Now Uber can take EVERYONE for a ride Casual car hire company Uber is teaming up with Spotify, ensuring neither your favourite musicians nor your driver get paid very much. "Uber users who link their Spotify account to their Uber account can push a button, get a ride and get in to the car their Spotify station is playing,” explained Travis Kalanick, Uber CEO. …
Let's see -- a soundtrack for two icky companies getting together for a marriage made in Las Vegas...
Like all good playlists, there has to be a conceptual development of sorts, in this case moving from the idealism of young love through to realism/cynicism and then on to mature acceptance of the inevitable fate -- whatever that is.
Early Innocence:
Among the Clouds - John Williams
What a Wonderful World - preferably Maceo Parker
Burning Rope - Genesis
*
Disillusion:
Smoke Gets in Your Eyes - the Platters
Who's Fooling Who - Mike Rutherford
What a Fool Believes - Doobies
(What's) The Name of the Game - ABBA
(Star Wars IV) The Last Battle - John Williams
Tie Me at the Crossroads (When I Die) - Bruce Cockburn
*
End:
Ten Years Gone - Led Zep
When All is Said and Done - ABBA
*****
Note that this playlist should, in most cities, be long enough for a trip of about eight blocks.
I know of a man who will be losing his job in the coming years. As he is rather shy I shall just refer to him as IDS. I wonder if companies that thrive in a slave economy might offer him a comfortable directorship as a suitable reward?
Playlist:-
Up against the Wall MotherF's - David Peel and the Lower Eastside Band
Repeat until arrested.
I'm a little confused by the following sentence:
"Uber users who link their Spotify account to their Uber account can push a button," - got that bit.
"get a ride" - uhuh, all good.
"and get in to the car their Spotify station is playing,” - eh? I'll assume he means that your Spotify playlist will start playing in the cab you ordered when you enter the vehicle?
And if so, that's a selling point of the service? Really? Narcissism? Are humans so self-obsessed that we want to force others to listen to our taste in music at any/every given opportunity? Maybe the cabbie might not be a fan of $genericXfactorBullshitArtist. If so, and you foist this tripe on them, then you deserve to be charged extra for your ride, to help for the PTS counselling they'll be wanting!
On a slightly more serious note though, why not just politely ask the driver if you may change the station, pair your phone via Bluetooth or use the auxiliary input?
This post has been deleted by its author
"Casual car hire company Uber is teaming up with Spotify, ensuring neither your favourite musicians nor your driver get paid very much."
This doesn't seem very fair - the driver'r price is because of the market, not Uber. The Spotify point I'd agree with but it isn't a cause that triggers much emotion in my heart.
Just tell the PRS (Performing Rights Society) that minicabs are playing music for the entertainment of their customers. They will want a cut, on behalf of the artists. As already noted, it makes a big change from the current status quo, where the passenger gets forced to listen to the drivers favourite station.
Now if the PRS could only charge drivers for UKIP rants.
Slave wage are two emotive words..... but lets look at places where taxis are really cheap...... Turkey "dolmus system".... you hop on an off them with almost little thought for the pocket money prices....... do their drivers starve?
You have got to remember that higher prices lead to less use and therefore higher prices....... quality of service can be maintained by effective regulation/licensing etc.
Or is it better to have them standing empty at the rank because no body can afford their prices?
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2024
