back to article Linux chaps want to recycle your mobe as a supercomputer

A Finnish group of phone developers, hoping to get the world interested in modular smartphones, has proposed a nifty idea for re-using their phone motherboards: turn them into clusters. The Linux-based Puzzlephone project wants to extend the life of smartphones by making more of the phone replaceable, on the premise that most …

  1. Teiwaz

    What an amazing idea...

    Sensible, non-wasteful both financially and environmentally.

    It's doomed. And the last humans will curse us all as they drown in a poisoning sea of old broken mobile phones.

    1. Nate Amsden

      Re: What an amazing idea...

      this makes about as much sense as people who used to want to collect a bunch of old computers to build a beowulf cluster or something. It's a cute idea, but beyond being cute it is quite pointless. (same goes for folks that like building clusters out of Rasberry Pis, cute for about 30 seconds).

      1. MrDamage Silver badge

        Re: What an amazing idea...

        You mean its pointless like how car manufacturers realised that instead of using a single cylinder, they could cluster them in a V, W, straight, or horizontally opposed configuration, and get far more life and performance out of said cluster, than they could from the single piston?

        We need a car analogy icon.

        1. Michael Wojcik Silver badge

          Re: What an amazing idea...

          You mean its pointless like how car manufacturers realised that instead of using a single cylinder, they could cluster them in a V, W, straight, or horizontally opposed configuration, and get far more life and performance out of said cluster, than they could from the single piston?

          Or like how I travel to my destination twice as quickly when I drive two cars at once?

          Because more of something is automatically better.

          We need a car analogy icon.

          Clearly, what we need is a stupid analogy icon.

          1. MrDamage Silver badge

            Re: What an amazing idea...

            If you dont believe that more of something is automatically better, what system, may I ask, did you write that reply on?

            Was it a system with a multi-core CPU? Did it have more than 1gb of RAM? More than 1GB of hard drive space? Did it, perchance, have a multi-monitor display?

            The stupid analogy is yours, good sir.

            1. Michael Wojcik Silver badge

              Re: What an amazing idea...

              Was it a system with [blah blah blah rubbish]?

              It's a system that was purchased by my employer; I didn't choose the specs. I still have computers in use with single-core CPUs and less than 1GB RAM. I don't think I have any with drives smaller than 1GB, simply because such drives typically died a while back and replacements are all larger.

              And no, no multiple monitors. As I've noted in other posts, I had a multiheaded system back around 1990. I've not seen any need to return to that configuration.

              If you dont believe that more of something is automatically better...

              Then you're probably capable of critical thought. And indeed I am. You should try it sometime. (Also, may I suggest learning how to use the apostrophe?)

  2. Talic

    hasn't this been done already

    Or could we just expand on this http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/04/11/project_ara_mdk_alpha/

    and have the Processor/mainboard modular too?

    You know, just have everything plug into the back of the screen, acting like a hub?

  3. Christian Berger

    There are 2 problems with that

    First of all we are far from a common hardware platform which would be needed for this. Our mobiles currently are just different enough to prevent you from installing a common operating system without having to port it for every single phone. Even large projects like Cyanogenmod can only do this for a small part of the market.

    Second, mobile processors are rather slow. Combine that with the overhead, and you'll most likely end up with something that's much more expensive than just getting a computer that's much faster than the equipment to connect the mobiles. However this might work if you use already existing hardware. Your "rack" could consist of just some charger ports and you could do communications via Wifi.

  4. Chairo

    That would be very similar to a cluster of Rasperry PIs

    Or perhaps beagleboard's, as the PI's CPU is not the exactly fastest one in the market.

    Isn't this discouraged by Raspberry due to a bad performance/Watt ratio?

  5. John Sturdy
    Boffin

    You could make a cluster with intact phones anyway; how about "wolftooth" for a beowulf cluster that works over bluetooth?

    1. Michael Wojcik Silver badge

      Interconnect bandwidth would be pretty bad.

      The real issue, though, is that intact phones are going to want to power up the display, radios,1 etc. So the performance/power ratio will suck, relative to the just-the-motherboards design being mooted here. You could run specialized software on the phones so you aren't powering any peripherals you don't need, but if you're going to that trouble, you've already incurred a significant fraction of the cost of dismantling the phone - particularly if the phone's designed to make that dismantling easy.

      And connecting power to all the phones is going to require some rack-like arrangement anyway, unless you want a nasty tangle of cables.2 So what's the point?

      Mind you, it sounds so much like a plot point from a contemporary TV drama that I bet some writer's already put it in somewhere. "Oh no! [Scary hacker team name] has taken over all the phones in Manhattan and networked them with Bluetooth to create a super computer cluster that they're using to crack the President's daughter's password!"

      1You can't just put them in airplane mode because you're using Bluetooth.

      2Or you're anticipating using wireless exclusively. That seems unlikely, and I don't know how efficient it is.

  6. Bartholomew

    least expensive bit

    5 years is about the useful lifetime of most supercomputers. And the big cost is usually running a supercomputer, the ongoing power and cooling is easily 5+€/£/$ million a year. Throw in a 6+ support staff for 24/7/52 operation and the hardware is the cheapest part.

    In reality, this is just advertising .

  7. Dr Patrick J R Harkin

    I don't think it'll work

    But then I rejected the FedEx hub/spoke business model and refused to sign the Beatles.

  8. Patrick R

    User's choice

    I don't see 1 in 10 people able to choose their OS or hardware, they'll just go with what's in sale in the shop. And they are where the big money comes from.

  9. Vincent Ballard

    I am puzzled by the reference to batteries, because I was under the impression that they were the piece of hardware with the shortest useful lifespan. Am I out of date?

    1. werdsmith Silver badge

      "I am puzzled by the reference to batteries, because I was under the impression that they were the piece of hardware with the shortest useful lifespan. Am I out of date?"

      In my experience, the layer of glass on the top of the display/touchscreen lasts about 2 days.

    2. Michael Wojcik Silver badge

      Personally, I've had to change phones for three reasons:

      1. Spent a day crawling over concrete floors with phone in front pocket (don't ask). Screen was toast. Stupidity, in other words.

      2. Dropped Sprint and switched to AT&T for GSM rather than an also-ran protocol that's useless in most places outside the US. Had to get a GSM phone, obviously.

      3. After four years, screen on that phone had acquired too many bad pixels. Battery life was around four hours, but if the screen had still been good, I would simply have replaced the battery. Of course all my phones have had replaceable batteries.

      I've never wanted to replace a phone because the motherboard was ... what ... too slow? Geez, here I am stuck with the equivalent of an '80s graphical workstation in my pocket. Life is hard.

  10. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Not completely useless

    If the goal is to build a mobile robotics platform, 120 S8 boards in a rack might be fine and draw a tenth of the power of an array of graphics cards, TPUs etc.

    Also there are a lot around as users upgrade all the time, perhaps have an app that secure erases the phone once the data has been verifiably transferred to the new phone (independent of screen damage etc) so the board can be sent by post without issues.

    The latest phones have AI inference chips on them already but the goal here is sheer processing power.

    (wonder if I can get my hands on a couple of hundred Note 7 boards anywhere?)

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like