted NYPD computer and other law enforcement databases, including a system maintained by the FBI. Yehuda Katz, 45, of Brooklyn, New York, allegedly used the databases to obtain information about local traffic accident victims …
I see it on all those law enforcement documentaries, nearly every week the nerd of the team takes about 30 seconds to hack into the TLA database to change his grades and get the answer to 3 Down, "Gegs (9,4)" so why prosecute just this one? This was a very enterprising individual showing a real go-getter attitude and should be commended for their ingenuity.
Totally - I agree. Reward the entrepreneurial lawyer-wannabee for inventiveness and exposing the weaknesses in the security apparatuses.
And the heads of the police department and FBI should roll!
Actually, that would sort of be like making Snowden the President of the World and jailing the rest of the imposters. Why not?
Downvotes? Philistines!
Or possibly serves me right for not putting a big 'this might perhaps not be a serious remark to be taken at face value' on the last sentence even though it already had what I thought was some fairly well signposted wording. Maybe I should have added a 'splendidly' and a 'magnificent' just to be sure.
Or maybe I should have also flagged 'law enforcement documentaries'?
But I will learn from this experience. After sulking.